Allahabad HC clears way for Sambhal mosque survey: Here's what court said in its verdict
Allahabad high court
dismissed on Monday the Sambhal Shahi Jama Masjid committee's petition challenging a Nov 19, 2024 trial court order directing an advocate commissioner to survey the structure, the subject of a suit claiming that the mosque was built in 1526 after demolishing a temple, reports Rajesh Kumar Pandey.
While upholding the trial court's survey order, Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal vacated the interim stay on the
Hindu plaintiffs
' suit.
The mosque committee had asked for the suit to be dismissed on the ground that the Hindu side's claim to the site was prima facie barred under the Places of Worship Act, 1991. The legislation prohibits conversion of any place of worship and mandates maintaining the religious character of any such site that existed on Aug 15, 1947.
HC: Plaintiffs only seeking right to access to Sambhal site
This is not a case where any conversion of place of worship is taking place or the religious character is being changed.
The plaintiffs have only sought right to access to a protected monument, declared in 1920 under Section 18 of Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the 45-page judgment states. In its petition, the mosque committee contended that the civil judge (junior division) ordered the survey "hastily" and "without issuing notice".
Based on the Nov 19 directive, a survey was conducted that very day and another one on Nov 24.
Later that month, SC stayed proceedings in the trial court until the mosque committee's petition against the survey order was heard by an HC bench.
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) said in its submission to the bench that the mosque had been designated as a protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.
This effectively means that its status is governed by preservation laws rather than religious classification.
ASI also mentioned that nowhere in official records was the mosque described as a religious place.
The Hindu plaintiffs contend that the disputed Sambhal mosque stands at what used to be site of an ancient Harihar temple dedicated to Kalki, last avatar of Vishnu. The suit claims in 1526, on orders of Mughal emperor Babar, the temple was partially demolished and a mosque built over it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mahayuti leaders welcome Malegaon blast verdict, slam Congress for coining term ‘saffron terror'
Mumbai: Leaders of the ruling Mahayuti alliance in Maharashtra welcomed a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court's decision on Thursday to acquit all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, with chief minister Devendra Fadnavis slamming the previous Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government for allegedly coining the term 'saffron terrorism'. As soon as the verdict was out, Fadnavis posted his reaction on social media: 'Terrorism was never saffron, is not, and never will be!' (PTI) The Congress, meanwhile, alleged that the investigation was botched due to political pressure. Maharashtra Congress president Harshwardhan Sapkal also asked the Mahayuti government if it would approach a higher court to challenge the Malegaon verdict, just like it did recently when the Bombay High Court acquitted all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. Thursday's verdict was delivered nearly 17 years after a bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded near a mosque in the communally sensitive town of Malegaon in Nashik district in September 2008, killing six people and injuring over 100. Seven people were charged in the case, including Thakur and Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, a serving Army officer at the time. However, the court acquitted them after flagging several loopholes in the prosecution's case, saying there was no 'reliable and cogent' evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. As soon as the verdict was out, Fadnavis posted his reaction on social media: 'Terrorism was never saffron, is not, and never will be!' Later, speaking to reporters, Fadnavis said the Congress-led UPA government at the time was responsible for the entire case, alleging it was a conspiracy to create the narrative of 'Hindu terrorism' as a counter to Islamic terrorism, which had been globally recognised after the 9/11 terror attacks. 'More than the police, the then UPA government was responsible for the case. They had conspired to appease a certain community and extremist ideology. The court verdict has exposed the conspiracy, and the entire country is now condemning it. Congress leaders must now publicly apologise to Hindus for defaming them by associating them with so-called saffron terrorism and the conspiracy to coin a new term—Hindu or saffron terrorism,' he said. Fadnavis added that his government will look into the details of the verdict, checking what exactly the court has brought on record. A decision over the next course of action would be taken after this, he added. Senior BJP leader Sudhir Mungantiwar also blamed the previous Congress-led government for the bungled investigation, saying, 'The ruling parties at the time tried to indict innocent people in the case to appease certain communities. There was a political motive behind it, as was said after the case was registered. The verdict has ratified the doubt raised.' Shiv Sena president and deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde alleged that using the term 'saffron terrorism' was part of the Congress's conspiracy to defame the Hindu community. 'Hindus can never engage in anti-national activities, because patriotism is a sacred duty for those who follow Hinduism. The absurd term 'Hindu terrorism' was coined by conspiratorial Congress leaders. What answer do they have now for such blatant falsehoods?' he said. Adding that the court's verdict has ended a dark chapter, he said, 'The stigma on the Hindu community has been wiped off. The slogan 'Garv se kaho hum Hindu hain' (Say with pride we are Hindus) will now resonate across the country with a hundredfold louder voice. Truth may be troubled, but can never be defeated.' The Congress hit back at the Mahayuti, with state party chief Sapkal saying that terrorism has no religion or colour, and the state government should ensure justice is delivered in the case. 'As soon as the verdict of the 2006 [Mumbai train] bomb blasts was announced, the state government challenged it in the Supreme Court. Will the state government show the same will in this case, as both were acts of terrorism and the perpetrators of the cases should face justice,' he said, adding that the state government should not be double-faced. The 12 acquitted accused in the train blasts case were all Muslims. Congress spokesperson Sachin Sawant said, 'These people even view terrorism through a political lens. Those associated with the BJP and RSS had, for their political gain, labelled martyr Hemant Karkare a traitor. Wasn't it the same political mindset that led to [special public prosecutor] Rohini Salian being asked to take a lenient stand against the accused and slow down the investigation? Witnesses were enticed with offers. A witness like Randhir Singh was even given a ministerial position in Jharkhand.' Karkare, the former chief of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), led the team that initially investigated the blast and arrested 11 suspects, including Thakur and Purohit. He was killed in action during the 2008 Mumbai terror attack. Sawant also said that the central government should express sorrow that individuals responsible for such a major terrorist incident are now roaming free. 'Honestly, this verdict did not come as a surprise because the NIA had already given them a clean chit. The government should consider renaming this investigative agency the NaMo Investigation Agency,' he said. Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Arvind Sawant said the fact that the investigation agencies had failed to gather evidence properly and the real culprits were still not known was a serious matter. 'The remarks by the court, which said there is no evidence, was a serious matter. If there was no evidence against Sadhvi Pragya and others, why did they suffer all these years? It was an injustice to them. But the incident took place, so someone must be involved in it. Who are they? Why can't investigation agencies catch them?' he said. Former MP Imtiyaz Jalil from the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, meanwhile, maintained that the blast was aimed at 'creating communal division' in the country. 'An Army officer and a religious figure were accused in the case, which was being investigated by one of the finest officers, Hemant Karkare. The BJP has tried to derive political advantage from the case,' he said.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Mamata Banerjee hikes Durga Puja grant to Rs 1.10 lakh, slams BJP over criticism
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Wednesday announced an increase in the state government's financial grant to Durga Puja committees, raising it from Rs 85,000 to Rs 1.10 lakh. The announcement came during her address at a coordination meeting with Puja organisers in Kolkata, ahead of the festive 45,000 Durga Puja committees are registered across the state and will benefit from the increased grant, pushing the total estimated expenditure to over Rs 400 crore this year — a significant rise from last year's Rs 340 addressing the gathering, Banerjee defended the government's support for Durga Puja, taking a pointed dig at the opposition, particularly the BJP. 'Few people say Mamata didi doesn't allow Durga Puja and Saraswati Puja. They don't know these are regular affairs in households across Bengal,' she said. 'Some go to court and ask why we help those doing Puja. It's because so many people's bread and butter is involved with this.'The BJP, which has consistently opposed the grant, reiterated its criticism following the announcement. Senior BJP leader Rahul Sinha called the grant a misuse of public funds. 'This is a burden on taxpayers as the money is coming from the government exchequer. Why doesn't Mamata Banerjee give the grant from the Trinamool fund or from her own pocket?' he said, accusing the Chief Minister of attempting to woo Hindu voters ahead of elections by funding Durga Puja and planning the construction of a Jagannath temple in addition to the grant hike, Banerjee instructed the state administration to enhance infrastructure and public services during the Puja period. 'Public announcement systems should be placed inside and outside pandals. The Transport Department must increase the frequency of buses and I will ask Metro authorities to run services continuously. We will also speak with the Railways to ensure more local trains are available,' she Puja immersions are scheduled for October 2, 3, and 4. The Chief Minister assured that police and administrative authorities will manage law and order throughout the celebrations.- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
BJP says Congress should apologise for 'Hindu terror' claims
The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Thursday welcomed the acquittal of all the seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case and attacked the Congress, accusing it of coming up with the theory of 'Hindu terror' to appease its 'Muslim votebank', and demanded an apology from the leadership of the Opposition party. The Congress hit back, accusing the BJP of 'polarising' every issue. BJP says Congress should apologise for 'Hindu terror' claims Nearly 17 years after the blast in Muslim-dominated Malegaon in Maharashtra claimed six lives in 2008, a special NIA court in Mumbai acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit on Thursday, noting there was 'no reliable and cogent evidence' against them. 'The Congress can go to any extent to appease its vote bank. This case was a well-calculated conspiracy of the party for sheer vote-bank politics,' BJP lawmaker and former Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad told reporters after the court's verdict. He slammed Congress veterans and former home ministers P Chidambaram and Sushilkumar Shinde for promoting the idea of saffron and Hindu terrorism. Chidambaram used the term while addressing the annual conference of DGPs and IGPs on August 25, 2010, he said. 'There was no evidence against any of the accused. Colonel Purohit, who fought against terrorism in Kashmir, was accused. Pragya Thakur was accused of using her motorcycle in the blast. She was tortured so much that she could not walk after that. This was a Congress conspiracy for sheer vote-bank politics,' Prasad said, demanding an apology from the Congress leadership. On Wednesday, Union home minister Amit Shah during a special discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha had slammed the Congress for coining the term Hindu terror, while asserting that 'Hindus can never be terrorists'. Welcoming the court verdict, Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis in a post on X said: 'Terrorism was never saffron, is not and will never be.' The RSS, BJP's ideological fount, also hailed the verdict, saying the truth has been clarified by the court decision regarding the Malegaon blast case. 'Some individuals, driven by personal interests and political motives, misused power in a malicious attempt to associate Hinduism and the entire Hindu community with terrorism. Through a lengthy judicial process and based on facts, the court has today, with its decision, nullified those baseless allegations,' RSS chief spokesperson Sunil Ambekar said. Maharashtra deputy CM Eknath Shinde, who is also the president of Shiv Sena, an NDA partner, said the verdict has wiped off the stigma on the Hindu community. 'Truth is never defeated. After a long battle of seventeen years, a special court has acquitted seven alleged accused in the Malegaon bomb blast case. It is true that justice was delayed, but it has once again been proven that truth is never defeated,' Shinde wrote on X. Hitting back at the BJP, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge told reporters: 'They (the BJP) polarise everything. There was no good prosecution, good evidence was not collected… how should this matter be let go, if this is what the government has in mind, then what do they do on the prosecution side?' His party colleague Digviyaya Singh dismissed BJP's charge, saying the Congress never coined the term saffron terror. 'There is no terrorism on the basis of religion. There is neither Hindu terrorism nor Islamic terrorism. Every religion is the embodiment of love, faith, truth and non-violence. There are only a few people who use religion as a weapon of hatred. But you keep saying that the term Hindu terrorism was given by the Congress. You are absolutely wrong,' Singh told reporters. Maharashtra Congress chief Harshwardhan Sapkal asked the state government if it will move the higher court against the verdict to ensure justice is delivered in the Malegaon case. 'As soon as the verdict of the 2006 bomb blast was announced, the state government challenged it before the Supreme Court. Will the state government show the same will in this case, as both were the act of terrorism and the perpetrators of the cases should face justice,' he said, referring to the recent acquittal of convicts in the 2006 Mumbai blasts case. The top court set aside the HC order. Speaking to reporters in the Parliament complex, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi said, 'Will the Modi government and the Maharashtra government challenge the verdict in Supreme Court? Or will they continue their hypocrisy on terrorism?' (With inputs from Mumbai bureau)
