Allahabad HC clears way for Sambhal mosque survey: Here's what court said in its verdict
PRAYAGRAJ:
Allahabad high court
dismissed on Monday the Sambhal Shahi Jama Masjid committee's petition challenging a Nov 19, 2024 trial court order directing an advocate commissioner to survey the structure, the subject of a suit claiming that the mosque was built in 1526 after demolishing a temple, reports Rajesh Kumar Pandey.
While upholding the trial court's survey order, Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal vacated the interim stay on the
Hindu plaintiffs
' suit.
The mosque committee had asked for the suit to be dismissed on the ground that the Hindu side's claim to the site was prima facie barred under the Places of Worship Act, 1991. The legislation prohibits conversion of any place of worship and mandates maintaining the religious character of any such site that existed on Aug 15, 1947.
HC: Plaintiffs only seeking right to access to Sambhal site
This is not a case where any conversion of place of worship is taking place or the religious character is being changed.
The plaintiffs have only sought right to access to a protected monument, declared in 1920 under Section 18 of Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, the 45-page judgment states. In its petition, the mosque committee contended that the civil judge (junior division) ordered the survey "hastily" and "without issuing notice".
Based on the Nov 19 directive, a survey was conducted that very day and another one on Nov 24.
Later that month, SC stayed proceedings in the trial court until the mosque committee's petition against the survey order was heard by an HC bench.
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) said in its submission to the bench that the mosque had been designated as a protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.
This effectively means that its status is governed by preservation laws rather than religious classification.
ASI also mentioned that nowhere in official records was the mosque described as a religious place.
The Hindu plaintiffs contend that the disputed Sambhal mosque stands at what used to be site of an ancient Harihar temple dedicated to Kalki, last avatar of Vishnu. The suit claims in 1526, on orders of Mughal emperor Babar, the temple was partially demolished and a mosque built over it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Ayodhya & Beyond: How Ram Mandir Defines Modi's Civilisational Legacy
Last Updated: The prime minister's leadership shows that India can honour its traditions without being shackled by them, that it can build a modern state while nurturing its soul The air in Ayodhya bustles with a pulse—sandalwood and rosewater blended with the faint hum of anticipation—as if the city itself is holding its breath. On Thursday, the Pran Pratishtha of the Ram Darbar idols on the temple's first floor, alongside consecrations in six other shrines within its sprawling complex, marked a moment that transcends rituals. The Ram Mandir stands as a bridge between India's ancient soul and its restless modern ambitions, a monument forged from faith, sacrifice, and an unyielding will to reclaim a piece of its story. The Ram Mandir is no ordinary structure. It embodies centuries of longing and sacrifice—generations who whispered prayers for a temple to Lord Ram as their voices carried the weight of historical wounds. The site, once a battleground of competing narratives, now hosts a soaring edifice of sandstone and marble. Its gold-plated spires pierce the sky like a quiet declaration of victory. Yet, the temple's grandeur lies not just in its scale, but in its improbable speed. From the Supreme Court's 2019 verdict clearing the way to its near-completion in just five years, the Ram Mandir is a testament to what India can achieve when its heart and hands align. This breakneck pace owes much to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's resolve. He saw the temple not as a mere construction project but as a national vow. Modi's approach was surgical: he appointed Nripendra Mishra, his former principal secretary, to helm the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Mishra, a bureaucrat with a reputation for cutting through red tape, became the project's linchpin. Under his watch, artisans from across India carved stone with techniques passed down through generations. Modi's oversight was relentless, from securing funds to smoothing over bureaucratic hurdles, ensuring the project never stalled. The prime minister regularly reviewed the temple's progress, sending a clear message each time: this was India's mission, and it would not falter. The Mandir's rise is a mirror to India's evolving cultural narrative. For too long, parts of the nation's intellectual elite viewed overt expressions of Hindu heritage with unease, dismissing them as backward and divisive, or worse, as attempts to discount Indian 'secularism." The temple challenges that hesitance. It stands as an unapologetic embrace of India's spiritual roots, not as a rejection of modernity but as a foundation for it. The complex itself reflects this balance: alongside the Ram Darbar, temples to Shiva, Hanuman, Ganpati, Surya Dev, Mata Bhagwati, Annapurna, and Sheshavatar weave a tapestry of Sanatan Dharma's pluralism. This is not a monolithic vision of faith but a vibrant mosaic, inviting all to find their place within its fold. The Mandir's inclusivity is manifest by the fact that its doors open to every caste, creed, and community. It is a living symbol of a nation growing comfortable in its own skin, ready to assert its identity on a global stage. Yes, the Ram Mandir movement was always political. The Ram Mandir itself, apart from being a holy site of worship and a spiritual centre for Hindus, is also a living symbol of Bharat's civilisational resilience. It is a testament to Dharma always prevailing over injustice and adharma. That is truly the essence of Shri Ram himself. Even if it takes over 500 years to reestablish, the final victory of right over wrong is a given. In this case, the wrong was the demolition of the original Ram Mandir by Babur and his army of marauders. It was an out and out act of adharma. The realisation of the Ram Mandir dream in Ayodhya marks the arrival of the 'political Hindu". This is a Hindu who no longer accepts marginalisation in the name of vote bank politics. This is a Hindu that knows how to take what rightfully belongs to them. This is a Hindu that is proud of Bharat's ancient civilisation, and is not unnecessarily enamoured by alien concepts of 'secularism" and the complete elimination of dharma from politics. This is a Hindu that realises that the establishment of Raj Dharma is critical to India's journey ahead. Modi's legacy is deeply entwined with this achievement. He has taken a site of historical pain—a wound that festered through decades of legal battles and communal strife—and transformed it into a symbol of unity. His leadership shows that India can honour its traditions without being shackled by them, that it can build a modern state while nurturing its soul. The temple's construction is a marvel of collective effort. Artisans laboured alongside engineers, their hands shaping stone while cranes hummed overhead. Local communities, from shopkeepers to farmers, rallied to support the influx of workers and pilgrims. The project's funding, drawn from donations across India and the diaspora, reflects a shared stake in its success. This was not the work of one man or one government but of a civilisation pooling its energies toward a singular goal. The result is a structure that feels both timeless and immediate, its carvings telling stories of ancient sages while its very existence speaks to India's modern resolve. First Published: June 05, 2025, 12:13 IST News opinion Opinion | Ayodhya & Beyond: How Ram Mandir Defines Modi's Civilisational Legacy
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Special court closes Powai land case against Niranjan Hiranandani, others
MUMBAI : A special court Monday closed criminal proceedings against developer Niranjan Hiranandani and others in the alleged Rs 30,000 crore Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS) land scam case. The judge observed that prosecuting the accused would not be in keeping with justice and that there was no prima facie case after the state Anti-Corruption Bureau submitted a closure report saying there was no evidence of corruption, monetary gratification, dishonest intention, or criminal conspiracy. The case relates to allegations that prime public land leased at concessional rates for affordable housing was diverted to construct luxury real estate and commercial premises by private developers, notably Niranjan Hiranandani, managing director of the Hiranandani group . "Having perused the closure report, I find that no material or anything incriminating, which could connect the accused…with the alleged crime has been found…in my opinion it would thus, be futile to unnecessarily prosecute the accused.., sans any material against them," special judge Shashikant Eknathrao Bangar said in a 119-page order made available on Tuesday. The judge said the closure reports are based on cogent investigation, verified compliance, and supported by judicial orders of the Bombay high court. Pointing to the HC's orders in three related PILs alleging breach of agreement with govt and misuse of FSI and development rights, the judge said allegations concerning breach of affordable housing obligations, amalgamation of flats, and sale of flats were conclusively examined and remedied. The judge noted that the high court had constituted a three-member joint committee to verify compliance and accepted reports in 2016 and 2017, which confirmed that out of 2,200 flats of 80 sqm, 1,337 were constructed, 12 locked, and 887 remained to be completed as per the plan and timeline. "The directions for completion of the remaining flats were passed with monitoring provisions. Any further breach or non-compliance was made subject to the court's ongoing supervision, obviating the need for separate criminal proceedings…the ACB rightly concluded that no prosecutable offence remained. There was no material to show abuse of public office or conspiracy," the judge said, adding that the probe was a 'fair' one. The ACB, through public prosecutor Ramesh Siroya, submitted before the court that sale of larger flats and amalgamation, though deviating from the spirit of the Agreement, was retrospectively regularised through the high court hearing the PILs. The agreement dated 19 Nov 1986, was executed between the state, MMRDA, and the developer for an area of 232 acres. Based on activist Santosh Daundkar's plea alleging that Hiranandani and others were involved in irregularities in the housing project, a court in 2012 ordered a probe. The ACB filed an FIR against Hiranandani and senior urban development department officer Thomas Benjamin and others under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC. In 2013, the ACB sought to close the case on the grounds that there wasn't sufficient evidence. Daundkar opposed the move. The ACB's closure report, which was rejected by the court on Jan 4 2018, led to a directive for further investigations. Following this, a second closure report was submitted on Aug 30, 2019. Daundkar challenged this report too and sought a reinvestigation. He alleged malafide transfer of the investigating officer, who was purportedly preparing to file a chargesheet against top officials and the builder. Daundkar argued that the final report was a result of administrative interference and suppression of crucial material. He contended that the final report is based heavily on the HC's civil PIL orders and ignores criminal aspects. He sought a fresh probe by an independent agency. The ACB said the allegations were not supported by documentary evidence or witness statements. "There are around 8,000 residents (approx) residing in PADS. None of the residents have filed any criminal complaints over the years pertaining to the development carried out in PADS," it submitted. It also pointed out that Daundkar had neither purchased any commercial premises nor was a resident or investor in the development. The judge rejected Daundkar's plea against the closure report, saying it reiterated allegations already considered in PILs and brought no new substantive material.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Sindoor ka badla khoon': Shashi Tharoor lauds ‘brilliantly chosen name' for operation
Shashi Tharoor of the Congress on Wednesday said India's code name for the military response to Pakistan, 'Operation Sindoor', was 'brilliantly chosen', while adding that the vermilion's colour was not very far from blood. In an interaction at the National Press Club in Washington DC, Shashi Tharoor used the popular Indian phrase 'khoon ka badla khoon', while saying that this time it was 'sindoor ka badla khoon'. While explaining the meaning of sindoor, Tharoor said, 'Sindoor, in case some Americans obviously don't know about this, is a vermilion mark that is applied to the centre of the forehead of married women in the Hindu tradition. It's widely practised." 'Some non-Hindus do it too, but more for decorative purposes, but strictly speaking, the Sindoor is applied at the time of the marriage ceremony and is worn every day thereafter by married women,' he added, according to Mint. Tharoor is leading an all-party delegation to the US after hostilities between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, which claimed the lives of 26 people. India responded to the attack by launching 'Operation Sindoor' on May 7, striking terror bases in Pakistan. Tharoor said while naming the military action on Pakistan, India had been conscious of the 'brutal' terrorists who had killed men in front of their wives and children. 'When one wife screamed out, Kill me too, she was told, no, you go back and tell them what we've done,' the Congress MP said. He said that it was no accident that the colour of sindoor is bright red like vermilion, which is not far from the colour of blood. "That sindoor had essentially been wiped off the foreheads of 26 Indian women, 26 I was gonna say Hindu women, but one of them actually was a Christian, but the sindoor had been wiped off the rest by these terrorist actions, and so we wanted first of all, to avenge that act of wiping off the sindoor,' Tharoor said. In response to the Pakistani delegation's claim that Islamabad was also a 'victim of terrorism', Tharoor questioned who the blame should lie with. 'This (Pakistan) delegation is going around saying we are also victims of terrorism, we have lost more lives to terrorism than India has. We turn around and say—whose fault is that?" Tharoor asked. He quoted Hillary Clinton, saying, 'You can't breed vipers in your backyard and expect them to bite only your neighbours.' This comes after the Pakistani delegation led by Bilwala Bhutto, which is also in the US, said that Pakistan had been a victim of terrorism more than India. The multi-party delegation led by Tharoor has returned to interact with the members of the US Congress, politicians and thinktanks. The delegation will provide a brief on India's new approach to combat cross-border terrorism, and the military strikes carried out in terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The delegation is meeting members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, House Foreign Affairs Committee and the India Caucus, along with Washington's leading think tanks.
