High tech: How federal government helped birth Austin industry along with other essentials
At the close of World War II, the feds closed a bustling plant north of Austin that had processed magnesium used in explosives by the military.
Engineers at the University of Texas lobbied the federal government to release the sprawling complex — north of what is now Research Boulevard, south of what is now the Domain — so that it could be used as a site for fresh scientific research.
Thus was born the Balcones Research Center, later renamed the Pickle Research Center, after U.S. Rep. J.J. "Jake" Pickle, who followed Lyndon Baines Johnson and Homer Thornberry as congressional representatives for Austin and for the research hub located up on the former wooded prairie.
More on the feds in Austin: The short suborbital career of Austin native Sam the Space Monkey
Associated with this center were new, indigenous tech firms such as Tracor and National Instruments. In the 1960s and '70s, they were joined in Austin by IBM, Texas Instruments and Motorola, among others. Research collaborations and academic launchpads such as UT's IC² Institute, Microelectronics and Computer Consortium (MCC) and Sematech followed, along with home-grown tech home runs like Dell.
Today, descendants of these Austin projects stand alongside AMD, Samsung, Oracle, Apple, Meta, Google, Intel, Amazon, Silicon Labs, Microsoft, Tesla, SpaceX and other giants in the field. The support of locally based investors, such as Austin Ventures, has encouraged entrepreneurs to found countless additional tech startups.
In turn, the rush of tech-related money, ideas and leadership has changed the face of Austin culture. That includes its philanthropic, educational, culinary, retail, arts, design, moviemaking, festival and music scenes.
More on the feds in Austin: Trip to LBJ Presidential Library unearths unexpected family history
Not all the newcomers have expressed an interest in the community's past or its future. Yet those who have, following the mentorship of enlightened pioneers such as UT's George and Ronya Kozmetsky, have enriched our city immeasurably.
And let's not forget other gifts from the feds and what else they contributed to the shape of Austin and Texas.
1840s: The U.S. annexed the Republic of Texas on generous terms, which included the eventual payment of the young country's considerable debt and a provision letting Texas keep its public lands, which benefited the new state's public schools, universities and construction of the majestic Texas Capitol, among other big projects.
1840s-1920s: The U.S. ensured the protection of the state's citizens against Mexico, which did not easily accept the loss of so much of its territory, and against the Native Americans who actually controlled most of that territory in the mid-19th century. The U.S. had ended Native American rule by the 1870s, and while formal peace was made with Mexico in 1848, combatants crossed back and forth across the Rio Grande well into the 1920s.
More on the feds in Austin: More than 50 million artifacts from Texas' past kept at UT lab
1930s: While the Texas economy — dependent on cotton and newly discovered oil — thrived during the go-go 1920s, the Great Depression, along with the Dust Bowl, crippled most of the state in the 1930s. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his New Deal came to the rescue. In Austin, not only were many impoverished residents helped by programs such as direct relief and Social Security, as well as work programs like the WPA, CCC and NYA, the feds paid for local projects such as the UT Tower, numerous buildings, bridges and, perhaps most importantly, the dams along the Colorado River that offered essential flood protection along with electricity, water and recreation.
1940s: Austin and Texas were transformed forever by World War II. As in World War I, military bases proliferated, shipbuilding increased, and armament factories popped up all over the state. Families poured into the booming cities, and by 1950, Texas had become, for the first time, a state with a predominately urban population. Perhaps only California, with its Pacific Ocean ports and gargantuan defense industries, was altered more significantly.
1950s-2010s: Major Texas highways, airports, medical centers and research universities all depended on federal dollars. Fort Worth's defense plants, Dallas' financial enterprises, Houston oil and chemical industries, San Antonio, Corpus Christi and El Paso's military bases, Austin's university and tech sector — all of them required federal investment and federally funded infrastructure.
1990s: I'll add one last element that ties these together: Among the first federal efforts was to secure Texas militarily. That goal rarely wavered over the following decades. Among the major installations in Austin was the Del Valle Army Air Base, later renamed Bergstrom Air Force Base, after a native son who was an early casualty of World War II. In the 1990s, the feds turned the base over to the city of Austin to make way for what is now Austin-Bergstrom International Airport, an essential if overworked component of the city's success story.
Texans like to think of themselves as self-sufficient individualists, but, as this stroll through the American-Statesman archives demonstrates, we've had a little help along the way.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: High tech is not the only Austin component aided by federal help
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
18 hours ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Forgiveness Backlog Surges
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal program designed to help public service workers erase student debt is facing a growing backlog, with little sign of relief. Last week, a Department of Education court filing showed that the queue for the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Buyback program had continued to swell in recent months, even as the agency processed applications. The program allows borrowers to make a lump-sum payment so that periods of deferment or forbearance—when loan payments are temporarily paused—count toward the 10 years of qualifying payments required for Public Service Loan Forgiveness. The program is designed to ensure that nonpayment periods are counted toward loan forgiveness. Newsweek has contacted the Department for Education for comment via email. Why It Matters Over the past year, tens of thousands of borrowers caught in SAVE plan forbearance have turned to PSLF Buyback for relief. The program has become especially critical as about 8 million Americans have been barred from making student loan payments following a court injunction that temporarily halted the SAVE plan because of a Republican-led legal challenge. Because time spent in forbearance under SAVE does not count toward loan forgiveness, many borrowers who have already completed years of qualifying public service find themselves in uncertainty. PSLF Buyback was created to bridge that gap, particularly for those approaching the end of their 10-year repayment timeline. An exterior view of the Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) Department of Education Building in Washington, D.C., on June 24, 2022. An exterior view of the Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) Department of Education Building in Washington, D.C., on June 24, 2022. GETTY The Growing Backlog Even as some applications are processed, the department has struggled to keep up with demand. In its first filing on PSLF Buyback earlier this year, part of an interim agreement to provide monthly updates following a legal challenge over income-driven repayment plan delays, the department reported that it had processed 1,472 applications in April—with 49,318 still in the queue. In May, the number of pending requests grew to 58,761, while 3,312 requests were processed. At the end of June, there were 65,448 pending requests, with 2,224 given a decision that month. In July, the backlog grew further to 72,730, with 3,280 requests being processed. Overall, there has been a 47 percent increase in the number of requests between April and July. There is also a backlog for applications for income-driven repayment plans as many borrowers in SAVE forbearance have sought to switch into other plans to continue making progress toward loan forgiveness. The Trump administration increased pressure on borrowers to change plans after resuming interest charges earlier this month for those enrolled in SAVE. "The Department urges all borrowers in the SAVE Plan to quickly transition to a legally compliant repayment plan—such as the Income-Based Repayment Plan," Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement in July. "Borrowers in SAVE cannot access important loan benefits and cannot make progress toward loan discharge programs authorized by Congress." A major obstacle for borrowers is that switching repayment plans is not a quick process. The Department of Education is dealing with a massive backlog of income-driven repayment (IDR) applications, a problem made worse when the Trump administration temporarily shut down the entire processing system in the spring. While the department has reported some progress, the logjam remains significant. Last month, officials reported 1,511,504 pending IDR applications. As of the latest filing, the backlog had dropped to 1,386,406, with 304,844 applications processed in July.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Amid new dorms and dining, University of Tennessee is also planning new hires and awards
When students arrive or return to the University of Tennessee at Knoxville for the fall 2025 semester, they'll be met by a new building for the College of Nursing, along with new dining options and dorms. It's been a busy summer for UT, and some campus news can get lost in the shadow of big new buildings and all the other ways the university is growing. Before the first day of class Aug. 18, let us catch you up on some other UT developments: A new initiative to recruit researchers A new award for public service A new designation as a top-value university University of Tennessee pushing research in faculty recruitment initiative UT is launching a multi-year initiative to recruit faculty members who can help UT become a leader in research, something Chancellor Donde Plowman made a commitment to in June. Among the fields of interest for UT is artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, nuclear energy, quantum computing and radiopharmeceuticals. 'From nuclear energy to cancer treatments, the discoveries and solutions we provide Tennesseans demonstrate the value of public land-grant research universities,' Plowman said in a news release. 'We have built a lot of momentum over the past few years, and with those successes have come even bigger ambitions. Others are taking notice and want to be part of the work we're doing.' Plowman also is leading plans for three new innovation districts − one near downtown in the Maplehurst neighborhood, one in Oak Ridge and one at the Research Park at Cherokee Farms. These increased efforts around research stem from the federal government pulling funding for specific research projects on the Knoxville campus under President Donald Trump. Baker School is establishing new award The Howard H. Baker Jr. School of Public Policy and Public Affairs is establishing a new award that it will give to young leaders each year. It's called the the Howard H. Baker Jr. Award for Public Service, and it will recognize a young national leader whose work encapsulates public service, civic engagement and democracy. The recipient will receive $25,000, along with a commemorative plaque at the school, and will be honored at the Baker School Gala on Nov. 14, the night before what would be Sen. Howard Baker's 100th birthday. Anyone can make a nomination, and the Baker School Board will select the winner. Candidates must be 40 years old or younger and must have a portfolio that shows a dedication to solving public problems as an elected official or in a public service role, according to a news release. Nominations are open through Sept. 1. Princeton Review puts University of Tennessee on best value college list The Princeton Review recognized UT as a top value college, placing the flagship Knoxville campus in the No. 50 slot on its annual public schools list with a return-on-investment rating of 89 out of 99. The education services company bases its ratings on data from surveys of administrators, and it tallies the return on investment using more than 40 data points covering academics, affordability and career preparation. Keenan Thomas reports on higher education for the Knox News business growth and development team. You can reach him by email at Support strong local journalism and unlock premium perks at This article originally appeared on Knoxville News Sentinel: University of Tennessee, named value college, wants new research hires Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
A shipbuilding behemoth is rising in China. By scale, nothing else comes close.
Two of China's state-owned shipbuilding groups are finalizing a major merger, building a juggernaut. The deal has been in the works since 2019 and will extensively grow CSSC, the world's largest shipbuilder. CSSC accounts for a massive share of global shipbuilding and features dual-use yards for military vessels. A Chinese state-owned shipbuilding group was already the world's biggest. Now it's finishing up a merger with its main domestic rival, resulting in an absolute juggernaut of an industry force. China has been quantitatively dominating the global shipbuilding game, leaving the US and its allies playing catch-up. The merger only tightens Beijing's grip on the industry, handing China a critical advantage in generating commercial and naval power. Last week, trading in the shares of China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) and China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation (CSIC) was suspended as CSSC moves to absorb CSIC, which is ultimately being delisted. CSSC previously received approval from the Shanghai Stock Exchange to absorb its competitor in a substantial share-swap deal. It marked the latest step in a merger that's been in the works since 2019, a move that will create a new streamlined shipbuilding behemoth. Though the companies merged years ago, industrial overlap continues to be an issue, as is unresolved internal industry competition. The mega merger cuts duplicated costs and redundant functions for more efficient, more coordinated operations. Post merger, Chinese media reports, CSSC will control some $56 billion in assets while generating $18 billion in annual revenue. Some estimates are higher. CSSC is China's — and the world's — largest shipbuilding group. It built more commercial vessels by tonnage in 2024 than the entire US shipbuilding industry has built since the end of the World War II, according to a report on Chinese shipbuilding earlier this year from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank. And CSIC was the country's second-largest. Both are state-owned, meaning their operations and developments are overseen by the government, and they were originally part of the same firm until split in 1999 under Chinese Communist Party reforms. The reunion between the two is expected to result in a bigger, more powerful CSSC. It signals China's push for a more consolidated approach to its commercial and military shipbuilding. "When it's all said and done, CSSC will be the largest listed shipbuilding company in the world by a considerable margin, in terms of both assets and revenue," Matthew Funaiole, a CSIS senior fellow with the China Power Project, told Business Insider. "And maybe more importantly, it will have the full backing of the Chinese state and its industrial policy might." That kind of state backing means global rivals face not just a company, but an arm of Beijing's industrial strategy. A massive shipbuilding empire CSSC alone is a commercial shipbuilding giant, boasting expansive shipyards, factories, and research institutes controlled by political and military leaders in Beijing. It includes 84 subsidiaries and employs over 200,000 people across shipbuilding, engineering, research and development, and other areas, CSIS said earlier this year. Comparatively, the entire US shipbuilding industry directly employs just over 100,000 people, per available data. When the companies first began the merger process, CSSC and CSIC oversaw, by some estimates, $120 billion in combined assets — almost four times as much as South Korean rival Hyundai Heavy Industries. The companies shared resources, including financing, technologies, and personnel. The merger itself is part of China's long-standing push to consolidate its shipbuilding, as the "central government is trying to reduce horizontal competition between companies within its domestic market in order to be better positioned to extend its dominance over global markets," Funaiole said. And while the number of active Chinese shipyards has decreased since peaking in 2009 at just over 300 — as of 2024, it was around 150 spread across a handful of major production sites — the total production has continued to increase, substantially so in 2023 and 2024. China produced over 50% of global commercial shipbuilding in 2024, well beyond Japan and South Korea. And at its major shipbuilding hubs, especially in Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Dalian, commercial vessels are pumped out at rapid rates. Similarly, CSSC and CSIC have thrived on foreign ship orders. Data reviewed by CSIS has shown that foreign firms have purchased hundreds of hulls from China's biggest yards, resulting in billions in revenue. Many of these yards are co-production for military shipbuilding, too. CSSC in particular has been a successful case of what Beijing has called its "military-civil fusion" strategy, which removes the barriers between its commercial and defense sectors, allowing one to fuel the other. China's dual-use approach has allowed its shipbuilding industry to quickly produce naval vessels using the same equipment and personnel it uses for commercial ones, which has resulted in a naval force buildup that has received increased attention from the US and its allies and partners. The Chinese People's Liberation Army's Navy is the largest in the world, the Pentagon has noted repeatedly in its more recent annual reports on China's military. China's navy maintains a battle force of over 370 ships and submarines. And because China can produce a wide range of ships, engines, weapons, and systems, it is "nearly self-sufficient for all shipbuilding needs," the most recent report said. Self-sufficiency is an essential capability in a serious conflict, when supply lines could face unexpected pressures. Challenges for the US and its allies and partners The finalization of this merger adds to long-standing concerns in the West about China's shipbuilding dominance and raises questions about what the US and its allies, specifically South Korea and Japan, can and will do to bolster their own industries. US President Donald Trump has made revitalizing American shipbuilding a top priority, and there's growing talk about having the US military and defense contractors work more closely with South Korean and Japanese companies. Rhetoric, however, has been somewhat out of sync with action. By combining CSSC and CSIC, China appears to be notably strengthening its domestic industry for continued dominance of global shipbuilding. In January 2025, China held around 62% of the global order book for merchant vessels through 2033, CSIS reports, with over 80% of orders for new container ships and 30% for LNG, or liquefied natural gas, carriers vital for global trade. The new CSSC will now have even more resources across its yards for building military vessels. The consolidation between CSSC and CSIC lends to further expansion of China's shipbuilding capabilities and capacity, especially as Beijing will have more centralized control that will make it easier to transfer technologies, personnel, and assets for building ships across divisions, Funaiole said. For Washington and its allies, the merger underscores how far ahead Beijing already is — and the difficulties in catching up. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio