The past three years for SIG (LON:SHI) investors has not been profitable
SIG plc (LON:SHI) shareholders should be happy to see the share price up 23% in the last quarter. But over the last three years we've seen a quite serious decline. Tragically, the share price declined 58% in that time. So it is really good to see an improvement. While many would remain nervous, there could be further gains if the business can put its best foot forward.
So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
SIG wasn't profitable in the last twelve months, it is unlikely we'll see a strong correlation between its share price and its earnings per share (EPS). Arguably revenue is our next best option. Shareholders of unprofitable companies usually desire strong revenue growth. Some companies are willing to postpone profitability to grow revenue faster, but in that case one would hope for good top-line growth to make up for the lack of earnings.
Over three years, SIG grew revenue at 3.1% per year. That's not a very high growth rate considering it doesn't make profits. It's likely this weak growth has contributed to an annualised return of 16% for the last three years. When a stock falls hard like this, some investors like to add the company to a watchlist (in case the business recovers, longer term). After all, growing a business isn't easy, and the process will not always be smooth.
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
This free interactive report on SIG's balance sheet strength is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.
While the broader market gained around 6.4% in the last year, SIG shareholders lost 47%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 8% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand SIG better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks, for example - SIG has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
But note: SIG may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on British exchanges.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Global Fashion Agenda Addresses Sustainability's Struggles: Uncertainty Looms Amid Policy Shifts, Economic Pressures and Tariffs
COPENHAGEN — Does sustainability stand a chance in a world where it is being increasingly de-prioritized amid shifting government policies, mounting tariffs and more conservative political climates? That was the question attendees grappled with at this year's Global Fashion Agenda conference in Copenhagen. Organizers acknowledged the mood was 'somber,' reflecting rising uncertainty. Attendance was lighter, as brands cut budgets and pivoted toward contingency planning in response to legislative delays and economic headwinds. More from WWD Miley Cyrus Puts Her Own Twist on a '80s Rockstar Hairstyle at the Chanel and Tribeca Film Festival Luncheon in NYC Miley Cyrus, Parker Posey, Riley Keough & More Celebrate 'Through Her Lens' With Chanel and Tribeca Lucy Liu Anchors Chanel Textured Midi Dress With Pearl-heeled Pumps at TriBeCa Through Her Lens Luncheon In Europe, the European Commission's conservative pivot has led to a rollback of key legislation, most notably the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. The directive, which required large companies to identify and address human rights and environmental impacts across their supply chains, is now partially on hold, leaving many companies in limbo. 'The EU has given the world a political signal that we, too, are going to do things differently, and I would even call it a sort of 'Trump lite,'' said European Parliament member Lara Wolters. Though the EU's upcoming changes are being framed as simplifications, 'it's far too soon…to make a harsh policy move like this. And yet that's been done and everybody is now scrambling to try to do damage control,' said Wolters. The likely outcome will be more paperwork on imports and burdens on small businesses, with less scrutiny at the source of production. In the U.S., new tariffs under the Trump administration have further complicated sustainability strategies. Companies investing in decarbonizing their supply chains now face uncertainty around future production costs and sourcing locations. 'It's hard to convince your CFO to make that decision,' said Chelsea Murtha, senior director of sustainability at the American Apparel and Footwear Association. '[Companies are] operating in confusion.' Meanwhile, states that once led on climate action are facing rising costs and cross-border partnerships, such as U.S.-Canadian collaborations on recycling and sorting systems, are now under threat due to the new fees and increased shipping complexity. USAID had long funded many NGOs and programs that U.S. brands relied on to monitor human rights and labor conditions in sourcing countries. That support is now cut, and brands are being asked to fill the gap. 'As much as the brands would like to, they're also getting squeezed by the tariffs,' said Murtha. 'So there's this sort of paralysis happening right now where everyone's trying to figure out what on earth can we continue to hold on to?' Claus Teilmann Petersen, Bestseller's head of sustainability and human rights, urged brands to channel this uncertainty into 'productive paranoia.' He believes that while the EU battle 'is kind of lost,' legislators should regroup to implement simplified due diligence based on global OECD guidelines. GFA's vice president of public affairs María Luisa Martínez Díez added that geopolitical instability is adding to the uncertainty. 'Wars and conflicts [are] also disrupting the industry, with brands having to reassess production locations and loans due to the risky conflict zones.' Financing is also impacted, with banks less inclined to fund factory upgrades that set out to reduce carbon emissions or water use. 'The focus on sustainability has been left behind, fading into the background, to the favor of competitors,' she noted. Adding to the challenge is the compliance burden of data collection and upcoming circular economy regulations. Brands are navigating varying rules from the U.S., EU, China and pending new laws in India, South America and Mexico. Amid the gloom, some companies see a silver lining in artificial intelligence. One promising use case is to modernize the outdated wholesale model. 'The system relies on the traditional system of bulk ordering,' said MannyAI cofounder and chief executive officer Shruti Grover. AI, she suggested, could optimize inventory, reduce overstock, and cut costs. The system relies on the traditional method of bulk ordering. Brands have to front the stock then absorb the cost of any items that are returned. Revamping the system could be especially beneficial for small brands, but this would break longstanding business practices and is resisted by existing players in the industry. 'So brands need to take a really brave decision for this,' she said. But while AI has potential, so far it has not paid out, according to research from BCG. Arti Zeighami, partner and director at the consulting group's tech design division BCGX, shared that only 4 percent of CEOs implementing AI have seen measurable return on investment, highlighting a gap between hype and tangible value. Still, smaller brands see opportunity. Mudd Jeans CEO Jolanda Brink said AI could enable her 12-person team to compete at scale. 'Everybody's talking like people are scared about AI, but I'm actually thinking this can tremendously help me,' she told WWD. 'It used to be large team, large results. So now this can be small team, large results.' Brink hopes to build a product lifecycle management system and launch targeted paid ads built with AI tools, especially to reach 'light green' consumers who value style but consider sustainability a bonus. She sees this possibility as a win-win. 'That is really good for retailers also, because that means they don't have to invest a lot in us, because they can see if it sells, and then they can order from us,' she said. StyleDNA cofounder and CEO Elena Volkova echoed the hype vs. value gap in AI, this time from the consumer perspective. Her research found that while 82 percent of users want AI-assisted shopping, many haven't acted on its suggestions. It will take time for consumers to develop trust in a new system and to see any personal value in using it, she said. This disconnect between intention and action was a recurring theme. Visa Europe's vice president of impact and sustainability Katherine Brown said their Behavioral Insights Lab found 87 percent of consumers want to shop sustainably, but only 27 percent follow through. The lab partners with retailers such as Selfridges, Cos, and John Lewis to test messaging and to nudge strategies that drive more sustainable choices. For Gen Z, framing sustainability as community-driven behavior raised sales at Cos by 22 percent. Pre-purchase nudges promoting refillables were also successful in a Charlotte Tilbury case study, she told WWD. These 'nudges' are less about hard-hitting sustainability messaging and more about a few key words that appeal to style or make economic sense to consumers in a softer way. Visa is also exploring 'agentic AI,' which autonomously searches and shops for products based on a consumer's personalized preferences. Yet trust and fraud prevention remain critical, especially in resale. 'There is just so much financial fraud at this moment in time, so people really do want to know that if I'm buying something, I want to know that it's from a real source,' she said. 'Trust and security is not yet robust in the resale market.' Visa is supporting digital passports to ensure the authenticity of goods as well as ensure the payments systems behind secondhand transactions. The lab, focused on Europe, plans to expand into global markets and new sectors, including travel and home goods. 'The fashion industry has been a brilliant starting point because the industry just so vastly needs to understand how to move people away from fast fashion,' said Brown. Devon Leahy, global head of sustainability at L Catterton, stressed the business case for bridging the gap. 'Closing the consumer gap is tangible financial value,' she said, urging brands to present sustainability as a co-benefit, not the primary purchase driver. Florence Bulté, chief sustainability officer at Chalhoub Group, discussed efforts to shift secondhand perceptions in the Middle East, where the group operates. When the group launched a jewelry rental program, she knew it would appeal to expats in the region. But to her surprise, it performed better than expected with local communities. The group is working to extend this kind of change with handbags and shoes as well. GFA CEO Federica Marchionni acknowledged the global moment. 'This time was a very different feeling…we were anxious of the time and the situation we are living in, and it's hard to tackle all of these barriers that are growing every day,' she said, highlighting the event's theme of 'Barriers and Bridges.' 'I always say that sustainability can really be the uniting bond,' she said. Many attendees noted that this year's conference felt smaller, whether due to overlapping events, tighter travel budgets, or broader fatigue. SXSW London was scheduled at the same time, where one attendee was due to be a panelist before she realized the dates conflicted, and the Textiles Recycling Expo was happening in Brussels. As a result, 'all the recyclers are there and the brands are here,' the attendee said. Though fewer CEOs were visible, C-level sustainability leaders from brands like Chanel and Kering participated in closed-door roundtables. Kering even brought along its first 'sustainability futurist,' who is focused on studying long-range transformation a decade out. One returning attendee, attending for the sixth time, said they had hoped for more 'actionable' content given how 'people have backed down on messaging.' Nonetheless, the networking was strong. 'It's good to meet people we only see on Zoom,' one attendee said. 'In that aspect, it is doing its job.' A standout moment of the week was the debut of Lycra EcoMade with Qira — a corn-based stretch fiber containing 70 percent renewable content. The drop-in replacement for petroleum-based Lycra delivers the same performance, making it possible for activewear such as yoga pants to go bio-based. There's no difference in appearance or feel. Both CEOs were on hand to unveil the fiber at the event, Lycra's Gary Smith and Qira's Jon Veldhouse. The fiber has been in development for seven years, and already piloted by brands like A-Golde. The material is being produced at a factory in Iowa and will scale to 65 tons a year, with the first large-scale shipments expected this fall for inclusion in spring collections. Leather alternative pioneer Modern Meadow also revealed its newly rebranded material, Innovera, with CEO David Williamson on hand to discuss the future of bio-designed material innovations. To close the week, Refibered was awarded the GFA Trailblazer prize. The startup uses AI to identify textile compositions, helping recyclers and boosting resale authentication and traceability. Best of WWD Walmart Calls California Waste Dumping Lawsuit 'Unjustified' Year in Review: Sustainability's Biggest Controversies of 2021 Year in Review: Sustainability's New Strides
Boston Globe
17 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
The Trump administration canceled an $87 million award for this MIT startup. But life goes on.
Advertisement On May 20, Suffolk Technologies, a venture capital arm of Boston-based Suffolk Construction, announced it had invested an unspecified amount of money in Sublime and pre-purchased some of the cement that will be made in Holyoke. Two days later, Sublime announced an agreement with Microsoft in which the software giant will buy more than 620,000 metric tons of Sublime cement over up to nine years. Last fall, two of the world's largest cement suppliers, Holcim and CRH, together invested $75 million in the company. The company has also raised $45 million in venture capital funding, including from Lowercarbon Capital and Engine Ventures. And on Thursday, Sublime disclosed a roster of nine construction companies, including Suffolk, that have agreed to act as sales partners to pitch Advertisement The Holyoke factory is expected to be completed in 2027 and provide jobs for at least 70 people after it opens. The plant will still get some subsidies, including $47 million in federal tax credits that remain in place, $1.05 million in state tax credits, and $351,000 in local property tax breaks. Site work has begun in Holyoke, but not construction of the actual building. Joe Hicken, senior vice president of business development at Sublime, declined to say what kind of impact, if any, the Department of Energy's action will have on the project's timing. He noted that Sublime's mission dovetails with the Trump administration's goal of boosting American manufacturing. 'If anything, that termination letter is one data point,' Hicken said. 'We have many other data points associated with commercial movement [and] for every plan that we talk about publicly, we have 10 backup plans waiting for their day to shine.' Builders such as those at Suffolk and Consigli Construction in Milford have come to appreciate the technology developed by Sublime cofounders Leah Ellis and Yet-Ming Chiang. The process they developed replaces traditional kilns with electrolysers that make cement from calcium sources, avoiding the intense release of carbon dioxide from the super-heating of limestone used to make most cement. So far, Sublime's production has been limited to small test batches, including a foundation section included in the new building WS Development finished for Amazon in the Seaport. Consigli vice president Todd McCabe said his company signed up to sell Sublime cement because its executives are always looking for ways to build more sustainably and efficiently, and Sublime's clean cement will help with that. Advertisement At Suffolk, executives decided to buy equity in Sublime. Suffolk followed the startup soon after its 2020 inception. As Sublime moved closer to commercialization, Suffolk chief technology officer Jit Kee Chin decided it was the right time to invest. 'They're getting to the point where it's about to go to market,' Chin said. 'Really, it's no longer a science experiment. ... This is the right time for us to go in and really support them.' Chin said many of Suffolk's clients are keenly interested in Sublime's goal of creating a cost-effective, low-carbon cement that's just as effective as traditional cement, known as portland cement. The news about Sublime losing the federal award came as a disappointment to Ben Downing, the chief strategist at the Engine, a nonprofit startup accelerator affiliated with MIT and with VC firm Engine Ventures. Although it's a significant amount of money, Downing has confidence that Sublime will be able to finish the Holyoke factory. 'We know there's a lot of chaos in Washington but we believe in the science and we believe in the team,' Downing said. 'It's bad news, but if any team is going to be able to respond to it and grow and scale it, they're going to find a way [and] I know Holyoke and Massachusetts will be better for it.' Jon Chesto can be reached at
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Booker won't accept money from Elon Musk for campaign, but urges him to 'sound the alarm' on Trump-backed bill
Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., told NBC News on Sunday that he wouldn't accept money from Elon Musk for his re-election campaign, but urged the former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) official to "sound the alarm" on the "big, beautiful bill" endorsed by President Donald Trump. "Meet the Press" host Kristen Welker asked Booker on Sunday if he would accept money from Musk after the billionaire and the president traded barbs. "I will partner with anyone like I did in the last Congress, putting my vote alongside of John McCain's, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins to stop the tearing down of the Affordable Care Act. This is not about right or left. It's about right or wrong. And this bill is disastrous for the average American, driving up this cost. This bill is disastrous for our long-term economy. This is an American issue, and I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign, I welcome him right now, not to sit back and fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way, in putting pressure on Congresspeople and senators to not do this," Booker said. Timeline: Inside The Evolving Relationship Between Trump And Musk From First Term To This Week's Fallout Welker asked Booker again if he would accept money from Musk. "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know, sound the alarm, treat this like a Paul Revere moment. More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket, as this president, again, pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans," Booker said. Read On The Fox News App Musk criticized the Trump-backed bill as a "disgusting abomination." "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk said in a post on X. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Gop Senators Express 'Concerns,' 'Skepticism' Over Trump's Spending Bill After Musk Rant Welker also pressed Booker on the state of the Democratic Party, asking the liberal senator about former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's decision to register as an Independent, which she announced along with a new book about her time in the White House. "Do you think Democrats have to distance themselves from the party brand in order to win?" Welker asked, noting some of New Jersey's gubernatorial candidates have also been critical of the party, ahead of the primary election on Tuesday. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "I think the Democrats right now all across America should be less concerned about the Democratic Party and more concerned with the American people. There's a trust problem for Republicans and Democrats. Most Americans voted against both of the presidential candidates in the last election. We need to start standing up and show we're fighting for Americans right now," Booker responded. Booker also said he was going to endorse whoever wins the Democratic gubernatorial primary in New article source: Booker won't accept money from Elon Musk for campaign, but urges him to 'sound the alarm' on Trump-backed bill
