logo
Hong Kong must put ‘eco' before ‘tourism' in plans for coastal areas

Hong Kong must put ‘eco' before ‘tourism' in plans for coastal areas

The Hong Kong government's expression of interest process for
developing ecotourism in Tsim Bei Tsui and Pak Nai closed on July 2, marking a crucial milestone in the city's push to become a regional leader in sustainable tourism.
These two sites, spanning 120 hectares bordering Deep Bay and including ecologically sensitive coastal wetlands, represent far more than just another development opportunity; they're a test case for how Hong Kong can balance economic growth with environmental stewardship.
Over the past two decades, I've been fortunate to work on two extraordinary ecotourism projects that put environmental regeneration at the forefront of design and planning. From the cooled conservatories at Singapore's
Gardens by the Bay , where visitors now marvel at thriving biodiversity alongside stunning architecture, to the ongoing planning for the 500-hectare island of Sentosa, these projects illustrate how thoughtful governance can turn sustainability into a captivating visitor experience.
While Hong Kong might hesitate to reference
a rival , Gardens by the Bay – which has welcomed more than 100 million tourists since it opened in 2012 – serves an essential educational purpose, not least of which is that ecotourism projects succeed when they solve real environmental problems.
The conservatories are not just architectural showpieces; they are low-carbon structures that show how tourism infrastructure can contribute to sustainability goals. The project's success comes from integrating environmental function into every design decision, not treating conservation as an afterthought.
At Sentosa, this idea is taken even further. With a goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 while maintaining its position as a premier tourism destination, the island shows that environmental leadership and commercial success are not mutually exclusive. But achieving these two outcomes requires a different approach to governance – one that puts ecological outcomes at the centre of decision-making rather than as an afterthought.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global financial system must rewrite its rules for the tokenised future, says BIS adviser
Global financial system must rewrite its rules for the tokenised future, says BIS adviser

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Global financial system must rewrite its rules for the tokenised future, says BIS adviser

The worldwide financial system needs to rewrite its rules for a future of tokens, as the rise of stablecoins poses new challenges to the global infrastructure for instant payment, clearing and settlement, according to the gatekeeper of the world's central banks Stablecoins, which are digital tokens backed by fiat currencies or other reserve assets, could make anti-money-laundering (AML) work and banks' task of knowing their customers more difficult because of their cross-border, pseudonymous transactions, said the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the organisation that is often dubbed the 'central bank of central banks.' 'The rules of the monetary system are changing and stablecoins are right at the front line of the policy debate,' said Shin Hyun-Song, BIS' economic adviser and the head of its monetary and economic department, during an interview with the Post on Monday in Hong Kong. '[Stablecoin] is a borderless instrument used mainly as the gateway to the crypto ecosystem and other decentralised finance platforms, but it also generates many new types of challenges.' The challenges have been exacerbated by the buzz around the stablecoin issuer Circle Internet Group, whose stock price has soared sevenfold within a month of its June 5 initial public offering in New York. The Trump administration's embrace of private digital currencies has sent bitcoin 's value past US$120,000 for the first time, luring more believers to join the fray.

MTR must take to heart its duty to minimise service disruption
MTR must take to heart its duty to minimise service disruption

South China Morning Post

time2 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

MTR must take to heart its duty to minimise service disruption

Only last Sunday Hong Kong's railway operator had offered commuters half-fare rides to compensate for a serious service breakdown on a major rail line two months ago. So it was regrettable that the operation of the Tseung Kwan O line was disrupted again during rush hour yesterday morning, leaving passengers frustrated about the repeated malfunctions and inadequate contingency plans. MTR Corporation first confirmed the service disruption at 7.49am, saying there would be a five-to-eight-minute delay to train journeys as some signalling equipment was not functioning properly. Train frequencies were later adjusted to one every six minutes between North Point and Po Lam, and one every eight minutes between Tiu Keng Leng and Lohas Park. The delays resulted in long queues on train platforms at some stations, with some passengers having to wait for several trains to get on board. The disruption lasted less than three hours, not as long as the breakdown on May 22 when services were affected for five hours. But those caught by the delays were understandably outraged. Some asked why there were apparently no shuttle bus services arranged by MTR Corp or reinforcement by other transport operators this time. The frustration underlines the high standards expected of the rail operator. Considering the MTR's reputation as a world-class urban transport system running with clockwork precision for more than four decades, passengers may feel inconvenienced by the slightest technical glitch. The signalling malfunction on the Tseung Kwan O line yesterday was not the first. The breakdown in May forced tens of thousands of people to scramble for alternative transport home in the evening, after a displaced overhead cable component in a tunnel section triggered problems in the power supply and the signalling system.

HKU innovation hub must move forward, but community engagement is vital
HKU innovation hub must move forward, but community engagement is vital

South China Morning Post

time3 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

HKU innovation hub must move forward, but community engagement is vital

Integration with the local community should be a priority for universities. Everyone benefits from the connections which enrich student experiences and foster innovation, so it has been disappointing to see growing tension between residents of Pok Fu Lam and the University of Hong Kong (HKU) over a planned innovation centre. The Global Innovation Centre will provide space for teaching, conferences, offices, staff quarters, catering and support facilities, and even landscaped areas open to the public. It is envisioned as a world-class, deep-technology research facility that will focus on the interdisciplinary, blue-sky investigations giving rise to innovative solutions to global challenges. HKU says the facilities are needed to attract talent the city needs to evolve into an international innovation and technology hub as envisioned in the national five-year plan. The sticking point has been over the centre's proposed location at a government-owned green belt along Pok Fu Lam Road. Residents have pushed back over concerns about traffic, environmental impact and a lack of consultation. The university has responded by downsizing initial plans announced last year to preserve more than 75 per cent of the green belt and shifting to a smaller nearby residential plot. Some residents say the centre should instead be built on nearby Mount Davis or land set aside for the uncompleted Northern Metropolis. University planners said Pok Fu Lam is a faster and cheaper option. It is also near HKU's main campus, Queen Mary Hospital and Cyberport – proximity that is needed to draw innovators. HKU said it held four meetings with district councillors and lawmakers and another three each with a residents' group and representatives from a nearby home for the visually impaired. Two groups representing residents said HKU only spoke with them for three hours and did not seriously consider alternative sites. The project is important and should not be delayed. Reasonable balance between the concerns of residents and planners must be found. It will require proper communication and dialogue, as well as neighbours being open and understanding about the project.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store