Lauren Boebert Confuses Oliver Stone for Roger Stone at JFK Files Hearing
Lauren Boebert had an embarrassing flub on the House floor Tuesday while questioning director Oliver Stone during a House Oversight Committee hearing on the JFK files released last month.
Her first misstep? Mistaking the famed director behind 1991's Kevin Costner vehicle, 'JFK,' for Trump ally and 'The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ' author Roger Stone.
'Mr. Stone, you wrote a book accusing LBJ of being involved in the killing of President Kennedy,' Boebert questioned, a clip of which you can watch below. 'Do these most recent releases confirm or negate your initial charge?'
Oliver Stone, looking visibly confused, then turned to journalist and author Jefferson Morley, who also sat on the hearing panel. Whispers ensued until Stone responded, decidedly: 'No I didn't.' The filmmaker then spoke about the piece of Kennedy-related media he did create, 'JFK.'
'If you look closely at the film, there's no — it accuses President Johnson of being in part complicit in a cover-up of the case, but not in the assassination itself, which I don't know.'
'What do you think he was complicit in?' Boebert asked, before addressing Morley, who apparently tried to interrupt to correct the mistake. 'Yes sir, I'll get to you,' she responded.
'The cover-up, well, how about for starters appointing Allen Dulles, the head of the CIA, who was fired by Kennedy, to the commission itself, to the Warren Commission, and he goes to almost every meeting and he's pretty much in charge of the Warren Commission from the beginning, Allen Dulles. That's part of the evidence that points to President Johnson's either incompetence or involvement,' Stone answered, humoring the congresswoman's line of questioning.
'Mr. Morley, I think you had something to add on that?' Boebert then asked.
'I think you're confusing Mr. Oliver Stone with Mr. Roger Stone,' he journalist said over the congresswoman dismissing the mistake: 'I may have made a misstated it, yeah. Sorry.'
'It's Roger Stone who implicated LBJ in the assassination of the president, it's not my friend Oliver Stone,' Morley said.
'Is that what all the whispers were there?' Boebert asked. 'I may have, I may have misinterpreted that and I apologize for that.'
Watch the full exchange below:
The 1991 political conspiracy thriller 'JFK' grossed over $200 million in theaters and was nominated for eight Oscars, including best picture, and won two. Stone was nominated for Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay.
On March 18, President Donald Trump made thousands of classified documents related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy public.
The post Lauren Boebert Confuses Oliver Stone for Roger Stone at JFK Files Hearing | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Calls Trump's Bill 'Abomination,' Emboldening GOP Critics
Elon Musk speaks alongside President Donald Trump to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. Credit - Kevin Dietsch—Getty Images Former White House adviser Elon Musk on Tuesday issued a blistering criticism of President Donald Trump's tax and spending package, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' as the Senate seeks to quickly pass the measure and send it to Trump's desk before July 4. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk said in a post on X, the social media platform he owns. He added that the package is a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' The comments marked Musk's most public break yet with the President, and landed just days after he officially stepped down from his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, an advisory office created by Trump to identify and eliminate waste across the federal government. But it's not the first time Musk has criticized the bill. Last month he gave cover to Republican critics, saying that the measure failed to reduce the federal deficit and undermined his DOGE efforts. In a separate post Tuesday, Musk added that the bill would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden [American] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' He appeared to be referencing projections from budget analysts who estimate the legislation could add more than $2.5 trillion over the next decade to the national deficit, which has grown to $1.3 trillion. 'Congress is making America bankrupt,' Musk wrote. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has likewise concluded that while the bill includes cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and other safety net programs, those reductions would be overwhelmed by the tax cuts and other provisions projected to increase the deficit by between $2.3 trillion and $5 trillion over the same period. The House narrowly passed the GOP tax and spending bill last month by just one vote after weeks of tense negotiations between the White House and Republican lawmakers concerned about ballooning deficits. The package, dubbed by Trump as 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' extends his 2017 tax cuts, creates new tax breaks on tips and overtime, and raises the federal debt ceiling by $4 trillion. Musk posted his latest criticisms as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was defending the bill to reporters during a press briefing. She quickly found herself responding to Musk's view. 'The President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' Leavitt said. 'It doesn't change the President's opinion.' House Speaker Mike Johnson also pushed back on Musk's criticism, which he called "disappointing" and "surprising." 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the one big, beautiful bill,' Johnson told reporters. But Musk's rebuke has energized fiscal hawks in the Senate who were already uneasy with the legislation's scope. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican of Utah, responded directly to Musk's post on Tuesday: 'The Senate must make this bill better.' Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican of Kentucky, added: 'I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.' In the House, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, one of the few Republicans to vote against the measure in the House, also responded to Musk: 'He's right.' In the upper chamber, several Senate Republicans including Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Rick Scott of Florida, and Rand Paul of Kentucky, have called for deeper spending cuts before they will support the bill. If the Senate amends the legislation, it would be sent back to the House for another vote. The bill also includes provisions that have surprised and alarmed some of the President's staunchest allies. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, posted on X that she regretted voting for the bill after discovering a section—buried on pages 278 and 279—that she says strips states of the authority to regulate artificial intelligence for a decade. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights,' she wrote. 'I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' While Trump repeatedly praised Musk during his time in the Administration, reports of internal clashes and disagreements occasionally spilled into public view. Musk previously criticized Trump's protectionist trade policies and tariffs, and his time working for the government was met with uneven results as he came up well short of his goal of slashing $2 trillion from the federal budget. Write to Nik Popli at
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida state budget talks resume with $2.25B tax cut 'framework' in place
Armed with a new 'framework' for a deal, Florida House and Senate negotiators met June 3 to resolve their differences over a 2025-26 state budget. After blowing past their original deadline to pass a budget due to an impasse between House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, and Senate President Ben Albritton, R-Wauchula, over tax cuts, the chambers spent the day trading offers on spending for health care and environmental programs. While some disagreements were resolved, the details on the main source of the dispute – tax cuts – aren't likely to be unveiled for several days. Under the latest framework for a deal reached between the chambers, though, there will be $2.25 billion in recurring tax cuts. That will include eliminating the tax that Florida businesses pay on rents and exempting some items from sales taxes. Exactly which items will be exempt remains to be seen, though a memo announcing the deal last week from Albritton said the exemptions would be 'targeted towards Florida families.' Another plank of the agreement is to put more money – $750 million per year – into a key reserve fund. That move will require lawmakers to put a measure on the 2026 ballot. The House and Senate are poised to take up that measure Thursday. Lawmakers were supposed to pass a budget by May 2, the last day of the regular session, but the dispute led them to extend the session to June 6. The first outline of a broad deal between Perez and Albritton included an outright reduction in the state sales tax, from 6% to 5.75%. The across-the-board sales tax cut was a priority for Perez, who wants to restrain spending by drastically cutting back the amount of revenue available to the state. Albritton was wary of such a move, but he was willing to compromise to pass his top priority – an infusion of resources to rural areas to boost education, health care and transportation programs and projects, dubbed the 'Rural Renaissance.' Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has pressed lawmakers to move forward with cuts to property taxes, threatened to veto any tax cut bill with an overall sales tax reduction. He feared a major sales tax cut would make it harder to pass his preferred property tax reductions. Albritton opted to drop his Rural Renaissance priority to reach a deal with Perez. Now, rank-and-file members will hammer out the details in the coming days. The clock is running: The state's budget year runs July 1 to June 30, and failing to come up with a budget by the end of June could force a partial state government shutdown. Lawmakers also have to build in time for DeSantis to review their plan for any line-item vetoes before he signs it into law. Gray Rohrer is a reporter with the USA TODAY Network-Florida Capital Bureau. He can be reached at grohrer@ Follow him on X: @GrayRohrer. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Sales tax exemptions, reserves part of Florida budget talks
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'More is more': Hakeem Jeffries pushes Democrats to flood the zone in opposition to Trump
WASHINGTON — In the chaotic opening weeks of President Donald Trump's second administration, Democrats debated whether to push back on every norm-shattering executive action, or pick and choose their spots and hope Trump would prove to be his own worst enemy. That debate has been settled, with Democrats aggressively taking on Trump in the courts, in the streets and on social media. At the center of that messaging strategy is House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., who privately has been urging his members to be more visible in their districts and on digital media, and has stepped up his own activity in recent weeks. Rather than his regular, once-a-week news conference in the Capitol, Jeffries now holds as many as three press briefings with reporters each week in Washington. He is also making weekly appearances on popular podcasts outside the traditional political media circuit, including those hosted by Stephen A. Smith, Tony Kornheiser, Jon Stewart, Katie Couric and Scott Galloway. Marking the opening months of the Trump administration, Jeffries delivered a scathing 30-minute rebuke of Trump's '100 days of chaos, 100 days of cruelty and 100 days of corrupt behavior.' He also joined Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., for a 12-hour sit-in on the Capitol steps as they protested Medicaid cuts in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We are in a 'more is more' environment. These aren't ordinary times, and they require an extraordinary response,' Jeffries said in a phone interview with NBC News on Tuesday, one of roughly two dozen digitalmedia interviews he has participated in since February. 'House Democrats are rising to the occasion to meet the moment,' he said, 'but more from all of us will continue to be required until we can definitively end this national nightmare that Donald Trump and House Republicans are visiting on the American people.' After suffering a bruising defeat in the last presidential election and still years out from the next one, Democrats are without a clear national leader. And the party's base has displayed a hunger for a new and younger generation of voices to take charge. That has opened the door for Jeffries, 54, to assume an even bigger role in the party, even as he is still coming into national prominence and — less than three years removed from succeeding Nancy Pelosi as House Democrats' leader — not yet a household name. The flood-the-zone strategy is a marked change for a politician with a reputation for being cautious and calculated. But if that game plan pays off and Democrats manage to win control of the House in next year's midterm elections, Jeffries would be the favorite to become speaker — and the party's most powerful member in Washington. 'Hakeem Jeffries gets it. As he says, we're in an environment where more is more. We need to be flooding the zone. And not only is he doing that, he's encouraging every member of Congress to do that,' Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., an influential progressive in the party, told NBC News in an interview. 'He's meeting the moment,' Khanna added, 'and that's why I say he's, right now, the leader of the Democratic Party.' Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Pa., also praised Jeffries, saying that 'he is out there as much as he possibly can be, while still running a caucus and trying to block horrible legislation that this administration is putting forward.' Jeffries' more aggressive approach comes as the Democratic base has demanded party leaders do more to oppose Trump amid federal layoffs, mass deportations of undocumented immigrants and scores of executive actions that have tested the balance of powers. But it's not clear to what degree Democrats' throw-everything-at-the-wall strategy is breaking through in a cacophonous political environment — one almost exclusively driven and dominated by Trump. And there are still lingering questions about whether the party's current crop of leaders and their tactics are meeting the moment. 'The strategy of quarter one and quarter two was 'let Trump implode.' But you don't win elections, saying how bad that guy is — you have to win on substance,' said one Democratic strategist, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. Still, Jeffries has notched some key symbolic wins. In March, Jeffries unified House Democrats against a Republican-led government funding bill that included a hike to military spending and cuts to domestic spending. Only a single Democrat voted yes. By comparison, Jeffries' counterpart in the Senate, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., faced significant blowback when he and a band of Democrats in the chamber allowed the bill to pass to avert a shutdown. As House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., tried to push through the sweeping domestic policy package before Memorial Day, Jeffries and the Democrats threw up roadblocks to make it as politically painful as possible for Republicans. More than 100 Democrats testified against the Trump bill in the Rules Committee, dragging out the meeting for nearly 22 hours and delaying the process. As they stalled, Jeffries' leadership team urged members to record videos and join livestreams to speak out against the bill, which could boot millions of Americans from Medicaid rolls and off food stamps. Jeffries said he believes Democrats' messaging is breaking through, pointing to polls showing that most Americans disapprove of the way Trump is handling the presidency and a special election victory in Wisconsin in April that allowed liberals to hold their majority on the state Supreme Court. If 'Democrats as a party are truly on the run,' Jeffries said, 'then we'd be losing special elections, not winning them in the way that we are, including most decisively in Wisconsin.' In the wake of Trump's inauguration in January, some Democrats privately grumbled that perhaps Jeffries wasn't the right man for the job. Some pined for Pelosi, who famously clashed with Trump during his first term, lecturing the president in a 2019 White House meeting and ripping up a copy of his State of the Union speech the next year. While not pointing fingers at Jeffries, other Democrats have said the party needs to clearly state what it is for — not just say it's against Trump. 'Voters are turned off by Trump, but they want to know Democrats' affirmative agenda as well,' one Democratic official said. But few Democrats have chosen to directly challenge Jeffries. Ashley Etienne, who served as a top adviser to both Pelosi and Vice President Kamala Harris, has been the exception. Etienne, appearing on a Politico podcast last month, said Trump has given Democrats a tremendous political gift and that Jeffries and other leaders were 'squandering' it. She faulted him for failing to coordinate with outside groups and other elected officials around the country. 'If you don't have coordination, you've just got words on a paper that you're calling talking points,' Etienne told Politico. 'It's meaningless. And I think that's where we are right now.' Jeffries said in his 100-day address that Democrats in the coming months would lay out a 'vision for this country's future that isn't about Donald Trump.' But on Tuesday, he declined to offer any details. Internal discussions on that blueprint are getting underway now, following the House's passage of the massive bill for Trump's agenda. 'There are a variety of issues that distinguish Democrats from Republicans. And as we emerge from the debate around the one big, ugly bill that Donald Trump and his sycophants in Congress are trying to jam down the throat of the American people,' Jeffries said Tuesday, 'we will have the opportunity to draw a clear contrast between our values-based vision for making life better for all Americans and the Republican vision that is designed to benefit their billionaire donors like Elon Musk.' And a Jeffries aide pushed back on Etienne, saying their office holds a weekly meeting with between 60 and 100 surrogates, advocates and grassroots activists, in addition to pushing out regular talking points. On Sunday, Schumer said he and Jeffries had spoken 'about ways our caucuses can fight back together' against the Trump package as the Senate considers it. In March, leaders, working closely with House Democrats' messaging arm, also set up space in the Capitol for social media influencers and advocates to rebut a speech Trump gave to a joint session of Congress. 'We need to be messaging on all mediums, for people to see what we're about,' said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., a 35-year-old progressive star. 'As a millennial, I obviously lean on social media. I tend to participate in the mediums that I myself use,' she continued. 'I don't think that's necessarily about what is best for everybody. … I think it makes us better messengers when we are engaging on the platforms that we use ourselves.' Dean, the Pennsylvania congresswoman who served as one of the Democratic prosecutors in Trump's second impeachment trial, said each lawmaker is figuring out their own unique way to fight back against Trump. A member of the House Judiciary Committee, Dean has held seven town halls this year and said she has focused her messaging on the president's potential ethics violations, including accepting a $400 million jet from Qatar. 'The way I've said it, instead of more is more, is we can't normalize any of this stuff. … This is not normal. I don't want anybody to think that what is going on here is actually normal,' Dean said in an interview. 'The American people are really busy, but they have to be aware of these threats.' This article was originally published on
