Florida state budget talks resume with $2.25B tax cut 'framework' in place
Armed with a new 'framework' for a deal, Florida House and Senate negotiators met June 3 to resolve their differences over a 2025-26 state budget.
After blowing past their original deadline to pass a budget due to an impasse between House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, and Senate President Ben Albritton, R-Wauchula, over tax cuts, the chambers spent the day trading offers on spending for health care and environmental programs.
While some disagreements were resolved, the details on the main source of the dispute – tax cuts – aren't likely to be unveiled for several days. Under the latest framework for a deal reached between the chambers, though, there will be $2.25 billion in recurring tax cuts.
That will include eliminating the tax that Florida businesses pay on rents and exempting some items from sales taxes. Exactly which items will be exempt remains to be seen, though a memo announcing the deal last week from Albritton said the exemptions would be 'targeted towards Florida families.'
Another plank of the agreement is to put more money – $750 million per year – into a key reserve fund. That move will require lawmakers to put a measure on the 2026 ballot. The House and Senate are poised to take up that measure Thursday.
Lawmakers were supposed to pass a budget by May 2, the last day of the regular session, but the dispute led them to extend the session to June 6. The first outline of a broad deal between Perez and Albritton included an outright reduction in the state sales tax, from 6% to 5.75%.
The across-the-board sales tax cut was a priority for Perez, who wants to restrain spending by drastically cutting back the amount of revenue available to the state. Albritton was wary of such a move, but he was willing to compromise to pass his top priority – an infusion of resources to rural areas to boost education, health care and transportation programs and projects, dubbed the 'Rural Renaissance.'
Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has pressed lawmakers to move forward with cuts to property taxes, threatened to veto any tax cut bill with an overall sales tax reduction. He feared a major sales tax cut would make it harder to pass his preferred property tax reductions.
Albritton opted to drop his Rural Renaissance priority to reach a deal with Perez. Now, rank-and-file members will hammer out the details in the coming days.
The clock is running: The state's budget year runs July 1 to June 30, and failing to come up with a budget by the end of June could force a partial state government shutdown. Lawmakers also have to build in time for DeSantis to review their plan for any line-item vetoes before he signs it into law.
Gray Rohrer is a reporter with the USA TODAY Network-Florida Capital Bureau. He can be reached at grohrer@gannett.com. Follow him on X: @GrayRohrer.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Sales tax exemptions, reserves part of Florida budget talks

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ohio legislature closing in on tweaks to voter-approved recreational marijuana laws
Jun. 5—A Frankenstein's monster of sorts is coming alive in Columbus as members of the Ohio House and Senate work to close the gap in their chamber's different approaches to recreational marijuana reform. That gap has existed since Ohio voters approved recreational marijuana at the ballot box in 2023, with the Ohio Senate broadly pushing for more restrictions than the House was willing to tolerate. The House adopted a plan to try to find the middle: Amend Senate Bill 56 to include large portions of House Bill 160 and Senate Bill 86. Here's the broad overview of the hodgepodge piece of legislation, as things stand: — There would be no ban on the sharing of recreational marijuana between of-age adults. — The state's current flat 10% tax would be maintained on recreational sales and expanded onto intoxicating hemp products. Previous plans have sought to raise the tax to 15% or 20%. — Intoxicating hemp products would be banned from retail sales and only be purchasable at dispensaries. That's except for low-dose THC-infused beverages, which could still be sold retail. — The state's current host community financial kickback would be phased out seven years after the bill's effective date. Previous plans have considered cutting out that funding immediately. — The limit of Ohio dispensaries would rise from 350 to 400. — The minimum distance between dispensaries would be one mile. Previous plans have looked at a half-mile limit. — Public use would be allowed in permitting concert venues. Bars and restaurants still would not have the authority to permit marijuana consumption on their patios or outdoor areas. — THC concentration in certain products would be capped at 70%, with Ohio's Division of Cannabis Control having the regulatory power to bump it higher. The bill is likely to see further amendments in the House Judiciary Committee over the coming weeks. Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, who has headed the House's legislative efforts on intoxicating hemp and recreational marijuana, said that he hopes the compromise will be enough to get the Senate on board. The Senate's go-to expert on the subject, Sen. Steve Huffman, R-Tipp City, did not respond before publication when this news outlet asked if he approved of the House's changes. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden Slams Trump's 'Ridiculous' Revenge Probe Targeting Him
President Trump is still trying to turn President Joe Biden's autopen use into a real scandal, announcing an investigation Wednesday into the pen and its role in an alleged coverup of Biden's cognitive decline. The former president immediately slammed the move. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations,' Biden said in a statement. 'Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false.... This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.' Trump has been accusing Biden of using an autopen—essentially a signature machine to aid presidents in signing multiple bills in one sitting—for months now, in an attempt to create both a corruption scandal and a cognitive decline scandal around the former president. At one point, Trump even suggested that Senator Elizabeth Warren was using the autopen in place of Biden. 'With the exception of the RIGGED PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2020, THE AUTOPEN IS THE BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!' Trump posted on Truth Social Wednesday. The autopen is nowhere near as big of a deal as Trump is making it out to be, if at all. Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson, John F. Kennedy, Barack Obama, and Trump himself have all used it, although Trump swears it's 'only for very important papers.' For this to be at the top of Trump's mind while his One Big Beautiful Bill Act is in the midst of Senate gridlock shows how much of a nothingburger this issue is—especially compared to the myriad of scandalous events surrounding Trump's own tenure as president.

Miami Herald
40 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Will Donald Trump Get to Pick New Supreme Court Justices?
President Donald Trump may have the opportunity to appoint new Supreme Court justices during his second term in office, legal experts told Newsweek. Trump reshaped the judiciary during his first term, appointing three justices to the nation's highest court. The next few years may grant him another chance to pick a new justice, who could serve on the court for decades. This could have major implications for public policy on issues related to abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration and the scope of executive authority. Conservative-leaning Justices Clarence Thomas, 76, Samuel Alito, 75, and Chief Justice John Roberts, 70, already face pressure from some on the right to step down over the coming years as Republicans currently hold a trifecta in the federal government. Not only is Trump president, but the GOP holds a 53-seat majority in the Senate. This means no Democrats would be needed to vote in favor of Trump's Supreme Court nominees. Republicans could learn from Democrats about the consequences of their justices not retiring. Late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg faced calls to retire during former President Barack Obama's administration from Democrats who wanted him to pick her replacement, rather than a Republican president potentially getting to do so. However, she declined to do so, continuing to serve during Trump's first term. She died in September 2020—just months before the election in which President Joe Biden would unseat Trump. But it was Trump who got to pick her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, 53, who could continue serving on the court for decades. Conservatives point to that example as to why some of their older justices should retire while Trump can pick their successor. Daniel Urman, a Northeastern University law professor, told Newsweek no one really knows when someone will leave the court, but that Alito and Thomas would be the most likely to retire to ensure someone with similar legal views could replace them on the court. But it may not necessarily be likely because they are now in the majority after years of being dissenting voices they care most about. Pressure from the right may not be convincing to the justices, he said. "Judges and especially Justices are very independent, and I don't think they will be too influenced by the pressure campaign," he said. "It's ultimately a very personal decision and the Ginsburg example is important but she was older and faced more health issues than the current justices." None of the current justices on the court have publicly said they plan to retire anytime soon. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek Thomas could wait until after the 2026 midterms to avoid giving Democrats a motivating issue ahead of the elections. "However, if that happens, President Trump will pick a very young and conservative nominee because in his mind, he got burned with Justice Barrett," he said. "And he wants to put his further imprint on the tenor of the High Court." Although many conservatives may like to see Roberts retire, it's not clear that is likely, Stephen Wermiel, professor of practice in constitutional law at American University, told Newsweek, noting that he is only 70. His willingness to stand up against Trump may also leave a question about whether he would be "less than thrilled to give Trump the opportunity to replace him." Thomas, meanwhile, is only three years away from becoming the longest serving justice in history, and Alito also seemingly "still has a lot to say and do in the conservative Court," Wermiel said. "I think it is uncertain whether Trump will have another Supreme Court vacancy," he added. "It is certainly likely that conservatives will start putting pressure on Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito to retire after the current term so that Trump can appoint younger replacements." Whether a jurist is conservative may not be the only question for Trump, analysts said. Barbara McQuade, former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek Trump could consider loyalty in appointing justices, as some conservatives on the court have been willing to break with him on key issues. "With frustration over some of the decisions by Justices Barrett and Roberts, there would be a push for justices who are not just conservative, but who are loyal to Trump himself," she said. "They could make a significant difference in some of the cases that are percolating up from the lower courts on issues such as birthright citizenship, transgender healthcare, and executive power." Barrett, at times, has been more willing than some of the other conservatives on the bench to break from the president, such as when she opposed his efforts to deport alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and other key cases. Her independent streak has drawn backlash from conservatives aligned with Trump. Urman agreed Trump may be inclined to nominate a loyalist in the future, noting that he "seems to prize loyalty above all other characteristics in his nominees," and that his appointees could be more aligned with Alito or Thomas than Barrett. Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek: "It's likely Trump appoints at least one Supreme Court Justice, and maybe two. The odds increase over his four-year term, especially with Justices Thomas and Alito being in their mid-70s." "Trump's Cabinet and officer appointees during his second term have been largely loyalists without the experience or independent streaks that frustrated him during his first term. His Supreme Court appointment(s) will likely reflect those same values, especially given the importance of the judiciary in standing in the way of his executive orders." Roberts, during a fireside chat in May, reported The Hill: "I'm going out feet first. I say that now. I mean, I'm sure if your health declines, and if you recognize that you're a burden to the court rather than part of an assist to everybody, then, it'll be time to go." It's unclear whether any justices plan to retire in the coming years, but the court will continue weighing in on key legal issues and serve as a check on Trump's executive authority. Related Articles How Democrats Could Woo Elon Musk Back: Fired Trump AideMap Shows Where Prisons Are Expanding as Trump Ramps Up DeportationsSchumer Calls Trump Bill the 'We're All Going To Die Act'John Cornyn's Chances of Losing Republican Primary After 20 Years: Poll 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.