Asteroid's odds of hitting the Moon have now more than doubled
Earth is safe from asteroid 2024 YR4, but fresh looks at the space rock using Webb and other telescopes have now increased its chances of impacting the Moon.
After a brief stint as the highest risk asteroid we know about, 2024 YR4 is now deemed harmless to Earth. In fact, NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) and the ESA's Near-Earth Objects Coordination Centre (NEOCC) now only give a very slim chance of any threat from it. That probability now sits at just 1 in 120,000, but in 2047, a full 15 years after the 2032 encounter that initially raised so many alarms.
However, based on the newest telescopic observations of 2024 YR4, its December 22, 2032 flyby may be the last time it ever passes by our planet.
The extreme sensitivity of the James Webb Space Telescope allowed astronomers to continue to observe the asteroid long after it moved beyond the capabilities of Earth-based telescopes. Using the data collected by Webb, scientists with CNEOS updated their calculations of 2024 YR4's orbital path.
Back at the end of February, when NASA had ruled out any significant danger to Earth from the asteroid, they also determined there was a 1.7 per cent chance it would strike the Moon.
The new data has now increased that probability to 4.3 per cent. That's more than double the initial chance of lunar impact.
The latest probability of impact for asteroid 2024 YR4, as of June 3, 2025, at 4.3 per cent of striking the Moon on December 22, 2032. Along the top of the image is NASA's sequence of plots generated from Jan 27 through Feb 23 showing how the asteroid's closest approach to Earh changed as observations refined its orbit. (NASA CNEOS)
A 4.3 per cent of impact still counts as a 95.7 per cent chance that it will miss the Moon. So, with it having no chance of hitting Earth on that date, 2024 YR4 could simply slip through lunar orbit with no effect at all — just a telescopic curiosity to observe as it passes by.
Still, at an estimated 65-metres wide, when 2024 YR4 was still thought to be a threat to Earth, it was (unofficially) considered to be a 'city-killer' asteroid.
It was highly unlikely to have hit anywhere inhabited. However, if it did, that size of asteroid would have caused extensive damage on a local level. For any city in the impact zone, the effects would have been catastrophic.
An estimate of the size and shape of asteroid 2024 YR4 based on telescopic observations. (NOIRLab)
For comparison, the 20-metre asteroid that exploded over Cheylabinsk on February 15, 2013 produced an airburst — a pressurized wave of air — that shattered windows across the city when it reached the ground. Tiny fragments of the asteroid rained down over the area, with the largest piece, roughly 60 cm wide and with a mass of around 300 kg, punching a hole in the frozen surface of nearby Lake Chebarkul.
The airburst that would result from 65-metre 2024 YR4 exploding would be powerful enough to level buildings. While not large enough to produce a crater, the shattered asteroid would likely include several larger pieces that would cause further damage and injuries upon striking the ground.
If 2024 YR4 does hit the Moon in 2032, with no atmosphere to slow it down, it would impact with full force, travelling at nearly 13 kilometres per second, or over 46,000 km/h.
The Waning Gibbous phase of the Moon on the night of December 22, 2032. (NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio)
If it strikes somewhere in the dark region of the surface, the impact will certainly be noticeable from Earth. It wouldn't be powerful enough to affect the Moon's orbit, or knock any significant pieces off the Moon. It would certainly leave behind a crater that an orbiting spacecraft (such as NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) would be able to find, though.
According to NASA, as of now, 2024 YR4 has moved beyond even Webb's ability to observe it, as it is now too close to the Sun. The next 'encounter' with the asteroid will be in 2028, with its closest pass at that time being around 20 times farther than the Moon. Telescopes should be able to find and track it, though, adding more to our knowledge of its orbit, and potentially locking down whether it will hit or miss the Moon when it returns four years later.
(Thumbnail image was produced by the author, using photo-editing software, by adding a 3D computer model of asteroid 2024 YR4 to a background image of the Moon taken during NASA's Artemis 1 mission.)
Click here to view the video
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hurricane forecasters will go without a key tool this season
For the past four years, a fleet of drone vessels has purposefully steered into the heart of hurricanes to gather information on a storm's wind speeds, wave heights and, critically, the complex transfer of heat and moisture between the ocean and the air right above it. These small boats from California-based company Saildrone also film harrowing footage from the ocean surface in the middle of nature's most powerful tempests—videos that are scientifically useful and have also gone viral, giving ordinary people windows into storms. Importantly, Saildrone vessels were being used by federal scientists to improve forecast and warning accuracy. But they won't be in forecasters' suite of tools this year. The company 'was unable to bid' on a contract for this season, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration spokesperson Keeley Belva told CNN. The reason why concerns the timing of NOAA's solicitation for this season's contract, according to a NOAA employee speaking on condition of anonymity. NOAA sent out its request for contract proposals too late, preventing Saildrone not just from bidding, but from pre-deploying its fleet to multiple launching ports on the Atlantic and Gulf Coast in time for hurricane season. It's another example among many of the ways the Trump administration has fumbled storm preparedness and response efforts as the season begins, leading to fears of less accurate hurricane projections compared to recent years. The Saildrone news came just as NOAA was roiled by staffing cuts through firings, early retirements and other incentives used to shrink the agency. Morale has plummeted, especially in the wake of the Trump administration's budget proposal that would eliminate the entire branch of the agency that does oceanic and atmospheric research, which could wipe out hurricane research activities if enacted. Even if it isn't, the Trump administration could use other means to implement such steep cuts. Belva did not provide details when asked for specifics about the issuance date for the proposals request and the reasons for the delay given the start of hurricane season on June 1. She cited 'ongoing' discussions with Saildrone about potential future deployments with NOAA. 'NOAA continues to explore the use of other uncrewed systems in meeting the agency's data needs within hard-to-access regions of tropical cyclones during the 2025 season,' Belva added. 'The agency is preparing for the use of uncrewed surface vehicle deployments with industry partners for the 2026 season.' NOAA will still field new technologies this season to gain a better understanding of how hurricanes work and how strong individual storms are, including ultra-high altitude weather balloons, said Joe Cione, the lead meteorologist for emerging technologies at the agency's Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory. But all of these new tools are aerial assets, not ocean-based, as the saildrones were. With saildrones missing in action this hurricane season, meteorologists will lack continuous, direct observations of hurricanes' strongest winds near the surface of the ocean and temperatures of the warm water that fuels the storms. The agency will still use dropsondes—bundles of sensors that can measure the fierce winds as they fall through the storm after being dropped out of hurricane hunter aircraft. But they only offer a glimpse into a blip of time at a particular location in a storm, whereas the saildrones can loiter for hours or longer, providing rare observations from the lowest level of the atmosphere, said NOAA oceanographer Gregory Foltz. Saildrone observations were set to be piped directly into forecast models through newer, faster processes this year with the goal of boosting accuracy, Foltz said. In addition, forecasters at the National Hurricane Center would have been able to use saildrone data to better determine a storm's structure and intensity when issuing an advisory. The boats had another unexpected benefit: Their dizzying videos helped warn people in harm's way of a storm's ferocity, Foltz said. The videos may play a role in peoples' decisions to evacuate by showing how severe conditions are, he said. NOAA's aerial technology this season will hopefully bolster the data forecasters have to work with. During the next three weeks, NOAA's hurricane hunters will be conducting clear air tests of some of those new platforms. Cione, who focuses on identifying promising technologies for weather research and forecasting at the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, touted airborne drones like the Black Swift SØ drone. It weighs just three pounds and will be deployed into storms from the belly of a NOAA WP-3 hurricane hunter aircraft. These drones can fly low in a storm for extended periods, recording winds, temperatures and other parameters in the little-sampled lowest 1,500 feet of a hurricane. 'Our situational awareness goes way up,' Cione said, when readings come back from within this layer of air. Researchers will also be using tiny, light instrument packets known as 'Streamsondes' that can be dropped from an aircraft. These fall more slowly than the standard dropsondes and therefore gather more data. This year, Cione says, researchers may work to 'swarm' Streamsondes, or drop as many as 50 of them in a matter of minutes, into an area of interest within a storm to pinpoint what a hurricane's winds and air pressure are, for example. None of these aerial platforms will provide the clear video feeds that people may have become accustomed to from the saildrones the past four years, though, nor can they reliably measure winds and sea surface temperatures for long periods of time. Ultimately, Foltz said, researchers want to get aerial and ocean-based observations at the same time for a more three-dimensional glimpse into the inner workings of nature's most powerful storms. That includes uncrewed underwater drones collecting data beneath storms, he added. 'We need everything in the atmosphere and the ocean together,' Foltz said. 'That's a big goal of ours.' That won't happen this year, but assuming NOAA's research division still exists next year, it could get closer to being realized in 2026. 'You don't know how important something is until you take it away,' Foltz said of the saildrones' data contributions.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Monster black hole jet from the early universe is basking in the 'afterglow' of the Big Bang
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Astronomers have captured a ghostly image of an ancient supermassive black hole shooting a giant energy jet into the early universe. The ethereal structure is only visible thanks to the "afterglow" of the Big Bang and a crucial NASA space telescope that could soon be prematurely switched off forever. The striking image shows the light of quasar J1610+1811, shining from around 11.6 billion light-years from Earth, during the "cosmic noon" — a period of the universe between 2 billion and 3 billion years after the Big Bang. Quasars are supermassive black holes that shoot out giant, lightsaber-like beams of energy perpendicular to their swirling accretion disks. However, until now, researchers have not had a proper look at J1610+1811's energy jet, despite discovering the object back in 2018. The new image was captured with NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory, which is fine-tuned to hunt some of the most powerful wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. The research was uploaded to the preprint server arXiv on April 13 and has been accepted for future publication in The Astrophysical Journal. The researchers also presented their findings at the 246th meeting of the American Astronomical Society, held between June 8 and 12 in Anchorage, Alaska. Using the new image as a guideline, the team calculated that the quasar's jet is more than 300,000 light-years long, which is around three times wider than the Milky Way. High-energy particles within the jet are also likely shooting from the black hole at between 92% and 98% the speed of light. "The jet from J1610+1811 is remarkably powerful, carrying roughly half as much energy as the intense light from hot gas orbiting the black hole," which is among the fastest and hottest matter in the universe, NASA representatives wrote in a statement. Related: Behold the first direct image of a supermassive black hole spewing a jet of particles Despite their immense power, jets like J1610+1811's are hard to detect because they are often pointed away from Earth, which makes them appear much dimmer thanks to special relativity. However, Chandra could see this jet because it is "being illuminated by the leftover glow from the Big Bang itself," NASA representatives wrote. This afterglow is the cosmic microwave background (CMB), leftover radiation from just after the cosmos-birthing explosion that permeates the entire universe. During cosmic noon, the CMB was much more dense than the version we can currently detect from Earth, which is what creates the static heard on radios and seen on old televisions. As electrons from the black hole's jets shoot toward Earth, they collide with photons within the CMB and accelerate these light particles to become X-rays, which can be spotted by Chandra. Without the high density of the CMB during this period, the quasar would not have shone in X-ray light and the image would not have been possible. During the study, the researchers captured less-detailed images of another quasar, J1405+0415, which is also shining at us from the cosmic noon. The new findings could help shed light on why quasars and other supermassive black holes grew faster and larger during this period than at any other point in the universe's history. Chandra was launched in July 1999 and has since revolutionized X-ray astronomy. Today, it is still making new discoveries, including a fracture in a "cosmic bone" and never-before-seen types of pulsars. However, despite having an estimated 10 years of operational lifespan remaining, the space telescope's future is in doubt, due to some NASA funding problems in 2024 and the Trump administration's proposed budget cuts for 2026, which would be the largest in the agency's history. If the latest cuts are approved, Chandra will likely be switched off permanently. The loss of Chandra would be equivalent to an "extinction-level event" for X-ray astronomy in the United States, according to the website RELATED STORIES —Biggest black hole jets ever seen are as long as 140 Milky Ways —Scientists make lab-grown black hole jets —'Very rare' black hole energy jet discovered tearing through a spiral galaxy shaped like our own "I'm horrified by the prospect of Chandra being shut down prematurely," Andrew Fabian, an X-ray astronomer at the University of Cambridge, told Science magazine in 2024. "If you start doing deep cuts so abruptly, you will lose a whole generation [of X-ray astronomers]," Elisa Costantini, an astronomer at the Netherlands Institute for Space Research, added in an interview with Science. It will leave "a hole in our knowledge" of high-energy astrophysics, she said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Could the answers to cancer lie in space? Why off-Earth research is heating up
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. There's a good reason why astronauts tend not to stay on the International Space Station longer than six months: Microgravity is not kind to human bodies. Among other effects, it can flatten eyeballs and swell up fingers and faces, causing blinding headaches as blood, organs and cells react in ways they wouldn't on Earth. For the same reasons, though, space may be the perfect place to study cancer — and someday even treat it. This year, tumors grown in laboratories on Earth are headed to the ISS as part of the first research project to use artificial organs for cancer testing in space. Scientists at Wake Forest University are working to develop cancer-screening tests that are faster and more sensitive. But the greater significance of their experiment may be as a trial run for a raft of other biomedical projects planned for low-gravity environments that spur cell growth. "Microgravity is an accelerator of conditions. Every disease, every phenotype — everything we want to study can happen faster in less time," says Davide Marotta, program director for In-Space Biomanufacturing at the ISS National Laboratory. "Instead of waiting 10 months, you can go up [to space] in 10 days" to see the same biological effects, he adds. On Earth, gravity slows the development of cancer because cells normally need to be attached to a surface in order to function and grow. But in space, cancer cell clusters can expand in all directions as bubbles, like budding yeast or grapes, said Shay Soker, chief science program officer at Wake Forest's Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Since bubbles grow larger and more quickly in space, researchers can more easily test substances clinging to the edge of the larger bubbles, too. Scientists at the University of Notre Dame are taking advantage of this quirk to develop an in-space cancer test that needs just a single drop of blood. The work builds on a series of bubble-formation experiments that have already been conducted on the ISS. "If cancer screening using our bubble technology in space is democratized and made inexpensive, many more cancers can be screened, and everyone can benefit," said Tengfei Luo, a Notre Dame researcher who pioneered the technology, speaking to the ISS' magazine, Upward. "It's something we may be able to integrate into annual exams. It sounds far-fetched, but it's achievable." Protecting astronauts from the health risks of space travel is another key priority for biomedical researchers working with NASA. On the ISS and other space missions, astronauts not only have to deal with all of the physiological changes associated with microgravity, but also the dangers of cosmic radiation, which can mutate DNA in human cells. Astronaut Frank Rubio holds the NASA record for the longest continuous time spent in space at 371 days, with Russian cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov holding the overall record with 437 consecutive days — a venture he volunteered for to prove humans could survive the time it would take to travel to and from Mars. But NASA's general rule is that astronauts should try to minimize their time in orbit to reduce health risks. "For astronauts returning to Earth, they have difficulty just moving around," said Ben Soares, who studies space medicine at Boston University. "Even sitting in a chair involves muscles. Everything just falls apart when you don't use it." A study of astronaut twins Scott and Mark Kelly found that Scott aged faster than his brother, who remained on Earth while Scott was in space. Microgravity also altered Scott's genetics, switching certain genes on or off. Cancer risks are likely higher for astronauts, too, and not only because radiation can cause mutations in DNA. Cell membranes are held up by small proteins called microtubules that keep the cell's shape rigid, but when the gravitational force changes — even though gravity on the ISS is only 10% weaker than on Earth — the cell's structure changes with it. On Earth, microtubule spindles ensure that a cell's chromosome replicates the structure. But microgravity distorts microtubules and can lead to irregular cell division, making cancer more likely. "You may think [astronauts] are just floating around in space, but all those microtubules, and the major deformations in the outer membranes, change rapidly when there's microgravity exposure," said Soares. "People are wondering more and more whether changes are happening at an actual genetic level." Again, though, these genetic effects also create unique opportunities for researchers seeking new diagnostic tests and treatments. For example, if scientists can pinpoint which genes are switched off in microgravity, then they might be able to activate them or deactivate them artificially for cancer patients on Earth. Pharmaceutical research could benefit, too. In orbit, drug companies could drastically speed up a review and testing process that usually takes many years before the Food and Drug Administration approves the treatment. As the cost of in-orbit testing falls, it could become a key way to quickly evaluate all sorts of medications without having to spend years waiting to see if they work on diverse populations, according to the ISS National Laboratory's Marotta. "Every person has a different response to the same drug," Marotta said. "We have drug resistance, failure of therapies, etc. Meanwhile, space costs will be lower and lower in the future." Chemotherapy patients could save precious time, too. In normal gravity, they typically have to spend a half-hour hooked up to a needle before the medicine begins to take effect, because most drugs don't dissolve easily in water. But scientists at Merck have discovered that, in space, their widely used cancer drug pembrolizumab, or Keytruda, can be administered through a simple injection, because large crystalline molecules that would normally clump together are suspended in microgravity. So far, though, Merck hasn't been able to find a way to administer its drug via injection on Earth. Similarly, the blood test developed by Notre Dame researchers only works in space, with no ability yet to simulate low gravity effectively here on Earth. These limitations raise the question of whether patients might someday be treated in space to take advantage of lower gravity. It's not a completely far-fetched idea, according to Soker, though he acknowledged that it is prohibitively expensive for now. The ISS currently houses just seven astronauts, and SpaceX apparently charges space tourists approximately $55 million for a three- to eight-day trip into low Earth orbit. The hope is that those costs will come down drastically in the future. Related Stories: — How can space travel lead to medical breakthroughs? Veteran astronaut explains — 'Them space drugs cooked real good:' Varda Space just made an HIV medicine in Earth orbit — Can we live long and prosper in space? The astronaut health dilemma The next big step, according to Soker, would be an orbiting facility dedicated to researching treatments for cancer and other debilitating conditions. "Maybe we can actually figure out which patients are the ones who are going to benefit from the space environment," he says. "If you're going to put several million dollars [into cancer treatment], I mean, you need to actually be sure that this is going to be helpful for you." Someday, microgravity could even help patients recovering from surgery heal faster than they would on Earth, Soker added. "Wound healing in high pressure is faster. That's the hyperbaric treatment for wounds." Before they can dream of a new generation of orbiting laboratories, though, researchers are under pressure to make the most of the one they have now — but won't be able to use for much longer. The ISS is set for destruction in 2031, after more than three decades in orbit, giving scientists only a handful of additional years to conduct their tests in the hopes of medical breakthroughs. "It's run its course," says Soker. The key task now, he said, is for teams like his to deliver practical research results that could unlock funding for the next phase of biomedical research in space. Researchers are already benefiting from a recent increase in support thanks to the U.S. government's Cancer Moonshot Initiative, which funnels research dollars into techniques to help Earth-bound patients as well as astronauts. For the Wake Forest experiment, which is scheduled to launch next spring, scientists will cut out two sections of a cancer tumor from around 20 patients. One sample will stay on Earth while the other heads to the ISS, with scientists observing the difference. The testing will be completed within a week, to avoid any interference from cosmic radiation. If successful, Soker said, it could set the stage for diagnostic cancer tests in space available to the general population — perhaps on a biomedical space station that could launch after the planned demise of the ISS. "Can we actually design a special cancer space station that will be dedicated to cancer and maybe other diseases?" Shoker asked, answering his question in the affirmative. "Pharmaceutical companies that have deep pockets would certainly support that program."
