logo
Did a Human Write That? Detect AI Writing With These Tips

Did a Human Write That? Detect AI Writing With These Tips

CNET5 hours ago
AI has exploded in popularity over the last few years, thanks in no small part to large learning models like ChatGPT. As AI has evolved, it's become an easy way to whip up emails, and for students to write their assignments. The days of paying someone else to write their essay are over, when there are AI writing tools that can do the deed in mere moments.
As a professor of strategic communications, I encounter students using AI tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly and EssayGenius on a regular basis. It's usually easy to tell when a student has used one of these tools to draft their entire work. The telltale signs include ambiguous language and a super annoying tendency for AI to spit out text with the assignment prompt featured broadly.
Don't miss any of CNET's unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add us as a preferred Google source on Chrome.
How to tell if it was written by AI
Some of the most common ways to tell if something was written using AI are:
Key terms from your assignment prompt are used repeatedly.
Inaccurate facts are included, thanks to the AI chatbot hallucinating.
Sentences don't sound natural.
Explanations are generic and repetitive, rather than actually leading anywhere.
The tone doesn't sound like their usual writing style.
For example, a student might use ChatGPT -- an AI chatbot that uses large language model learning and a conversational question and answer format to provide query results -- to write a short essay response to a prompt by simply copying and pasting the essay question into the tool.
Take this prompt: In 300 words or fewer, explain how this SWAT and brand audit will inform your final pitch.
This is ChatGPT's result:
Screenshot by Rachel Kane/CNET
I have received responses like this, or those very close to it, a few times in my tenure as a teacher, and one of the most recognizable red flags is the amount of instances in which key terms from the prompt are used in the final product.
Students don't usually repeat key terms from the prompt in their work in this way, and the results read closer to old-school SEO-driven copy meant to define these terms rather than a unique essay meant to demonstrate an understanding of the subject matter.
But can teachers use AI tools to catch students using AI tools? I devised some ways to be smarter in spotting artificial intelligence in papers.
Catch AI cheaters
Here's how to use AI tools to catch cheaters in your class.
Understand AI capabilities
There are AI tools on the market that can scan an assignment and its grading criteria to provide a fully written, cited and complete piece of work in a matter of moments. Some of these tools include GPTZero and Smodin. Familiarizing yourself with tools like these is the first step in the war against AI-driven integrity violations.
Do as the cheaters do
Before the semester begins, copy and paste all your assignments into a tool like ChatGPT and ask it to do the work for you. When you have an example of the type of results it provides specifically in response to your assignments, you'll be better equipped to catch AI-written answers. You could also use a tool designed specifically to spot AI writing in papers.
Get a real sample of writing
At the beginning of the semester, require your students to submit a simple, fun and personal piece of writing to you. The prompt should be something like "200 words on what your favorite toy was as a child," or "Tell me a story about the most fun you ever had." Once you have a sample of the student's real writing style in hand, you can use it later to have an AI tool review that sample against what you suspect might be AI-written work.
Ask for a rewrite
If you suspect a student of using AI to cheat on their assignment, take the submitted work and ask an AI tool to rewrite the work for you. In most cases I've encountered, an AI tool will rewrite its own work in the laziest manner possible, substituting synonyms instead of changing any material elements of the "original" work.
Here's an example:
Screenshot by Rachel Kane/CNET
Screenshot by Rachel Kane/CNET
Now, let's take something an actual human (me) wrote, my CNET bio:
Screenshot by Rachel Kane/CNET
The phrasing is changed, extracting much of the soul in the writing and replacing it with sentences that are arguably more clear and straightforward. There are also more additions to the writing, presumably for further clarity.
Can you always tell if something was written using AI?
The most important part about catching cheaters who use AI to do their work is having a reasonable amount of evidence to show the student and the administration at your school if it comes to that. Maintaining a skeptical mind when grading is vital, and your ability to demonstrate ease of use and understanding with these tools will make your case that much stronger.
Good luck out there in the new AI frontier, fellow teachers, and try not to be offended when a student turns in work written by a robot collaborator. It's up to us to make the prospect of learning more alluring than the temptation to cheat.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Reserve Vice Chair Pushes for Small Crypto Stakes at the Fed
Federal Reserve Vice Chair Pushes for Small Crypto Stakes at the Fed

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Federal Reserve Vice Chair Pushes for Small Crypto Stakes at the Fed

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman thinks Fed staff should be able to dip a toe into crypto literally. Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium on Tuesday, she argued examiners need real-life experience with digital assets if they're going to regulate them effectively. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. Our approach should consider allowing Federal Reserve staff to hold de minimus amounts of crypto, Bowman said, comparing it to learning a sport. I wouldn't trust someone to teach me to ski if they'd never put on skis. She stressed this isn't about encouraging speculation, but about giving examiners the hands-on perspective they need. Bowman also warned that strict investment bans might be scaring off talented people who could help the Fed shape crypto oversight. Her comments come just as the landscape is shifting. Congress recently passed the GENIUS Act, aimed at stablecoins, and the Fed shut down its Biden-era crypto monitoring program last week. Trump administration officials now say they want a clearer, more permanent regulatory framework. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Treasury Secretary Signals Bold Intel Move as Washington Tightens Grip on Chip Race
Treasury Secretary Signals Bold Intel Move as Washington Tightens Grip on Chip Race

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Treasury Secretary Signals Bold Intel Move as Washington Tightens Grip on Chip Race

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) shares shot up 10% Tuesday after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed the Trump Administration is seriously considering taking a 10% stake in the company. The idea is to funnel CHIPS Act funds into Intel to help it stand up a stronger U.S. foundry, which Bessent called essential for national security. He stressed this isn't about Washington meddling in Intel's operations but about stabilizing the business so it can compete. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. Bessent said the U.S. can't afford to keep relying on Taiwan, which makes 99% of the world's most advanced chips. Covid was a beta test for what being cut off to key industry supplies looks like, he told CNBC, warning that if America doesn't onshore chips, rare earths, and other critical sectors by 2029, we have failed. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed the talks, adding the U.S. would become Intel's biggest shareholder if the deal happens. He also weighed in on Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and AMD (NASDAQ:AMD). Under a new deal, both firms must hand over 15% of revenue from previously banned chips sold to China. That includes Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308. Bessent said those chips aren't a security risk, but Nvidia's upcoming B30A will need a license before being exported. For investors, Washington is getting more involved in the chip race, and that means both opportunity and new rules for U.S. tech giants.

$11 Billion Power Move? Thoma Bravo Targets Dayforce in One of Its Biggest Tech Deals Ever
$11 Billion Power Move? Thoma Bravo Targets Dayforce in One of Its Biggest Tech Deals Ever

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

$11 Billion Power Move? Thoma Bravo Targets Dayforce in One of Its Biggest Tech Deals Ever

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Thoma Bravo is deep in talks to buy human capital software provider Dayforce (NYSE:DAY) in what could become one of the private equity giant's largest-ever acquisitions. The deal, pitched at $70 a share, would value Dayforce at around $11.2 billionroughly 32% above its last closing price before the news leaked. While the offer is still non-binding, the jump in Dayforce's stock on Wednesdayup as much as 3.6%suggests the market is betting a deal could materialize. Shares still ended below the offer price, implying some skepticism around final execution. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Sign with DAY. Dayforce, formerly known as Ceridian, sells workforce software that powers recruiting, payroll, and employee development for industries ranging from healthcare to financial services. It's a solid businessrevenue is up, margins have improvedbut headwinds from corporate layoffs have begun to slow client growth. The company, which still carries about $1.2 billion in debt, was taken public in 2018 after being backed by Thomas H. Lee Partners and Fidelity National. That PE DNA makes a take-private logical. But Dayforce isn't cheap, and closing such a large deal in today's funding environment would be no small feat. For Thoma Bravo, though, this is right on script. Despite a more cautious PE landscape, the firm has stayed aggressive in enterprise software. In 2024 alone, it's struck a $10.6 billion deal for Boeing's digital flight assets, acquired Olo for $2 billion, and is reportedly eyeing Verint Systems next. CEO Orlando Bravo has made it clear he's still shopping, and Dayforce could slot neatly into a growing portfolio of recurring-revenue tech bets. Still, while talks are advanced, Dayforce noted there's no certainty a deal will be finalized. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store