Zelensky claims Russia ‘complicating' ceasefire efforts as PM meets allies
The coalition of the willing, the alliance which is planning to police a future peace deal in Ukraine, will meet on Sunday afternoon amid reports Donald Trump favours a Russian land grab to end the war.
Following the Alaska summit between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin on Friday, the American leader suggested he wants to move straight to a full peace deal, rather than negotiating a ceasefire first.
The shift in Mr Trump's position appears to echo the Russians' refusal to agree to ceasefire before engaging in peace talks.
Several news outlets have cited sources which claimed that during the negotiations Mr Putin demanded full control of Donetsk and Luhansk – two occupied Ukrainian regions – as a condition for ending the war.
In exchange, he would give up other Ukrainian territories held by Russian troops.
Other outlets reported that Mr Trump is inclined to support the plan, and will speak to Mr Zelensky about it when they meet in the Oval Office.
Writing on social media on Sunday morning, the Ukrainian leader railed against Russia's refusal to lay down arms temporarily before agreeing to end the war.
Mr Zelensky said: 'We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing.
'This complicates the situation.'
He added: 'If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades.
'But together we are working for peace and security. Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war.'
The Prime Minister, alongside French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz, will host the coalition of the willing on Sunday afternoon.
The video conference will see allies who plan to keep the peace in Ukraine gather ahead of Mr Zelensky's visit to Washington on Monday.
The Ukrainian leader is expected to attend the Sunday afternoon video call, which is scheduled to take place at 2pm UK time.
Friday's summit between Mr Trump and Mr Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any commitment towards a ceasefire.
The Russian president described it as 'timely' and 'useful' after he left.
Mr Trump afterwards suggested it was time for Mr Zelensky to make a deal to end the war.
Sir Keir commended Mr Trump's 'pursuit of an end to the killing', but insisted Ukraine's leader must not be excluded from future talks to broker a peace in Ukraine.
The Prime Minister and European leaders appeared increasingly confident that Mr Trump will offer a 'security guarantee' of air support to back up allied troops on the ground in Ukraine, should they be deployed to keep the peace.
Experts have warned the face-to-face summit has risked legitimising the Russian leader, who has been made a pariah by the international community for invading Ukraine.
Mr Zelensky has warned Russia may ramp up its strikes against his country in the coming days 'in order to create more favourable political circumstances for talks with global actors'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
24 minutes ago
- Spectator
The uncomfortable history of Narva
The Alaska talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin might have happened on American territory, but the symbolism of their location is a win for the Russian President. Alaska is considerably closer to Russia than it is to the rest of mainland America, and it was once a Russian territory. Putin was returning to a land previously conquered by his people. On Russia's opposite border, to the west, it is Russia's imperial past, and Putin's twisted view of shared history, that worries Europeans. Narva, Estonia's third largest city, is a strange place, and seems even stranger since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The Narva river – from which the city gets its name – separates Estonia from Russia; two fortresses stand across each other imposing on the landscape, the 13th century Hermann Castle on the Estonian side and the 15th century Ivangorod Fortress on the Russian side. Two other symbols of Russian influence are hard to miss in the town: the Orthodox Church, and a now abandoned 19th century textiles factory that suffered in the years following the collapse of the USSR. Over 90 per cent of Narva's population speak Russian. This worries many Estonians, who think Putin could invade under the pretext of protecting this minority. For years, Estonia's Russian minority wasn't considered problematic. That has changed since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Estonia has begun phasing out Russian as a first language in education and it plans to remove the voting rights of foreign citizens in local elections. In Narva, long queues now form at the aptly named 'Friendship Bridge' – a 162 mile Soviet-era bridge that links Estonia to Russia. Vehicle travel was banned in 2024, and it can take hours to cross now. In recent weeks, Estonia has begun installing metal gates on the bridge for further deterrence. One-hundred-and-thirty miles away in Tallinn, Estonia's modern, bustling and charming capital, opposition to Russia is hard to avoid. The Russian Embassy is in the centre of town and the makeshift riot fences, protecting the building from protestors, are plastered with posters. 'Putin is a Killer' stands out among a sea of red handprints and pictures of the late Alexei Navalny. A smattering of protestors gather every week outside the embassy to protest. This isn't new. It started in 2008 following the Russian invasion of Georgia, but has grown in size since. There are many reminders of Estonia's Soviet past. One of the most imposing buildings on the Tallinn skyline is the high-rise Hotel Viru. The rectangular 1970s block is a prefab building built in 1972 that stands imposing on the outskirts of the old city walls. The hotel is still in use, but it's more popular for the secrets held on its top floor – once upon a time it was the unofficial headquarters of the KGB in Estonia. The floor was out of bounds and, with only foreign dignitaries and visitors allowed to stay in the hotel. It was an open secret that rooms were bugged. In the confusion of the early 1990s as the USSR fell, KGB operatives slowly snuck out of the hotel. Locals were so terrified that it was weeks before they accessed the top floors to discover the spying devices and records left behind. Earlier this year when I toured the building, my Estonian guide told me he felt he could say 'with certainty' that 'the USSR is back'. It sounded like hyperbole, but only this week Estonia declared a Russian diplomat persona non grata. The Baltic memory of Russian espionage runs deep. Estonia became an independent sovereign nation in 1991 for only the second time in its history; both times bookended by Russia, with the former being the collapse of the Russian Empire in 1919. The pattern is the same for its Baltic neighbours Lithuania and Latvia. This history of Russian interference in the Baltics is why Estonians are still uneasy. The Baltic governments of the post-Soviet era were determined not to repeat the mistakes of their first period of collective independence. The countries were swallowed up by the USSR during the second world war and debate still rages between the Baltics, who view it as an occupation, and the Russians, who argue they protected them from the Nazis. The violence and oppression across the Baltics at the hands of the Soviets was so bad that many citizens quietly celebrated when the Nazis occupied them for several years in the middle of the war, though this isn't something many would be keen to highlight. The post-war period heralded almost half a century of Soviet occupation. Once the USSR fell, the Baltic nations lobbied, and fiercely planned, to turn west – and, less than a decade later, they joined both the EU and Nato on the same day. This is what has set the three nations apart from other former parts of the USSR which have faced continuous Russian interference – namely Ukraine and Georgia. The Russian threat for the Baltics remains, however. Estonia and Latvia are vulnerable across their eastern borders with Russia; Lithuania's longest border is with Belarus; and the exclave of Kaliningrad (between Lithuania and Poland) is just 40 miles from the Russian-backed autocracy. An incursion across this strip, the Suwalki Gap, would cut the Baltic nations off from the rest of Europe in one fell swoop. Half a century of Baltic history was determined by the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, the carving up of Europe between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. Many Europeans have long feared that Putin will seek to do similar with Trump. For Estonians, suddenly Alaska doesn't seem so far away.
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Hungarian opposition leader demands Russia refrain from interference
BUDAPEST, Aug 17 (Reuters) - Hungarian opposition leader Peter Magyar has sought assurances from Russia that it will refrain from interference in his country's politics, saying there would be no scope for meaningful cooperation without respecting its sovereignty. Earlier this week, Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) published a statement describing Magyar as being loyal to "globalist elites" and alleging that the European Commission was considering "regime change in Budapest." Magyar, whose Tisza Party is ahead of Prime Minister Viktor Orban's Fidesz in most polls ahead of parliamentary elections due next spring, published an open letter to Russia's ambassador in Hungary, asking what was the intended effect of the SVR statement. "I demand clear assurances that the Russian Federation will refrain from any actions that could be deemed as interference in Hungary's domestic politics, including disinformation campaigns, cyber operations or the intimidation of politicians and citizens," Magyar said in the letter published on Facebook on Sunday. The Russian Embassy in Budapest did not immediately respond to emailed questions for comment. In power since 2010, Orban has been criticised by some fellow EU leaders for his government's warm ties with Moscow and opposition to military aid for Ukraine. Orban has also accused EU leaders of plotting to topple him. Magyar, a former government insider, has previously said he would strive for "pragmatic relations" with Russia, which supplies Hungary with most of its energy and is also involved in an expansion of its Paks nuclear plant. He said the SVR's statement showed Russia was trying to intervene directly to sway voters in Hungary, which is a member of the NATO military alliance but which under Orban has refused to send weapons to neighbouring Ukraine. "Hungary's sovereignty and the inviolability of our democratic processes cannot be negotiable. Adherence to these principles is the minimum requirement for any meaningful bilateral cooperation between our countries," Magyar said.
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Starmer taught Zelensky to speak Trump
It is hard to overplay the sense of despondency and sheer dread felt by Downing Street insiders as they watched Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky trade barbs in the Oval Office. Just 24 hours earlier, on Feb 27, Sir Keir Starmer had pulled off what the media and Labour loyalists alike saw as a diplomatic triumph with his first meeting with the US president. Weeks of preparation had been invested in how the Prime Minister handled that moment, how to strike the balance of massaging Mr Trump's ego while landing the critical UK talking points. The result was delight from the US president at a state visit invitation, support for Sir Keir's deal to give away the Chagos Islands and warm words on a trade deal from the world's most powerful man. How differently Mr Zelensky's meeting went the next day, when he was harangued by JD Vance, the US-vice president, for not saying thank you to America, as Ukraine's allies looked on, horrified. The contrast of those two meetings – and the way the spiralling row in the latter undercut the progress made on Ukraine in the former – left Sir Keir and his team kicking themselves. Why had they not done more to prepare the Ukrainian president as they had their own Prime Minister? Senior Number 10 figures have since told The Telegraph they felt they dropped the ball. As a result, a new approach is being taken by London and other European capitals – one that comes to fruition on Monday when Mr Zelensky travels to Washington not alone but alongside his allies. A similar trip had almost happened within days of the Oval Office skirmish as Sir Keir, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and others tried to repair the damage done. But those attempts to get Mr Zelensky back to the White House with European leaders in tow ultimately did not come to fruition. The Prime Minister ended up doing something else to project a similar message: Hugging Mr Zelensky outside the black Number 10 front door in an image that showed he was standing by Kyiv's side. Since then, behind the scenes, there has been a deliberate attempt from British ministers and officials to teach the Ukrainian leader how to 'speak Trump'. It is notable that now Mr Zelensky often begins conversations with American counterparts with a word of thanks for all the US support in countering Russia – a nod to what Mr Vance had demanded. Jonathan Powell, Sir Tony Blair's former chief of staff, who, as Sir Keir's national security adviser, is one of the most influential figures in British foreign policy, has worked closely with the Ukrainians on ways they can best achieve their goals with a MAGA White House. Sir Keir's inner circle believe – with some evidence to back up their case – that they have sussed out the best strategy for trying to influence Mr Trump from the outside. The touchstones are: Do not bite on every provocative statement he makes; Do not publicly try to bounce the US president into a corner (for fear of a backlash by pricking his ego). Instead, heap as much praise on Mr Trump in public as is possible and use your influence behind the scenes to nudge him into a position that best suits your national interests. It is notable how Sir Keir's statement after Mr Trump's Alaskan huddle with Vladimir Putin was not one of condemnation but praise at the White House's attempt to secure peace. 'President Trump's efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine,' read the first line of the Starmer statement issued on Saturday. Meanwhile, European allies have clearly reached a similar conclusion to the Prime Minister – that the best chance of avoiding another White House clash on Monday is to be there themselves alongside Mr Zelensky. As well as Sir Keir, Mr Macron, Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, and Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, and others will all be in Washington. Mr Rutte, who bent the knee so far at this summer's Nato summit that he ended up referring to Mr Trump as 'daddy', but in turn won praise for the military alliance at a precarious moment, is a leader who is evidently taking a similar strategy to Sir Keir. But the decision to fly to Washington is also a sign of concern. Getting Europe's most prominent political leaders to rip up their August plans and to rally together many hours of travelling time away from their homes underscores the sense of uncertainty and fear. Two former British ambassadors to Washington told The Telegraph the scramble for the White House shows they know how important it is to unpick Putin's spin. Lord Darroch, who was ambassador during Mr Trump's first term, said: 'This rapidly assembled highest level European delegation accompanying Zelensky to Washington is a sign of profound concern about two aspects of the outcome of the Alaska summit. 'First, the news that President Trump now thinks a comprehensive peace deal should precede a ceasefire. And second, the suggestions that the way to peace could involve Ukraine surrendering still further territory in the Donbas.' Trump was 'rolled over' in Alaska Sir Peter Westmacott, our man in Washington during Barack Obama's tenure, said: 'It indicates to me that the more they look at what happened in Alaska the more they realise that it went badly wrong and that Trump has been rolled over. 'Putin has given nothing and gone home feeling very pleased with himself. So whatever he has talked Trump into believing about Zelensky's responsibility for the conflict, or Russia's right to reconquer its former subjects in eastern Europe, is going to require some pretty robust pushback. 'The president really needs to have a better solution than just thanking Putin for agreeing that he won the election he lost in 2020 and giving up all his threats to sanction Russia simply because Putin says he doesn't want a ceasefire.' Sunday's press conference between Mr Zelensky and Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission President, revealed many of the points the Euro contingent will be pressing on Monday. One, pushing back on the idea of handing over all of Donbas to Putin. Two, demanding an end to Russia's attacks before proper talks. Three, meaningful security guarantees backed up by the US for Ukraine after peace. There will also be a call for Mr Zelensky, Mr Putin and Mr Trump to get together as a three to negotiate territorial changes – a position Moscow is expected to reject, thereby helping frame Putin, not Mr Zelensky, as the blocker to peace. The Prime Minister travels out on Monday. Sir Keir's team believes he understands how to 'speak Trump'. Being there in person is another attempt to help Mr Zelensky to do likewise, helping Ukraine's cause in the process. Whether the US president hears what he wants is another matter.
