Mahindra Scorpio safety update coming, supply won't be affected
Mahindra Australia has been able to secure sufficient supply of its large Scorpio off-road SUV to tide dealers over until an updated model arrives that'll meet incoming Australian regulations.
But stock of the current Mahindra Pik-Up will soon be exhausted, leaving the Indian brand without its ute until an all-new model arrives in mid-2026.
'Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd (our parent company) is committed to adhering to all regulatory standards,' said a spokesperson for Mahindra Australia.
'We plan to introduce Scorpio with AEB [autonomous emergency braking] in Australia by the end of this year.'
The company says it has 'adequate stocks' of six-seat and new seven-seat Scorpio vehicles to see dealers and customers through to the updated model.
Other brands impacted by Australian Design Rule 98/00, including Mitsubishi and Suzuki, have also confirmed they'll have sufficient supply of affected vehicles until updated or replacement models arrive.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Effectively, Mahindra will need to have current Scorpio vehicles imported and complied before March 1, 2025 so they can be sold, as on this date ADR 98/00 comes into effect for all passenger cars, SUVs, vans, and utes with a gross vehicle mass of under 3.5 tonnes on sale in Australia.
The Scorpio currently doesn't offer AEB, even as an option.
ADR 98/00 (Advanced Emergency Braking for Passenger Vehicles and Light Goods Vehicles) has also spelled the end of the Mahindra Pik-Up and Suzuki Ignis.
And it has forced a range of vehicles off sale – including the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, Toyota Granvia and Mazda 6 – that have AEB but don't meet the new requirements detailed in this regulation.
Mahindra launched the Scorpio in Australia back in 2023, and confirmed at the time that AEB would come as part of a mid-life update.
It narrowly scraped by a March 1, 2023 deadline for ADR 98/00 that saw all newly introduced vehicles require the potentially life-saving feature.
When Mahindra launched the Scorpio here it also confirmed that a seven-seat option was coming 'as part of the mid-product cycle update' for the large off-road SUV.
This seven-seat option is now on sale, having entered production for our market in December.
But Mahindra the mid-cycle makeover for the Scorpio, which was promised to bring AEB, has yet to arrive.
At the Scorpio's 2023 local launch, Mahindra said it wouldn't have the vehicle tested by safety authority ANCAP until AEB was fitted, but ANCAP subsequently purchased Scorpios to test and awarded the SUV a zero-star rating.
After the announcement of this rating, Mahindra reiterated a safety upgrade was coming and that it would have the vehicle retested. At the time, this update was understood to be due for release during the second half of 2024.
Among Mahindra's three-model lineup in Australia, only the XUV700 comes with AEB as standard. The mid-sized SUV also features a suite of other active safety features.
Mahindra has previously confirmed a Pik-Up replacement is due here by mid-2026, and the company says it'll meet ADR requirements at launch. Stock of the current Pik-Up is 'nearly sold out', the company added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
5 hours ago
- Herald Sun
New owner for rundown Toorak mansion with a wild history
A dilapidated Toorak mansion with a colourful history has fetched more than $5m. Named Cloyne, the circa-1926 Georgian Revival house at 611 Toorak Rd was scheduled to go under the hammer on Saturday. But due to a high level of interest from buyers, a boardroom auction for the property was held on Thursday. RELATED: Toorak land now asking $40m with no permit Toorak mid-century home listed with plans to transform into $8m luxury residence Myer family reveal new look for Toorak estate aiming to be Melbourne's second $100m home Jellis Craig Stonnington director Nathan Waterson declined to comment on the sold price but industry insiders indicated the five-bedroom home changed hands for a figure above the $4.75m-$5.225m asking range. The abode featuring a ballroom and a pool flanked by lion statues was previously owned by Louis Nelken, who was reportedly a butler to King George VI. In 1935, newspapers covered a reception that Mr Nelken and his wife Lesley held for guests to meet the then-political candidate for the seat of Fawkner, Harold Holt. Mr Holt later became the Australian Prime Minister and disappeared while swimming near Portsea in 1967. The Nelken's parties often made the gossip columns including a 1948 Melbourne Cup eve soiree they hosted for 300 people. Two years later, thieves broke into Cloyne and stole £5500 worth of jewellery, drank a bottle of Mr Nelken's beer and smoked his cigarettes. In the 1960s, Melbourne playboy and pilot Don Busch owned Cloyne before it was sold to hotelier William Drever. The mansion, which is protected under a heritage overlay, was designed by influential Australian architect Harold Desbrowe-Annear. Its interior has been subject to partial renovations across past years and requires significant work to restore its former glory. Three bidders contested the auction for Cloyne including one Canberra-based buyer, although the house was bought by a Melbourne family. 'I would say that all parties were there due to the architectural heritage of the home, the Harold Desbrowe-Annear design was a drawcard for a lot of people,' Mr Waterson said. According to PropTrack, Victoria recorded a preliminary 68.4 per cent clearance rate from 250 early auction results this week. About 1058 homes are expected to go under the hammer across the state next week. Sign up to the Herald Sun Weekly Real Estate Update. Click here to get the latest Victorian property market news delivered direct to your inbox. MORE: Former Carlton star Fraser Brown seals nine-figure deal Price shock: Luxe Aussie mansions now start at $2.52m Balwyn North arcade hits market after 50 years
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Doesn't stack up': Australian review of US beef considers demand
Hunter Valley Cattle Farmer Tony Hegarty reacts to US beef imports facing an Australian review, claiming 'it doesn't stack up' considering the $3.3 billion traded last financial year. 'It doesn't stack up, their prices over there are significantly higher than ours on equivalent terms, apart from freight, just the cost of it,' Mr Hegarty told Sky News Australia. 'They're demanding a lot of beef from us … $3.3 billion of beef into the US last financial year. 'It's not as if we're not allowing imports, it's 'does it make sense?', and 'do they meet the requirements?''
The Advertiser
9 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Biosecurity not competition a meaty issue in beef talks
Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence. Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence. Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence. Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence.
