Harvard settles lawsuit over enslaved ancestor images
Harvard University has agreed to settle a deeply emotional dispute over who has the rights to images of enslaved Africans taken in 1850 by a professor who sought to support a racist theory.
The daguerrotypes, a precursor to modern photographs, are considered to be the earliest known images of Black American slaves, who were posed nude and semi-nude "without consent, dignity or compensation," a 2019 lawsuit stated.
The Cambridge institution has agreed to relinquish the images and has offered plaintiff Tamara Lanier a confidential monetary settlement.
Lanier says she is a descendant of a slave known only by his first name, Renty, who was photographed nude, and his daughter Delia, who was photographed nude from the waist up, in images commissioned by Harvard biologist Louis Agassiz as supposed evidence of Black inferiority.
The images were taken in South Carolina, and Lanier is advocating for them to be transferred to the International African American Museum there.
Lanier accused the university of using them for advertising and commercial purposes, and denounced the use of Renty's image on a cover of a $40 anthropology book it published in 2017.
"Since Black Americans were first brought to this country in chains, our pain and trauma have been exploited for capitalistic gain," said Lanier.
Lanier claimed rights to the images 15 years ago, but Harvard has long-disputed the claim that she is Renty's great-great-great-granddaughter.
"As descendants of slaves, familial history and well-documented genealogy are a luxury that many Black Americans do not have," Lanier said, who relied on her family's oral history to determine the connection in lineage.
In a statement on the settlement, Harvard said they have "long been eager" to steward "the daguerrotypes in a responsible manner."
In his time Agassiz, a Swiss-born biologist, was a renowned scientist who worked in geology.
But Lanier's attorney Ben Crump said Agassiz also supported polygenism, which was "used to justify both the ongoing enslavement of Black people prior to the Civil War and their segregation afterward."
The daguerrotypes were in the possession of Harvard's Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology to date.
"Harvard played a role in the darkest chapter in American history," Lanier said. "This is a small step in the right direction towards fully acknowledging that history and working to rectify it."
The stain of Agassiz's work has been controversial elsewhere, too.
He had an elementary school named after him near Harvard -- but local residents successfully demanded the name be changed to honor a long-serving Black principal Maria Louise Baldwin in 2002, citing his scientific racism.
arb/gl/sla/jgc
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration threat to end Harvard contracts puts research at risk
May 30 (UPI) -- The Trump administration is seeking to end all contracts it has with Harvard University, a move that adds to the strain between the federal government and America's researchers. The administration announced on Tuesday that it is in the process of reviewing its contracts with Harvard in preparation for their termination. The move may cost the United States a generation of top researchers, Sarah Spreitzer, vice president and chief of staff in the American Council of Education's government relations department, told UPI. "We're going to lose grad students or post-docs that might have been educated in those federally funded labs," Spreitzer said. "The undergrads are going to lose the opportunity of working alongside those researchers and learning from their work." Harvard has contracts partnering with government departments including NASA, Veterans Affairs, the Office of the Secretary in the Department of Commerce and the Small Business Administration. Dozens of these contracts have been entered into, extended or otherwise updated since President Donald Trump took office. Harvard University did not respond to requests for comment from UPI. One of the largest contracts Harvard holds with the government is a $15 million contract from the Department of Health and Human Services. It is described in the Federal Procurement Data System as a "task order for human organ chip enabled development of radiation countermeasures." It was entered into on July 26. Another of its largest contracts is a $10.6 million contract with the National Institutes of Health for tuberculosis research. Harvard holds more than one contract with the government related to this work. "They want to do more with less," Spreitzer said of the Trump administration. "They're making decisions based on budgetary impacts but that's layered on top of some of the regulatory actions that they are taking, which is really, again, slowing down or completely stalling the scientific process." The Trump administration has cut research funding grants to several universities, many of them Ivy League schools. It has also made cuts to programs in the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, among others that offer grant opportunities to universities. Since World War II, the U.S. government has leaned on universities to expand its research capabilities, leading to innovations in health, technology, economics and other disciplines. Spreitzer, who has been an advocate for higher education for 20 years. In that time she said she has interacted with nearly every federal agency, said the partnership has advanced the interests of the government and delivered value to U.S. taxpayers. "Right now we are at this historical inflection point where the federal government is rethinking their partnership with our institutions of higher education," she said. "It's been a very profitable and very important partnership that's helped the entire United States. Whether you're talking about new drugs or medical research or the innovative products that might be spun out and have created jobs." The rethinking of the partnership between the government and universities goes beyond contracts and grants. It is also proposing a lower cap on its reimbursement to universities for indirect costs or facilities and administrative costs. These are overhead expenses that an institution has that are not related to specific projects, such as government-funded research. Prior to the current Trump administration, the National Institutes of Health reimbursed an average of 27% to 28% of direct costs to universities to help cover indirect costs. These rates were negotiated with some institutions being reimbursed at rates more than 50%. There has not been a cap on most reimbursements since Congress removed them in 1965. In February, the National Institutes of Health announced a new policy to cap these reimbursements at 15%. The American Council on Education filed a lawsuit seeking to block the proposed cap, warning that it would greatly disrupt research across the country. Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs granted a preliminary injunction against the Department of Energy from instituting a rate cap policy. The injunction succeeds a temporary restraining order Burroughs granted against the administration, shielding all institutions of higher education from rate caps. "It would have a huge impact on our institutions," Spreitzer said. "They've also made huge cuts in some of the fellowship programs. Whether it's the fellowship program for the next generation of NSF scientists or whether it's the Fulbright program -- those have all been suddenly stopped."
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State implements reviews of Harvard visa applicants' social media accounts
The State Department has told U.S. consulates and embassies to immediately begin reviewing the social media accounts of Harvard's student visa applicants for antisemitism in what it called a pilot program that could be rolled out for colleges nationwide. The cable signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, obtained by POLITICO, was sent late Thursday. It says consular officers should 'conduct a complete screening of the online presence of any nonimmigrant visa applicant seeking to travel to Harvard University for any purpose.' The policy will take effect immediately, per the cable. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The document puts into motion a proposal the Trump administration floated earlier this week for expanded social media vetting of all foreign students applying to U.S. colleges, pausing new appointments for student visa applicants in the meantime. Increased social media vetting did already exist, but it was previously primarily intended for returning students who may have participated in protests against Israel's actions in Gaza. It also adds to the White House's battle with elite academic institutions over alleged mishandling of cases of antisemitism during campus protests in response to Israel's military operations in the Gaza Strip against militant group Hamas. The cable specifically identifies antisemitism and antisemitic viewpoints as the focus for consular officers but does not spell out what specifically would rise to the level of inadmissible antisemitism in the eyes of State Department leadership. It says that the Harvard review process 'will also serve as a pilot for expanded screening and vetting of visa applicants' and that 'this pilot will be expanded over time,' indicating it will likely reach other universities in the Trump administration's crosshairs. Notably, State Department leadership wants consular officers to consider 'whether the lack of any online presence, or having social media accounts restricted to 'private' or with limited visibility, may be reflective of evasiveness and call into question the applicant's credibility.' The cable also instructs consular officers to inform applicants that private social media accounts could be viewed as evading vetting and request they make their accounts public while the Fraud Prevention Unit reviews their case. The new guidance comes as the U.S. government continues its showdown with Harvard for alleged failures to address antisemitism on campus amid the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. The federal government has stripped Harvard of billions in research funding and entered in dueling litigation with the Cambridge, Massachusetts, school. It had also suspended Harvard's ability to enroll international students by briefly blocking visa applications before that decision was blocked by a federal judge. It also comes as the administration has targeted other academic communities, including Chinese nationals studying at U.S. colleges and universities. Rubio said Wednesday the administration would 'aggressively revoke' visas of Chinese nationals studying in sensitive fields, the potential implementation of which has flummoxed State Department officials.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man who buried wife under stairs guilty of murder
A man who killed his wife and kept her body hidden for years under the stairs of their County Cork home has been found guilty of her murder. Tina Satchwell, who was 45, was killed by Richard Satchwell in March 2017. Days after the murder he reported her missing and then kept lying about what happened to her. In October 2023 gardaí (Irish police) returned to the couple's home in Youghal for a futher search. Mrs Satchwell's body was found wrapped in plastic and buried face down in the makeshift grave. Richard Satchwell, a 58-year-old truck driver, had pleaded not guilty to murdering his wife between 19 and 20 March 2017. He reported her as a missing person on 24 March that year. He told gardai that he came home from running errands to find she had left him. He also alleged his wife had run off with €26,000 (£22,000) of the couple's savings. The home belonging to the couple on Grattan Street in Youghal was searched by gardaí in June 2017 but at that time Mrs Satchwell remained missing. In March 2023, on the sixth anniversary of her disappearance, gardaí renewed their appeal for the public's help to find Tina Satchwell. They searched the couple's home again and this time they discovered the skeletal remains of the missing 45-year-old. She had been wrapped in a black plastic bag and buried face down in a grave under the stairs. She was wearing her pyjamas and dressing gown, and her wallet was in the pocket of the dressing gown. The cause of her death could not be determined due to the advanced state of decomposition of her remains. Richard Satchwell was then arrested and charged in connection with the murder of his wife. At that point he changed his story, claiming his wife had tried to stab him in the head with a chisel on the morning of 20 March 2017. He claimed he defended himself using the belt of her dressing gown, and she collapsed limp in his arms. He later transferred her body into a disused freezer and travelled to his wife's relatives in Fermoy to ask if they had seen her. That same day he reported her missing at Fermoy garda station. Two days later, he buried her body under the stairs. He claimed to gardaí he put supermarket tulips into the makeshift grave, before covering it with concrete. The trial heard he attended a driving course and a car boot sale before the burial. He also gave away the freezer he had stored his wife's body in, after advertising it online. Satchwell later took part in public appeals to find his wife, and gave several media interviews telling lies about what happened on the day his wife disappeared. He had claimed to journalists that he had long been a victim of domestic violence but had never defended himself during attacks from his wife. During the murder trial a prosecuting barrister said the defendant's account had more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese. His month-long trial began at the end of April 2025 and the jury heard evidence from about 50 witnesses. After almost nine and a half hours of deliberations, the jury rejected Satchwell's claim that he acted in self-defence and found him guilty of murder. Man appears in court charged with wife's murder Remains found at home of missing woman Tina Satchwell
