logo
Sunday hunting proposal passes Pa. House. What's next?

Sunday hunting proposal passes Pa. House. What's next?

Yahoo13-06-2025
A hunter walks across a field. (Getty Images)
For the second year in a row, a proposal to repeal Pennsylvania's Sunday hunting prohibition passed the state House in bipartisan fashion this week. After Wednesday's vote, a bevy of organizations have weighed in with some arguing it's past time to end the ban, while others say it would be a step backwards for the outdoor experience in Pennsylvania.
As the debate moves to the Senate, a key committee chair told the Capital-Star he's still evaluating House Bill 1431, but the legislation advancing seems like good news. Senate Game and Fisheries Committee Chairperson Greg Rothman (R-Cumberland) said he expects to have a debate and vote on it in the near future.
'I think it's an idea that's time has come,' Rothman told the Capital-Star on Thursday. 'Other states allow it. What we want to be doing as a state government is to promote hunting and make it as accessible as possible, especially to working families and to younger people.'
'And I think Sunday (hunting) gives them more opportunities,' he added. 'So the more opportunities to hunt gets more hunters, and helps us keep this great tradition alive in Pennsylvania.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
The sale of hunting licenses generated more than $59 million in revenue for the Game Commission last year.
Rothman said he supports Sen. Dan Laughlin's (R-Erie) proposal to end the ban and believes that proposal would have the support in the chamber. Rothman said state Rep. Mandy Steele (D-Allegheny) assured him the language in her proposal is the same in Laughlin's. While the bill proposed by Laughlin also has the support of Sen. James Malone (D-Lancaster), the minority chair of the Senate Game and Fisheries Committee, Rothman wants to go over the details of Steele's proposal to see if it can also pass the chamber.
Steele described the state's ban as 'archaic' and 'not based in the reality of today.'
Pennsylvania expanded Sunday hunting in 2019 when Gov. Tom Wolf signed a law to allow hunting on three Sundays each year: One during archery season, one during rifle season, and one Sunday selected by the Game Commission. Laughlin also led that effort.
Prior to the 2019 expansion, hunting had been mostly illegal on Sundays for over 200 years under the state's Blue Laws, which stem from the Quaker foundations of the commonwealth and barred certain activities on the sabbath.
'It's a law that most states have eliminated long ago,' Steele said during debate on the House floor, noting that with a Monday to Friday workweek, most people only have Saturday to hunt. 'Not being able to hunt on Sundays creates major hurdles for busy families. It's a significant barrier for working people.'
Steele described herself as 'not a typical hunter' and someone who did not grow up learning to hunt. But she spent a lot of time outdoors and later picked it up as an adult and mother of four children. She said she's been welcomed into the hunting community wholeheartedly.
'It has been a gratifying experience,' Steele said.
Her proposal is backed by the Pennsylvania Game Commission, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen and Conservationists, Hunter Nation, Hunters United for Sunday Hunting, and Backcountry Hunters & Anglers.
The Game Commission celebrated the bill advancing Wednesday, issuing a statement referencing a number of reasons that it backs the measure.
'Though hunters play an active role in helping to manage wildlife populations through the purchase of their licenses and other revenue they generate, they also fund wildlife conservation at a larger scale, for all species,' Game Commission Executive Director Steve Smith said. 'For those reasons and others, it's important to keep hunters engaged and providing the valuable service they do. These bills would help accomplish that.'
'One of the biggest reasons hunters stop hunting is a lack of time,' he added. 'While no one can add hours to the day or days to the week, removing the prohibition on Sunday hunting holds the potential to add significantly more time to the hunting calendar and keep hunters hunting.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The Pennsylvania Farm Bureau said expanding hunting could help reduce crop damage across the state by better managing deer populations. The bill would require at least one member of the Game Commission's Board of Commissioners to have an agriculture background.
The bill passed by a 131-72 vote on Wednesday, with support from most Democrats. Republicans were more divided on the matter.
The House unanimously approved an amendment to H.B. 1431, to restore the hunting rights of people charged with trespassing immediately upon their acquittal or dismissal of the charges. Other amendments were rejected, including one defeated along party lines that would move the first day of deer hunting season to the Monday after Thanksgiving.
The debate around Sunday hunting in Pennsylvania is far from new.
Last session, the House passed Steele's bill to repeal the Sunday hunting ban by a 129-73 vote. That bill did not advance in the Senate.
Rep. David Maloney, minority chairperson of the House Game and Fisheries Committee, opposed H.B. 1431 and argued that it is 'not a simple Sunday hunting piece of legislation.'
Touting his experience with hunting from a young age, Maloney said the bill would have 'unintended consequences.' The problems Maloney had with the proposal included the language regarding trespassing penalties, the requirement for a member of the agriculture community to be on the Game Commission Board, the power given to farmers to hunt deer, and negative impacts on waterfowl hunters.
He also said he doesn't buy the supporters' argument about free time. Maloney said since he began hunting at age 12, the opportunities to hunt throughout the year have more than doubled.
Maloney also said he believes the bill is unconstitutional because it violates the requirement that legislation must be limited to a single subject. For that reason, Maloney said he doesn't believe the Senate would consider it or Gov. Josh Shapiro would sign it.
Rep. Greg Vitali (D-Delaware), one of the three Democrats who did not vote in support of H.B. 1431, said the Pennsylvania chapter of the Sierra Club, the Keystone Trails Association, and the Pennsylvania Parks and Forest Foundation oppose the bill.
Jen Quinn, legislative and political director for the Pennsylvania Chapter of the Sierra Club, told the Capital-Star the organization supports hunting and effective management of the deer population, but cited a number of concerns she has with the proposal.
'Our concern is that when people know there are hunters in the woods, are they going to stay out?' Quinn said.
She noted that it is relatively safe to be in the woods with hunters, but there are people who may decide to stay home instead of enjoying the outdoors when hunters are out.
Quinn also said she doesn't think the legislation would address the problem of deer overpopulation and the decline in hunting licenses.
'I doubt adding one more day will fix this, because the state did add three Sundays a few years ago, and it didn't reverse that trend,' Quinn said. She also said that the organization supports phasing out lead ammunition, arguing that it is harmful to wildlife.
Brook Lenker, executive director of the Keystone Trails Association, said the organization was disappointed that H.B. 1431 passed the House, even though it anticipated it might move on to the Senate. He's holding out hope that the Senate won't pass the bill.
'We just feel that additional Sundays open to hunting has the potential to erode quality hiking opportunities on Pennsylvania's trails … a lot of hiking occurs on weekends,' Lenker told the Capital-Star.
Steele or Laughlin's proposal would have to receive a vote in the Senate Game and Fisheries Committee before it could advance to a full vote in the chamber.
The Senate is slated to return to session on Monday, June 23.
Earlier this year, both Steele and Laughlin, who are leading the efforts in their respective chambers again this session, told the Capital-Star that they were optimistic the bill could get across the finish line.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California's redistricting play sets up fight for control of Congress
California's redistricting play sets up fight for control of Congress

Axios

time3 minutes ago

  • Axios

California's redistricting play sets up fight for control of Congress

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says the state will advance a plan to draw new congressional maps — a move he claims will "end the Trump presidency" and flip the U.S. House to Democrats. Why it matters: Newsom's gambit escalates a red-versus-blue-state standoff ahead of the 2026 midterms — a fight that could decide control of Congress. Driving the news: The Golden State governor mocked the president's bombastic style in a Tuesday-evening post on X, referring to President Trump in all caps as "Donald 'Taco' Trump" before declaring that California would draw "historic" and "more 'beautiful maps'" to have Trump removed from office and help Democrats "take back the House." What he's saying:"BIG PRESS CONFERENCE THIS WEEK WITH POWERFUL DEMS AND GAVIN NEWSOM — YOUR FAVORITE GOVERNOR — THAT WILL BE DEVASTATING FOR 'MAGA'," he wrote. Catch up quick: After Texas Republicans pushed ahead with off‑cycle congressional redistricting under pressure from Trump, Newsom proposed a "trigger" ballot measure: California would redraw its own electoral maps if Texas proceeded with its plan. Newsom previously said he intends to hold a special election on Nov. 4 for voters to approve a yet-to-be-drawn map aimed at increasing Democratic seats. "We'll fight fire with fire," Newsom said late last week. "We'll assert ourselves, and we'll punch above our weight, and it will have profound impacts on the national outcome, not just here in the state of California." The Legislature would need to vote to send the measure to a special election before voters could weigh in. Context: Trump ignited the redistricting arms race last month by urging Texas Republicans to redraw their maps to gain seats, with Missouri and Ohio following suit. New York and California, Democratic bastions, quickly promised to answer in kind. The U.S. Supreme Court unleashed the partisan gerrymandering floodgates in 2019, when it ruled federal courts had no right to rein in the practice. Between the lines: California's initiative would amend a 2008 voter-approved measure that created an independent redistricting commission to do the job every decade after a new census. The new maps would be in place for the next three election cycles — in 2026, 2028 and 2030 — with authority then reverting to the redistricting commission.

Column: Illinois, Texas both need remap reform
Column: Illinois, Texas both need remap reform

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Column: Illinois, Texas both need remap reform

Nearly a thousand miles and opposite sides of the political spectrum separate Illinois and Texas. Yet there's one thing Democrats in the Land of Lincoln and Republicans in the Lone Star State can agree on: Gerrymandering works. For political operatives, the crafting of partisan redistricting maps is the miracle elixir that cures party ills and keeps politicians entrenched for generations. Like in Illinois and Texas. Which is why dozens of Texas Democrats have fled Austin, the state capitol, and are glamping in Chicagoland. They do not want to be part of a legislative quorum, which would allow the state's Republicans to redistrict upward of five new bright-red congressional districts. On its face, it seems supremely unfair attempting to wipe out constitutional guarantees of 'one man, one vote,' which is core to our democratic institutions. Instead of redistricting, both Illinois and Texas need remap reform. Under the Texas two-step of Gov. Greg Abbott, he who bused Illinois thousands of asylum seekers in recent years, we are told will give the administration of President Donald Trump additional seats in the U.S. House — Texas currently has 35 — in order to push through any wacky proposals he can come up with. So far, there have been plenty that have squeaked through the House and Senate with the help of Trump-friendly lawmakers. Texas Democrats setting up their rump headquarters in Illinois, at least through Aug. 19, is the latest foray in this battle of political wills. After all, we are a sanctuary state, and all are welcome. Notice these Dems didn't abscond to Oklahoma or Arkansas to boycott their legislative session. They made a beeline here and have been garnering much media play with Illinois Democrats by their side, denouncing Trump and this vote grab. Indeed, lame-duck Sen. Dick Durbin said the other day the opposition to the remap is not alone to Texas: 'This is an American issue, where we have to stand together for the families of this country.' But he would be so eloquent for families in Illinois who have seen their votes diluted over the years through the gerrymandering of congressional and state legislative districts. It's not that this isn't well-known. Gov. JB Pritzker, who signed the 2021 redistricting bill into law which has locked in Democrats' super-majorities in the Legislature, has warned if Texas goes through with this questionable mid-term redistricting, Illinois could do the same. Unsure where those additional blue seats would come from. Of our 17 congressional districts, 14 are ruled by Democrats. That's an 82% majority. Gerrymandering has been around since the nascent days of the republic. The term combines the name of Elbridge Gerry with salamander and is considered anathema to those who seek to keep that elusive 'one man, one vote' in play. Gerry, an early patriot during the American Revolution who eventually became a vice president, was governor of Massachusetts in 1812 when he signed a bill that created a partisan House district in the Boston area that opponents compared to the shape of a salamander. Sort of like the looks of the 5th Congressional District represented by Chicago Democrat Mike Quigley. Quigley's district snakes from deep inside Wrigleyville on Chicago's North Side through Skokie, Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, and eventually finding its way into a sliver of Lake County, with 5.62% of its electorate. Lake County towns include Lake Zurich, Buffalo Grove, Long Grove, Barrington, Kildeer, and Deer Park. Besides being potential voters, what those Lake County communities have in common with Chicagoans only Springfield's Democrat political mapmakers know for certain. Perhaps many once lived in the big city and bolted for the suburbs. State Democrats have voiced concerns that the Republican remap of Texas' congressional districts would be unconstitutional for violating federal voting protections in minority-majority districts. They do this while ignoring what has been done in Illinois, where the redistricting maps were drawn after the 2020 census, not in the middle of the decade. To end this political theater in the future and to install fairness back in the process, there needs to be an independent, nationwide mapmaking system to consider congressional and legislative districts every decade. Talk of remap retaliation by elected leaders in Illinois, California, New York and others sounds like we're living in a banana republic instead of a constitutional one.

Newsom Says California Will Redraw Its ‘BEAUTIFUL MAPS' In All-Caps Post Mocking Trump
Newsom Says California Will Redraw Its ‘BEAUTIFUL MAPS' In All-Caps Post Mocking Trump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom Says California Will Redraw Its ‘BEAUTIFUL MAPS' In All-Caps Post Mocking Trump

Finally someone is communicating with President Donald Trump in a language he can understand. On Tuesday night, Newsom (D-Calif.) informed the president that California is going to go ahead and redraw the state's electoral maps after Trump missed a deadline amid the ongoing redistricting battle. The Democratic governor also decided to deliver his message in the funniest way possible — by writing in the same style that Trump writes his social media posts. 'DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, 'MISSED' THE DEADLINE!!!' Newsom's office wrote in a pinned post on his X account. 'CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS,' THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!).' The message continued, 'BIG PRESS CONFERENCE THIS WEEK WITH POWERFUL DEMS AND GAVIN NEWSOM — YOUR FAVORITE GOVERNOR — THAT WILL BE DEVASTATING FOR 'MAGA.' THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! — GN.' Not only does the language itself mock Trump, but the decision to open the announcement by calling Trump 'TACO' — an acronymcoined by Wall Street that stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out' and that Trump hates — was a great way of needling the president enough that he might actually read the message. The snarky insinuation that Newsom is Trump's 'favorite governor' was a nice touch as well. Although Newsom's announcement is funny, the GOP's shady redistricting efforts are anything but. Last week, several Democratic members of the Texas House fled the state to avoid a vote on a redrawn congressional map that Trump wants, and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) is more than happy to shove Trump's request down lawmakers' throats. Political maps are typically redraw every 10 years, and Texas' mid-decade redistricting effort has been viewed by Democrats as a shameless gerrymandering scheme that would flip five seats currently held by Democrats from blue to red. The move will essentially help secure Republicans' control in the U.S. House after the midterm elections in 2026. Ever since the Dems in Texas fled, there has been an effort on the left to even the score, with Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) saying they'd be game to change their state's political maps if Texas does. In a threatening letter to Trumpon Monday, Newsom said he'd 'happily' stand down if Texas doesn't go through with this BS. Newsom followed up his warning with another post on X that Trump can better understand. 'DONALD TRUMP, THE LOWEST POLLING PRESIDENT IN RECENT HISTORY,' the post began. 'THIS IS YOUR SECOND-TO-LAST WARNING!!! (THE NEXT ONE IS THE LAST ONE!). STAND DOWN NOW OR CALIFORNIA WILL COUNTER-STRIKE (LEGALLY!) TO DESTROY YOUR ILLEGAL CROOKED MAPS IN RED STATES. PRESS CONFERENCE COMING — HOSTED BY AMERICA'S FAVORITE GOVERNOR, GAVIN NEWSOM. FINAL WARNING NEXT. YOU WON'T LIKE IT!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' Newsom followed that up with another Trump-friendly message on Tuesday. 'FINAL WARNING DONALD TRUMP — MAYBE THE MOST IMPORTANT WARNING IN HISTORY!' the post began. 'STOP CHEATING OR CALIFORNIA WILL REDRAW THE MAPS. AND GUESS WHO WILL ANNOUNCE IT THIS WEEK?' It continued,'GAVIN NEWSOM (MANY SAY THE MOST LOVED & HANDSOME GOVERNOR) AND A VERY POWERFUL TEAM. DON'T MAKE US DO IT!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' But on Tuesday, Texas went ahead with a vote and passed their redrawn maps in a special session, prompting most of Texas' Democrats who remained in the state to storm out of the chamber in protest. The Dallas Morning News reports that despite the vote in the GOP's favor, the new map is 'unlikely to go anywhere' because the Texas Dems that are still MIA deny the chamber a quorum. Lawmakers anticipate there will be another special session on Friday, if Abbott can wrangle his state's wayward Democrats to return. On Friday, Abbot went as far as having the GOP-controlled Texas House of Representatives issue civil arrest warrants for the Democrats who fled, and enlisting Texas state troopers to help hunt them down.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store