logo
'Truth' protester interrupts mushroom murder trial

'Truth' protester interrupts mushroom murder trial

1News26-05-2025

A high-profile murder trial over a poisonous mushroom meal has been interrupted by an outburst from a protester inside court.
Erin Patterson, 50, is facing the fifth week of a trial over a toxic beef Wellington that she served up to her estranged husband's family.
She has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, over the July 2023 meal which caused the deaths of her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66.
Following a mid-morning break on Monday, moments after the jury was brought into the court room, a protester stood up in the public gallery and addressed Justice Christopher Beale.
"How can you be a judge?" the man, wearing a yellow T-shirt with "all we are saying is give truth a chance" written on it, said.
ADVERTISEMENT
He made a number of allegations against the judge before he was quickly escorted out of the court, in Morwell, regional Victoria.
The trial resumed shortly after, with Victoria Police forensics officer Shamen Fox-Henry cross-examined by defence.
In his fourth day on the witness stand, Fox-Henry was questioned about his training in software used to analyse devices seized from Patterson's home.
Fox-Henry previously told the jury he used a program called Magnet Axiom to examine a Cooler Master PC seized from Patterson's property during a police search on August 5, 2023.
Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC asked him if he had received any formal training on Magnet Axiom before using it to extract data from three storage devices found on the computer.
"No," Fox-Henry replied.
He followed steps given from another member of the Victoria Police cybercrime unit on how to extract the material.
ADVERTISEMENT
Under re-examination by prosecutor Jane Warren, Fox-Henry confirmed he had used Magnet Axiom before this and his training in digital software was a combination of formal training with certification and "on the job use of tools".
"A large majority of the governing principles behind the applications we use are the same if not similar," he said.
Mandy also asked Fox-Henry about "phone B," a Samsung mobile which had been factory reset four times, including once the day after it was seized from Patterson's home.
He did not find any data on the phone, apart from the record that it had been factory reset in February and August 2023.
"The information available to the people conducting the extraction on this phone is limited because of the fact of the factory reset?" Mandy asked.
"That is correct," Fox-Henry said.
The trial continues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mushroom murder-accused denies 'wild goose chase' about grocer
Mushroom murder-accused denies 'wild goose chase' about grocer

Otago Daily Times

time4 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Mushroom murder-accused denies 'wild goose chase' about grocer

Erin Patterson has been accused of sending health authorities on a "wild goose chase" to track down the shop where she claimed to have bought dried mushrooms used in a deadly lunch. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC on Wednesday continued her cross-examination of Patterson by asking about the origins of mushrooms contained in the beef Wellingtons she served. The 50-year-old's former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, died after consuming the meal, while Heather's husband Ian became seriously ill but survived. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three charges of murder and one attempted murder charge. She denies deliberately poisoning her lunch guests on July 29, 2023 when she served them the death cap mushroom-laced dishes. The mushroom cook agreed the first time she mentioned dried mushrooms being in the meal was in a call with her former brother-in-law Matthew Patterson while she was in hospital, when he asked where the ingredients had come from. "I said possibly the Oakleigh area," she told the court. Patterson was pointed to evidence from doctors and others who suggested she told them she bought the mushrooms in Oakleigh, Clayton or Glen Waverley, all suburbs in east Melbourne. She was also shown texts between her and Department of Health manager Sally Ann Atkinson in which she described the mushroom packaging. Patterson agreed with the prosecutor that the mushroom packaging did not look professional, was in a small snack-sized bag that was not resealable and didn't have a printed label. "You gave detailed (recollection of the) packaging even though you couldn't give details about the store," Dr Rogers said. "Correct," Patterson responded. "You wanted it to sound like they were not commercially produced mushrooms," the prosecutor continued. "Incorrect," the accused replied. Dr Rogers suggested Patterson used the information to make her story about buying death cap mushrooms from an Asian grocer "seem more believable". But the accused killer replied she didn't remember saying she bought death caps from an Asian grocer. "I suggest you were deliberately vague about suburbs when asked about it," Dr Rogers said. "Incorrect," Patterson responded. "Your story kept changing," the prosecutor said. "I don't think it did," Patterson replied. In a police interview, Patterson said she had been "very, very helpful" with the health department during their investigation. But Dr Rogers suggested Patterson wasn't "very, very helpful to the department". "You sent them on a wild goose chase to find this Asian grocer," the prosecutor said. "Incorrect," Patterson replied. Patterson was also asked about leftovers she fed her children a day after the fatal lunch, telling the court: "I was pretty clear it was the meal minus the mushrooms and pastry, so not the same." Dr Rogers queried why she fed her kids the food despite suspecting the meal made Don and Gail sick. "I didn't know or suspect that," Patterson replied. "You told the lie about feeding leftovers to your children because it gave you some distance from a deliberate poisoning," Dr Rogers suggested. "I don't see how it could, but I disagree anyway," Patterson responded. The trial continues.

Erin Patterson accused of inconsistencies in mushroom trial
Erin Patterson accused of inconsistencies in mushroom trial

1News

time7 hours ago

  • 1News

Erin Patterson accused of inconsistencies in mushroom trial

The woman at the centre of Australia's "mushroom murder" case has been accused of lying in the witness box, as prosecutors press her on inconsistencies in her story. Erin Patterson is on trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria, charged with murdering three people and attempting to murder a fourth, after serving them beef Wellingtons allegedly laced with deadly death cap mushrooms during a family lunch in July 2023. The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to all charges, maintaining the incident was a tragic accident. But today, on her sixth day of cross-examination, prosecutors alleged she had misled the court on multiple fronts, including what she knew about mushroom poisoning, her internet history, and her hospital visit in the hours after the lunch. Hospital visit scrutinised ADVERTISEMENT During questioning, Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC suggested that Patterson was "shocked that the doctors were onto death cap [mushroom poisoning] so quickly." Patterson responded, "I was anxious at the idea that we might have eaten those things". When asked if she was worried about being caught, she replied: "Incorrect." The prosecution highlighted inconsistencies in Patterson's account of her hospital visit. While nurse Kylie Ashton testified that Patterson declined admission despite being warned of the seriousness of her condition, Patterson claimed there was "no conversation" about her children at that point and that she left to care for her animals. Discrepancies over plate usage Survivor Ian Wilkinson previously testified that Patterson served herself on a different, smaller plate compared to her guests. Patterson denied this, stating, "there was no smaller plate". ADVERTISEMENT She suggested that any differences in plates were due to her not owning a matching set, adding, "I did not deliberately choose which plates to serve my lunch guests with". Internet searches and medical appointments questioned The prosecution presented evidence that Patterson's computer accessed the iNaturalist website in May 2022, viewing a post about death cap mushrooms. Patterson claimed she didn't recall visiting the site, stating, "I don't remember ever visiting iNaturalist". When asked if she had an interest in death cap mushrooms at that time, she responded: "I have no idea." Rogers then questioned Patterson about an appointment she claimed to have had at Enrich Clinic for gastric bypass surgery. The prosecution noted that the clinic does not offer such procedures. Patterson expressed confusion, saying: "Well, I had an appointment with them, and that's my memory of what the appointment was for, so that's why I'm puzzled." ADVERTISEMENT Vomiting claims under scrutiny Patterson testified that she made herself vomit after the lunch due to feeling overfull, attributing it to a history of binge eating and purging. Rogers also challenged this, stating, "You did not tell a single medical person that you had vomited up after the lunch on the 29th of July?" Patterson said: "That is true, I didn't do that." The case revolves around a lunch hosted by Patterson on July 29, 2023, in Leongatha, Victoria. The meal resulted in the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson. Ian Wilkinson survived after intensive care. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges, asserting the incident was a tragic accident. The trial continues, with further cross-examination and testimonies expected in the coming days

Alleged mushroom murderer accused of lying
Alleged mushroom murderer accused of lying

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Alleged mushroom murderer accused of lying

Accused triple-murderer Erin Patterson has been accused of lying about throwing up remains from a beef Wellington and serving herself on a different plate. On her sixth day in the witness box, the 50-year-old has disputed evidence from a doctor, nurse, her estranged husband Simon and what the only surviving lunch guest told the jury in her trial. Patterson has entered week seven of a Victorian Supreme Court trial accused of three murders and one attempted murder over a toxic mushroom dish she served up to Simon's family in July 2023. Her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, all died in hospital days after eating death cap mushroom-laced beef Wellingtons cooked by Patterson. She has pleaded not guilty to all charges and claims the poisonings were a terrible accident. Patterson last week admitted foraging for wild mushrooms and accepted they may have been in the individual beef Wellingtons that she had prepared. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC, at the beginning of her third day cross-examining Patterson on Tuesday, accused her of more lies. Patterson on Friday said she'd a pre-surgery appointment for gastric bypass procedure at Enrich Clinic in Melbourne. But Dr Rogers put to Patterson that Enrich "does not offer gastric bypass or sleeve surgery". "I don't know," Patterson replied. "I had an appointment with them ... It was for weight-loss surgery but maybe it was a different kind." The prosecutor suggested she had lied about that appointment but Patterson said: "It wasn't a lie, that's what my memory was". Dr Rogers quizzed Patterson about sole surviving lunch guest Ian Wilkinson's evidence to the jury about being served the beef Wellington on one of four large grey plates. He also told the jury, in week two of the trial, Patterson had served herself on a smaller orange or tan plate. Patterson said she did not own any grey plates, and did not serve herself on a plate that was orange, tan and small. Dr Rogers asked Patterson about evidence that Heather Wilkinson said she noticed the cook had served herself the food on a "coloured plate which was different from the rest". "I didn't serve myself at all," she replied, before adding she wanted to "clarify" she did not own any matching sets of plates. "Somebody would've had different plates and I don't have four plates the same," Patterson said. Dr Rogers suggested her "whole story is untrue" about plating the food, to which Patterson replied: "You're wrong". She directly put to Patterson that she lied to medical professionals about vomiting to "try and account for why you didn't get seriously ill". "I wish that was true but it's not," Patterson said. Patterson further disputed evidence from Simon, saying she did not tell him she was worried she may "poo her pants" if she drove her son's friend home after the lunch. She disputed evidence from Leongatha doctor and nurse, Chris Webster and Kylie Ashton, about what they discussed when she admitted herself to hospital two days after the lunch. She said Leongatha hospital staff would not tell her what had happened to the other lunch guests. Patterson said she "probably was very stressed" when she went to the hospital because doctors had suspected death cap mushroom poisoning in the meal she prepared. "I was anxious at the idea we might've eaten those things," she said. The trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store