Erin Patterson accused of inconsistencies in mushroom trial
The woman at the centre of Australia's "mushroom murder" case has been accused of lying in the witness box, as prosecutors press her on inconsistencies in her story.
Erin Patterson is on trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria, charged with murdering three people and attempting to murder a fourth, after serving them beef Wellingtons allegedly laced with deadly death cap mushrooms during a family lunch in July 2023.
The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to all charges, maintaining the incident was a tragic accident.
But today, on her sixth day of cross-examination, prosecutors alleged she had misled the court on multiple fronts, including what she knew about mushroom poisoning, her internet history, and her hospital visit in the hours after the lunch.
Hospital visit scrutinised
ADVERTISEMENT
During questioning, Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC suggested that Patterson was "shocked that the doctors were onto death cap [mushroom poisoning] so quickly."
Patterson responded, "I was anxious at the idea that we might have eaten those things". When asked if she was worried about being caught, she replied: "Incorrect."
The prosecution highlighted inconsistencies in Patterson's account of her hospital visit.
While nurse Kylie Ashton testified that Patterson declined admission despite being warned of the seriousness of her condition, Patterson claimed there was "no conversation" about her children at that point and that she left to care for her animals.
Discrepancies over plate usage
Survivor Ian Wilkinson previously testified that Patterson served herself on a different, smaller plate compared to her guests.
Patterson denied this, stating, "there was no smaller plate".
ADVERTISEMENT
She suggested that any differences in plates were due to her not owning a matching set, adding, "I did not deliberately choose which plates to serve my lunch guests with".
Internet searches and medical appointments questioned
The prosecution presented evidence that Patterson's computer accessed the iNaturalist website in May 2022, viewing a post about death cap mushrooms.
Patterson claimed she didn't recall visiting the site, stating, "I don't remember ever visiting iNaturalist". When asked if she had an interest in death cap mushrooms at that time, she responded: "I have no idea."
Rogers then questioned Patterson about an appointment she claimed to have had at Enrich Clinic for gastric bypass surgery.
The prosecution noted that the clinic does not offer such procedures.
Patterson expressed confusion, saying: "Well, I had an appointment with them, and that's my memory of what the appointment was for, so that's why I'm puzzled."
ADVERTISEMENT
Vomiting claims under scrutiny
Patterson testified that she made herself vomit after the lunch due to feeling overfull, attributing it to a history of binge eating and purging.
Rogers also challenged this, stating, "You did not tell a single medical person that you had vomited up after the lunch on the 29th of July?"
Patterson said: "That is true, I didn't do that."
The case revolves around a lunch hosted by Patterson on July 29, 2023, in Leongatha, Victoria. The meal resulted in the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson. Ian Wilkinson survived after intensive care.
Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges, asserting the incident was a tragic accident.
The trial continues, with further cross-examination and testimonies expected in the coming days
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Sydney underworld figure offers cemetery as bail security
An underworld figure, desperate for release from prison, has wagered a multimillion-dollar cemetery as collateral, taking a judge by surprise. Omar Haouchar, 32, was arrested in January over an alleged conspiracy to murder a rival gang member outside the Day St police station in Sydney's city centre. His barrister told a Supreme Court bail hearing that a person close to Haouchar had put forward a cemetery as security to support his release application. "I've never seen a cemetery offered as security before," Justice Ian Harrison told the NSW Supreme Court today. The valuation of the cemetery was uncertain because, unlike its surrounding property, it was not available for subdivision, barrister Ertunc Ozen SC said. ADVERTISEMENT But it was estimated to be worth millions of dollars. Haouchar, who appeared in court via a video link from the Goulburn supermax remand centre, was previously denied bail in February. Since that time, Ozen said further documents had been tendered to the court by prosecutors, detailing evidence against his client. Associates of the Haouchar crime network allegedly used encrypted app Threema to discuss murdering 30-year-old Andre Kallita in December 2023. Prosecutors claimed that Haouchar was using the handle "Invisible" in an encrypted group chat titled "URGENT". The murder plot involved a lookout, waiting to see Kallita report to the police station for bail, alerting two shooters waiting close by, according to a police statement filed with the NSW Supreme Court. But Ozen said there was insufficient evidence to prove Haouchar was Invisible. ADVERTISEMENT "The Crown simply cannot tie Invisible to this applicant," he told the court. "This is the crux of the crown case, and without that attribution, the crown case fails." He also argued that since Haouchar's transfer to supermax, his ability to communicate with his legal team had been limited and this would result in delays to court proceedings. "The conditions of custody make it nearly impossible for him to prepare for this matter," Ozen said. Crown prosecutor Rebecca Stefani opposed bail, arguing Haouchar posed a risk of committing further offences and attempting to leave the state. She told the court he had spent 11 years in custody for a slew of offences. These included reckless wounding, aggravated burglary and directing the activities of a criminal group. The Haouchar syndicate, largely operated by leaders based in Lebanon, has been tied to AU$1.5 billion (NZ$1.6 billion) in cryptocurrency transactions and various firearm, drug, tobacco and money-laundering offences, police said previously. Justice Harrison will make his decision on the bail application after further submissions have been filed.
NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Erin Patterson murder trial: Mushroom cook grilled in Australian court on sixth beef wellington dish
Patterson disputed a suggestion by Rogers that the sixth was for her husband, Simon, if he changed his mind and attended. 'I didn't make that sixth one for Simon,' she said. 'It's just an extra one. Simon wasn't coming.' Erin Patterson said her estranged husband, Simon Patterson, was not expected at the lunch. Photo / NewsWire Mandy took Patterson to her Woolworths rewards data, which the barrister said showed the purchase of five twin packs of beef eye fillet steaks. 'I had five twin packs, I put two in the freezer, and I had six to make,' Patterson said. 'So I did that.' She said she had enough ingredients to prepare a sixth dish, so she did, thinking she could eat it another day. Simon Patterson's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and aunt, Heather Wilkinson, died after eating a meal at Erin Patterson's home on July 29, 2023, in the country Victorian town of Leongatha. Wilkinson's husband, Ian Wilkinson, survived after spending about a month and a half in hospital. Prosecutors allege Patterson deliberately poisoned the guests with death cap mushrooms, while her defence argues it was a tragic accident. Jury sent home for the day Jurors have been sent home for the day after they were told they'd reached the end of the evidence they would hear. Shortly before 1pm, after Mandy completed his re-examination of Patterson, the jury was told the defence had now closed its case. 'Ladies and gentlemen, that's the completion of the evidence in this case,' Justice Christopher Beale said. Justice Beale told jurors he was now required to have discussions with the two parties in their absence, 'and they could take a while'. He sent the jury home for the day, suggesting they might not be required to attend court on Friday. 'If you can just check your phone this evening, we will let you know if you get a long weekend or to come in tomorrow,' Justice Beale said. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers and Detective Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall are involved in the ongoing mushroom trial. Photo / Getty Images Defence clarifies Patterson's evidence Mandy took Patterson to evidence she'd given last week that she had a pre-surgery appointment booked at the Enrich Clinic in Melbourne for September 2023. She told the jury she had decided to get gastric bypass surgery, and this was the medical issue she'd mentioned in messages to her husband before the fatal lunch. On Tuesday, Rogers produced evidence that the clinic had never offered gastric bypass surgery. Mandy produced a screenshot of a message on the Enrich Clinic's website saying it would 'no longer' be offering liposuction as of June 2024. Patterson told the court that she had not had an appointment and believed they'd 'offered a full range of weight-loss surgery'. 'I was obviously mistaken,' she said. Prosecution asks three final questions Shortly after 11.30am, Rogers remarked that the jury would be pleased that she had three final questions for Patterson after a week of cross-examination. Rogers suggested that Patterson deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms, deliberately included them in the beef wellington and did so intending to kill her four guests. Patterson responded 'disagree' three times to each of the propositions. 'Your Honour, I have no further questions,' Rogers said. Mandy rose to his feet, telling the court that he had about 30 minutes of re-examination for Patterson before asking for a half-hour break. The jury then took a mid-morning break. Erin Patterson's defence team worked to clarify her evidence about booking in at a clinic. Photo / Getty Images Erin disputes children's account of leftovers In her evidence, Patterson said she scraped off the mushrooms and pastry of the lunch leftovers for her son and daughter and served herself a bowl of cereal because she wasn't feeling well. In her children's evidence, both said Patterson had plated herself up some leftovers too. Her daughter said Patterson 'wasn't very hungry' and her son ate his portion and the remainder of his mother's. Asked if her son and daughter were 'wrong about what you prepared yourself for dinner that night', Patterson agreed. Alleged poisoner grilled on bush poo claim Rogers took Patterson to evidence she gave last week about stopping to defacate on the side of the road, because of diarrhoea, while driving her son to a flying lesson in Tyabb. Earlier in the trial, the jury was told Patterson drove her two children an hour and a half to Tyabb for the lesson on the afternoon of July 30, 2023, but it was cancelled shortly before they arrived and she turned around. Patterson claimed she was suffering nausea and regular diarrhoea that day and stopped 30 minutes into the trip. Rogers took Patterson to her son's evidence, where he said that at no stage did his mother stop to use the toilet. 'I suggest he did not recall it because it did not happen?' Rogers asked. 'Disagree,' Patterson replied. 'This is another lie you told to explain how you managed the trip to Tyabb?' the prosecutor continued. 'Disagree,' Patterson said. Mushroom cook denies 'wild goose chase' claim Facing questions from Rogers on Wednesday, Patterson denied she led health authorities on a 'wild goose chase' as they probed the mushroom poisoning of her four lunch guests. Giving evidence last week, Patterson maintained that she used dried mushrooms in the deadly lunch that she had bought from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's east in about April 2023. She told the court she initially planned to use them in a pasta dish but decided they would be too overpowering and stored them in a Tupperware container in her pantry. She said she now believed she may have added foraged wild mushrooms to that container. Facing questions from Rogers on Wednesday, Patterson was asked if she was worried about them being too strong for the beef wellington. 'No, I didn't think that. I thought it was the perfect dish for them,' she responded. Rogers went on to probe the exchange Patterson had with Department of Health officer Sally Ann Atkinson about the Asian grocer. Atkinson gave evidence that she communicated with Patterson over several days in earlier August amid a public health probe into the poisoning. Text messages and calls between the pair showed Atkinson attempting to narrow down the location of the store. Rogers suggested Patterson was 'very familiar' with the area, owning a home in Mt Waverley and having previously worked for the Monash City Council. Patterson disputed this but did say she was familiar with the adjoining areas of Glen Waverley, Oakleigh and Clayton. Rogers suggested Patterson was 'deliberately vague' about the location of the Asian grocer because it was a lie. 'Incorrect,' Patterson responded. 'I was doing my best to remember when it happened, but I think I was clear at all times that I didn't have a memory of the actual purchase.' The trial, now in its seventh week, continues.
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
More denials from mushroom murder-accused
Disagree. Disagree. Disagree. Those were Erin Patterson's responses to the prosecution's final three questions in her murder trial. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC rounded out her marathon cross-examination on Thursday with three suggestions: that Patterson deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms in 2023, deliberately included them in the beef Wellington she served her former in-laws and did so intending to kill them. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the murders of her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, his aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, and the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. She denies deliberately poisoning her lunch guests on July 29, 2023 when she served them meals that included death cap mushrooms. Patterson was accused of more lies on her eighth and final day in the witness box at the Supreme Court in Morwell in regional Victoria. The 50-year-old was asked about her evidence that she dehydrated dried mushrooms she had bought from an Asian grocer before adding them to the beef Wellingtons. She agreed she never said this to anyone at the time and didn't mention putting the fungi into the dehydrator when she earlier admitted adding them to the lunch. "I suggest this is another lie you made up on the spot," Dr Rogers said, accusing Patterson of hedging her bets to try to make it sound like there were multiple possible sources for the death cap mushrooms. "Incorrect," the accused killer responded. The prosecutor also suggested Patterson lied about taking diarrhoea treatment following the lunch after the 50-year-old earlier claimed one reason she went to hospital was because she thought they would have something stronger. Patterson agreed she did not tell medical staff at the hospital she had taken the medication, maintaining no one asked. "If you were looking for something stronger, you would've told medical staff you had already taken Imodium and it didn't work," Dr Rogers said. "I don't agree," Patterson responded. She was also questioned about her evidence that she had to stop by the side of a road and go to the toilet in the bushes while driving her son to a flying lesson, something the boy denied during his testimony. "I suggest he did not recall you stopping by the bushes on the side of the road because it did not happen ... I suggest this is another lie you told the jury about how you managed the trip to Tyabb," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson said. The mother-of-two said she had served her children reheated beef Wellington with the mushroom and pastry scraped off while she had a bowl of cereal the night after the deadly lunch. But Dr Rogers referred to her children's evidence, in which they suggested their mother had the same meal of leftovers the night after the fatal lunch. One of Patterson's children said she "ate the same as us", but Patterson told the court they were incorrect and denied eating the leftover food. She also denied that she "deliberately concealed" one of her phones, referred to at the trial as phone A, from police when they searched her house. Patterson said she switched from phone A to another, referred to as phone B, because the former was "not cutting it anymore". But the prosecution pointed to records that showed regular use from a SIM card in phone A until days after the mushroom lunch. Patterson said she conducted a factory reset of phone B because she wanted to use it and that was the phone she gave police. "I suggest to you that there was nothing wrong with phone A and this is another lie," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson responded. Under defence barrister Colin Mandy SC's re-examination, Patterson became emotional as she talked about her daughter's ballet lessons and son's flying lesson. With all evidence in the trial concluded, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors about discussions they could expect before dismissing them for the day.
