Sydney underworld figure offers cemetery as bail security
An underworld figure, desperate for release from prison, has wagered a multimillion-dollar cemetery as collateral, taking a judge by surprise.
Omar Haouchar, 32, was arrested in January over an alleged conspiracy to murder a rival gang member outside the Day St police station in Sydney's city centre.
His barrister told a Supreme Court bail hearing that a person close to Haouchar had put forward a cemetery as security to support his release application.
"I've never seen a cemetery offered as security before," Justice Ian Harrison told the NSW Supreme Court today.
The valuation of the cemetery was uncertain because, unlike its surrounding property, it was not available for subdivision, barrister Ertunc Ozen SC said.
ADVERTISEMENT
But it was estimated to be worth millions of dollars.
Haouchar, who appeared in court via a video link from the Goulburn supermax remand centre, was previously denied bail in February.
Since that time, Ozen said further documents had been tendered to the court by prosecutors, detailing evidence against his client.
Associates of the Haouchar crime network allegedly used encrypted app Threema to discuss murdering 30-year-old Andre Kallita in December 2023.
Prosecutors claimed that Haouchar was using the handle "Invisible" in an encrypted group chat titled "URGENT".
The murder plot involved a lookout, waiting to see Kallita report to the police station for bail, alerting two shooters waiting close by, according to a police statement filed with the NSW Supreme Court.
But Ozen said there was insufficient evidence to prove Haouchar was Invisible.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The Crown simply cannot tie Invisible to this applicant," he told the court.
"This is the crux of the crown case, and without that attribution, the crown case fails."
He also argued that since Haouchar's transfer to supermax, his ability to communicate with his legal team had been limited and this would result in delays to court proceedings.
"The conditions of custody make it nearly impossible for him to prepare for this matter," Ozen said.
Crown prosecutor Rebecca Stefani opposed bail, arguing Haouchar posed a risk of committing further offences and attempting to leave the state.
She told the court he had spent 11 years in custody for a slew of offences.
These included reckless wounding, aggravated burglary and directing the activities of a criminal group.
The Haouchar syndicate, largely operated by leaders based in Lebanon, has been tied to AU$1.5 billion (NZ$1.6 billion) in cryptocurrency transactions and various firearm, drug, tobacco and money-laundering offences, police said previously.
Justice Harrison will make his decision on the bail application after further submissions have been filed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Sydney underworld figure offers cemetery as bail security
An underworld figure, desperate for release from prison, has wagered a multimillion-dollar cemetery as collateral, taking a judge by surprise. Omar Haouchar, 32, was arrested in January over an alleged conspiracy to murder a rival gang member outside the Day St police station in Sydney's city centre. His barrister told a Supreme Court bail hearing that a person close to Haouchar had put forward a cemetery as security to support his release application. "I've never seen a cemetery offered as security before," Justice Ian Harrison told the NSW Supreme Court today. The valuation of the cemetery was uncertain because, unlike its surrounding property, it was not available for subdivision, barrister Ertunc Ozen SC said. ADVERTISEMENT But it was estimated to be worth millions of dollars. Haouchar, who appeared in court via a video link from the Goulburn supermax remand centre, was previously denied bail in February. Since that time, Ozen said further documents had been tendered to the court by prosecutors, detailing evidence against his client. Associates of the Haouchar crime network allegedly used encrypted app Threema to discuss murdering 30-year-old Andre Kallita in December 2023. Prosecutors claimed that Haouchar was using the handle "Invisible" in an encrypted group chat titled "URGENT". The murder plot involved a lookout, waiting to see Kallita report to the police station for bail, alerting two shooters waiting close by, according to a police statement filed with the NSW Supreme Court. But Ozen said there was insufficient evidence to prove Haouchar was Invisible. ADVERTISEMENT "The Crown simply cannot tie Invisible to this applicant," he told the court. "This is the crux of the crown case, and without that attribution, the crown case fails." He also argued that since Haouchar's transfer to supermax, his ability to communicate with his legal team had been limited and this would result in delays to court proceedings. "The conditions of custody make it nearly impossible for him to prepare for this matter," Ozen said. Crown prosecutor Rebecca Stefani opposed bail, arguing Haouchar posed a risk of committing further offences and attempting to leave the state. She told the court he had spent 11 years in custody for a slew of offences. These included reckless wounding, aggravated burglary and directing the activities of a criminal group. The Haouchar syndicate, largely operated by leaders based in Lebanon, has been tied to AU$1.5 billion (NZ$1.6 billion) in cryptocurrency transactions and various firearm, drug, tobacco and money-laundering offences, police said previously. Justice Harrison will make his decision on the bail application after further submissions have been filed.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
More denials from mushroom murder-accused
Disagree. Disagree. Disagree. Those were Erin Patterson's responses to the prosecution's final three questions in her murder trial. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC rounded out her marathon cross-examination on Thursday with three suggestions: that Patterson deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms in 2023, deliberately included them in the beef Wellington she served her former in-laws and did so intending to kill them. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the murders of her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, his aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, and the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. She denies deliberately poisoning her lunch guests on July 29, 2023 when she served them meals that included death cap mushrooms. Patterson was accused of more lies on her eighth and final day in the witness box at the Supreme Court in Morwell in regional Victoria. The 50-year-old was asked about her evidence that she dehydrated dried mushrooms she had bought from an Asian grocer before adding them to the beef Wellingtons. She agreed she never said this to anyone at the time and didn't mention putting the fungi into the dehydrator when she earlier admitted adding them to the lunch. "I suggest this is another lie you made up on the spot," Dr Rogers said, accusing Patterson of hedging her bets to try to make it sound like there were multiple possible sources for the death cap mushrooms. "Incorrect," the accused killer responded. The prosecutor also suggested Patterson lied about taking diarrhoea treatment following the lunch after the 50-year-old earlier claimed one reason she went to hospital was because she thought they would have something stronger. Patterson agreed she did not tell medical staff at the hospital she had taken the medication, maintaining no one asked. "If you were looking for something stronger, you would've told medical staff you had already taken Imodium and it didn't work," Dr Rogers said. "I don't agree," Patterson responded. She was also questioned about her evidence that she had to stop by the side of a road and go to the toilet in the bushes while driving her son to a flying lesson, something the boy denied during his testimony. "I suggest he did not recall you stopping by the bushes on the side of the road because it did not happen ... I suggest this is another lie you told the jury about how you managed the trip to Tyabb," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson said. The mother-of-two said she had served her children reheated beef Wellington with the mushroom and pastry scraped off while she had a bowl of cereal the night after the deadly lunch. But Dr Rogers referred to her children's evidence, in which they suggested their mother had the same meal of leftovers the night after the fatal lunch. One of Patterson's children said she "ate the same as us", but Patterson told the court they were incorrect and denied eating the leftover food. She also denied that she "deliberately concealed" one of her phones, referred to at the trial as phone A, from police when they searched her house. Patterson said she switched from phone A to another, referred to as phone B, because the former was "not cutting it anymore". But the prosecution pointed to records that showed regular use from a SIM card in phone A until days after the mushroom lunch. Patterson said she conducted a factory reset of phone B because she wanted to use it and that was the phone she gave police. "I suggest to you that there was nothing wrong with phone A and this is another lie," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson responded. Under defence barrister Colin Mandy SC's re-examination, Patterson became emotional as she talked about her daughter's ballet lessons and son's flying lesson. With all evidence in the trial concluded, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors about discussions they could expect before dismissing them for the day.
1News
3 days ago
- 1News
'Wild goose chase': Patterson accused of inventing Asian grocer
Prosecutors have accused Erin Patterson of fabricating a key detail in her defence, telling the Supreme Court of Victoria she lied about buying mushrooms from an Asian grocery store in a bid to cover up the alleged poisoning of her in-laws. The Crown argues Patterson deliberately misled health authorities, doctors and police by claiming she purchased dried mushrooms from a shop in Melbourne's southeast, despite being unable to name the store or its location. "You lied about the source of the death cap mushrooms because you knew you were guilty of deliberately poisoning your four [relatives]," Crown Prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC said in court. "Incorrect," Patterson replied. Rogers told the court that Patterson had claimed to public health official Sally Ann Atkinson that she bought the mushrooms from a store somewhere in Oakleigh or Glen Waverley – areas she would be familiar with, having worked for the Monash Council. Yet, Patterson has never identified the store. ADVERTISEMENT "The Asian grocer story was a deliberate lie," Rogers alleged. Patterson insisted she wasn't sure where the mushrooms came from, but was trying to help. "I clarified... I think I made it clear at all times that I really wasn't sure, but I was trying to be helpful," she said. Woman accused of killing three people with poisonous mushrooms in beef Wellington testifies in her defence. (Source: 1News) She also told the court the mushrooms "smelled funny" when she first bought them, so she transferred them to a Tupperware container and later ran them through a food dehydrator – a detail Rogers suggested was "invented" to make the story sound more plausible. "You described the packaging in this way because you wanted it to sound like they were not commercially [provided] mushrooms," Rogers said. "That's incorrect," Patterson replied. ADVERTISEMENT In a tense back-and-forth, Patterson said she couldn't remember some of the details, including whether she herself accessed the iNaturalist website where sightings of death cap mushrooms had been logged in the months before the fatal lunch. "Well, somebody did," she said, "and that somebody could've been me." She also rejected allegations that she told doctors inconsistent things about where the mushrooms came from. When Rogers suggested she had changed her story about the mushrooms' weight and packaging to different officials, Patterson maintained: "It would have been me trying to clarify, not change." The prosecution argued the story mattered because it prompted a full-scale investigation by health officials – one they say was needlessly complicated by Patterson's misleading and inconsistent accounts. Patterson's defence lawyer Colin Mandy SC told the jury in opening remarks that these were not calculated lies, but rather actions made in panic and fear, as Patterson worried about being blamed. 'You went to Loch to collect death caps' Death cap mushrooms (file image). (Source: Prosecutors pointed to mobile phone data showing Patterson travelled to the town of Loch where death cap mushrooms had previously been spotted just hours before buying a food dehydrator. ADVERTISEMENT Dr Rogers alleged: "You went to Loch to collect death cap mushrooms. Within two hours, you bought a dehydrator." Patterson replied: "The only part of that that is true is that I bought a dehydrator." The court also heard further phone tower data allegedly placed Patterson in the Outtrim area on May 22, near a site where a well-known fungi expert had flagged death cap mushrooms on iNaturalist just one day earlier. Patterson said she didn't go there deliberately: "I didn't go to Outtrim, to Neilson St, and I don't remember going to Outtrim as a destination." Asked whether she may have passed through, she said: "That is possible, because you can pass through Outtrim on the way to Wonthaggi or Phillip Island." Rogers also suggested Patterson had "blitzed" dehydrated death cap mushrooms into powder and used it in the beef Wellingtons, comparing the method to how she'd previously hidden powdered mushrooms in her children's meals. Patterson rejected that claim, responding simply: "Disagree." ADVERTISEMENT Feeding leftovers to her children Most recipes for the dish found online contain mushrooms. (Source: Patterson admitted serving her children leftovers from the same lunch, telling the court: "It was the same lunch, yes." But she insisted the mushrooms had been removed. When asked why she proceeded with the meal after learning her in-laws were unwell, she said: "I didn't know or suspect that." When prosecutors suggested she hesitated to take her children to hospital for assessment after the lunch, Patterson admitted she asked doctors if it was "really necessary" because they had no symptoms. Rogers said it was not credible that, "if you thought, genuinely, that your children had eaten a potentially fatal poison... you'd be worried or stressed about pulling them out of school." Patterson replied: "The issue was mushrooms and they had not eaten the mushrooms." When asked if she loved her children, she responded: "I still love them." Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, maintaining the fatal July 2023 lunch was a tragic accident. The cross-examination of Erin Patterson in her triple murder trial continues.
