'No Kings' protests against Trump show liberals' silliness
Parades have dominated the headlines of late because President Donald Trump is holding one to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. The spectacle, which will feature tanks and soldiers, among other displays of our country's military might, will take place June 14 in our nation's capital.
The date also happens to be Trump's 79th birthday.
In a video previewing the parade, he invited Americans to attend the "unforgettable celebration," calling it - in Trump fashion - "one like you've never seen before."
"For two and a half centuries, the men and women of America's Army have dominated our enemies and protected our freedom at home," the president said. "This parade salutes our soldiers' remarkable strength and unbeatable spirit. You won't want to miss it. Just don't miss this one. It's going to be good."
Opinion: Hey, Democrats, LA riots make Americans like me glad Trump is president
That all sounds quite patriotic to me, and it's in line with Trump's longstanding desire to properly mark the country's 250th birthday in 2026.
In his first term, Trump fashioned the 1776 Commission to help prepare the celebration and remind Americans what the Founding Fathers envisioned when creating our republic.
Democrats shout 'dictator' and plan ridiculous protests
Democrats, however, are freaking out (what's new, right?).
Sen. Adam Schiff of California, pompous progressive extraordinaire, called the planned event a "dictator-style military parade," putting Trump on par with global bad guys like Russia's Vladimir Putin, North Korea's late Kim Jong Il and China's Xi Jinping.
For years, the left has tried to paint Trump as a Hitler-style strongman whose authoritarian instincts threaten democracy itself. Clearly, that argument has failed. Yet, they persist.
Opinion: Can you be legally punished for misgendering someone? Colorado says yes.
Liberals love nothing more than a rowdy protest, so that's what many are planning for the same day to show their outrage at the president.
"No Kings Day" is one of the most prominent anti-parade "movements," with at least 1,800 events planned nationwide. It has received financial support from the likes of Walmart heiress Christy Walton and a host of progressive groups.
"People from all walks of life support No Kings because our country was founded on the idea that presidents answer to the people - not to authoritarian overreach or violence," said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, a No Kings partner organization.
That is rich coming from Weingarten, who helped orchestrate the devastating and needless school shutdowns during COVID-19 that harmed millions of children.
The "No Kings" name is also ironic, considering Trump first got the idea to hold a big parade in 2017 when he attended France's Bastille Day celebration. The holiday marks a pivotal point in the French Revolution that overturned the monarchy and ushered in the country's democracy.
Not to be outdone with the silliness, the Women's March (remember the pink "pussyhat" marchers from 2017?) is trying to revive itself by hosting circus-themed "Kick Out the Clowns" protests, purportedly more than 300 events countrywide.
Activists will wear clown costumes to show their outrage at the Trump administration's "clown-show fascism." They have a "goal" of setting the record for the most circuses in one day.
"We need to kick out the clowns, and end the greatest shitshow on earth," the Women's March website proclaims.
I wish I were kidding ... but I'm not.
Clowns aside, should we be worried about a military parade?
Back briefly to Trump's parade. Should we be worried? Is it a symbol of the president's devious machinations?
It's helpful to consider what's happened in the past. While military-style parades aren't common in the United States, they aren't unprecedented, either. USA TODAY has referred to them as "retro."
Opinion: Democrats waste $20 million to learn why they lost men. Here's my free advice.
"I see it like most things in American politics today," David Dulio, distinguished professor of political science at Michigan's Oakland University, told me via email. "Many observers would like to reduce this to something simple when, in fact, it's complex. Are military parades in the U.S. common? No. But are they unprecedented? Also no."
The most recent such parade was in 1991, under President George H.W. Bush to commemorate the end of the Persian Gulf War. The inaugurations of former Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy also featured parades with military elements.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
The fact the Army's anniversary falls on Trump's birthday is leading to a lot of Democrats' consternation.
It's true that our reality TV president has a flair for the dramatic. And it's obvious he holds himself in high esteem.
It's also possible that Trump loves the country, too.
Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@usatoday.com or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump: Epstein did not introduce me to Melania
Jeffrey Epstein did not introduce Donald and Melania Trump, the president has said, after the first lady threatened to sue Hunter Biden for $1bn for making the claim. Biden, the son of the former US president, claimed last month that Mr Trump had met his wife through Epstein, the paedophile financier who died in prison in 2019. The first lady threatened to take legal action against him if he did not retract the 'disparaging and inflammatory' statement. Mr Trump on Thursday pushed back on Biden's claim, saying he met his wife through 'another person' whom he did not name. The US president has been under pressure over his former friendship with Epstein as his administration refuses to approve a blanket release of the documents it holds on the paedophile. Mr Trump accused Biden of making up stories to demean the first lady and said he had encouraged her to sue him. 'I said go forward. You know, I've done pretty well on these lawsuits lately… and Jeffrey Epstein had nothing to do with Melania and introducing,' he told Fox News Radio host Brian Kilmeade on Thursday morning. 'But they do that to demean, they make up stories. I mean I can tell you exactly how it was and it was another person actually… but it wasn't Jeffrey Epstein. 'I told her go ahead and do it. I'd rather use my lawyers – very upset about it.' Biden claimed in an interview in July that Mr Trump had been introduced to his wife, then a model, by Epstein, citing Michael Wolff, the journalist who has written four books about the president. Mrs Trump threatened to sue him if he did not retract his claim. Lawyers acting for the first lady wrote to the former president's son last week, accusing him of making 'false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements' about her, Fox News reported. Biden has so far refused to do so, saying on Thursday: 'F— that. That's not going to happen.' 'They spent an enormous time together. According to [Trump's] biographer, Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania,' Biden told Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan in an interview published on July 22. 'That's how... the first lady and the president met. Yeah, according to Michael Wolff.' Biden, a businessman and artist, has recently embarked on a media tour, marking a contrast to his father Joe, who has maintained a low profile since leaving office in January as he battles an aggressive form of prostate cancer. The former first son has defended his father and angrily lashed out at Democrats who forced his father to abandon his presidential bid, including George Clooney. 'F‑‑‑ him. F‑‑‑ him. F‑‑‑ him and everybody around him,' Biden said of the actor, a long-time Democratic supporter who called for his father to end his re-election campaign. He also lashed out at Mr Trump, whom he labelled a 'f---ing dictator thug'.
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
MSNBC pundit George Conway compares Trump to ‘Tony Soprano' over DC crime crackdown
George Conway, a conservative and leading critic of President Donald Trump, has compared the Republican to a fictional mobster when discussing the DC streets takover. Conway and former Homeland Security official Miles Taylor appeared on MSNBC Wednesday to discuss Trump's takeover of Washington, D.C. Trump placed the D.C. police force under federal control and deployed the National Guard to the nation's capital. Trump has claimed the move was in response to 'out of control' crime that is getting worse, though data shows violent crime in D.C. has been declining since it hit a peak in 2023. In response, Conway compared Trump to Tony Soprano, a fictional crime boss from the TV series The Sopranos. Conway has long criticized Trump and was once married to Kellyanne Conway, who served as an adviser to the president during his first term. 'We don't have Ronald Reagan anymore,' Conway told MSNBC, referring to the former conservative president. 'We have Tony Soprano. He's holding people up, threatening them, bullying them, doing things that are beyond his legal power to do. And that scares people.' The Independent has contacted the White House for comment. Conway went on to argue that the president intimidates and threatens his perceived enemies. 'We see the intimidation of people who have had the courage, like Miles [Taylor], to speak out and criticize the president,' Conway said. 'There is no limit to how low he will go, and what he will do to intimidate and to threaten and to assert power over things.' Taylor served as the Department of Homeland Security Chief of Staff under Trump's first administration. In 2018, Taylor penned an anonymous op-ed titled, ' I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration.' Taylor wrote that many Trump appointees 'have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump's more misguided impulses until he is out of office.' Trump signed an executive order in April targeting Taylor, stripping him of his security clearance and ordering the Justice Department to investigate his conduct. At the time, Taylor told The Independent that he predicted Trump might target him. Taylor's attorneys then sent a letter to inspectors general at the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security calling on them to investigate Trump's executive order. Taylor described the ordeal as destructive to his personal life. 'This has not been made easy, because once you are on the president's blacklist, all sorts of things in your life start to implode, businesses, relationships, friendships, financial, you have an army of lawyers,' he told MSNBC. Later in the segment, Conway went on to say he's concerned about federal involvement in local law enforcement throughout the country. This comes after Trump revealed Wednesday that his actions in D.C. will 'serve as a beacon for New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other places all over the country.' 'I also think it's important that people understand why it is that this kind of federal overreach is bad, and it's bad because it consolidates power in a federal government. And as Americans, we have never, never wanted that to happen,' Conway said. 'We've always had a federal system where local authorities handle local things like crime and safety on the streets, public safety.' 'For the federal government to get involved in that stuff — it's just a prescription for potential abuse, because they can do it all over the country, and there are no checks,' he added. 'So that's why we have to really draw the line here and fight back.' Trump also said he wants to extend the federal takeover of the D.C. police past its 30-day limi t, which would require Congressional authorization. Trump said he expects 'the Republicans will do it almost unanimously.'
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Putin is floating a new nuclear deal with the US ahead of Trump talks. Here's why
Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated he wants to pursue a new nuclear weapons agreement with US President Donald Trump, ahead of their anticipated summit in Alaska on Friday. The potential accord is framed by Mr Putin as part of a wider initiative to bolster global peace, coming amid persistent pressure from Mr Trump to de-escalate the three-and-a-half-year conflict in Ukraine. Moscow views the Ukrainian situation as integral to a complex web of security concerns that have elevated East-West tensions to their highest point since the Cold War. Despite Kyiv's repeated calls for an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire, Mr Putin has resisted, even as Russian forces continue their gradual advance in Ukraine. However, progress on a new arms control treaty at the summit could allow Mr Putin to present himself as actively engaged in broader peace efforts. This, in turn, might help dissuade Mr Trump from imposing new sanctions on Russia and its key exports, including oil, a measure the US leader has previously threatened. Such a development could also signify a broader push to mend relations with Washington, particularly concerning trade and economic ties, areas the Kremlin believes hold significant untapped potential. Why has Putin repeatedly talked up Russia's nuclear arsenal? Throughout the war, Mr Putin has delivered veiled threats about using nuclear missiles and warned that entering a direct confrontation with Russia could lead to World War Three. They have included verbal statements, war games, and lowering Russia's threshold for using nuclear weapons. The fact that Russia has more nuclear weapons than any other country gives it a stature in this domain that far exceeds its conventional military or economic power, allowing Mr Putin to face Mr Trump as an equal on the world stage when it comes to security. How many nuclear weapons do Russia and the US have? According to the Federation of American Scientists, Russia and the United States have estimated military stockpiles of 4,309 and 3,700 nuclear warheads respectively. China trails behind with an estimated 600. What does the existing US-Russia nuclear treaty say? Signed by then-US president Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev in 2010, the New START treaty caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the United States and Russia can deploy. Each is limited to no more than 1,550, and a maximum of 700 long-range missiles and bombers. Strategic weapons are those designed by each side to hit the enemy's centres of military, economic and political power. The treaty came into force in 2011 and was extended in 2021 for five more years after US President Joe Biden took office. In 2023, Mr Putin suspended Russia's participation but Moscow said it would continue to observe the warhead limits. The treaty expires on 5 February 2026. Security analysts expect both sides to breach the limits if it is not extended or replaced. What are the other nuclear points of contention? In a symptom of the underlying tensions, Mr Trump this month said he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia because of what he called threatening comments by Mr Medvedev about the possibility of war with the US. The Kremlin played down the move but said "everyone should be very, very careful" with nuclear rhetoric. Separately, an arms race looms over shorter- and intermediate-range missiles, which can also carry nuclear warheads. During Mr Trump's first presidency, in 2019, he pulled the US out of a treaty that had abolished all ground-based weapons in this category. Moscow denied his accusations that it was cheating. The United States plans to start deploying weapons including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles, previously placed mainly on ships, as well as new hypersonic missiles, in Germany from 2026. Russia said this month it no longer observes any restrictions on where it might deploy intermediate-range missiles.
