How To Build A Certificate Program Workers Actually Want In 6 Steps
How To Build A Certificate Program Workers Actually Want In 6 Steps
Certificate programs are everywhere now. Universities, tech companies, even influencers are offering them. According to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center (NSCRC), more students earned a certificate in 2023 than in any of the previous 10 years. But some of them feel like a letdown. You sign up hoping to gain something practical and maybe even transformational. Instead, you get recorded interviews, awkward discussion boards, and assignments that seem pulled from a high school workbook. If it is not going to challenge, inspire, or genuinely teach something useful, why are learners paying thousands of dollars?
I recently completed a certificate course at a major university and found myself increasingly frustrated. The content was limited to recorded interviews and materials that offered little beyond what I could have found through a quick search. What made it worse was that the course released content one week at a time. I had to wait for each new section to open, even though I could have completed the entire program in a few days. Dragging it out made the experience feel like an attempt to justify the high cost. I kept thinking: I could have learned this with a few well-phrased prompts or YouTube tutorials.
How Are Certificate Programs Different From University Courses?
I have developed quite a bit of curriculum throughout my career for many different universities, online platforms, and even Forbes. Much of what universities do is create a template with course learning outcomes (aka what you want people to learn by the end of the course) and align assignments to reach those goals. It is not that different to write a certificate program. A college course is typically part of a degree program, focused on academic learning and theoretical foundations, often taught over several weeks for credit. A certificate program is designed to teach a specific skill or outcome, usually in a shorter, more flexible format geared toward working professionals. A college course teaches you why something matters, while a certificate program shows you how to do it.
So, I thought it might be interesting to write an article that is a mini certificate program on how to build a certificate program. For this example, let's assume you want to create an emotional intelligence trainer certificate. The steps below apply to nearly any professional certification, whether you're building it as a consultant, a university, or a learning and development leader.
Step One: Start With The Learner's Goal In The Certificate Program
Step Two: Map The Milestones In The Certificate Program
Step Three: Choose The Right Format For The Certificate Program
Step Four: Build Assignments That Add Value To The Certificate Program
Step Five: Test The Certificate Program Like A Product
Step Six: Market The Outcome Of The Certificate Program
What Learners And Employers Want From A Certificate Program
Learners want clear results, a practical toolkit, a sense of progress, and content they cannot find with a quick search. Many do not want delayed access, forced discussions, or assignments that serve no clear purpose.
Certificates only matter to employers if they lead to real skill-building. Can the learner apply what they have learned? Can they show the presentation, workshop, or framework they created, not just a digital badge. Did they solve a relevant problem? For example, they helped improve team communication through an emotional intelligence training they designed. Did they take initiative to grow in a specific direction? Certification should be a proactive approach to professional development.
A Final Thought For Anyone Creating A Certificate Program
A good certificate program is about leveling up. If someone pays a premium, they should walk away with something they could not have learned from a free video or generic course. Whether you are a university, an entrepreneur, or a training leader, the ultimate test is this: Can your learners do something new, useful, and relevant because of your course? If the answer is yes, you are building something that truly gives value.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bodies of husband and wife taken into Gaza by Hamas recovered after special operation by Israeli forces
The bodies of a couple taken into Gaza by Hamas during the 7 October attacks have been recovered by Israeli forces, the country's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has announced. He said the bodies of husband and wife Judi Weinstein Haggai, 70, and Gad Haggai, 72, were recovered during a special operation by the Israeli military and the country's security agency, Shin Bet. Mr Netanyahu said they were killed on 7 October, 2023, and their bodies taken into Gaza by Hamas. In a statement, he said: "Together with all the citizens of Israel, my wife and I extend our heartfelt condolences to the dear families. "Our hearts ache for the most terrible loss. May their memory be blessed. "We will not rest or be silent until we return all of our abductees home - the living and the dead alike." The Hostages and Missing Persons Families Forum has been campaigning for the safe return of all Israeli citizens held hostage by Hamas. The hostage families said in a statement: "The return of Judi and Gad is painful and heartbreaking, yet it also brings healing to our uncertainty. "Their return reminds us all that it is the state's duty to bring everyone home, so that we, the families, together with all the people of Israel, can begin the process of healing and recovery. "Decision-makers must do everything necessary to reach an agreement that will return all 56 remaining hostages - the living for rehabilitation and the deceased for burial. There is no need to wait another 608 agonising days for this. "The mission can be completed as early as tomorrow morning. This is what the majority of the Israeli people want." Most of the hostages returned alive to Israel so far have been released as part of deals with Hamas during two temporary ceasefires in late 2023 and early 2025. The most recent ceasefire that saw a pause in the fighting and the exchange of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners fell apart in March. Israel has rejected calls for an unconditional or permanent ceasefire, saying Hamas cannot stay in Gaza. Read more from Sky News: On Wednesday, the US vetoed a draft UN Security Council resolution that demanded an "immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire" between Israel and Hamas militants in Gaza and unhindered aid access across the the war-ravaged territory. The other 14 countries on the council voted in favor of the draft. "The United States has been clear: We would not support any measure that fails to condemn Hamas and does not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza," said Dorothy Shea, acting US ambassador to the UN, ahead of the vote. She told the council it would also undermine US-led efforts to broker a ceasefire. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the latest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
Future Forecasting The Yearly Path That Will Advance AI To Reach AGI By 2040
Future forecasting the yearly path of advancing todays to AGI by 2040. In today's column, I am continuing my special series on the likely pathways that will get us from conventional AI to the avidly sought attainment of AGI (artificial general intelligence). AGI would be a type of AI that is fully on par with human intellect in all respects. I've previously outlined seven major paths that seem to be the most probable routes of advancing AI to reach AGI (see the link here). Here, I undertake an analytically speculative deep dive into one of those paths, namely I explore the year-by-year aspects of the considered most-expected route, the linear path. Other upcoming postings will cover each of the other remaining paths. The linear path consists of AI being advanced incrementally, one step at a time until we arrive at AGI. Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown as to whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. Right now, efforts to forecast when AGI is going to be attained consist principally of two paths. First, there are highly vocal AI luminaires making individualized brazen predictions. Their headiness makes outsized media headlines. Those prophecies seem to be coalescing toward the year 2030 as a targeted date for AGI. A somewhat quieter path is the advent of periodic surveys or polls of AI experts. This wisdom of the crowd approach is a form of scientific consensus. As I discuss at the link here, the latest polls seem to suggest that AI experts generally believe that we will reach AGI by the year 2040. Should you be swayed by the AI luminaries or more so by the AI experts and their scientific consensus? Historically, the use of scientific consensus as a method of understanding scientific postures has been relatively popular and construed as the standard way of doing things. If you rely on an individual scientist, they might have their own quirky view of the matter. The beauty of consensus is that a majority or more of those in a given realm are putting their collective weight behind whatever position is being espoused. The old adage is that two heads are better than one. In the case of scientific consensus, it might be dozens, hundreds, or thousands of heads that are better than one. For this discussion on the various pathways to AGI, I am going to proceed with the year 2040 as the consensus anticipated target date. Besides the scientific consensus of AI experts, another newer and more expansive approach to gauging when AGI will be achieved is known as AGI convergence-of-evidence or AGI consilience, which I discuss at the link here. As mentioned, in a previous posting I identified seven major pathways that AI is going to advance to become AGI (see the link here). The most often presumed path is the incremental progression trail. The AI industry tends to refer to this as the linear path. It is essentially slow and steady. Each of the other remaining major routes involves various twists and turns. Here's my list of all seven major pathways getting us from contemporary AI to the treasured AGI: You can apply those seven possible pathways to whatever AGI timeline that you want to come up with. Let's undertake a handy divide-and-conquer approach to identify what must presumably happen on a year-by-year basis to get from current AI to AGI. Here's how that goes. We are living in 2025 and somehow are supposed to arrive at AGI by the year 2040. That's essentially 15 years of elapsed time. In the particular case of the linear path, the key assumption is that AI is advancing in a stepwise fashion each year. There aren't any sudden breakthroughs or miracles that perchance arise. It is steady work and requires earnestly keeping our nose to the grind and getting the job done in those fifteen years ahead. The idea is to map out the next fifteen years and speculate what will happen with AI in each respective year. This can be done in a forward-looking mode and also a backward-looking mode. The forward-looking entails thinking about the progress of AI on a year-by-year basis, starting now and culminating in arriving at AGI in 2040. The backward-looking mode involves starting with 2040 as the deadline for AGI and then working back from that achievement on a year-by-year basis to arrive at the year 2025 (matching AI presently). This combination of forward and backward envisioning is a typical hallmark of futurecasting. Is this kind of a forecast of the future ironclad? Nope. If anyone could precisely lay out the next fifteen years of what will happen in AI, they probably would be as clairvoyant as Warren Buffett when it comes to predicting the stock market. Such a person could easily be awarded a Nobel Prize and ought to be one of the richest people ever. All in all, this strawman that I show here is primarily meant to get the juices flowing on how we can be future forecasting the state of AI. It is a conjecture. It is speculative. But at least it has a reasonable basis and is not entirely arbitrary or totally artificial. I went ahead and used the fifteen years of reaching AGI in 2040 as an illustrative example. It could be that 2050 is the date for AGI instead, and thus this journey will play out over 25 years. The timeline and mapping would then have 25 years to deal with rather than fifteen. If 2030 is going to be the AGI arrival year, the pathway would need to be markedly compressed. I opted to identify AI technological advancements for each of the years and added some brief thoughts on the societal implications too. Here's why. AI ethics and AI law are bound to become increasingly vital and will to some degree foster AI advances and in other ways possibly dampen some AI advances, see my in-depth coverage of such tensions at the link here. Here then is a strawman futures forecast year-by-year roadmap from 2025 to 2040 of a linear path getting us to AGI: Year 2025: AI multi-modal models finally become robust and fully integrated into LLMs. Significant improvements in AI real-time reasoning, sensorimotor integration, and grounded language understanding occur. The use of AI in professional domains such as law, medicine, and the like rachet up. Regulatory frameworks remain sporadic and generally unadopted. Year 2026: Agentic AI starts to blossom and become practical and widespread. AI systems with memory and planning capabilities achieve competence in open-ended tasks in simulation environments. Public interest in governing AI increases. Year 2027: The use of AI large-scale world models spurs substantially improved AI capabilities. AI can now computationally improve from fewer examples via advancements in AI meta-learning. Some of these advances allow AI to be employed in white-collar jobs that have a mild displacement economically, but only to a minor degree. Year 2028: AI agents have gained wide acceptance and are capable of executing multi-step tasks semi-autonomously in digital and physical domains, including robotics. AI becomes a key element as taught in schools and as used in education, co-teaching jointly with human teachers. Year 2029: AI is advanced sufficiently to have a generalized understanding of physical causality and real-world constraints through embodied learning. Concerns about AI as a job displacer reach heightened attention. Year 2030: Self-improving AI systems begin modifying their own code under controlled conditions, improving efficiency without human input. This is an important underpinning. Some claim that AGI is now just a year or two away, but this is premature, and ten more years will first take place. Year 2031: Hybrid AI consisting of integrated cognitive architectures unifying symbolic reasoning, neural networks, and probabilistic models has become the new accepted approach to AI. Infighting among AI developers as to whether hybrid AI was the way to go has now evaporated. AI-based tutors fully surpass human teachers in personalization and subject mastery, putting human teachers at great job risk. Year 2032: AI agents achieve human-level performance across most cognitive benchmarks, including abstraction, theory of mind (ToM), and cross-domain learning. This immensely exceeds prior versions of AI that did well on those metrics but not nearly to this degree. Industries begin to radically restructure and rethink their businesses with an AI-first mindset. Year 2033: AI scalability alignment protocols improve in terms of human-AI values alignment. This opens the door to faster adoption of AI due to a belief that AI safety is getting stronger. Trust in AI grows. But so is societal dependence on AI. Year 2034: AI interaction appears to be indistinguishable from human-to-human interaction, even as tested by those who are versed in tricking AI into revealing itself. The role of non-human intelligence and how AI stretches our understanding of philosophy, religion, and human psychology has become a high priority. Year 2035: AI systems exhibit bona fide signs of self-reflection, not just routinized mimicry or parroting. Advances occur in having AI computationally learn from failure across domains and optimizing for long-term utility functions. Debates over some form of UBI (universal basic income) lead to various trials of the approach to aid human labor displacements due to AI. Year 2036: AI advancement has led to fluid generalization across a wide swath of domains. Heated arguments take place about whether AGI is emerging, some say it is, and others insist that a scaling wall is about to be hit and that this is the best that AI will be. Nations begin to covet their AI and set up barriers to prevent other nations from stealing or copying the early AGI systems. Year 2037: Advances in AI showcase human-like situational adaptability and innovation. New inventions and scientific discoveries are being led by AI. Questions arise about whether this pre-AGI has sufficient moral reasoning and human goal alignment. Year 2038: AI systems now embody persistent identities, seemingly able to reflect on experiences across time. Experts believe we are on the cusp of AI reaching cognitive coherence akin to humans. Worldwide discourse on the legal personhood and rights of AI intensifies. Year 2039: Some of the last barriers to acceptance of AI as nearing AGI are overcome when AI demonstrates creativity, emotional nuance, and abstract reasoning in diverse contexts. This was one of the last straws on the camel's back. Existential risks and utopian visions fully dominate public apprehensions. Year 2040: General agreement occurs that AGI has now been attained, though it is still early days of AGI and some are not yet convinced that AGI is truly achieved. Society enters a transitional phase: post-scarcity economics, redefinition of human purpose, and consideration of co-evolution with AGI. Mull over the strawman timeline and consider where you will be and what you will be doing during each of those fifteen years. One viewpoint is that we are all along for the ride and there isn't much that anyone can individually do. I don't agree with that sentiment. Any of us can make a difference in how AI plays out and what the trajectory and impact of reaching AGI is going to be. As per the famous words of Abraham Lincoln: 'The most reliable way to predict the future is to create it.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Michigan man convicted for trying to support ISIS, possessing ‘destructive device'
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — Another Michigan man has been convicted for trying to provide support the Islamic State militant group. Aws Mohammed Naser, a 37-year-old from Westland, was convicted following a five-week trial in federal court. He was convicted of attempting to provide material support for a foreign terrorist organization and for being a felon in possession of a destructive device. Prosecutors claim Naser tried to travel and fight for the , also known as ISIS, but was turned away. So instead, he gathered drones and built a bomb in his basement. 19-year-old accused of working for ISIS, plotting attack at Michigan military base Jerome Gorgon Jr., the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, said Naser's actions made it clear he is a threat to the country. '(Naser) is a bombmaker and self-avowed 'son of the Islamic State' — a vicious foreign terrorist organization hell-bent on murdering Americans and destroying our way of life,' . 'Our office is dedicated to finding and applying the full force of the law against any terrorist, like Naser, plotting to harm Americans.' Prosecutors say Naser was radicalized years ago and posted 'extreme' content on his YouTube channel. He traveled to Iraq in 2012 and returned to the U.S. months later. He was set to head back to Iraq in January 2013 but was arrested and charged for robbing a gas station, resulting in prison time. When he was released from prison, he could no longer travel to join ISIS. 'Naser surreptitiously created social media accounts and joined invitation-only ISIS supporters' chatrooms, groups and private rooms where he obtained and viewed official ISIS media reports, publications and other jihadi propaganda,' Gorgon stated. 'In October 2017, FBI searched Naser's home and vehicle and recovered a readily 'assembleable' destructive device.' US says it broke up effort to bring toxic fungus to Michigan lab from China Naser faces up to 35 years in prison for the two charges. His conviction happened less than a month after another person from Michigan was arrested for planning an attack on a Michigan military base in support of ISIS. Ammar Abdulmajid-Mohamed Said, 19, on two federal charges for plotting an attack on the Tank-Automotive & Armaments Command facility in Warren. He allegedly bought armor-piercing ammo and magazines for the attack, used a drone to conduct 'recon' work over the facility and trained undercover employees how to use firearms and make Molotov cocktails. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
