RFK Jr. names 8 vaccine committee replacements, including COVID shot critic
The new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices include Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak.
Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots. He's even suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years.
Advertisement
Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named.
Advertisement
Kennedy made the announcement in
The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how Food and Drug Administration-cleared vaccines should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and determine the scope of vaccination programs.
Associated Press reporter Amanda Seitz contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is A Spray Tan Really That Much Safer Than A Suntan?
A bronzy glow may be the look you want for summer, but you likely know that sunbathing or using tanning beds could expose you to ultraviolet rays, which raise your risk for skin cancer. A spray tan may seem like a safer option for sun-kissed skin — but is it? In reality, 'the safest option is no tan via sun, tanning bed, spray or lotion,' Dr. Allison Larson, the physician executive director of dermatology at MedStar Health in Washington, D.C., told HuffPost. 'Love the skin you have.' Still, doctors recognize that you may want a tan. And spray tans are 'definitely safer from a skin cancer perspective,' said Dr. Kenneth Mark, a cosmetic dermatologist in New York City. 'We know that sun exposure and its ultraviolet rays damage our skin cells' DNA and predispose us to skin cancer and skin aging, in general, including sun spots, wrinkles, thinning of skin and collagen breakdown.' While spray tans are safer than lying out in the sun or using a tanning bed, they're not risk-free. Here's what medical experts want you to know about them. Spray tans are made of a sugar compound called dihydroxyacetone (DHA) that reacts to the proteins in the outer layer of your skin, giving you a bronzed color, said Marc Hurlbert, a pharmacologist and CEO of the Melanoma Research Alliance. DHA is a colorless compound that's applied as a fine mist by a trained technician. 'It doesn't involve melanin or UV exposure, just a surface-level chemical reaction,' Dr. Asmi Berry, a dermatologist in Los Angeles, told HuffPost. That reaction produces a temporary tan that fades over several days as your skin cells turn over and naturally exfoliate, she said. The biggest benefit is that you get a tan without exposing yourself to UV rays, Hurlbert said. This is important, as skin cancer is the most common cancer in the U.S., and 1 in 5 Americans will develop it in their lifetimes, according to the American Academy of Dermatology. Spray tans also often produce quick results, Larson said. And if you struggle to apply self-tanners evenly, spray tans can provide 'streak-free color,' Berry added. 'Spray tans are ideal if you want fast, all-over results and don't want to risk sun exposure,' Berry said. 'Compared to self-tanning lotions or mousses, spray tans can be more even and less messy, but they require a trip to the salon.' The Food and Drug Administration has approved DHA for use in sunless tanners but not in spray tans. The agency says, 'the use of DHA in 'tanning' booths as an all-over spray has not been approved by the FDA.' The reason is that there's a lack of safety data on the effects of inhaling the DHA mist. This is notable, Larson said. 'Based on animal and cell culture studies, we have reasons to be concerned about a negative impact on the lungs when DHA is inhaled. It is not yet known the degree of impact a spray tan would have, if inhaled, or how long this might last.' Inhaling particles from a chemical that's not tested for use as a spray tan could pose an 'unknown risk' for anyone, but especially those with asthma or pregnant women, Hurlbert said. The impact of getting DHA in your eyes, mouth or nose is also unknown. 'So, ultimate all-around safety cannot be confirmed,' he noted. Experts also aren't sure how much DHA is absorbed into the body from the skin or what impact that will have, Larson said. There's the potential for DHA to irritate your skin or cause an allergic reaction, Berry said. If you have a history of eczema or sensitive skin, she recommended doing a test patch or checking with your dermatologist first. Spray tans may also contain fragrances, which some people find irritating, Hurlbert said. Getting spray tans too often could lead to a buildup of DHA on your skin, which might cause dryness, Berry said. Keep in mind, too, that spray tans don't protect your skin from UV rays — so you still need to wear sunscreen and take steps to reduce your risk for skin cancer, Larson said. However, not everyone does that. A 2018 study published in JAMA Dermatology found that people who use sunless tanners often engaged in risky skin cancer-related behaviors, such as not seeking shade or wearing protective clothing outdoors. They were also more likely to report a recent sunburn. Research also suggests that DHA application followed by sunlight exposure can lead to damaging free radical formation in the skin, which could possibly lead to skin cancer, Larson said. That's why wearing sunscreen after a spray tan is crucial. Other studies have shown that DHA could damage the DNA of skin cells, Mark said. DNA damage is linked to skin cancer and may hinder new cell growth. Since we don't know the full risk of inhaling DHA, Mark recommended covering your eyes, nose, lips and mouth during a spray tan to avoid exposure. However, he acknowledged, 'That could prove challenging to also tan your face.' And make sure the room is ventilated, Hurlbert added. When you get a spray tan, they'll tell you how long to leave it on before showering. Follow those directions to ensure the tan sets properly, and then moisturize daily to keep your skin barrier healthy and to maintain the tan, Berry said. And don't forget to wear sunscreen before going outside, Larson emphasized. The bottom line is spray tans are safer for skin than suntanning or using a tanning bed when it comes to skin cancer risk, Mark said. But they could still bring some safety concerns. 'The aerosolized 'spray' form has not necessarily been studied enough or proven to be safe,' he said. The Important Body Part You're Probably Missing When You Apply Sunscreen These Skin Care-Quality Sunscreens Are Worth Every Penny The Best Sunscreen Is On Amazon, And It's Not What You Think
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How one state reduced its overdose death rate by 32% in a year
Overdose deaths in New York state declined 32% last year, a significant drop that officials and experts attribute to the state's efforts to expand harm reduction and addiction treatment services. An estimated 4,567 New Yorkers died of a drug overdose in 2024, compared to 6,688 in 2023, according to provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 77% of those deaths involved an opioid like fentanyl or heroin. Healthbeat dug into the measures the state took to help decrease its overdose death rate. The statewide decline mirrors a national trend, said Dr. Magdalena Cerdá, a professor and director of the Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy at the Department of Population Health at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Last year, about 80,000 Americans died of a drug overdose, down from about 110,000 deaths in 2023, a reduction of almost 27%, according to the CDC. 'We're still definitely in the middle of an overdose crisis,' Cerdá said. 'But the substantial decline in the past year gives me a lot of hope.' The reduction in deaths is promising but tenuous, experts say. Although overdose deaths have declined overall, racial disparities in mortality have widened, and uncertainty around federal funding related to addiction services could imperil recent progress. The Trump administration's recently released budget plan calls for more than $1 billion in cuts to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the federal agency focused on addiction and mental health. In New York, the reduction in deaths reflects a combination of forces, including wider availability of the overdose-reversing medication naloxone, expanded access to medication for opioid use disorder, and deeper investments in harm reduction services, experts say. 'There's likely multiple reasons for this decline, but one of them is the substantial investment that states have done, and in particular, New York state has done, in terms of the provision of harm reduction services and services to treat substance use disorders,' Cerdá said. In an announcement, Gov. Kathy Hochul's administration linked the decline in deaths to the state's distribution of nearly $400 million in opioid settlement funds, which are funding efforts to expand access to medication for addiction, supportive services, and recovery programs. 'These numbers show that our hard work and innovative approaches to establishing services are making a difference across the state,' Dr. Chinazo Cunningham, the commissioner of the Office of Addiction Services and Supports, said in a statement. Through a new online portal, the state has distributed more than 13 million fentanyl test strips and 10 million xylazine test strips — used to test drug samples — and 296,000 naloxone kits to residents for free, according to Hochul's administration. Additionally, the state Health Department distributed more than 537,600 naloxone kits from January 2024 through April 2025. The declines in mortality have not been evenly distributed across demographic groups. In New York City, while overdose deaths in 2023 declined for the first time in four years, including among white New Yorkers, they were unchanged among Black New Yorkers and increased among Latino New Yorkers. Recent data from the city Department of Health and Mental Hygiene show that high rates of overdose mortality persist in parts of the Bronx, Upper Manhattan, and Central Brooklyn. Addressing those disparities will require deeper investments in the impacted communities, including by reducing barriers to care and services, Cerdá said. In its annual report released in November, New York's Opioid Settlement Fund Advisory Board — a committee tasked with making recommendations for the allocation of the funding — stressed the need for racial equity in the distribution of settlement funds, describing ongoing overdose deaths in Black and Latino communities as an 'overarching concern.' Dr. Silvia Martins, a professor of epidemiology and director of the Substance Use Epidemiology Unit in the Department of Epidemiology at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, raised concerns that cuts to federal programs related to addiction could slow or stop the recent overall reduction in overdose deaths. Reduced funding for SAMHSA and looming cuts to Medicaid could curtail many Americans' access to addiction prevention and treatment programs, she said. And if federal funding for addiction services dries up, opioid settlement funds won't be able to fully close the gaps, she cautioned. 'I truly hope that the federal government realizes now is not the time to stop these efforts, because it's trending, in most states, in the right direction,' she said. 'We see that these efforts are working.' This story was produced by Healthbeat and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
After Purging Key Vaccine Panel, RFK Jr. Moves to Assert Control
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took to Fox News to do what he does best: spread wildly incendiary misinformation about vaccines and public health. RFK Jr. was asked about his decision to fire the entire vaccine advisory committee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a move that directly contradicted a confirmation process promise and set off alarms for experts. 'Ninety-seven percent of the people on the committee had conflicts of interest. This is a committee that has … we've gone up from 11 vaccines in 1986. Today, children get between 69 and 92 vaccines before they're 18. Not one of those vaccines—' 'That's really high,' Fox News's Martha McCallum said. 'Those are not all mandatory.' 'Those are all mandatory, and the reason there's 69 to 92 is some of the brands require three doses, some of them require four. But none of them have been safety tested. Except for the Covid vaccine, the only vaccine on the schedule that has gone through placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure was the Covid vaccine, so nobody has any idea what the risk profiles are on these products. And we don;t know whether they have anything to do with the epidemic of chronic disease, almost all the chronic disease … These are products designed to deregulate your immune system, change your immune system for like. And we are now having an epidemic of immune desregulation in our country and we don't have an idea … we're gonna investigate.' Kennedy Jr. is exaggerating about the number of vaccines before 18, which is closer to between 24 and 50. And many medical professionals have already stated their opposition to this placebo-controlled testing. 'The first vaccine for a disease is already proven safe through a placebo-controlled trial,' Senator Bill Cassidy—who was recently betrayed by Kennedy— told The Washington Post. 'Updating that vaccine does not require a new placebo-controlled trial to determine its safety. To require a placebo group would deny those patients access to the vaccine that has already been found safe.' There's also the fact that this kind of testing would be intentionally deceptive to patients. 'Ethics must be taken into account when you set up a study,' physician Stanley Plotkin said. 'Can I ethically agree to having people acquire the disease because they receive a placebo?' We should expect more delusional, crank-adjacent theories from perhaps our most important public sector.
