
Gareth O'Callaghan: Pope Francis let Jesus out of the church – will his successor lock him back in?
There's a small brown door to the left of the altar in the Sistine Chapel that mostly goes unnoticed by the millions who visit every year to marvel at its Renaissance architecture, and Michelangelo's frescoes, which adorn the ceiling of this hallowed place. Built in the late 15th century during the reign of Pope Sixtus IV, it's the second most visited museum in the world.
The door opens into the Stanza del Pianto, the Room of Tears, where the newly elected pope, within minutes of his accession, spends time changing into the white vestments of the papacy. The antechamber's name comes from the overwhelming emotions that the club-of-one member is overcome by, as he realises he must say goodbye to his past and relinquish his previous life.
Late next week, another man will walk through that door, completely unaware of what sort of life awaits him on the other side. According to the age-old rules of the conclave, his election is directed by the Holy Spirit, in whose charge and on whose advice he will lean for the rest of his life.
But what does that mean for the rest of us? For many, not a lot; but for Catholics, it's an indication of the Church's direction for many years to come.
Clergy and workers make arrangements in the Sistine Chapel before the papal conclave on May 9 in Vatican City. The world's 1.4 billion Catholics don't have a say in who is elected, nor do they gain any insight into the secrecy of how or why one individual is finally chosen. Photo:The world's 1.4 billion Catholics don't have a say in who is elected, nor do they gain any insight into the secrecy of how or why one individual is finally chosen. All we know is that this man will be appointed guardian of the sacred traditions of a Church that is in deep trouble, and has been for a long time.
My lasting impression of Pope Francis will be of a man who made an invisible God visible. He lived his life through a common-or-garden Jesus. In doing so, for people who struggle with the central message of the Christian faith, he brought to life the humanity and inclusiveness of this centuries-old figure upon whom our religion is based.
Migration, health, poverty, and climate change became his advocacies in a public showing of solidarity. He bled empathy, while leaning on theology – not an easy balancing act. He didn't so much dumb down the role of pope as make it accessible and relevant.
That couldn't have been easy when many of those around him in the Vatican's highest echelons would have preferred the opposite, namely conservatism bordering-on-regression, and secrecy. His dissenters – and there are many – would prefer to keep the papacy shrouded in a veil of mystery and airy-fairy spiritualism, despite the many walls he partly broke down.
He has raised the bar for his successor; but in a world that thrived since its inception on silence and secrecy – add in a generous helping of lies and deceit – that means nothing. What the world needs right now might not necessarily be what the next pope has in mind.
'I see this time as a reckoning,' are the opening words in Pope Francis's book Let Us Dream: The Path To A Better Future. Published five years ago, he was addressing the covid crisis; but these words resonate more strongly than ever in the aftermath of his death, and in what direction the Church should take under his successor.
He said:
We need a movement of people who know we need each other, who have a sense of responsibility to others and to the world.
I was asked last week if I believe the world needs another pope? I answered a resounding yes. We really do. We are desperately in need of a great pope, not just a good pope – one who is inclusive and wears his heart on his sleeve.
For what it's worth, my own choice would be José Tolentino de Mendonca, the son of a Portuguese fisherman, who Francis ordained cardinal in 2019.
Ireland is perhaps more critical of the Catholic Church than any other European country, and we have every right to be. We are still trying to break free of its appalling history, which we will likely never do because of how victims of clerical sex abuse, the Magdelene Laundries, and the mother and baby homes were frozen out by a Church that shamefully claimed love and truth as central to its teaching.
Training for the priesthood
In 1981, years before I became aware of sexual abuse within the Church, I started my studies for the priesthood at a Dublin seminary. I had been fortunate to know two fantastic priests who were passionate about their vocations. Perhaps it was their compassion that shaped my belief that I could also make a good priest.
During my time there, I witnessed a bizarre way of life, different to anything I could have imagined – a parallel universe not unlike the quirk and innocence of Father Ted. Young men – many were still teenagers – wearing vestments, playing childish pranks on each other, while slowly being institutionalised into a mindset that had little in common with the world beyond the walls of the college.
At teatime some evenings, a small number of priests who would later be convicted of rape and sex abuse in the diocese – including Bill Kearney and Tony Walsh – joined the younger students for the meal. It never occurred to me at the time that it wasn't their vocations these deviants were interested in.
After a year, I couldn't take any more of this strange existence. So I left. Whatever it was that I went there to find was so far removed from what I witnessed.
Church hypocrisy
Predators like Kearney and Walsh, and the bishops who moved abusers from parish to parish while ignoring allegations against them, buried the Church – showing up not just the stinking hypocrisy at the time, but also a complete absence of moral principles. Will it ever recover? I don't believe so.
It's a sadness at the heart of an increasing number of lapsed Catholics – of which I'm one; bearing grievances towards a Church that grounds itself on the teachings of Jesus but refuses to be inclusive of the needs of the most vulnerable.
Last year while attending a funeral, I watched a priest openly refuse communion to the daughter of the deceased. When she asked why, he replied: 'Because you're divorced'.
Pope Francis singled out priests who deny the sacraments to those because of their life's circumstances, calling them the 'hypocrites of today'. 'You have to go to the edges of existence if you want to see the world as it is,' he said. But how many popes or priests have ever done that?
Mourners at the tomb of Pope Francis inside St Mary Major Basilica in Rome last Sunday. While the pageantry of his funeral, with its bells and smells, was symbolically stunning, it wasn't what he wanted. File photo: AP/Alessandra Tarantino
Uniformity – once the bedrock of the Church – is no longer a reality. While the pageantry of his funeral, with its bells and smells, was symbolically stunning, it wasn't what he wanted. It was theatre, not faith. Symbolism from a time in history that some of the would-be popes believe is crucial to restore.
Will we ever witness pink smoke at a papal election? Will we ever see ordained women or married priests? Was it just a coincidence that Jesus appeared first to Mary Magdalene after his resurrection, instead of his male disciples? What does it tell us about her value to him? Until women have as meaningful a role as men, the Church can never hope to be a true reflection of modern life.
Part of the Church's uniformity was in how we once interpreted Jesus. We were meant to see him as we were taught to believe. Pope Francis changed that. He showed the world what it badly needed to see during his 12 years as pope.
During that time, he said the church will get sick if it stays safe 'locked inside'.
He wasn't afraid to use terms like 'armchair Catholics' – spiritual actors who pray loud in public but despise and criticise in private; and 'spiritual Alzheimer's' – aimed at those who love nothing more than spouting their 'cold morality'.
Days before his election in 2013, Pope Francis told his fellow cardinals, 'I have the impression that Jesus is locked inside the church and that he is knocking because he wants to get out!'
A pope has the power to take risks to mend his church and restore unity. Or he can cling to the past and destroy it. While it would be impossible for a new pope to drag church doctrine back to a time when Michelangelo lay on his back painting murals by candlelight, for some of the men who secretly fancy the job it wouldn't be for the lack of trying.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
4 days ago
- Irish Independent
Re-enactment of Daniel O'Connell's famous speech to take place in Cork town this Friday
2025 marks the 250th anniversary of the birth of Irish political leader who was one of Ireland's foremost politicians in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The Kerry native has often been hailed in his time as The Liberator. O'Connell a qualified barrister was the acknowledged political leader of Ireland's Roman Catholic majority in the first half of the 19th century. Born near Cahersiveen on August 6, 1775, O'Connell was instrumental in the Catholic Emancipation Act that granted political and civil rights to Catholics in Ireland. He was also a leading abolitionist who sought to ban the international slave trade in the early 1800s. Two of Ireland's major cities – Limerick and Dublin – have their main streets named in honour of O'Connell. He staged one of his famous Monster Meetings in Mallow on June 11, 1843 which attracted a reported crowd of 250,000 people from all over north Cork and further afield at the Repeal of the Act of Union meeting. 40 bands also marched in the parade. The heights and fields were crowded with spectators. As a person, O'Connell was extraordinary. Deeply popular with the public, rather than being a 'populist', he could explain the essence of complex arguments to audiences of thousands. O'Connell's constitutional approach was carried on by Thomas Davis and by Charles Stewart Parnell. ADVERTISEMENT Friday's re-enactment in Mallow town will attempt to recreate the events of that famous day in Mallow history. A number of monster repeal meetings were held at various locations throughout Ireland and preparations for the great Mallow Repeal Meeting commenced in October 1842. During a powerful oration Mr O'Connell told the captivated audience that there was one thing which gave him pleasure, and that was the length of time he enjoyed the confidence of the people. He was counsel for Ireland – the people were his clients - he had none other. He also told the spectators that he had given up the profession in which he was successful; and now for the remainder of his life he was resolved to devote himself to the advocacy of the Irish people and old Ireland. The speech by Daniel O'Connell in Mallow became known as the Mallow Defiance. The famous sculptor John Hogan carved an 18 feet marble statue of O'Connell which is located in the City Hall in Dublin. Famous orator Daniel O'Connell made his first ever speech in 1800 in City Hall, then called the Royal Exchange, and his statue shows him as an orator, raising his right hand to make a point. In November 1841, O'Connell became Lord Mayor of Dublin, another reason for having his statue in City Hall, where council meetings are still held.


Irish Independent
4 days ago
- Irish Independent
Man who committed ‘deceitful and premeditated' sex assaults at Lough Derg pilgrimage site jailed for four years
A worker at the Lough Derg Pilgrimage site who committed a range of sexual assault offences at the famous Christian retreat has been jailed for a total of four years.


RTÉ News
5 days ago
- RTÉ News
Pope Leo, in first month, makes a break in style from Francis
In his first month, Pope Leo XIV has taken a very different approach to his predecessor Francis. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, has led some two dozen public events since he was elected as the first US pope on 8 May but not made notable appointments, nor announced plans for foreign trips, nor said where he will live at the Vatican. It's a stark contrast to when Francis, originally from Argentina, was selected as the first pope from the Americas in March 2013. Within a month, Francis had announced he would be the first pontiff in more than a century to live outside the Vatican's apostolic palace, appointed his successor as Archbishop of Buenos Aires and created a new formal advisory group of senior Catholic cardinals. Two of Leo's long-time associates said they expect the 69-year-old Pope to take a deliberative approach to the challenges facing the Catholic Church and may require months before making major decisions. "Leo is taking his time," Rev Mark Francis, a friend of the new pontiff since the 1970s, said. "While he is going to continue in the path indicated by Pope Francis, his disposition is very different." Leo was first appointed a bishop by Francis in 2015 and then chosen by the late pope to take up a senior Vatican role two years ago. He has frequently praised his predecessor in his first weeks. He has also repeated some of Francis' main themes, and has echoed the Argentine pontiff's emotional appeals for an end to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. But the two men have different temperaments, according to Rev Francis, who attended seminary with Leo in Chicago and later knew him when they both lived in Rome in the 2000s. "Leo is much more focused and methodical and not inclined to hasty decisions," he said. Among the challenges facing the American pope is the Vatican's €83 million budget shortfall, which Reuters reported in February had stirred contention among senior cardinals under his predecessor. Other looming issues facing the 1.4 billion-member Church include declining adherence to the faith in Europe, ongoing revelations of clerical sexual abuse, and doctrinal debates over matters such as inclusion of LGBT Catholics and the possibility of women's ordination. Francis, who sought to modernise the Church, did not formally change many doctrines but garnered criticism from conservative cardinals by opening the door to communion for divorcees and blessings for same-sex couples. Rev Anthony Pizzo, who has known Leo since 1974 when they attended Villanova University outside Philadelphia together, said the pope is someone who listens carefully and seeks to hear many viewpoints before making decisions. "This is going to be his modus operandi," said Rev Pizzo, who leads the Midwest US province of the Augustinian religious order, to which Leo also belongs. "When you first come into leadership, listen well, get to know your constituency … to make a well-informed decision," he added, describing the pope's thought process. A 'shy' listener Francis and Leo came to the papacy at different ages and with different career backgrounds. Francis, elected at age 76, had been a cardinal for 12 years before ascending to the papacy. He had earlier been a leading contender in the 2005 conclave that elected his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI. Leo, seven years younger when he donned the white papal cassock, is a relative unknown on the world stage who only became a cardinal and Vatican official two years ago. He spent most of his prior career as a missionary in Peru. Early in his tenure, Francis told journalists that, due to his age, he expected to have a brief papacy of only a few years. Leo, the youngest pontiff since John Paul II was elected at age 58 in 1978, can perhaps expect a papacy of ten or more years. Among the challenges facing the new pope is the Vatican budget shortfall and the city-state also has a much larger gap in its pension fund, said to total some €631m by the Vatican's finance czar in 2022 but estimated by several insiders to have since ballooned significantly. In his first weeks, Leo has not addressed the budget issues and has made only a few new appointments to Vatican roles. But he has held formal one-on-one meetings with many senior Vatican officials, which Rev Pizzo suggested the pope could be using to try to learn quickly. Rev Jorge Martinez Vizueta, who knew Leo in Peru, said he is someone who pays close attention to what people tell him. "He listens a lot, even with a certain shyness," said Rev Martinez, an Augustinian at a monastery where Leo previously was a spiritual advisor. Although Leo has not announced where he will live, more than three informed sources said he is expected to move into the official papal apartments in the Vatican's apostolic palace overlooking St Peter's Square. Francis shunned the palace in favour of a Vatican hotel. One senior source, who asked not to be identified, said the papal apartments, which have not been lived in since 2013, will require at least two to three months of renovations. Careful with responses While Francis made some big decisions quickly in his first month, he also took time on other issues. He did not make his first trip abroad until late July 2013, four months into his papacy. Leo's first foreign trip is likely to be to Turkey, to celebrate the 1,700th anniversary of an early Church council with Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Vatican has not announced the trip, but it was previously planned for Francis. Bartholomew told an Italian television station that he and Leo discussed the possibility of the new pope travelling to Turkey in late November. Francis, who often spoke off the cuff, was known for giving freewheeling news conferences on flights home from his trips abroad and frequently responded to queries with an unexpected quip. Asked during his first flight home about a Vatican official said to be gay, Francis famously responded: "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?" Rev Francis said Leo, who in his first month has largely read from prepared texts, is likely to be more careful with his responses during news conferences. "He won't be shooting from the hip like Francis did while speaking with journalists," he said.