The White House said book bans aren't happening. Now JD Vance's memoir is a target.
Vice President JD Vance's memoir became a political lightning rod that propelled him to office, but now 'Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis' has been caught up in a censorship controversy sparked by the White House.
The 2016 bestseller, adapted for film by Netflix four years later, is one of over a dozen books reportedly pulled from the shelves of Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) school libraries. The DoDEA runs 161 schools across the globe for children from active-duty U.S. military families and DoD civilian families.
The agency has not outright banned 'Hillbilly Elegy,' but its officials have flagged the book for a compliance review, according to PEN America, a freedom of expression advocacy group. The pending review appears to be a case of 'soft censorship,' which occurs when officials temporarily pull books for evaluation, require parental permission for students to read, relocate materials to certain parts of libraries or impose other restrictions short of a ban.
The claims of censorship come after President Donald Trump's administration issued executive orders prohibiting the Armed Forces from promoting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), divisive concepts concerning race or sex, and 'gender ideology.' For similar reasons, DoDEA schools are reportedly no longer celebrating cultural heritage months like Black History Month or allowing trans students to play on sports teams or use bathrooms that align with their gender identity. Schools have also scrubbed references to historical figures including Susan B. Anthony, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks and Harriet Tubman from bulletin boards, multiple outlets have reported.
Jessica Tackaberry, communications director for DoDEA's Europe region, where some of the censorship claims originated, said in a statement to The 19th that the agency is reviewing its current policies and instructional resources to comply with the White House's recent executive orders and Department of Defense guidance.
'At this time, we are conducting a review,' she said. 'No materials have been permanently removed from our school libraries pending completion of the review. During this period, materials under review will have access limited to professional staff.'
Tackaberry would not confirm which books have been pulled from shelves or disclose when the compliance review period will end. DoDEA officials have a March 3 deadline to complete the review, according to Task & Purpose, which covers military news.
On February 7, Rep. Jamie Raskin posted a memo to X addressed to teachers at a DoDEA school. The directive informed them that books 'related to gender ideology or discriminatory equity ideology topics' will be removed from circulation so they can be assessed. It also advised the teachers to evaluate books in their classroom libraries for potential violations of recent executive orders.
Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, said his constituents are outraged that military families have been subjected to censorship. 'One asked a school official why they removed photos on the walls of Susan B. Anthony and Dr. King but not Leonardo DaVinci and was told: 'He was a real historical figure,'' he shared on X.
Many of the books DoDEA schools reportedly flagged for review implicitly or explicitly promote diversity. That includes 'Hillbilly Elegy,' a race-conscious book in which Vance often likens the White Appalachian population to other marginalized groups, particularly the Black and Latino communities. At times, Vance revels in the diversity around him. Describing his experience in a constitutional law seminar at Yale Law School, Vance writes:
'We called ourselves the island of misfit toys, as there was no real unifying force to our team — a conservative hillbilly from Appalachia, the super smart daughter of Indian immigrants, a black Canadian with decades' worth of street smarts, a neuroscientist from Phoenix, an aspiring civil rights attorney born a few minutes from Yale's campus, and an extremely progressive lesbian with the fantastic sense of humor, among others — but we became excellent friends.'
Discussing his time in the Marines, Vance recalls being pleasantly surprised by the diversity in his boot camp platoon. The members were White, Black and Hispanic; Catholic, Jewish, Protestant, atheist; rich and poor, he points out.
The Trump administration has directed DoDEA schools to give their students a patriotic education that avoids divisive concepts related to race or sex. In 'Hillbilly Elegy,' Vance critiques the government by suggesting that the child welfare system lacks the cultural awareness to understand how Black, Latino and Appalachian families function. In these communities, grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins play an influential role in children's lives rather than the nuclear family alone, Vance posits while discussing how his troubled mother almost lost custody of him. But social service agencies ignore this, he continues. They not only require extended family members to obtain licenses to become foster parents to their young kin but are also just as likely to place vulnerable youth with strangers than they are with blood relatives.
'In other words, our country's social services weren't made for hillbilly families, and they often made a bad problem worse,' Vance says.
While the book makes no reference to transgender people, it discusses sexuality throughout — that of the author and of others. In fact, Vance, who convinced himself he was gay as a child, takes aim at the church for focusing more on the 'gay agenda' than on Christian character. The memoir's sympathetic portrayal of LGBTQ+ people and descriptions of substance use disorder would be enough to get the book banned in both red and blue states, if not in DoDEA schools. It is also littered with the F-word and other foul language — 'Do you want to suck dicks?' his grandmother asks him when Vance frets over his sexuality.
The Office of the Vice President did not respond to The 19th's request for comment before publication. Vance was elected to the U.S. Senate in Ohio in 2022 and sworn in as vice president in January.
It's not as clear why the DoDEA has targeted other books, such as Oscar winner Julianne Moore's 2007 picture book 'Freckleface Strawberry.' Illustrated by LeUyen Pham, the children's book contains no references to race, gender or sexuality, but it tacitly celebrates diversity. The protagonist, who doesn't like how her red hair and freckles make her stand out, comes to appreciate these features. She realizes that her classmates also have unique characteristics, and she is shown playing with a diverse group of friends, including girls who appear to be Black and Asian American, though the book never calls out their race or ethnicity.
'Freckleface Strawberry is a semi-autobiographical story about a seven-year-old girl who dislikes her freckles but eventually learns to live with them when she realizes that she is different 'just like everybody else,'' explained Moore on Instagram, adding that she graduated from a Department of Defense-run school. 'It is a book I wrote for my children and for other kids to remind them that we all struggle, but are united by our humanity and our community.'
PEN America reports that DoDEA officials also pulled an Advanced Placement psychology book because it includes a chapter on 'sexuality and gender' and a social studies lesson for fourth-graders called 'A Nation of Immigrants.' A publication for elementary school students called 'How Does Immigration Affect the US?' and a biography of a transgender man who served in the Civil War were also flagged.
'The removal of these titles is yet another indicator of the new administration's flippant and autocratic approach to K-12 education,' Kasey Meehan, director of PEN America's Freedom to Read program, said in a statement.
News of censorship in DoDEA schools comes just weeks after the Trump administration denied that censorship is an issue in schools, calling such claims a 'hoax.' Instead, schools are simply removing materials that are obscene or grade level-inappropriate, the administration said in a January 24 press release announcing that the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights would not be investigating multiple claims of book banning.
PEN America says that over the past three years, book bans have nearly reached McCarthy-era levels, referring to Sen. Joe McCarthy, who led the charge against communist influences in government, the arts and other parts of society during the 1940s and '50s. The organization has recorded almost 16,000 instances of book bans nationally since 2021.
Other books PEN America says have been pulled for review from DoDEA schools:
'Becoming Nicole: The Transformation of an American Family' by Amy Ellis Nutt
'No Truth Without Ruth' written by Kathleen Krull, illustrated by Nancy Zhang
'The Kite Runner' by Khaled Hosseini
'Brave New World' by Aldous Huxley
'An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States' by Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz
'Well-Read Black Girl: Finding Our Stories, Discovering Ourselves' by Glory Edim
'War: How Conflict Shaped Us' by Margaret MacMillan
Instructional materials for sixth graders for Black History Month
The post The White House said book bans aren't happening. Now JD Vance's memoir is a target. appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
36 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump: Ukraine provoked Russian strikes
US President Donald Trump has suggested that Ukraine itself provoked the Russian strikes by conducting Operation Spider's Web. Source: Trump speaking to journalists on board Air Force One Details: Responding to a journalist's question about whether Operation Spider's Web had changed his view of what advantages Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy holds, Trump said it had given Russian leader Vladimir Putin a reason to bomb Ukrainian cities. Quote: "They gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night. That's the thing I didn't like about it. When I saw it I said 'Here we go, now it's going to be a strike'." Background: On 1 June 2025, the Security Service of Ukraine carried out a special operation codenamed Pavutyna (Spider's Web) and hit Russian strategic jets at four airfields. Vasyl Maliuk, Head of the Security Service of Ukraine, stated that 34% of strategic carriers of cruise missiles at the main airfields of the Russian Federation had been destroyed. The Security Service of Ukraine officially stated that 41 Russian strategic aircraft had been destroyed by FPV drone strikes, including A-50, Tu-95, Tu-22 M3 and Tu-160 aircraft. The estimated cost of the strategic aircraft destroyed is over US$7 billion. Colonel Ants Kiviselg, Head of the Estonian Defence Forces' Intelligence Centre, reported that the Russian Tu-95 bombers targeted during Operation Spider's Web had been preparing to launch missile strikes on Ukraine. In response to these actions, Russia launched large-scale strikes on Ukraine on the night of 5-6 June, using over 400 drones and 40 cruise and ballistic missiles. The attack resulted in numerous civilian casualties and significant damage to infrastructure. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities , lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant.