logo
Important voices ‘get heard about this'

Important voices ‘get heard about this'

An advocate for Palestinian freedom is disappointed Invercargill Mayor Nobby Clark rejected her group's request to speak at a recent council meeting.
On Tuesday, councillors voted against boycotting 112 companies connected to illegal Israeli settlements within Palestinian territory — a decision sealed by the mayor's casting vote following a 6-6 split.
The list of companies was created by the United Nations and brought to the council's attention by Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) at an earlier meeting.
PSNA Invercargill member Seren Palliser-O'Donohoe said an opportunity for the group to reinforce the motion on Tuesday was refused by the mayor.
Ms Palliser-O'Donohoe said she then requested to present to the council on a personal level with hopes of sharing a wider context of the occupation, but was also rejected.
"It's so important that the voices of ... affected communities that live in New Zealand get heard about this," Ms Palliser-O'Donohoe said.
"That was refused, unfortunately."
Ms Palliser-O'Donohoe said follow-up presentations had been allowed at other councils, and the group planned to complain to the chief executive and mayor.
In response to questions, Mr Clark said he believed he only refused individual members the right to speak, but he would have declined the group too had he been asked.
Mr Clark said members had emailed him and others to promote their views between meetings.
"They spoke at the previous council meeting and I committed to a staff report that was tabled at yesterday's meeting."
He said the council supported the United Nations declaration and the government's support of it but decided not to include it in the procurement policy.
There was no evidence the council had ever dealt with any of the listed companies, Mr Clark said.
Councillors discussed the matter for 30 minutes at Tuesday's meeting, Mr Clark making it clear he did not support the boycott.
Deputy mayor Tom Campbell agreed, questioning where the council would stop in relation to other countries.
Cr Lesley Soper took a different view, urging the companies be barred on ethical and legal grounds.
"We are handed on a plate the list of companies that we can say are excluded suppliers because they're involved in human rights violations," she said.
Cr Soper was supported by Cr Darren Ludlow, who gave the example of councils declaring themselves nuclear-free in days gone by.
Cr Alex Crackett said the council was involved in international relations whether it accepted it or not, while Cr Steve Broad said he was guided by the thought of his nieces and nephews one day asking how he had acted.
The staff recommendation was to alter guidelines for procurement, which would have still allowed the council to engage with the listed companies under exceptional circumstances.
The United Nations resolution was supported by the government when it was adopted in 2016, and has been included in procurement guidelines at the Christchurch City Council, Nelson City Council and Environment Canterbury.
Companies on the United Nations list encompass a variety of sectors, and include Airbnb, Expedia, TripAdvisor, Booking.com and Motorola.
— Matthew Rosenberg, Local Democracy Reporter
— LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Important voices ‘get heard about this'
Important voices ‘get heard about this'

Otago Daily Times

time7 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Important voices ‘get heard about this'

An advocate for Palestinian freedom is disappointed Invercargill Mayor Nobby Clark rejected her group's request to speak at a recent council meeting. On Tuesday, councillors voted against boycotting 112 companies connected to illegal Israeli settlements within Palestinian territory — a decision sealed by the mayor's casting vote following a 6-6 split. The list of companies was created by the United Nations and brought to the council's attention by Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) at an earlier meeting. PSNA Invercargill member Seren Palliser-O'Donohoe said an opportunity for the group to reinforce the motion on Tuesday was refused by the mayor. Ms Palliser-O'Donohoe said she then requested to present to the council on a personal level with hopes of sharing a wider context of the occupation, but was also rejected. "It's so important that the voices of ... affected communities that live in New Zealand get heard about this," Ms Palliser-O'Donohoe said. "That was refused, unfortunately." Ms Palliser-O'Donohoe said follow-up presentations had been allowed at other councils, and the group planned to complain to the chief executive and mayor. In response to questions, Mr Clark said he believed he only refused individual members the right to speak, but he would have declined the group too had he been asked. Mr Clark said members had emailed him and others to promote their views between meetings. "They spoke at the previous council meeting and I committed to a staff report that was tabled at yesterday's meeting." He said the council supported the United Nations declaration and the government's support of it but decided not to include it in the procurement policy. There was no evidence the council had ever dealt with any of the listed companies, Mr Clark said. Councillors discussed the matter for 30 minutes at Tuesday's meeting, Mr Clark making it clear he did not support the boycott. Deputy mayor Tom Campbell agreed, questioning where the council would stop in relation to other countries. Cr Lesley Soper took a different view, urging the companies be barred on ethical and legal grounds. "We are handed on a plate the list of companies that we can say are excluded suppliers because they're involved in human rights violations," she said. Cr Soper was supported by Cr Darren Ludlow, who gave the example of councils declaring themselves nuclear-free in days gone by. Cr Alex Crackett said the council was involved in international relations whether it accepted it or not, while Cr Steve Broad said he was guided by the thought of his nieces and nephews one day asking how he had acted. The staff recommendation was to alter guidelines for procurement, which would have still allowed the council to engage with the listed companies under exceptional circumstances. The United Nations resolution was supported by the government when it was adopted in 2016, and has been included in procurement guidelines at the Christchurch City Council, Nelson City Council and Environment Canterbury. Companies on the United Nations list encompass a variety of sectors, and include Airbnb, Expedia, TripAdvisor, and Motorola. — Matthew Rosenberg, Local Democracy Reporter — LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

The House: Parliament's Reaction To The Middle East Crisis
The House: Parliament's Reaction To The Middle East Crisis

Scoop

time14 hours ago

  • Scoop

The House: Parliament's Reaction To The Middle East Crisis

Parliament's week began with an assurance that the safety of New Zealanders in the Middle East is the first priority. The tense situation in the Middle East, and indeed, intervention from one of our allies is something that no government could ignore, so when the sitting day began on Tuesday, the first item of business was not Question Time, but a Ministerial Statement from Foreign Minister Winston Peters, followed by debate and questions. Peters emphasised that the government's main focus amidst the tension in the region was to get New Zealanders out of harm's way. "The government is committed to supporting New Zealanders caught up in this crisis," Peters told the House. "Since the beginning of the conflict, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade has provided around the clock, 24/7 consular support to New Zealanders in Israel and Iran-and to their families back home in New Zealand - and will continue to do so." The statement was also peppered with lines advocating for three D words: diplomacy, de-escalation, and dialogue - treading a delicate line of not signalling outright support for either side, citing New Zealand's limited influence in the Middle East. Perhaps as a reaction to accusations of fence-sitting in recent days, Peters finished the statement by offering a list of what New Zealand does and does not want in the region. "We want de-escalation and dialogue. We want a two-state solution, with Israelis and Palestinians living in security and peace side-by-side. We want humanitarian aid to get to those who need it. Ultimately, we want peace. "What we do not want is New Zealanders in harm's way. We do not want ever escalating rounds of military action. We do not want a nuclear Iran. We do not want Hamas holding hostages and terrorising Palestinian and Israeli civilians alike. And we do not want Israel occupying Palestinian land. "Ultimately, we do not want another generation of young people in the Middle East, scarred by conflict, replicating the enmities of today and yesterday. This cycle of conflict, now generations old, must end." Statement benefits Ministerial Statements are used by the government to brief Parliament-and by extension the public-on an unfolding situation or event and explain the government's plan of action in response to it. They resemble a press conference wherein a minister delivers a statement, followed by questions or comments from MPs from other parties, generally spokespersons on the relevant topic. There is a tactical benefit for governments in getting in first and delivering a Ministerial Statement (instead of waiting for the Opposition to request an Urgent Debate), in that you can lead the messaging, and so try to control it. Equally though, there is a benefit to the Opposition from Ministerial Statements - because they are able to both make comments and ask questions. Ministerial Statements are more flexible than either Question Time or Urgent Debates. The Q & A Labour leader Chris Hipkins generally agreed with Peters' advocation for diplomacy over the conflict saying "there is much in the statement by our Minister of Foreign Affairs that I completely agree with". "We also welcome the possibility of a ceasefire. We also endorse the non-expulsion of ambassadors from countries who have taken actions that we disagree with. "If we want international diplomacy, if we want international dialogue, the role of diplomats has never been more important. We also want to acknowledge the New Zealand Defence Force deployment, and they go with our full support." Opinions diverged over whether New Zealand should have called the US strike on Iran a violation of the UN Charter, with Hipkins asking Peters whether the government believed the strike was in line with the Charter's clause on the right to self defence. Peter continued to tread a delicate line in his reply. "Unlike some, we wait till we get the evidence, and we've said it constantly day-after-day that instead of rushing to judgement, as we were asked this morning by the media, 'Has peace broken out?' - 'No,' we said, 'We're going to trust but verify,' and when we sought to verify we found that what they were saying by way of questioning was wrong. "And in this case, we're going to find out the facts as time goes by. There'll be some days yet-maybe sometime yet-before we can establish as to the immediacy of the problem and the level of deterioration with respect to the Iran position on gaining nuclear capability in terms of weapons." While Hipkins wasn't quite able to milk the committal he wanted from Peters, the two weren't especially adversarial in their exchange. That mood wasn't to last though, with Green co-leader Marama Davidson the other opposition MP to question the minister. After a speech advocating upholding the rules-based order, Davidson asked whether the minister would condemn the Israeli and American strikes on Iran. This question seemed to open the floodgates for a shouting match between the two parties, which perhaps is a lot easier with the new seating configuration in the House (New Zealand First are now close to the Greens, having swapped with ACT to allow the new deputy prime minister to sit next to the prime minister). A Ministerial Statement which began in a relatively statesmanlike fashion then morphed into a political tit-for-tat. "I have to say when it comes to the proxies for Iran that have committed so much terrorism and the loss of thousands of lives, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, with respect to Iran-when it comes to that, the Greens have been not a syllable, not a sound, not a mutter, not a murmur, no condemnation whatsoever," Peters said. "We've condemned all parties, and shouting out like that typically just disposes me to point to that member and say that member's only got one side, and, for the first time ever, she's mentioned Iran's people. Yes, Iran's people have been under 40 years of desperation." After a few minutes of back and forth and argy-bargy, Speaker Gerry Brownlee blew his metaphorical whistle. "Neither party here is displaying the sort of decorum that you'd expect out of Parliament. I refer both sides to Speaker's ruling 150/1, which means that neither side of the House has carte blanche to say whatever they like as a result of a ministerial statement." *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.

PNG And Bougainville Leaders To Finalise Independence Agreements On Thursday
PNG And Bougainville Leaders To Finalise Independence Agreements On Thursday

Scoop

time14 hours ago

  • Scoop

PNG And Bougainville Leaders To Finalise Independence Agreements On Thursday

Leaders of Papua New Guinea and Bougainville are due to hold a one-day meeting on Thursday to sign off on agreements related to the autonomous region's quest for independence. The meeting will likely mark the end of the involvement of former New Zealand governor-general Sir Jerry Mateparae. Sir Jerry was brought in to help find a way forward after a years' long stalemate over the tabling of the results of Bougainville's independence referendum. His involvement is set to end as Bougainville enters its election process, with writs expected to be issued at the end of next week. Most recently, ten days of meetings in Burnham, New Zealand, orchestrated by Sir Jerry, appear to have failed to achieve significant progress. The PNG and Bougainville governments have largely refused to talk about the issues publicly. Meanwhile, the United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres is set to attend a major peace and reconciliation ceremony between PNG and Bougainville in September. PNG Foreign Affairs Minister Justin Tkatchenko has confirmed Guterres' attendance. The Post-Courier reports Tkatchenko saying the UN chief will be in Port Moresby from 2-3 September for the national reconciliation. The national reconciliation was originally going to be staged in 2019 before Bougainvilleans had voted in their independence referendum, but it did not go ahead.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store