‘Say Kate is your boss': Pharmacist claims ex-TD O'Connell and husband were working him ‘to death'
A pharmacist who claims he was forced out of a €112,000-a-year job because former TD
Kate O'Connell
and her husband were working him 'to death' has denied raising his voice and becoming 'aggressive' when she pulled him up on using his phone at work.
In a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977, Marwan Al Rahbi has alleged that he was constructively dismissed by Rathgar Pharmacy Ltd – having been forced to quit order to protect his health after a diagnosis of workplace stress, the
Workplace Relations Commission
(WRC) was told.
The company, which is owned and operated by Mrs O'Connell and her husband, has pharmacies in
Kilmacud
,
Rathgar
and
Sandyford
in south
Dublin
. It denies the complaint.
Mr Al Rahbi in evidence to the WRC on Tuesday: 'They were working me to the death. One of the reasons to resign was to protect my health and mental health. I couldn't sleep at night, and I have a family. I provided them many opportunities to resolve things, and they didn't,' he said.
READ MORE
His barrister, Cillian McGovern, appearing instructed by Crushell & Co Solicitors, said his client had written to his employer raising a formal workplace grievance in May 2024, referring to 'several concerning incidents', but was met with 'blanket denial' from Mrs O'Connell, and that the matters were not addressed by the firm.
The WRC heard that Mr Al Rahbi initially complained about Mrs O'Connell to her husband after she found him using his mobile phone at work on one occasion early in 2024. Mr Al Rahbi said Mrs O'Connell had come up to him and said: 'Are you not working?'
Mr Al Rahbi's evidence was that despite a directive on mobile phone use at work, the pharmacy group operated five or six WhatsApp groups where work-related information was circulated. He said he was using his phone on that occasion because he was 'dealing with my sick child' at the time.
The complainant said he then phoned Morgan O'Connell about what had happened. At the time, Mr O'Connell was waiting in hospital for his wife to collect him following shoulder surgery, the tribunal heard.
'I rang Morgan, and he said: 'Go the f*** back to work',' Mr Al Rahbi said. His position was that it showed that the likely outcome of any workplace grievance he raised with Mr O'Connell about his wife, or vice versa, was going to be 'unfair'.
Mrs O'Connell told the WRC on Tuesday that Mr Al Rahbi was 'insubordinate' towards her on April 15th, 2024. 'It was the flying off the handle at me ... it was extremely unusual for a support pharmacist to verbally attack their senior pharmacist, their boss, in front of other staff,' she said.
She said Mr Al Rahbi was 'very on edge, agitated, aggressive', Mrs O'Connell said, adding that she 'instinctively' moved to the far side of a bench during the incident. 'I do remember I said to him: 'If you think you're going to hit me, that's not going to go very well for you', as he wagged his finger and shouted in my face,' she added.
When counsel for the respondent Derek Dunne, instructed by Kelly Hoban Solicitors, put it to Mr Al Rahbi in cross-examination that he had been 'aggressive' or 'confrontational' with Mrs O'Connell, he said: 'No, I haven't been aggressive. This is my way to speak.'
Questioned on a further interaction with Mr O'Connell in the pharmacy a number of days later, Mr Dunne, put it to Mr Al Rahbi that he had 'refused to acknowledge Mrs O'Connell as your immediate superior'.
The complainant said Mr O'Connell was 'shaking' and 'screaming' at him, quoting him as saying: ''Say Kate is your boss.''
'I said: 'Why should I say that?'' Mr Al Rahbi said.
He said Mr O'Connell then told him he was to put his phone in the kitchen. 'We are not in school. I have a family. I am a responsible adult,' he said. 'He was screaming: 'Are you continuing to use the phone?'' he added.
Counsel put it to Mr Al Rahbi that Mr O'Connell had given him a verbal warning on that occasion. Mr Al Rahbi said it was 'five minutes of shouting' and that 'turning up shouting and angry at me' was 'not a verbal warning'.
Mr Al Rahbi said Mr and Mrs O'Connell raised mobile phone use as an issue with him at a review meeting later in May 2024. 'I was trying to answer; they didn't allow me to speak.'
He said he wanted to discuss his overall working hours, rostering during Ramadan, the contract he had been presented with and the question of a pay rise, but that these were not addressed by the couple. His evidence was that Morgan O'Connell told him: 'You are here just to listen, not to speak.''
The employer's position is that Mr Al Rahbi told his bosses he was quitting the job with a week's notice. Mr Al Rahbi said Mr O'Connell told him he was 'dismissed' but that he had not been sure whether that meant from the meeting or from his employment.
The tribunal heard Mr O'Connell wrote to Mr Al Rahbi a few days later: 'You were not dismissed by me, you were offered a renewal of your contract under the same terms and conditions.' Mr O'Connell added in his email that he was 'an employer of 20 years' and was aware that a dismissal was meant to be in writing.
In her evidence, Mrs O'Connell told the WRC that Mr Al Rahbi 'said he was quitting' at that stage. 'I distinctly remember Morgan saying: 'We're going to offer you the same contract and the same terms and conditions.' He [Mr Al Rahbi] said: 'I quit.' We said: 'When?' He said: 'I'm leaving in a week.''
Mr Al Rahbi's complaint stated that he reached 'breaking point' during a 12.5-hour shift on June 19th last year.
The tribunal heard the pharmacy followed a four-three shift pattern on a 28-day rotation, with 12.5-hour daily shifts.
Mr Al Rahbi said he had agreed with Mrs O'Connell in September 2023 that he would have reduced hours for Ramadan in 2024.
Adjudicator Andrew Heavey has asked Mrs O'Connell to produce working-time records.
The adjudicator has adjourned the case pending the arrangement of another date for the hearing in the autumn, when it is expected Mr O'Connell and an employee of the pharmacy group, Sarah Lynch, will give their evidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Families deported to Nigeria could have left voluntarily, says Minister
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan has defended the State's handling of the deportation of 35 people to Nigeria on Wednesday, saying those removed had previously been asked to leave voluntarily. Speaking on Sunday on RTÉ Radio 1's This Week programme, the Minister said: 'Each person who was on the aeroplane that went back to Nigeria had their own individual narratives of persecution assessed by the International Protection Office , and on appeal, and subsequently they got a deportation order that wasn't responded to. 'They were requested to leave voluntarily and that didn't happen.' The Garda National Immigration Bureau carried out the operation, which involved 21 men, nine women and five children, who were deported on a chartered flight from Dublin Airport to Lagos, Nigeria on Wednesday night. The children involved were deported as part of family groups. READ MORE Friends of the families deported, who were living with them at an International Protection Accommodation Services (Ipas) centre in west Dublin, described the scenes last week as upsetting and 'traumatising'. Farhiya Ali, a mother living with her four children in the centre, said: 'The kids were coming down for breakfast when these five men wearing cargo pants, big jackets arrived. 'They came into the third floor, stood in front of the bedroom door, took the three kids back in and told them to pack up. We heard them say: 'You are going to be deported.' As soon as the other children heard then they were all crying. It was such a horrific scene.' Three siblings from one family were among those deported. They had lived at their accommodation since January 2022 with their mother and father. [ Families facing deportation are 'at serious risk of destitution', warns refugee council Opens in new window ] Asked about the criticism from families at the Ipas centre about the manner of the deportation of children, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'This is not a pleasant part of my job. I don't relish doing this, but it has to be done. If we have an immigration system or an asylum system that doesn't have a consequence for people who are ruled not to be entitled to stay here then the system becomes meaningless.' Asked whether he would put Nigeria on Ireland's safe list of countries, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'There's a difference here between putting a country on the safe list for the purposes of international protection under the [International Protection] Act, and determining whether or not to send somebody back to a country from whence they came.' [ Ministers accused of giving 'half the picture' on refugees as more than 40% get positive decisions Opens in new window ] Applicants from designated safe countries of origin receive their interview date on the day they apply for international protection, reducing their waiting time for an interview. 'There's faster time frames for Nigeria at present anyway because of the heightened number of people from Nigeria claiming asylum in Ireland,' said the Minister. 'It doesn't mean if you're not on the safe list of countries from international protection, we can't send you back to the country where you came from.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Will the new rental reforms work? Many industry observers are sceptical
What's happening to the rules governing renting? A proposed overhaul of rules is going before Cabinet on Tuesday morning. It would see a significant shake-up in the rental market in the months ahead. What are the current rules? Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) were introduced in 2016 to cap rent increases in areas where there was a very high demand for housing and rental homes. Initially, RPZs were confined to large urban centres but, as the housing crisis deepened, more and more areas were designated RPZs. In these locations, as it stands, rent increases cannot be greater than the rate of inflation or 2 per cent – whichever is lower. What are the changes proposed? The Government is planning to keep the caps for existing tenancies, at least to a large degree, while easing restrictions on rent increases for newly built homes. The plan – and it has yet to be agreed – would see the current RPZ annual caps not apply to new buildings constructed after a certain date, with the rents in qualifying properties instead to be tied to inflation. [ Rent controls to be eased for new builds in planned 'pressure zones' reform Opens in new window ] And why would the Government create what looks like a two-tiered rental system? In fairness, there is already a two-tiered system, with some properties in RPZs and some not, so what the Government is considering is a three-tiered system. READ MORE What is the market currently like for rents? Rents are climbing faster than at any point over the past 20 years, with the national monthly average between January and March surpassing €2,000 for the first time, according to a report from That compares to a low of just €765 in 2011. Why are rents climbing so fast? Much of that increase is down to a lack of supply. There were just 2,300 homes available to rent nationally on May 1st, down 14 per cent year-on-year and the third-lowest total for May in 20 years. In a properly functioning market that number should be closer to 10,000. Why is supply such an issue? There are many, many reasons but the author of the report, Trinity College Dublin economist Ronan Lyons, has said changes made to rent controls in 2021 when rent caps were reduced from 4 per cent to 2 per cent 'dramatically reduced the ability of Ireland's rental sector to attract the capital needed for new supply, the ultimate remedy for the shortage'. And this overhaul is aimed at attracting that capital, is that correct? That is the rationale, certainly. The thinking is that if rent restrictions are eased for new apartments, more money will pour into the sector and more apartments will be built, which will ease the pressure on the market as a whole. Will the owners of these new builds be able to charge what they want? They will be able to charge what the market will bear, for sure. However, there is some good news for people who are renting now: under the proposals the existing cap of 2 per cent will remain in place – at least for existing tenancies, but landlords will be able to increase the rent to the market rate between tenancies, something which is not permitted under the current rules. [ Ireland's rising rents: 'Our budget would have been €1,300 a month, there isn't even anything listed for that' Opens in new window ] Surely that will incentivise landlords to evict their current tenants so they can get new ones in and charge them more? That is undoubtedly a fear. Under the proposals going before Cabinet, there will be more protections put in place for renters for a minimum of six years. During that period, there will be restrictions put in place on no-fault evictions. At the end of a six-year period, a landlord will be able to reset the rent to the market rate. Opposition parties have questioned the adequacy of these planned protections. Will the changes work? That is the big, big question. It is undoubtedly in the Government's interests that it does work. Part of the Government's pitch to voters in the run-up to the last general election was that the State had turned a corner on housing and that the supply of new homes would hit 40,000 in 2024. Completions instead fell by 7 per cent to 30,000. Housing commencements, which indicate future supply, have also fallen off a cliff, with housing starts in the first quarter of 2025 eight times down on last year and at their at their lowest level since 2016. The rate of building when it comes to apartments is even worse. What are interested parties saying about the proposals? Many are unconvinced. The housing charity Threshold has welcomed the degree of security it will give to tenants if restrictions on no-fault evictions are imposed for a six-year period. However, it stressed that it could actually push more people into homelessness if the RPZs are diluted. Opposition parties have been lining up to give out about the proposals. Those voices will only get louder between now and next Tuesday when full details are outlined. The initial reaction from landlords and property investors is that there is little in the plans to support them in the short to medium term. Industry sources have also said that the new measures are 'partial ones' and contain levels of uncertainty that may not encourage the envisaged money to come in to the sector.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Drivers put a brake on Tesla sales,
Irish drivers have put a brake on buying Tesla electric cars, says The Sunday Times. The company run by billionaire Elon Musk, whose split with US president, Donald Trump, dominated headlines this week, has suffered a 13 per cent drop in Irish sales so far this year. Chinese rival BYD has overtaken Tesla, increasing its sales by 48 per cent, the newspaper reports. 'In Ireland Tesla's year got off to a good start with sale of his cars doubling year on year in early 2025, driven by the arrival of the cheaper Tesla Model 3,' it says. 'But sales plunged by 62 per cent last month.' READ MORE Housing policy chasing developers away Government policy is driving investment in housing to other countries, according to the Sunday Independent. Developers including Claire Solon, managing director of the Irish arm of international player, Greystar, tells the newspaper that the Government needs to tackle 'planning, infrastructure, rent caps and viability'. The company warns that 'problematic policy changes' are pushing housing investment to other countries. Michael O'Flynn, chief executive of O'Flynn Group, says additional taxes on the building industry in the middle of a housing crisis are 'actually holding back the delivery of new homes'. He maintains that the residential zoned land tax has become a development tax. Hotelier's Heathrow runway pitch Billionaire hotelier, Surinder Arora is joining forces with US engineering giant Bechtel, to pitch an alternative third runway plan for London's Heathrow airport , reports The Sunday Telegraph. Mike Kane, Britain's aviation minister, says the country's government is open to alternative bids for the hub's third runway. Mr Arora told the newspaper that his bid could no doubt 'build it cheaper than Heathrow airport Ltd'. The hotels mogul previously led an alternative bid in 2018, saying he could do it one third cheaper than the airport company. Renewables' biogas call Renewables developer Bia Energy says data centres and large energy users should be obliged to use biogas to aid kick-starting the industry here, the Business Post writes. The firm, backed by businessman Eamon Waters, who sold Panda Recycling to Macquarie Infrastructure Fund for €1.2 billion, warns that the Government will not meet its climate plan biogas targets. Bia Energy is calling for a 'renewable heat obligation policy' which legally binds large energy users, such as data centres and pharmaceutical manufacturers, to buy renewable energy. The Republic faces penalties of up to €28 billion by 2030 if it fails to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 51 per cent.
