SC to hear ‘PTI's reserved seats case' tomorrow
ISLAMABAD: The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court will resume hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) reserved seats case from tomorrow (Monday).
It is expected that an 11-member Constitutional Bench, which has been hearing the case since May 6, 2025 will conclude it next week, if the lawyers of Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) complete their argument by June 17.
Advocates Faisal Siddiqui and Hamid Khan are representing the SIC in this case.
Faisal in the last proceedings had assured the bench that he would conclude his submissions in the next hearing.
The PML-N, PPP and the ECP have submitted their written arguments. The ECP has contended that as PTI was evidently not party to proceedings before the ECP; therefore no relief could have been lawfully granted to it vide the majority judgement, even by exercising power under Article 187(1) of the Constitution.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, who had authored the majority judgment (8 judges), and Justice Munir Akhtar, Justice Athar Minallah, and Justice Shahid Waheed, who agreed with Justice Mansoor are not part of the bench, hearing the review petitions of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan Peoples' Party (PPP) and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).
The Supreme Court's 11 judges on July 12, 24 ruled that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf is a political party and entitled to reserved seats of women and non-Muslims to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in the National and the Provincial Assemblies. A Full Court of 13 judges had announced five separate short orders.
Eight judges comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha A. Malik, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan passed one set of order, while Chief Justice Qazi and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel released separate note. Similarly, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Amin ud Din Khan, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan wrote their own independent notes.
The order of eight judges had set aside the Peshawar High Court (PHC) judgment and declared the ECP order on reserved seats ultra vires the constitution. They held that the PTI was and is a political party, which secured or won general seats in the National and Provincial Assemblies in the General Elections of 2024.
The two judges' order also set aside the PHC judgment to the extent to exclude the PTI for calculation and allocation of reserved seats. They also held that the PTI as a Parliamentary Party is entitled to the reserved seats. Similar stance was taken by Justice Yahya Afridi in dismissing the SIC appeal against the PHC verdict. However, Justice Amin and Justice Afghan simply turned down the SIC appeal and said detailed reasons be recorded later.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PTI slams govt over 'bad economy, load-shedding'
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Saturday lambasted the federal government over the worsening electricity crisis, economic mismanagement and a growing assault on constitutional rights. In a joint press conference held at the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa House, senior PTI leaders, including Sheikh Waqas Akram, Shibli Faraz, Omar Ayub and Taimur Jhagra, blasted the government. Referring to the controversial February 8 elections, former provincial minister Taimur Jhagra warned the public not to forget how the current coalition government led by the PML-N and PPP came into power. He said electricity tariffs under the present administration have become massively expensive compared to the previous PTI government. "Where there used to be just a few hours of loadshedding in Punjab, now people are enduring outages lasting over 12 hours. In K-P, the temperature has hit 46 degrees Celsius and there is still no respite from prolonged power cuts," he said. He dismissed the government's economic claims as "fabricated figures", arguing that it had failed to protect even the most basic rights of ordinary citizens. "From agriculture to industry, all sectors are in decline. The required electricity supply is simply not reaching those who need it most," he said. Jhagra also drew comparisons with regional competitors, lamenting, "Today, Bangladesh is miles ahead of us in the power sector." He criticised the government's plans to privatise only three distribution companies – LESCO, FESCO and IESCO – asking, "What national benefit can come from selectively privatising just three utilities?" He said over six million people in the former FATA region remain without electricity access, and no one in government has taken responsibility. "The K-P budget has been presented. Let the people see for themselves what makes the difference," he said, referring to the provincial government's unveiling of the budget with a total outlay of Rs2,119bn for the fiscal year 2025-26, a day ago. Jhagra also protested that PTI leaders were being denied meetings with the incarcerated party founder, Imran Khan, questioning under what law or constitutional provision such restrictions were being imposed. Electricity shortfall Speaking on the occasion, Sheikh Waqas Akram lamented that the country was facing a growing shortfall between electricity demand and supply. "The situation in rural areas is especially dire. Loadshedding in K-P and Balochistan now spans 12 to 18 hours daily. Even in Punjab, there is a minimum of four hours of outages," he said. He slammed the utility privatisation narrative, saying, "Go ahead and privatise FESCO if you wish, but what about improving the performance of LESCO, IESCO and others?" Akram also raised alarm over the treatment of political prisoners, particularly those held in Kot Lakhpat military trials. "These prisoners are being subjected to political vengeance. In this heat, they are being denied their basic rights, including the right to appeal," he said. Senior leader Shibli Faraz stressed the power sector's centrality to the economy. "Electricity is the engine that drives our economy. Our power sector is vast but has seen no meaningful development in recent years," he said, accusing PML-N and PPP of damaging the sector. "Today, there are long hours of loadshedding in most major cities. When there's only one buyer for your power company, problems are inevitable. We introduced competition in the power sector during our tenure," he added. Faraz also highlighted the growing burden of circular debt and unpaid dues of petroleum and power companies. Omar Ayub said his speech during the federal budget session was deliberately taken off air. "Even WiFi access was suspended during the session. They feared I would hold up a mirror to their failures," he claimed. He noted that international markets are becoming unstable due to the Israel-Iran conflict, which could severely disrupt oil supplies. "If this war continues, the country's Rs6.5 trillion deficit could worsen. Iran, a key oil hub, exports to Japan, Europe and others. Any disruption there will impact us all," he warned. Ayub accused the current government of shelving PTI-era power projects and said the nation had access to significantly cheaper electricity during PTI's rule.
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Sectarianism stoked to block Islamic rule: Fazl
JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman has claimed that certain forces stoke the flames of sectarianism to sow discord among religious scholars of different schools of thought whenever calls are made for the imposition of an Islamic system in the country. "There are sectarian organisations in the country, but they fight each other only at the behest of some forces. Sectarianism is fanned whenever people raise their voice for an Islamic system," said Fazl on Saturday while addressing a digital media convention in the country's economic hub. Denouncing the official moon-sighting system, Fazl noted that the Ruet-e-Hilal Committee has been operating without a legal framework, and attempts to access its founding documents or minutes have led nowhere. He said if there were a proper law in place, it would lead to accountability. "But the lack of legislation allows disputes among scholars over moon sighting to escalate into larger issues," he added. Fazl lamented that no code of conduct had been developed over the past 77 years regarding Muharram processions, calling it a deliberate omission intended to pit religious groups against one another. "At the state level, such measures are taken to keep religious factions in conflict," he said. He also criticised those who advocate a wall of separation between religion and state, arguing that religion is blamed too quickly for disorder. "However, sectarianism alone is not the sole cause of discord in the country. Ethnicity, provincialism, regionalism, and similar factors also contribute to unrest. At times, conflicts between Baloch and Pashtuns, Sindhis and Mohajirs, and other groups have led to disorder," he said. He said there has never been any dispute over the Objectives Resolution, and all schools of thought are united on the Islamic provisions of the Constitution. Fazl said the Constitution clearly states that no law can be made in the country that contradicts with teachings of Islam and its sharia. However, laws, according to him, are being made on the instruction of the International Monetary Fund, the Financial Action Task Force and the United Nations. In this regard, he cited the example of the recent passage of a bill banning marriage under the age of 18 in Islamabad and said the religion does not impose any such restrictions. Fazl said nowadays, highlighting vices is being considered news, especially when it comes to politicians. "One should not go around searching for people's faults and mistakes; this is a grave sin. When a person pursues someone to exploit their weaknesses, it is highly condemnable," he added. According to the JUI-F chief, some institutions running on our tax money sit in their offices and fabricate lies about politicians. He said in the media that the search for news and the effort to find good stories are natural. "However, it is also essential to avoid evil and to distinguish between what is halal and haram."
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
SC to hear ‘PTI's reserved seats case' tomorrow
ISLAMABAD: The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court will resume hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) reserved seats case from tomorrow (Monday). It is expected that an 11-member Constitutional Bench, which has been hearing the case since May 6, 2025 will conclude it next week, if the lawyers of Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) complete their argument by June 17. Advocates Faisal Siddiqui and Hamid Khan are representing the SIC in this case. Faisal in the last proceedings had assured the bench that he would conclude his submissions in the next hearing. The PML-N, PPP and the ECP have submitted their written arguments. The ECP has contended that as PTI was evidently not party to proceedings before the ECP; therefore no relief could have been lawfully granted to it vide the majority judgement, even by exercising power under Article 187(1) of the Constitution. Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, who had authored the majority judgment (8 judges), and Justice Munir Akhtar, Justice Athar Minallah, and Justice Shahid Waheed, who agreed with Justice Mansoor are not part of the bench, hearing the review petitions of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan Peoples' Party (PPP) and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). The Supreme Court's 11 judges on July 12, 24 ruled that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf is a political party and entitled to reserved seats of women and non-Muslims to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in the National and the Provincial Assemblies. A Full Court of 13 judges had announced five separate short orders. Eight judges comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha A. Malik, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan passed one set of order, while Chief Justice Qazi and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel released separate note. Similarly, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Amin ud Din Khan, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan wrote their own independent notes. The order of eight judges had set aside the Peshawar High Court (PHC) judgment and declared the ECP order on reserved seats ultra vires the constitution. They held that the PTI was and is a political party, which secured or won general seats in the National and Provincial Assemblies in the General Elections of 2024. The two judges' order also set aside the PHC judgment to the extent to exclude the PTI for calculation and allocation of reserved seats. They also held that the PTI as a Parliamentary Party is entitled to the reserved seats. Similar stance was taken by Justice Yahya Afridi in dismissing the SIC appeal against the PHC verdict. However, Justice Amin and Justice Afghan simply turned down the SIC appeal and said detailed reasons be recorded later. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
