
South African safety fears force parents in Cape Town to seek former white-only schools
Fears of crime and gang violence in the notorious townships on the outskirts of South Africa's city of Cape Town are forcing some parents to make difficult decisions to send their children on long daily commutes to former white-only schools."Thugs would go into the school carrying guns threatening teachers, forcefully taking their laptops in front of the learners," Sibahle Mbasana told the BBC the about the school her sons used to attend in Khayelitsha, Cape Town's largest township."Imagine your child experiencing this regularly. There's hardly any security at the school and even if there is they are powerless to do anything about."It is more than three decades since the end of white-minority rule in South Africa, but there are still black students who have to endure the vast inequalities that were the bedrock of the racist system of apartheid.Mrs Mbasana feels her three children are the inheritors of this legacy - particularly affecting her oldest son Lifalethu who was at a township school between the ages of six and 10.One of the apartheid era's main laws was the Bantu Education Act of 1953, which aimed to prevent black children from reaching their full potential. This created segregated schools with less funding and fewer resources for those in poor areas, which to this day are overcrowded and often suffer from the fallout of high crime, drug use and violence.Mrs Mbasana, who grew up in Eastern Cape province and moved to Khayelitsha when she was 18, decided she had no choice but to transfer Lifalethu, who is now 12, and her other son Anele, 11, to a state school some 40km (25 miles) away in Simon's Town, situated on a picturesque bay on the Cape Peninsula which is famously home to South Africa's navy.The boys have been joined by their seven-year-old sister Buhle at the school, which has better facilities and smaller class sizes."I told myself [that] Buhle was not going to that [local] school because I already endured so many things with the two boys when they were at that school," the 34-year-old clothes designer.She and her husband would love to move their family away from Khayelitsha completely."We don't want to live in the township, but we have to live here because we can't afford to move out," she said."Speak to anyone in the township and they'll tell you they would move out at the first opportunity if they could."
There is no doubt that there are township schools, led by visionary principals and hard-working teachers, that have done wonders despite the obstacles of poor infrastructure and large class sizes.However, safety and security have proved insurmountable for some when, for example, gangs demand protection fees from teachers.The GroundUp news website has reported that teachers at Zanemfundo Primary School in the Philippi East, close to Khayelitsha, were allegedly told to pay 10% of their salaries to the extortionists who seemed to operate with impunity."It is not safe at all. We are in extreme danger," one teacher told GroundUp."These gangs come to the school gun-wielding. Our lives are at risk. Teachers at the school are asking for transfers because they don't feel safe."According to the Western Cape Education Department (WCED), a private security company is now to be stationed at the school and the police are patrolling nearby.But similar incidents have reportedly taken place at five other schools in the surrounding areas of Nyanga, Philippi and Samora Machel.
"My husband Sipho works in the navy in Simon's Town and he travels there so I thought it would be safer and more comfortable for my children to go to that school," said Mrs Mbasana.But longer commutes, often by bus or minibus taxi, to safer schools come with their own dangers and stresses."My children get up at around 4.30am and leave at 5.50am when Sipho is transporting them. When they go by bus, because Sipho may be working elsewhere, they leave by 5.30 and they get home by 4.30 in the afternoon," said Mrs Mbasana."They are always tired and want to sleep. They are strong because they do their homework, but they sleep much earlier than other kids would."Lifalethu made national headlines last year when there was a frantic search for him after he was forced to walk home from Simon's Town to Khayelitsha as the bus he regularly takes refused him entry as he could not find his ticket.The driver involved was subsequently suspended for contravening company policy, which requires employees to assist schoolchildren in uniform who have lost their tickets.With darkness falling, it was Mrs Mbasana's worst nightmare when Anele called to say his elder brother had not been allowed aboard.But a massive social media frenzy followed and by several strokes of good fortune he was found - at one stage the boy had been given a lift by a good Samaritan who dropped him off at a petrol station around 5km from his home.From there he was accompanied on foot by a security guard who lived in his area before being picked up and taken home to his relieved family by police officers who had joined the search for him.
His case highlighted the plight of thousands of pupils from townships some of whom do a round trip of up to 80km per day either on public transport or pre-arranged trips with minibus taxis to attend school in the city's suburban areas - which used to accept only white students in the apartheid era.Wealthier residents of these suburbs often opt for a private education for their offspring, meaning that the state schools there tend to have spaces for those coming from further afield.Donovan Williams, vice-principal of the state primary school in Observatory - a Bohemian area of the Cape Town, says about 85% of his school's intake of around 830 students come from the townships - many of whom are exhausted by their long days."Some parents work in the area while most spend lots of money on transport for their children to access schools with better infrastructure," he told the BBC."Sometimes they fall asleep in class."According to Amnesty International, South Africa has one of the most unequal school systems in the world - with a child's outcome very much dependent on their place of birth, wealth and colour of their skin."Children in the top 200 schools achieve more distinctions in mathematics than children in the next 6,600 schools combined. The playing field must be levelled," its 2020 report said.State schools are subsidised, but parents still have to pay school fees, which in the Western Cape can range from between $60 (£45) and $4,500 (£3,350) annually.Of the nearly 1,700 schools across the province, more than 100 are no-fee institutions as designated by the government for learners living in economically depressed areas.The province's education department explains that it often has to cover a shortfall in funding from the government - and schools in more middle-class areas turn to parents to cover the costs.Recently 2,407 teaching posts had been lost in the province as the government allocated only 64% of the cost of the nationally negotiated wage agreement with teachers, the WCED said.The reduction in posts has meant that some contract teachers were not reappointed when their contracts ended in December, while some permanent teachers have been asked to move schools."We are in an impossible position, and it is not of our making, and the Western Cape is not the only province affected," the WCED added.
The National Professional Teachers' Organisation of South Africa (Naptosa) says the decision has been particularly devastating for schools in impoverished and crime-ridden areas."The schools that are feeling the real impact of this is your typical township school. They can't afford to replace those teachers with governing-body appointments, which is the case with the better-resourced schools where parents can afford to pay extra fees to cover the costs to employ additional teachers," Naptosa executive director Basil Manuel told the BBC."They feel the cut, they will have the bigger class sizes, they will have the teachers that are more stressed out."The children, especially those who are not too academically inclined, will slip through the cracks."Experts blame the continuing educational disparities on the debt the African National Congress (ANC) government of Nelson Mandela inherited in 1994 from the apartheid regime."The ANC had to confront the fact that it couldn't deliver in the way it said it would," Aslam Fataar, research professor in higher education transformation at Stellenbosch University, told the BBC.Faced with fiscal austerity "poorer schools were never given a chance to develop a sustainable platform for teaching and learning", he said."The political interest in what happens in the township schools has been lost 20 years ago. When it comes to teacher expenditure and pupil-teacher ratios you can see how that sector has been neglected. The numbers of teachers in those schools continues to bear the brunt of cuts."Prof Fataar is equally bleak about the future: "I can't see, bar a miracle, how we can increase the finances for poor schools."Parents like the Mbasanas, stuck in the townships and often at the mercy of gangs, have run out of patience.
You may also be interested in:
Pictures of how Muslim worship helps quell South African ganglands'We are students thanks to South Africa's #FeesMustFall protests'South Africa's deadly love affair with gunsCape Town anger over slave quarter gentrificationThe white student braving racial politics in South Africa
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Primary school in 'sectarian' Union Jack row after headteacher suggests flag is 'potentially offensive'
A primary school headteacher has been forced to apologise after a letter to parents suggested the Union Flag could be 'sectarian'. Cross Arthurlie Primary School, in Barrhead, Renfrewshire, found itself at the centre of an extraordinary row yesterday after its headteacher sent parents a letter which appeared to insinuate the Union Flag was 'potentially offensive'. In a note, Fiona MacDonald told her Primary Seven pupils parents that the 'use of the union flag with staff images on caused some upset' and that the school was 'actively working against potentially offensive or sectarian messaging'. The letter caused uproar as MSPs hit out at the school letter, with East Renfrewshire Council and the headteacher apologising for 'any offence and upset that has been caused'. Russell Findlay, leader of the Scottish Conservatives, branded the letter 'daft' and said: 'For a school to tell parents that our country's flag is 'offensive or sectarian' is ludicrous and embarrassing. 'This is what happens when the SNP spends years pushing its petty nationalist agenda in our schools, councils and other public bodies. 'After 18 years of the SNP trashing Scotland's once world-leading schools, you might think they'd be focused on improving educational standards.' Meanwhile, Scots Tory MSP Jackson Carlaw said he was 'both angry and concerned' the official letter 'suggested the use of the Union flag amounts to 'sectarian messaging'.' The Eastwood MSP said: 'Let me be clear - to equate the Union Flag with sectarianism is totally unacceptable and deeply offensive to people both locally and across Scotland. 'Our national flag is not up for debate - it is a symbol of our tradition, unity as a nation and hope for so many.' The row, which now overshadows the end of term, was ignited by Mrs MacDonald's letter sent on June 12. Writing to P7 families, she thanked them for going to a leavers' event the night before and said the 'children looked fantastic and had a great time'. But the letter goes on: 'Unfortunately, the use of the Union Flag with staff images on caused some upset at the beginning of the evening. 'As a school we promote inclusion and acceptance, actively working against potentially offensive or sectarian messaging. 'Although we recognise this was not the intent, we are concerned that others within or beyond the school community may consider that this is something we would encourage. 'I have spoken with the children about it this morning explaining why it wasn't a good idea: Using images without permission; the symbolism and association of flags and symbols to different groups of people; their actions which were contrary to the school values of respect and kindness. 'I hope this helps everyone understand where mistakes have been made and we can move on enjoying the rest of the end of term celebrations.' The local authority yesterday issued a statement insisting: 'It was not the school's intention to imply the Union Flag is sectarian and both the head teacher and the council apologises for any offence and upset that has been caused to pupils, parents and carers and the wider community. 'All educational establishments in East Renfrewshire should be spaces that are focused on learning, unity, and pride in a diverse British society. 'We expect our schools to foster an ethos of respect for diverse perspectives and national identity.'


Sky News
8 hours ago
- Sky News
Council apologises after headteacher's letter to parents 'implied Union Flag was potentially offensive or sectarian'
A council has apologised for any "upset" caused over a letter sent to parents by a headteacher which implied the Union Flag could be seen as "potentially offensive or sectarian". Fiona MacDonald, head of Cross Arthurlie Primary School in Barrhead, East Renfrewshire, raised concerns following a P7 leavers' event last week which was attended by parents and carers. In her letter, Ms MacDonald said the use of a Union Flag featuring staff images "caused some upset at the beginning of the evening". She added: "As a school we promote inclusion and acceptance, actively working against potentially offensive or sectarian messaging. "Although we recognise this was not the intent we are concerned that others within or beyond the school community may consider that this is something we would encourage." The headteacher said she had spoken to the children to explain "why it wasn't a good idea" to use images without permission. She also explained "the symbolism and association of flags and symbols to different groups of people" and how the youngsters' actions were "contrary to the school values of respect and kindness". Ms MacDonald then signed off: "I hope this helps everyone understand where mistakes have been made and we can move on enjoying the rest of the end of term celebrations." East Renfrewshire Council later apologised and said it was "not the school's intention to imply the Union Flag is sectarian". The leader of the Scottish Conservatives had earlier called for the local authority to apologise for the "daft letter". MSP Russell Findlay said: "For a school to tell parents that our country's flag is 'offensive or sectarian' is ludicrous and embarrassing." Former party leader and colleague Jackson Carlaw, MSP for Eastwood, also voiced his anger at the letter. Posting on X, he said: "Let me be clear - to equate the Union Flag with sectarianism is totally unacceptable and deeply offensive to people both locally and across Scotland." Demanding an apology, he added: "Our national flag is not up for debate - it is a symbol of our tradition, unity as a nation and hope for so many." In a statement, East Renfrewshire Council said: "It was not the school's intention to imply the Union flag is sectarian and both the headteacher and the council apologises for any offence and upset that has been caused to pupils, parents and carers and the wider community. "All educational establishments in East Renfrewshire should be spaces that are focused on learning, unity, and pride in a diverse British society.


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Giving children phones is the same as giving them cigarettes - they must be banned in schools, warns top Tory
Giving children smartphones is the same as giving them cigarettes, shadow education secretary Laura Trott has said. Renewing her call for ministers to ban phones in schools, she said they were just as inappropriate for pupils as tobacco. And she also criticised the Government over plans to have screen-based testing for Reception children, saying it 'normalises' tablets. Mrs Trott has forbidden her own three children from owning a smartphone until they are 16, and believes other parents should do the same. Yesterday, she said schools implementing blanket bans would make it easier for families to follow suit at home. She said: 'Giving children smartphones is the equivalent of giving them cigarettes. 'Children are increasingly glued to their phones, often at the cost of real social interactions, their well-being and attainment. 'Countries around the world have woken up to the damage phones are doing to young people, but Labour are still dragging their feet.' Mrs Trott, MP for Sevenoaks, has previously said it is her 'mission' to get ministers to legislate for mobile phones to be banned in schools. Non-statutory guidance was issued to this effect under the Tories in 2024 - but schools were not legally obliged to follow it. Earlier this year, the Tories tabled an amendment to the Schools Bill which would have made phone bans in classrooms the law, but it was defeated by Labour MPs. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has previously branded the proposal a 'headline-grabbing gimmick'. Yesterday, Mrs Trott said this was 'wrong' and added: 'Even the Department for Education's own evidence shows half of GCSE classes are disrupted daily by phones. 'Another U-turn from this Government is inevitable, so they should act now: ban smartphones in schools, shift homework off screens, and reset the norm on when children get their first phone, before it's too late.' She added in comments to Politics Home: 'One of the best things we can do for pupils' mental health in schools is to take out the phones.' Last week, it was revealed the Department for Education (DfE) had written new guidelines requiring schools to assess Reception-age pupils using screens. Grilling ministers in the Commons yesterday, Mrs Trott said: 'The Secretary of State may have dismissed banning smartphones in schools as a gimmick but teachers, health professionals and parents are all calling for action to reduce children's screentime. 'Every day, we have new evidence of the harm screens are doing. 'So why is the Education Secretary ignoring this and still pressing ahead with screen-based assessments for children as young as four from September? 'Does she accept that this is normalising screentime for young people, which is the opposite of what we should be doing?' Education minister Stephen Morgan ducked the testing question and replied: 'There's guidance already in place for schools, the majority of schools already have a ban in place on mobile phone use.' According to the Government, 97 per cent of schools restrict mobile phone use in some way. It comes after the Government's National Behaviour Survey found 46 per cent of GCSE pupils reported phones causing disruption in most or all lessons. In addition, a Canadian study found teenagers who spend more than two hours a day scrolling on their phones double their risk of developing anxiety and quadruple their chances of depression. Meanwhile, a separate poll found a quarter of 11 to 18-year-olds in the UK now spend the majority of their free time outside school scrolling on their phones. The poll by the charity OnSide, found half of these - 52 per cent - want to break their addiction and reduce their screen time, but do not know how.