Japan's Nissan tests driverless vehicles in city streets filled with cars and people
The van makes its way slowly but surely through the city streets, braking gently when a car swerves into its lane. But its steering wheel is turning on its own, and there's no one in the driver's seat.
The driverless technology from Nissan Motor Corp., which uses 14 cameras, nine radars and six LiDar sensors installed in and around the vehicle, highlights Japan's eagerness to catch up with players like Google's Waymo that have taken the lead in the U.S.
Japan, home to the world's top automakers, has not kept pace with the global shift to autonomous driving, so far led by China and the U.S. But momentum is building.
Waymo is going to land in Japan this year. Details haven't been disclosed, but it has a partnership with major cab company Nihon Kotsu, which will oversee and manage their all-electric Jaguar I-PACE sport-utility vehicles, first in the Tokyo area, still with a human cab driver riding along.
During Nissan's demonstration, the streets were bustling with other cars and pedestrians. The vehicle stayed within the maximum speed limit in the area of 40 kph (25 mph), its destination set with a smartphone app.
Takeshi Kimura, the Mobility and AI Laboratory engineer at Nissan, insists an automaker is more adept at integrating self-driving technology with the overall workings of a car — simply because it knows cars better.
'How the sensors must be adapted to the car's movements, or to monitor sensors and computers to ensure reliability and safety requires an understanding of the auto system overall,' he said during a recent demonstration that took reporters on a brief ride.
Nissan's technology, being tested on its Serena minivan, is still technically at the industry's Level Two because a person sits before a remote-control panel in a separate location outside the vehicle, in this case, at the automaker's headquarters, and is ready to step in if the technology fails.
Nissan also has a human sitting in the front passenger seat during the test rides, who can take over the driving, if needed. Unless there is a problem, the people in the remote control room and the passenger seat are doing nothing.
Nissan plans to have 20 such vehicles moving in the Yokohama area in the next couple of years, with the plan to reach Level Four, which means no human involvement even as backup, by 2029 or 2030.
Autonomous vehicles can serve a real need given the nation's shrinking population, including a shortage of drivers.
Other companies are working on the technology in Japan, including startups like Tier IV, which is pushing an open source collaboration on autonomous driving technology.
So far, Japan has approved the use of so-called Level Four autonomous vehicles in a rural area in Fukui Prefecture, but those look more like golf carts. A Level Four bus is scuttling around a limited area near Tokyo's Haneda airport. But its maximum speed is 12 kmph (7.5 mph). Nissan's autonomous vehicle is a real car, capable of all its mechanical workings and speed levels.
Toyota Motor Corp. recently showed its very own 'city' or living area for its workers and partnering startups, near Mount Fuji, being built especially to test various technology, including autonomous driving.
Progress has been cautious.
University of Tokyo Professor Takeo Igarashi, who specializes in computer and information technology, believes challenges remain because it's human nature to be more alarmed by accidents with driverless vehicles than regular crashes.
'In human driving, the driver takes responsibility. It's so clear. But nobody is driving so you don't know who will take responsibility,' Igarashi told The Associated Press.
'In Japan, the expectation for commercial services is very high. The customer expects perfect quality for any service — restaurants or drivers or anything. This kind of auto-driving is a service form a company, and everybody expects high quality and perfection. Even a small mistake is not acceptable.'
Nissan says its technology is safe. After all, a human can't be looking at the front, the back and all around at the same time. But the driverless car can, with all its sensors.
When a system failure happened during the recent demonstration, the car just came to a stop and all was well.
Phil Koopman, professor of electrical and computer engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, believes the autonomous vehicle industry is just getting started.
The main problem is what's known as 'edge cases,' those rare but dangerous situations that the machine has not yet been taught to respond to. Using autonomous fleets of a significant size for some time is needed for such edge cases to be learned, he said.
'We will see each city require special engineering efforts and the creation of a special remote support center. This will be a city-by-city deployment for many years,' said Koopman.
'There is no magic switch.'
___
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
a day ago
- Times
Fix our woeful rollout of EV charging to rescue our car industry
Cyclists can drive motorists round the bend. Small wonder then that car bosses were peeved when Rachel Reeves gave them £400 million to build electric vehicle chargers in last week's spending review, compared to the £616 million grant to maintain cycle lanes. To be fair, once you add in benefits across other ongoing government schemes, a total of £1.4 billion has been earmarked to support uptake of zero-emission vehicles. Not that this stopped the car industry complaining. Senior figures in the industry were quick to demand 'more substantive measures to incentivise private consumer demand' if our EV targets are to be met. The obvious complaint is that a shortage of subsidies is holding back motorists' full-throttle embrace of electric vehicles. Yes, Britain's car industry is in the grip of a net-zero-infused crisis. Production is languishing at 70-year lows — with the exception of the Covid paralysis in 2020 — and the blame has been placed squarely at EV production quotas. So what's the answer? How about a return to lavish incentives to jumpstart demand, as the likes of Ford and Nissan have advocated? The government has resisted thus far — and rightly so. There has been much debate over the decision to outlaw the sale of most new petrol or diesel-powered cars at the end of the decade. Boris Johnson introduced the 2030 ban; Rishi Sunak pushed it back to 2035; Sir Keir Starmer has dragged it forward to 2030 again. But the time for flip-flopping is over. Britain has charted its course for EVs. Now we must stick to it. Achieving this goal — five years ahead of the EU, we should remember — rightly requires carrots and sticks. In terms of carrots, the primary incentive is that workers buying a company car benefit from tax incentives through a salary-sacrifice scheme that is so generous, it accounts for the lion's share of new EV registrations. As for sticks, supply is being forced up by the government's controversial Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate. Under this, car manufacturers must sell a certain percentage of EVs each year. This started at 22 per cent in 2024, and will be 28 per cent this year, ratcheting up to 80 per cent in 2030 and 100 per cent by 2035. Manufacturers will be allowed to sell new hybrid vehicles from 2030-35. Until recently, failing to hit the quota would have resulted in carmakers being slapped with a £15,000-per-car penalty. They escaped these fines last year by discounting heavily to stimulate demand, costing them an estimated £4 billion. Some might argue that the scheme is working perfectly, then. Nevertheless, Starmer has now agreed to reduce the per-car penalty to £12,000, alongside other flexible measures that could mean the fines are reduced further or negated completely. The introduction of grants to subsidise new EVs beyond company car schemes might, on the face of it, make sense, however. The No 1 barrier to purchasing an EV is that they are more expensive than petrol or diesel-powered alternatives, according to polling by YouGov from last August. Crucially, though, we may not be so far from parity. An EV was 51 per cent costlier than a petrol or diesel equivalent in 2018; this fell to 18 per cent in 2024, according to analysis by JATO Dynamics. That gap could soon disappear as a tidal wave of cheaper Chinese EVs floods the UK market. We will need to park the geopolitics of this, but it's hard to see how this isn't good for consumers from a purely financial perspective. Which brings us to what we should be concentrating on: charging points. That same YouGov poll — in which, by the way, 49 per cent of respondents said they would never buy an EV — revealed that the second-biggest barrier to going electric was a 'lack of charging infrastructure'. Yes, there are roughly 80,000 EV chargers in the UK, but the pace at which they are being installed is slowing. The compound growth rate between 2021 and 2024 was 37.5 per cent; in the first five months of this year, the number has increased by only 10 per cent. The slowdown counted its first casualty last week. Pod Point, which listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2021 at a £350 million valuation, was rescued by French energy firm EDF in a deal worth little more than £10 million. The £400 million that Reeves has set aside in the Comprehensive Spending Review for charging is an important first step. But money alone is not the answer. State aid might be best reserved for funding chargers in locations where the operation is wholly uneconomic. Yet talk to those in the EV charging industry and they will tell you that receiving timely planning permission and access to the electricity grid capacity are as important, if not more important than taxpayer handouts. One senior executive recently recounted the tale of a company behind a prospective charging site near Gatwick airport, which was told by officials that it would not be hooked up to the grid until 2037. 'We don't want grants — we want certainty,' said another. Then there is the inverse relationship between wealth and the cost of running an EV. An estimated 40 per cent of Britons live in a home without off-street parking, forcing them to charge their car at public chargers, which attract VAT at a rate of 20 per cent. Those with off-street parking, likely to be better off, can charge using their home supply, upon which VAT is levied at 5 per cent. For a Labour government seeking to champion 'working people', this discrepancy seems bonkers — but the Treasury may not see it that way. Crucial to driving the car industry out of its current malaise is a renewed focus on charging. Otherwise, the danger is that drivers will be running out of power left, right and centre. Which might anger them more than cyclists. Oliver Shah is away
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Why Waymo cars became sitting ducks during the LA protests
Engineers working on self-driving technology have given a lot of thought to difficult questions over the years, including how to keep pedestrians safe and how to avoid collisions with other vehicles. But last weekend's protests in Los Angeles threw a spotlight on one of the thorny problems that remain for autonomous vehicles: what to do about arson, vandalism or other physical attacks. Five vehicles owned by Google's self-driving spinoff Waymo were set ablaze last Sunday during protests against the Trump administration's immigration policies. Images and video of the flaming cars quickly went viral, illustrating for a global audience how vulnerable robotaxis can be in volatile situations. For all their advanced technology, including expensive cameras and sensors, the cars seemed to be defenseless. Waymo says the five cars were in downtown Los Angeles to serve passengers when they were attacked. There were no drivers to plead for mercy, and with crowds surrounding the vehicles, there was no escape path that didn't include threatening pedestrians — something Waymo vehicles are programmed not to do. 'They're very much sitting ducks,' said Jeff Fong, who has worked at tech companies including Lyft and Postmates and now writes a newsletter about cities and technology. And it wasn't the first time Waymo was a victim of arson. Last year, a Waymo in San Francisco's Chinatown was set on fire during Lunar New Year celebrations. Police later charged a juvenile with starting the blaze, saying they had thrown a lit firework into the vehicle. Waymos have been vandalized in other ways, too, including having their tires slashed, their windshields smashed, their doors torn off and their exteriors defaced with spray-paint. Local prosecutors have charged individuals in at least some cases. Part of what makes robotaxis vulnerable is their caution. While it's impossible to know if a human driver behind the steering wheel could have deterred or escaped vandalism in any specific case involving a robotaxi, driverless vehicles are generally designed to stay put if there's any risk that they'd hit a person while moving. 'There's been so much effort into making sure they can't hurt human beings,' Fong said. 'That's the problem Waymo has been solving for, rightfully so, but when you have the problem where a human wants to do harm, these cars have no countermeasures.' Autonomous technology companies, including Waymo, appear to be largely at a loss for ideas on how to deter vandalism over the long term. Their cameras may be a partial deterrent — Waymo says each of its cars has 29 cameras — and the company has cooperated with police to help find vandalism suspects after the fact. But Waymo's collection of street data through its cameras and sensors is also one of the sources of anger against the company and other startups like it. Some Uber and Lyft drivers have said that vandalism incidents bolster the importance of human drivers as a deterrent. A spokesperson for Waymo said that in response to the protests in Los Angeles and elsewhere, it was temporarily adjusting its service area. Waymo declined to make anyone available for an interview about the problems of arson and vandalism and how the company plans to deal with such incidents in the long term. The vandalism problem is mostly limited for now to Waymo, which is the biggest self-driving car company. It has about 1,500 vehicles operating in four regions, with additional cities scheduled to come online this year. But the market is set to become more competitive soon, with Tesla saying it plans to launch a robotaxi service this month in Austin, Texas, and Amazon-backed Zoox planning a service in Las Vegas and San Francisco. Representatives for Tesla and Zoox did not respond to requests for comment about how they plan to avoid incidents like last Sunday's attack on Waymo vehicles. The problem has been gnawing at robotaxi fans on message boards on Reddit. In one thread in January, users tossed around ideas like having dedicated security on motorcycles nearby or equipping Waymo vehicles with pepper spray. Adam Millard-Ball, director of the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, said that robotaxis are a symbolic target for some street demonstrators. 'They're attacked not because they're autonomous cars but because they're a symbol of inequality in cities and a symbol of the power of large technology companies,' he said. He noted that electric scooters are also sometimes targets. He also said it's hard to imagine what the companies, police or city officials could do to eliminate the threat entirely. 'I don't think any country in the world has eliminated vandalism in public spaces,' he said. The incidents are problematic for Waymo on multiple levels: not only the cost of repairing or replacing the vehicles, but also the reputational risk when images and videos spread widely online. There's also the possible danger to passengers. And although no passengers were harmed in either arson incident, some passengers have been delayed or reported feeling threatened when the cars they were riding in were vandalized from the outside. Last year, a San Francisco woman posted a video online after she said two men targeted her while riding in a Waymo. Then there's the lost business from what Waymo calls 'temporary service adjustments.' In Los Angeles and San Francisco this past week, Waymo stopped serving certain areas that are part of its normal service area. People using the company's app in recent days were greeted with a message, alluding to the street protests: 'Pickup times and routing may be affected by local events. Thank you for your patience.' In San Francisco, that meant Waymo refused to take customers through or to several neighborhoods, including parts of the Financial District, the Civic Center area near City Hall and the sprawling South of Market neighborhood. Waymo also limited service to the Mission District, a historically working-class and Latino neighborhood that's also home now to many tech workers and a vibrant nightlife scene. Thousands of people attended an anti-Trump protest in the Mission on Monday night, and the effects on Waymo reverberated for days: A post on X with an example of rerouting around the Mission went viral Wednesday, getting 1.2 million views. Searches of the Waymo app by NBC News showed the service continuing to refuse service to parts of the Mission throughout the week, including during relatively quiet morning hours and on Friday. The app labeled certain destinations as 'unreachable.' A Waymo spokesperson said: 'We're taking these heightened measures now out of an abundance of caution.' They said the situation was temporary and subject to change quickly in response to conditions on the ground. Waymo hasn't published a map of which areas are restricted. Mass anti-Trump protests advocating for 'No Kings' are scheduled for Saturday nationwide, providing another potential disruption for robotaxis. Though the service restrictions may be temporary, they struck some people as discriminatory against poorer neighborhoods, with some social media users on X calling the practice ' redlining ' on the part of Waymo. The term refers to the decades-long practice of refusing home loans to predominantly Black neighborhoods. In contrast, ride-hailing services Uber and Lyft, which use human drivers, still offered rides to the Mission in recent days, according to NBC News searches of their apps. San Francisco's Municipal Transportation Agency rerouted some buses during the height of anti-Trump administration protests but then resumed regular service. There have been no arrests for the attacks on Waymo vehicles in Los Angeles last Sunday. On Friday, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) said it was taking the lead in investigating the Waymo attacks, making them the subject of a federal investigation. 'The cause of these fires is quite obvious,' ATF Special Agent in Charge Kenneth Cooper of the Los Angeles Field Division said in a statement. 'The task at hand now is to determine who is responsible. ATF's National Response Team is going to be a tremendous asset, and we look forward to the results of their efforts to hold the responsible parties accountable,' he said.
Top Gear
2 days ago
- Top Gear
Volt-zilla: is this electrified Nissan R32 Skyline GT-R brilliant or sacrilege?
Big Reads EV restomods are controversial at the best of times... but electrifying an R32 Skyline? This could go either way Skip 11 photos in the image carousel and continue reading There's something lurking in the basement of Nissan's global HQ, and it's likely to ruffle a few feathers. Like Bowie, this legend is evolving into something otherworldly, transcending time, space and preconceptions about lightning bolts painted proudly across your face. Deep underground, Godzilla has had a heart transplant and is waiting for the doctor's all clear before being let loose on the streets of Tokyo. This is the passion project of Mr Ryozo Hiraku, an engineer at Nissan and GT-R owner. He and his small team have designed and built this electric Skyline entirely in their spare time and with a very limited budget. Luckily, Nissan just so happened to have a mint condition R32 lying around, finished in the ineffably cool gunmetal grey. Advertisement - Page continues below The rest of the conversion is all parts bin donations too – there's a 92kWh battery from the Leaf Nismo RC and two of Nissan's e-Powertrain electric motors. Lifting the bonnet to find a squiggle of wires, inverters and a distinct lack of anything turbo shaped immediately conjures comparisons to Doc's DeLorean. Words & Photography: Toby Thyer You might like In period, the R32 had a claimed output of 276bhp under the gentlemen's agreement, although we now know that was probably underselling the car's true power output, and indeed potential. How does this R32 EV stack up? The combined front and rear drive motors make 429bhp, and 251lb ft of torque each, which is enough to give the car a similar power to weight ratio considering the disadvantage of having a small polar bear's worth of batteries on the back seats – 367kg to be precise. We're yet to drive it, but you know the drill – not only is the power and torque immense, but the electric motors slap it on immediately. Even the most efficient e-assisted turbo can't compete with that. It's important to note the goal here wasn't to create a 1,000bhp electric straight line monster, but to equal the baseline performance of the original car... accounting for the extra weight. Advertisement - Page continues below In an ideal world, we'd all be swimming in eco friendly carbon neutral synthetic fuels in order to keep the ICE party going until our sun fizzles out. Realistically though, the future is more uncertain than that, and electric has a central role to play in a renewable future – for mass produced cars at least. What Hiraku-san is trying to do is safeguard against the loss of engaging driving machines, here essentially distilling the handling and spirit of the original GT-R and storing it in a battery cell for future generations to enjoy. He's not trying to create a new R32, more to recreate it in digital form. He calls it a 'digital remaster'. It's a positive step in connecting the GT-R's glorious past to its electrifying future Basically you lose the dirty, noisy, polluting dinosaur juice drinking lump that is the RB26 engine and replace it with nice clean electricity while – and this is crucial – retaining the excitement and experience of the original car. Many, including myself, would argue that you can't have one without the other, the analogue sensory overload is what makes pushing these cars hard so appealing. The team has tried to address this, kind of, with a speaker mounted behind the driver's seat pumping synthesised rev matched engine noise into the cabin. There's even talk of adding vibrations into the touchpoints too. Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Then there's that hefty stack of cells in the back seat, how do you make them less noticeable while chucking the car around a local B-road? The chassis is all standard R32 fare, but the stock double wishbone setup has been tuned to cope with the extra weight, with upgraded Öhlins shocks from the Nismo parts bin. Brakes are Nismo's off the shelf R35 six pot conversion kit, which is handy because this weighs roughly the same as an R35. There are quite a few tasty new parts that have been produced especially for this project too, which has got GT-R fans salivating. The carbon fibre full bucket seats made by Recaro, the digital readouts on the dash and centre console, and best of all the 18in wheels, direct copies upscaled from the OG 16in R32 items. Hiroku-san has even got some period correct RE-71RS Potenzas recreated in 18in form. Well played. While the car is basically finished in physical form, it had its shakedown last year on Nissan's test track and the team is a long way off having it drive and handle like the original. The Recaros, dials and reupholstered interior are classy additions though, making this the best looking test mule ever made. A Bowie-esque lightning bolt livery might be a bit much, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't want to see it. Will Hiraku-san and his team succeed in bottling the essence of Godzilla? Will this study result in a small, fun to drive EV sports car that handles like a 1990's GT-R? Will the next gen R36 GT-R go electric and have some of this DNA programmed into its bones? Your guess is as good as mine, but whatever happens, it's a positive step in connecting the GT-R's glorious past to its electrifying future.
