Jagdeep Dhankhar quits as Vice President: What he said in Rajya Sabha today; judge impeachment, cash under seat
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
EW DELHI: Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday resigned as Vice President citing health reasons and said that he made the decision to 'prioritise health care' and act on 'medical advice.'
The announcement came just hours after Dhankhar, who also served as Rajya Sabha chairman, addressed the House and raised several serious issues, including the impeachment motion against a high court judge Yashwant Varma and an incident involving unclaimed cash found under a seat in the House.
In a detailed statement, Dhankhar informed the members that he had received a motion for the removal of a high court judge Yashwant varma under Article 217(1)(b) read with Article 218 of the Constitution and Section 3 of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.
'It is signed by more than 50 members of the Council of States and thus it meets the numerical requirement,' he said.
RS | Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar's Remarks | 04:06 pm - 04:19 pm | 21 July, 2025
Explaining the technical procedure involved in such cases, Dhankhar pointed out the constitutional requirement of whether such motions are presented in one or both Houses of Parliament on the same day. 'If the motion is presented in the two houses on different dates, then the motion which is presented in the house first that alone is taken into consideration and the second motion gets nonjurisdictional,' he said.
He directed the Secretary-General to verify if a similar motion had been moved in the Lok Sabha. The Law Minister, present in the House, confirmed that over 100 members had submitted such a motion there as well.
Dhankhar also referred to an earlier motion from December concerning a another judge of the Allahabad high court Shekhar Yadav, PTI reported. He said the motion was initially signed by 55 members, but a scrutiny revealed that one MP had signed twice, bringing the total valid count down to 54.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
'The result was that the representation, the motion indicated there are 55 members seeking removal. But actually it was not 55, it was only 54,' he noted.
He said the process for verifying signatures and authentication is still ongoing.
He added that one MP, whose signature appeared twice, denied having signed the motion more than once. 'If a motion carries two signatures of the same member and the honorable member declines that he has not signed at two places but he has signed only at one place, the matter becomes serious and culpable,' Dhankhar said, while stressing the need for Parliament to uphold transparency and integrity.
'This August House has to set very high standards. If we do not live up to the highest expectations of the people, then we'll be putting things under the carpet and not subjecting them to deep investigation,' he said.
In a startling revelation, Dhankhar said that 'on seat number 222 a bundle of rupees 500 notes was found.' He added, 'What is more surprising and deeply concerning is not that a pad of notes was found but no one has owned it.
No one has claimed it. This is quite serious.' He said the matter would be referred to floor leaders for further discussion and direction.
Reacting to Dhankhar's resignation, senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal said, 'I wish him the best of health, because I am saddened, because I have a very good relationship with him. I have known him for 30-40 years. We were paired with each other. We have appeared against each other in matters.
We have a bonhomie between us that is quite unique. I always respected him, and he always respected me. He has been to some family occasions of ours, and I am saddened and I hope that he is healthy and has a long, long life, and I wish him well.
We may have had differences, in respect to our political views, or on opinions, but at a personal level, we had a very strong bond. Whenever I needed time to speak in the House, I met him personally in his chamber, and he never refused me, and gave me a little more time than is otherwise available to independent members of Parliament.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump administration to rule out counting of illegal immigrants in new census
US President Donald Trump on Thursday announced that he has instructed the Commerce Department to create a new census. He took it to his account on Truth Social to announce the data is used to determine how many seats each state receives in the House of Representatives. This procedure is also known as apportionment. The numbers also help allocate billions in government funding. Trying to exclude undocumented immigrants from the count could change the resource allocation and distribution of political representation in ABOUT THE NEW CENSUSAs per the latest announcement by Trump, the new census would exclude the names of undocumented migrants. "People who are in our Country illegally will not be counted in the census," he said. The census' data collections will be based on 'modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024,' the Republican president said on his Truth Social account, an indication he might try to inject his politics into a head count that determines political power and how federal funding is is not his first attempt to exclude the count of illegal immigrants in the CALL FOR CLARITYExperts said it was unclear what exactly Trump was calling for, whether it was changes to the 2030 census or a mid-decade census, and, if so, whether it would be used for a mid-decade apportionment, which is the process of divvying up congressional seats among the states based on the population changes in the conduct of a national census, which is the biggest non-military undertaking by the federal government, would require alterations to the Census Act and approval from Congress, which has oversight responsibilities, and there would likely be a fierce fight. While the Census Act permits a mid-decade census for things like distributing federal funding, it can't be used for apportionment or redistricting and must be done in a year ending in 5, said Terri Ann Lowenthal, a former congressional staffer who consults on census issues.'He cannot unilaterally order a new census. The census is governed by law, not to mention the Constitution,' Lowenthal said. 'Logistically, it's a half-baked idea.'His decision to reshape the census could face certain legal challenges, which also guides the distribution of $2.8 trillion in federal funds to the states for roads, health care and other the citizenship question was stopped by the Supreme Court in 2019, Trump made another effort in 2020, announcing a plan to exclude people living in the country illegally from the apportionment DRIVES AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTSadvertisementFollowing the Supreme Court's 2019 decision to block the addition of a citizenship question to the census, Trump launched an initiative in his first term in 2020 which aimed at removing undocumented immigrants from the population counts used for congressional President Joe Biden reversed Trump's exclusion policy with an executive order upon taking office in proposal faced immediate legal challenges from states, municipalities, and advocacy groups, with lower courts ultimately deeming it unlawful. By the time the case reached the Supreme Court, Trump had already lost the presidential justices avoided ruling on the legality of the plan, dismissing the case on procedural grounds. In an unsigned opinion representing the six-member conservative majority, the Court stated, 'we express no view on the merits of the constitutional and related statutory claims presented. We hold only that they are not suitable for adjudication at this time.'The Court's three liberal members dissented, asserting that excluding undocumented individuals from the apportionment count violates the law.'I believe this Court should say so,' wrote Justice Stephen Breyer, with Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor joining his opinion.- EndsWith inputs from Associated PressTune InMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Amid oppn protests, govt passes bill to legalise houses on comunidade land
Porvorim: Amidst vociferous protests by the opposition, the state legislative assembly on Thursday passed a bill that paves the way for govt to regularise unauthorised houses constructed before Feb 28, 2014, on comunidade land. The bill, introduced by revenue minister Atanasio Monserrate, sparked a furore in the state assembly as the opposition questioned govt's legal standing to compel a private entity to hand over comunidade land to encroachers. The opposition said that the amendment — Goa Legislative Diploma No. 2070 dated April 15, 1961 (Amendment) Bill, 2025 — is nothing but a reintroduction of the Goa Bhumiputra Adhikarini Bill in a new garb by BJP. The opposition MLAs rushed to the well of the House twice to protest against the bill, forcing speaker Ramesh Tawadkar to adjourn the House twice for five minutes each time. Monserrate said that the amendment aims to provide 'legal security' to 'landless persons' who built houses on land owned by a comunidade. According to the bill, the area eligible for regularisation is the plinth of the dwelling house plus two metres on all sides, subject to a maximum of 300sqm. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Beautiful Hairstyles For Women Over 30 Undo If an application for regularisation is not filed within six months of the notification by govt or is rejected, the administrator of comunidades shall initiate proceedings for the removal of the structure. Comunidades will have 30 days to decide on the applications. The one-time measure is a 'humanitarian gesture', said Monserrate, but Aldona MLA Carlos Ferreira demanded a strict approach and demolition of unauthorised structures on comunidade land. 'Over the years, it was observed that a significant number of landless persons who have been residing in Goa for a very long time have constructed dwelling houses on lands belonging to the comunidades without any formal authorisation or legal right,' said the bill. There are several homes built on comunidade land without legal ownership and permission from authorities. The absence of legal recognition has rendered such occupants vulnerable to eviction, which would deprive them of shelter and basic civic amenities. Monserrate said that the main objective of the amendment is to also protect comunidade lands from further encroachment and to enable the comunidades to reclaim land that was encroached upon. 'It also seeks to deter future unauthorised construction by clarifying that regularisation is a one-time measure,' said Monserrate. RGP MLA Viresh Borkar said the regularisation will benefit migrant workers who have encroached on comunidade land. He said that the bill should have specified that only landless persons of Goan origin would be able to apply for regularisation of houses. Chief minister Pramod Sawant tried to intervene to quieten the protesting opposition MLAs. During the uproar, the House also passed the Goa Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which provides a fresh window of two years for individuals to apply to regularise illegal homes and structures in villages and in towns. The structures or homes will be regularised as long as they are within a limit of 500sqm in villages and 600sqm in towns or in the capital city. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
2.7L sqm notified for change of use under TCP's Sec 39A: Rane
Porvorim: Town and country planning (TCP) minister Vishwajit Rane on Thursday said in the House that 2.7 lakh sqm of land was notified under Section 39A of the TCP Act for change of land use. Responding to a question by St Andre MLA Viresh Borkar, Rane said not a single guideline was violated under Section 39A and that the court itself had observed that the section was an excellent mechanism. Borkar pointed out that the use of vast tracts of land had been changed under Section 39A and that rampant hill-cutting has been taking place. 'There have been changes on no-development slopes, in natural cover and in orchard land,' he said. Citing an instance, he said that change of use had been recommended for 5,000sqm of land at Siridao and that this area included a religious structure and comprised partly natural cover with a no-development zone. In yet another case, he said, 6,000sqm of orchard land had been recommended for a change in use, and that in one more instance, more than 74,000sqm was sought to be converted despite it being partly natural cover, partly micro-industrial zone, and partly orchard land. 'This land has not been notified but recommended for a change in land use,' Borkar said. The MLA asked if the land of a Delhi-based person which was cleared for change of use, would be reverted to its original use by the minister. Rane said he had noted the objections and that the matter would no longer be processed. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.
