Two-tier justice quango ‘letting hundreds of illegal migrants dodge deportation'

Telegraph

26-03-2025

Hundreds of convicted illegal migrants will avoid deportation because of lax Sentencing Council guidelines, Robert Jenrick has warned.
Research by the shadow justice secretary suggests that draft guidance by the council would allow migrants convicted of immigration offences to escape with sentences below the threshold for automatic deportation.
This is because the council's 'starting points' for sentences are below the cut-off point of 12 months in prison, after which convicted migrants automatically face deportation.
Mr Jenrick claimed the guidelines would 'blow a hole' in border controls by making it more difficult for the Home Office to deport criminals convicted of immigration offences. Crimes could range from illegally entering the UK to deception and possession of false ID documents.
The disclosures come in the wake of a row over the council's new sentencing rules that give special treatment to criminals from ethnic, religious and gender minorities.
Courts have been told they should 'normally consider' ordering a pre-sentence report on an offender if they come from 'an ethnic minority, cultural minority, and/or faith minority community', or are transgender.
The Tories, who first raised the change in guidance, have criticised it as 'two-tier justice' as there are no requirements for similar reports on offenders of any other ethnicity.
Mr Jenrick said: 'The guidelines the Sentencing Council have drafted will blow a hole in border enforcement. Yet again, they are acting in a way that disregards Parliament's will.
'That's why I brought forward a Bill to restore ministerial oversight to the council, but shamefully Labour opposed it. The Justice Secretary has chosen to be powerless to stop madness like this and the two-tier sentencing rules.'
The research also found the range of punishment for the most serious immigration offences was set by the council below the maximum jail terms proposed by the Government.
The Council recommended a custody range of 10 to 16 years for people smuggling when the Nationality and Borders Act set the maximum for facilitating entry to the UK as life imprisonment.
Reduced sentences
A convicted offender could also get a reduced sentence on the basis that it was a first immigration offence, even though it was likely that the vast majority would likely never have been in the country before.
Mr Jenrick's analysis found that for illegal entry, the starting point was as low as six months in jail where there was low harm and low culpability.
Even for the highest harm and culpability, the range was from one year and six months in jail to three years in custody, even though the maximum sentence was four years in prison.
For possession of false ID documents, the council's suggested starting point for the highest harm was nine months in jail, and a community order for lower-level harm. The statutory maximum for the offence is two years in jail.
The latest Home Office figures show that 390 migrants were sentenced for the four offences analysed in 2022, the most recent year for which data is available.
It is the first guidance issued by the Sentencing Council on immigration offences and refers judges to the judiciary's Equal Treatment Bench Book.
This book warns judges that 'negative perceptions of migrants, refugees and people seeking asylum are fuelled by parts of the press and some political debate.'
A sentencing council spokesman said that it aimed to maintain current levels of sentencing when drawing up guidelines.
'The guidelines as a whole are designed to cover the full range of offending from the least to the most serious, while leaving headroom for the very most extreme offences. Judges and magistrates can sentence outside guidelines if they feel it is in the interests of justice to do so,' said the spokesman.