Sounds serious: NYC noise pollution takes a toll
"Even with your earbuds in, turned all the way up, you can't hear anything for the whole commute, and you're ruining your ears at that level," said Mulligan, a US Marines veteran who lives with PTSD.
At his home close to New York's tourist hub Times Square, Mulligan has sealed his windows with high-density soundproof foam, draped them with double thick curtains and invested in earplugs to sleep.
On the street he has resorted to noise-cancelling headphones, and he prefers bikes to the subway for getting around.
New Yorkers and visitors to the megacity of 8.5 million people are bombarded with blaring sirens, loud locals, raucous bars and car horns almost constantly.
A city-wide hotline received 750,000 noise complaints in 2024, the most commonly complained about quality of life issue.
The city that never sleeps, perhaps because it can't, is one of the few built up US areas with a noise code regulating sound from vehicles, construction, businesses, and recreation.
It has even installed cameras with sensors to detect and penalize violators.
Nine-in-ten New Yorkers are at risk of hearing loss from daily exposure to noise levels exceeding 70 decibels, the healthy average, a Columbia University study conducted between 2010 and 2012 found.
The report's author, professor Richard Neitzel, is now leading the first national study on noise in which 200,000 volunteers wear smart watches to track sound levels.
"It looks like somewhere around one-in-four Americans are exposed to noise levels that could hurt their hearing over the long term," said Neitzel, a professor at the University of Michigan.
- 'You can't undo it' -
Among young people aged 18 to 25, the primary source of excess noise exposure comes from headphones.
Overall, more people are exposed to high levels of environmental noise than to noise from their headphones, Neitzel added.
Although the percentage of the population exposed to noise is similar to those exposed to air pollution, acoustic issues are not prioritized by residents and officials like air quality is, Neitzel said.
There is clear evidence that excess noise is linked to poor sleep, cardiovascular issues, depression, cognitive decline, premature births and poor academic performance.
Tinnitus, a permanent ringing in the ear affecting three out of 20 study participants, is increasingly prevalent.
Loud music is even used to promote increased consumption, said Shane Newman, who manages a popular Mexican restaurant in Manhattan's trendy Hudson Yards development.
"You have a drink in the music, it feels like a nice vibe and... they end up staying longer," he told AFP.
Audiologist Michele DiStefano said the effects of noise on well-being have "not really been studied well enough."
"The longer you have the exposure, and the higher the level, the (greater) degree of hearing loss you'll have" -- particularly for young people, she warned.
"Once it does affect your hearing, you can't undo it, but you can actually prevent it," she said.
"There's really a push to educate the younger generations on how you don't have to just have really loud noise at a concert -- it can be cumulative."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Gynaecological cancer survivors help educate Australia's future doctors and nurses
When Kristin Young was diagnosed with stage 3 ovarian cancer in 2009, it had taken her doctors some time to figure out what was wrong. "Ovarian cancer is difficult to pick up and often thought to be other things," she said. "The most common symptoms — bloating, feeling full [quickly] and the need to urinate more often … they present like other common conditions." In Kristin's case, it was a much rarer symptom — swollen lymph nodes in her groin — that prompted concern. "The really tricky thing about ovarian cancer is it manifests in many different ways … and spreads quite widely before it ever gets big enough to give you a symptom," she said. "Many women have hoped that the medical system would do better to pick it up early, but the system is up against the perplexing biology of ovarian cancer, which is worsened by its rarity." Kristin underwent treatment, which was successful, but 4.5 years later, the cancer returned. The now-retired psychologist said one of the biggest challenges of dealing with a cancer diagnosis was navigating the health system and "getting the right communication" with her medical team. When an opportunity came up to work with trainee health professionals to improve their understanding of gynaecological patients' lived experiences, Kristin knew she wanted to be involved. "One of the really important things … is to share that message that [ovarian cancer] is difficult to diagnose, and how important it is to listen to the stories that women bring to the doctor," she said. "If, through education and awareness, we can help a small number of people be diagnosed even a bit earlier, it's better than things staying the way they are." The volunteer-led program, Survivors Teaching Students, is a national initiative that brings ovarian and other gynaecological cancer survivors and caregivers into the classrooms of medical, nursing and other health professional students across the country. Alison Evans, CEO of the Australian and New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), said the program was developed by the Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance in the US and brought to Australia by ANZGOG in 2017. "It's vital because it's really giving voice to what symptoms are, what diagnosis looks like, and what treatment looks like from a patient's perspective," Ms Evans told the Health Report. In Australia, 19 women are diagnosed and six women die from gynaecological cancer every day. Despite this, Ms Evans said gynaecological cancers — which include uterine, endometrial, ovarian, vulval, vaginal and cervical — were poorly understood in the community. "There's a stigma around these cancers because they are part of the reproductive system, and therefore they're hidden and they're very personal," she said. With the exception of cervical screening, there are no early detection tests available, and as a result, gynaecological cancers often grow silently during the curable stage. Adding to the challenge is the fact women may have symptoms overlooked or minimised by health professionals, which Ms Evans hopes the program will help to change. Since 2017, Survivors Teaching Students volunteers have delivered in-person and online programs to more than 20,000 students across 22 universities in Australia and New Zealand. During a typical session, students hear from three volunteers — including patients, carers and family members — about their personal experience with gynaecological cancer, including the physical, mental and emotional toll it takes. "Patients are real people with lives and families, and we want the doctors and nurses of the future to see that," Kristin said. One of the key goals, she said, is to emphasise the importance of good health communication and compassionate care. "Patients remember what doctors and nurses say, and that sometimes can be engraved in your mind forever." But the most important part, according to Kristin, is answering the questions from students. "Many students are really touched at an emotional level … and perhaps start to think they would consider a career in oncology or oncology-based research." Further research was critical for early detection and treatment options to be improved, Ms Evans said, particularly for the 55 per cent of gynaecological cancers considered rare or less common, which often had limited treatment options. "We want doctors to be curious about these diseases for the rest of their career," she said. "The most important thing is that GPs and nurses … have a voice in their head that is the woman's voice or the carer's voice that they take with them." Kristin said her own experience with ovarian cancer was proof that oncology research was having an impact. "I'm a 'super responder' on one of these new molecular-based treatments … so the prognosis that I had, which was very poor, I have now outlived this, and I know that that represents hope," she said. "Research is prolonging lives in some people and with more research it will prolong more lives." In addition to inspiring and educating the next generation of health professionals, she said the Survivors Teaching Students program had strengthened the community of people living with gynaecological cancer. "At the very personal level, I have made good friends, what I feel are lifelong friends. "The term lifelong is ironic in ovarian cancer because many of the women I have met … unfortunately have not had long lives. I have my contacts list and my phone is full of people who have passed away, but I never delete them." The program helped people affected by gynaecological cancer leave a "lasting legacy", Ms Evans added. "Many women and their families at the end of treatment are looking for a way to make a difference. Listen to the full story and subscribe to the Health Report podcast for more.

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Astronomers get first look deep inside a star during supernova explosion
Astronomers have peered directly at a star's inner layers for the first time, thanks to a stellar explosion 2.2 billion light-years away. The star was stripped of its outer shells, revealing its dense innards to the Keck Observatory in Hawaii just after it exploded in a cataclysmic blast. The star's demise, reported in the journal Nature, also confirms current theories about stellar evolution. Study lead author and Northwestern University astronomer Steve Schulze said their team was "awestruck" by the discovery, but there's plenty still to uncover about the supernova dubbed 2021yfj. Stars burn for billions of years, but their deaths can be very abrupt, with supernova explosions over in a matter of hours. Despite detecting thousands of supernovas, their brevity makes it difficult for astronomers to study them in detail. Generally, stars burn by converting hydrogen into progressively heavier elements via nuclear fusion. When massive stars run out of hydrogen, they collapse in on themselves, producing a violent supernova explosion. But before the explosion, astronomers believe a star's heavier elements settle into onion-like layers, with the heaviest — iron — at the core of the biggest stars. That iron core is surrounded by layers of lighter elements such as argon, sulphur and silicon, which are in turn surrounded by elements that are lighter still, such as oxygen and carbon. Helium and hydrogen form the outermost layers, or the skin of the onion. Until now, Dr Schulze said, it was nearly impossible to see any of these deeper layers directly. "The silicon- and sulphur-rich layer is buried under many other materials and is therefore inaccessible [by telescopes] under normal circumstances." The astronomers were able to see the true weirdness of 2021yfj because they took advantage of a lucky cosmic moment. In September 2021, a survey of the night sky by the Zwicky Transient Facility in California spotted a bright flash in a star-forming region some 2.2 billion light-years from Earth. Dr Schulze and their team raced to see if any observatories could collect a spectrum — a record of light from the explosion showing elements present — shortly after the supernova happened. The Keck Observatory managed to provide one within a day of the explosion. But rather than seeing the relatively light element shells usually present in a supernova, such as carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, the spectrum was full of heavier elements: silicon, sulphur, and argon. This means that something pulled those upper layers off the star before it exploded, exposing the layers closer to the core. Brad Tucker, an astronomer at the Australian National University who wasn't involved in the research, said this find was an "important confirmation" of stellar structure. "We've always modelled it this way. We've had evidence from our understanding of nuclear physics. The researchers don't know exactly what removed so many outer layers of the star before the supernova. The most likely theory, they suggest, is a massive star more than 100 times the mass of our Sun fired its outer material off in waves right before exploding. Dr Schulze said this behaviour had been seen with a few other stars — although only with their lighter upper hydrogen and helium layers, not the heavier elements below. Dr Tucker agreed this was a likely explanation, and that a star ejecting its lower layers prior to explosion was "the next logical step" after venting the lighter elements. But there are still puzzles in the data. The researchers also found small amounts of helium in the star's debris, for instance, which they don't yet have a good explanation for. Dr Schulze said the supernova they observed was "only one among the more than 10,000 supernovas known, making it a very rare event". Nevertheless, they're confident that astronomers will be able to observe another partially denuded star exploding and learn more about the strange phenomenon. New facilities, like the Rubin Observatory in Chile, allow astronomers to see supernovas in much greater number, according to Dr Tucker. "We now have surveys that are getting hundreds to thousands of supernovas a year, whereas previously we'd get dozens to maybe 100," he said.

News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘First contact': Fears as alien object speeds toward earth
A mystery object tearing towards Earth at break-neck speed has raised fears that aliens are on their way here. Scientists warn that the odd entity, which astronomers are calling 31/Atlas, could be an ET craft set to launch probes on our planet. Estimated at more than 12 miles (19 kilometres) wide, it is whizzing through our solar system on a trajectory that will bring it within about 170 million miles (274 million kilometres) of us on December 19. A trio of scientists from Harvard University, led by astrophysicist Avi Loeb, have published a paper speculating whether it could be 'hostile' extraterrestrial technology. Nick Pope, who used to investigate UFOs for the UK's Ministry of Defence, said: 'It is not beyond the realms of science fiction that 31/Atlas could be an alien spaceship of some kind. 'It's an unusual size, unusual acceleration, unusual course and unusual behaviour — those things combined very closely match a sort of mapping or survey mission. 'Of course, this could turn out to be just a comet or an asteroid — albeit an interstellar one, so interesting and incredibly rare. 'The good thing is this is a testable hypothesis. 'The clock is ticking down. We will know soon enough whether we're dealing with first contact … or just a big rock.' Here, Nick sets out the six key theories proposed by Harvard experts. 1. It's too large to be an asteroid. We do know asteroids in our solar system range in size but this is much bigger than average 2. Its rate of acceleration seems unusual for a natural object. The European Space Agency and Hubble space telescope calculate it is travelling at about 130,000mph (209,215km/h) NASA says at that speed, it is the fastest solar system visitor. 3. We spotted it very late. This was because it was coming in from the centre of the galaxy, where there are a lot of obstacles, light and stars. If you wanted to covertly send a probe into our solar system, this is exactly the course you would choose. 4. Its course makes it very hard to intercept. At critical points where it might do something technological, such as perform a non-natural manoeuvre, it is blocked by the sun. 5. Passing close to Venus, Mars and Jupiter. This is like a mapping or survey mission. There is a very low probability of that happening naturally — the report suggests close to 0.005 per cent. That is statistically minute. 6. We won't see it. At its closest approach, the sun will be between the Earth and Atlas so we won't be able to see it. Again, this is exactly the course you would choose, as it can do all its sneaky braking manoeuvres and changes of course without us seeing it. It might do one of two things if this is technological. It could change course and come to Earth itself. Or it could, if it's a mothership, deploy some probes that would come to Earth.