logo
Can Preventing, Treating Herpes Reduce Dementia Risk?

Can Preventing, Treating Herpes Reduce Dementia Risk?

Medscape3 days ago
Mounting evidence points to a connection between dementia and common herpes virus infections, particularly herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), which causes cold sores, and varicella zoster virus (VZV), the cause of chickenpox and shingles.
Multiple studies have shown that individuals with a history of these infections face a higher risk for dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). What was once a fringe hypothesis has gained traction, as a growing body of research points to these viruses as major factors in Alzheimer's and other dementias.
'There is now quite a lot of evidence obtained by a variety of methods which suggests that this virus is really a major factor in Alzheimer's disease. And the weight of the evidence supports a causal role,' Ruth Itzhaki, MSc, PhD, visiting professor, The Oxford Institute of Population Aging, Oxford, England, told Medscape Medical News .
Itzhaki was one of the first to hypothesize there was a potential connection between the herpes virus and AD and has spent much of her career investigating the link.
These pathogens may act as 'under-recognized drivers of neurodegeneration. They can hide in the nervous system and reactivate later in life, each flare-up potentially inflicting cumulative damage that accelerates cognitive decline,' Shaheen Lakhan, MD, PhD, neurologist and researcher based in Miami told Medscape Medical News .
One early clue came decades ago, when Itzhaki and colleagues discovered HSV-1 DNA in the brains of patients with AD, most notably in carriers of the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 ( APOE ε4 ) gene, a known genetic risk factor for the disease.
'The virus and the gene may be working in tandem — a synergy where a latent viral infection 'flips the switch' on a genetic vulnerability,' Lakhan said.
Supporting a potential causal role, Itzhaki's team has since demonstrated that HSV-1 infection of cultured human neuronal cells induces the accumulation of amyloid-beta and phosphorylated tau — the primary components of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in AD. The treatment with antiviral agents significantly reduced both these pathological markers and cell death.
Are All Herpes Viruses Tied to Dementia?
While research strongly suggests a link between certain herpes viruses and an increased risk for dementia, not all herpes viruses have been implicated.
HSV-1 and VZV have been more consistently linked to an increased risk for dementia, including AD. While some studies suggest a possible association with HSV-2 (genital herpes), the evidence is less conclusive than that for HSV-1 and VZV.
Other herpes viruses, like cytomegalovirus, have not shown a strong or consistent association with an increased dementia risk in most studies.
Research has also suggested that individuals with both HSV-1 and VZV infections may face an elevated, compounded risk. In one study, patients co-infected with HSV and VZV had a hazard ratio of 1.57 for developing dementia, whereas those with HSV-1 alone had a hazard ratio of 1.38 and those with VZV alone had a hazard ratio of 1.41.
Itzhaki explained that multiple biologically plausible mechanisms — supported by various studies — may explain the link between herpes virus infections and an increased risk for dementia.
For instance, herpes viruses can trigger chronic inflammation in the brain, a critical factor in neurodegeneration. Additionally, HSV-1 may promote amyloid plaque formation and influence tau phosphorylation, as previously noted.
The damage and risk occur as a result of reactivation of dormant HSV-1 in the brain after various types of damage, Itzhaki noted.
One recent study showed reactivation of dormant HSV-1 after mild brain injury or after cumulative general infections may drive neurodegenerative diseases by triggering pathological changes including accumulation of beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau.
'The notion that a virus many of us carry could be stoking neurodegeneration is provocative, but the science behind it is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. The past few years have delivered especially compelling data to support this viral link,' said Lakhan.
Antivirals, Vaccines Preventive?
Some studies suggest antiviral medications used to treat herpes infections and vaccination against VZV could potentially reduce the dementia risk.
For example, one recent Taiwanese cohort study showed that symptomatic HSV-1 infection was associated with nearly a threefold increased risk of developing dementia. Antiherpetic medication reduced the risk by 90%.
However, a study of US veterans showed no link between HSV infection and increased dementia risk. Nonetheless, similar to the Taiwanese study, antiherpetic medication was associated with a protective effect against dementia.
Separately, in a matched case-control study of nearly 700,000 older adults, HSV-1 was more common in those with AD, and antiviral therapy for HSV-1 was associated with a lower risk of developing AD.
Yet in the VALAD clinical trial, valacyclovir therapy did not change the course of disease in older adults with early AD or mild cognitive impairment and antibodies revealing previous herpes infections — mainly HSV-1.
'Our trial suggests antivirals that target herpes are not effective in treating early Alzheimer's and cannot be recommended to treat such patients with evidence of prior HSV infection,' lead investigator, Davangere P. Devanand, MD, professor of psychiatry and neurology and director of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, in New York City, said in a news release.
'We do not know if long-term antiviral medication treatment following herpes infection can prevent Alzheimer's because prospective controlled trials have not been conducted,' Devanand said.
On the other hand, data suggest that vaccination against VZV may offer protection against cognitive decline.
In a landmark UK study that leveraged a unique vaccine rollout policy in Wales and analyzed health records of over 280,000 older adults, the receipt of the live-attenuated shingles vaccine was associated with approximately a 20% reduction in the risk of developing dementia over 7 years.
Lakhan said this study offers 'one of the strongest pieces of evidence yet that preventing varicella-zoster reactivation (shingles) may translate into protecting the brain. In an era when we have few effective dementia preventives, the possibility that something as simple as a vaccine or antiviral could reduce risk by 20% or more is galvanizing.'
What to Tell Patients
Lakhan believes 'the herpes-dementia connection can no longer be dismissed as coincidence; it demands our attention and further investigation.'
He said physicians should be ready to address it in conversations with patients. 'It's increasingly common for older patients, and their families, to ask, 'Doc, I heard that cold sores or shingles might cause Alzheimer's — should I be worried?' Lakhan said.
The answer should be 'balanced. We can't say herpes viruses cause Alzheimer's with absolute certainty, but we can say there's enough evidence to suggest they're contributing factors — and that taking steps to mitigate these infections is wise,' Lakhan said.
He added that he now routinely recommends the shingles vaccine to all eligible patients not only to prevent a painful rash but also as a potential investment in their long-term brain health. 'There's little downside and plenty of upside to keeping these viruses at bay,' he added.
He also advised 'prompt and aggressive' treatment of herpes outbreaks and prescribes antivirals for recurrent HSV-1 flares.
Some researchers, he said, are investigating whether chronic suppressive antiviral therapy might help delay dementia in high-risk individuals, though it's too early to recommend this as standard practice.
At present, Lakhan advises against prescribing daily antivirals solely for dementia prevention outside of clinical trials. However, for patients with frequent herpes reactivations or those who carry the APOE ε4 gene alongside a strong family history, he maintains a low threshold for treatment and emphasizes counseling on viral prevention.
Itzhaki noted that several surveys suggest antivirals may offer some protection against dementia. Taking antivirals in late middle age — when the immune system weakens — could be considered for individuals infected with HSV who also carry genetic risk factors.
Lakhan, said 'the bottom line for practitioners is clear — encourage shingles vaccination, stay vigilant against chronic herpes infections, and consider that maintaining viral suppression might become part of our toolkit for preserving brain health.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lithium could help treat Alzheimer's disease, Harvard Medical School researchers say
Lithium could help treat Alzheimer's disease, Harvard Medical School researchers say

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

Lithium could help treat Alzheimer's disease, Harvard Medical School researchers say

Researchers at Harvard Medical School in Boston now say that lithium could help treat the 7 million people with Alzheimer's disease. For the first time ever, the research team found that lithium naturally appears in the human brain and it has a protective effect, shielding the brain from memory-robbing harm. The researchers found the loss of lithium in the brain could be the first signs of Alzheimer's in a patient. Lab mice saw improvement in memory when their lithium levels were restored after it was withheld in an experiment. The study suggests that one day, lithium could be used to treat Alzheimer's. It's already used to treat people with bipolar disorder. "I think these new findings suggest a new potential mechanism for Alzheimer's disease and it raises hope for a therapeutical approach that could potentially be benign and rather in expensive," said Dr. Bruce Yankner, a professor of genetics and neurology at Harvard Medical School. Only mice have seen the lithium trials so far. It's unclear if adding lithium to a human patient would have the same effect but it gives scientists a new avenue to study. "We need to see what happens in a human. So I do not recommend that people go out and take lithium based on this," said Yankner. "Our hope is that it will enter into early clinical trials in the not too distant future." Yankner said he "can't be precise" on when a possible trial in humans would begin.

Do Employers Have A Rational Fear Of Hiring Disabled Staff?
Do Employers Have A Rational Fear Of Hiring Disabled Staff?

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

Do Employers Have A Rational Fear Of Hiring Disabled Staff?

Sir Charlie Mayfield, a stalwart of the UK business community and advisor to Liz Kendall, Work and Pensions Secretary, has recently been quoted in The Times stating that employers have a 'rational' fear of hiring disabled staff. During his review of workplace sickness, Mayfield concluded that adapting work to staff with health problems was a huge issue that required employers to change, but suggested extra duties on businesses were not the answer. He said: "We've got a large amount of legislation which places requirements on employers and it's partly because of that that a lot of employers see it as risky to employ disabled people. And so quite rationally, they don't, even though we all know that's not the right outcome." The context for these comments is one in which 2.5 million UK workers are permanently off sick, and 8.7 million workers identifying as disabled. There's been an increase of 800,000 people too unwell to work since 2019, which is unsustainable for workers, their life outcomes and financial stability as well as the national economy. Rights Versus Reality? So are Mayfield's comments and his discovery report for the Department of Work and Pensions yet another stick with which to beat disabled people? Or are his remarks click bait headlines, papering over some well reasoned insights which need to be surfaced, understood and addressed? Mayfield commented on the rise in Employment Tribunals and the extra duties on UK businesses: The present approach "pitches rights against reality. If someone's ill and they have a fit note, there's a stand-off almost between that person and their employer, who could be part of the solution. We need to move from a position where too much of this is about risk and fear, to one where we humanise this and encourage people to be talking of finding solutions." The adversarial narratives that exist between communities of lived experience and employers has swiftly deepened in recent years, with each group finding very different sources of advice online and increases in perceptions of conflict and unfairness from all sides – employee, colleague and employer. However, read deeper into the report, and Mayfield is recommending an incentivisation approach to disability employment (the proverbial 'carrot', rather than the legislative 'stick'). Crucially, he recommends that employers intervene early when someone is struggling, rather than lagging in the provision of adjustments or support. Indeed, failure to provide timely intervention is a frequent cause of employment tribunals, with compensation up to £230,000 in one recent case. A shift in responsiveness would be very welcome by the disabled and neurodivergent community and it seems pretty logical. Government support and incentives for early intervention seem rational, but we will need to think carefully about what to provide. Early Intervention Guidance Advice on disability adjustments for individuals from the government service Access to Work or in-house / private Occupational Health is routinely a first port of call for employees and employers respectively. Access to Work has been a lifeline for employees over the past few decades, and has funded services and equipment that exceeds the budgets of many small businesses. However, it has become so log jammed that there is a community pressure group now set up to raise awareness of the problem founded by Dr Shani Dhanda. Occupational health services can be excellent and provide or signpost the specialist advice needed. But costs have spiralled with a clinical, 'assessment first' provision when there are so many referrals. There's a lack of filtering so those with the greatest needs are getting the same level of intervention as those who need a simple set of strategies or some software. Some of the occupational health companies are delivering the same services that they recommend, which is a structural conflict of interest and risks driving up costs - this practice is banned in Access to Work and Disabled Students Allowance, for example. So while we're telling employers to do more, faster, we will also need to be clear about the 'how' and the 'what'. With grand policy gestures and an increasingly litigious atmosphere, the needs of the businesses risk being overlooked and on that note, Sir Mayfield's comments are on point. Advice on adjustments for health and disability needs to be a collaboration between employer and employee. An assessment should consult both parties, and review what the individual needs in relation to the resources available. For example, a higher cost burden might be acceptable for a larger business than a small business. Safety critical roles might not have as much flexibility as a standard role. It is therefore not possible to list reasonable adjustments for each physical, emotional or cognitive difficulty. These can act as guidance, but not definitive entitlements. The policy and specialist support environment is going to need to become more sophisticated, and more responsive to balancing needs and addressing conflict, unfairness and unreasonable requests / restrictions. This is not a straightforward ask. Needs-led models How can employers find good advice in a complex and risky environment? The needs-led model is a good alternative to the medical model, relying more on practical support than clinical diagnosis. At work, we don't need to know the cause of back pain to know that a first port of call is a desk assessment or moving and handling review. Improving knowledge of functional, everyday difficulties and potential scaffolding is within the grasp of HR with the occasional advice of specialists where needed. Up-skilling employer confidence and competence is a potential avenue to improving outcomes, particularly in the areas of emotional regulation and cognition-dependent task performance where the challenges and the solutions are not visible. Knowing what to provide can be a pragmatic, low-cost conversation – research indicates that the cheapest or free adjustments are typically the most welcome, and that employees prefer the ability to personalize rather than passively receive an off-the-shelf allocation. As the population ages, the disability inclusion problem is not going to go away. Employers who are not developing a straightforward and accessible pathway to inclusion – at the company and individual level – will remain at risk of employment tribunal losses. This isn't a question of rights versus reality, it is a question of taking charge of a business need versus sticking your head in the sand. The rational fear of tribunals can be replaced by a rational approach to managing a large and growing cohort of disabled employees. Given the urgency of resolving the problem at the national level, now is a great time to start a strategic workforce plan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store