logo
Calls for Scotland-wide seagull summit amid warnings someone could be killed

Calls for Scotland-wide seagull summit amid warnings someone could be killed

Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who called a debate on the issue at Holyrood, warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls.
Fellow Tory Rachael Hamilton said a nationwide summit must be held to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'.
Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie had already promised to hold a seagull summit in the north of Scotland but Ms Hamilton, who represents the south of Scotland, said a summit for the whole country is needed.
The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'.
She called for action on the 'growing nuisance', which she said posed a health and safety risk to residents.
Despite rising complaints from locals, though, she said NatureScot's licensing system to control the birds was bureaucratic and failing to solve the issue.
'I think we need a summit,' she said. 'I don't think we just need a summit in Moray, we need a summit across Scotland.'
Ms Hamilton said the debate was 'important' as she criticised what she said was a lack of action from the Scottish Government.
She told MSPs: 'Absolutely nothing is getting done. I don't believe the Government are listening to us because the issue continues in my constituency in Eyemouth.
'Aggressive seagull behaviour continues to cause a real concern amongst businesses, amongst tourists, amongst everybody that has anything to do along the harbour.
'And it is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a serious, growing health risk. It's a safety risk, particularly for children and elderly residents.'
She said one business owner had described the situation as 'people being scared, attacked and traumatised'.
NatureScot and the SNP have ignored this problem for far too long.
I'm bringing forward a debate in Parliament today to demand action to control the menace of gulls in our communities. pic.twitter.com/W85WB2ZeAC
— Douglas Ross MSP (@Douglas4Moray) June 26, 2025
MSPs debated the issue on Thursday, the last day of Parliament before the summer recess.
Opening the debate, Mr Ross said people often 'smirk' when hearing that the Scottish Parliament is debating the problems around gulls – but he said it was an 'extremely serious issue'.
The Highlands and Islands MSP said constituents have told him they are worried about leaving their homes for fear of being 'divebombed', while others have suffered mental health issues thanks to a lack of sleep caused by noisy gulls.
One resident, he said, is spending £2,000 a year to remove nests from her home.
'People should not have to keep living in fear of being divebombed by these menaces on a daily basis, and are crying out for action,' he said.
He accused NatureScot of having a conflict of interest as the body responsible for both the licensing to control birds and to conserve them.
He went on: 'The behaviour of the SNP's quango NatureScot confirms they have lost the plot. They have told people to protect themselves with umbrellas and even suggested dogs as a deterrent.
'The time has come to break up NatureScot. There is a clear conflict of interest in the fact they are responsible for considering licences to control gulls but are also responsible for protecting bird numbers.
'If the minister cannot see that is a problem, then he is divorced from reality.
'The strength of the cross-party support in my debate today should be all the SNP Government need to finally act before we see someone killed due to being attacked by a gull.'
Jim Fairlie, the minister for agriculture, said while people often 'chuckle and laugh' about the issue of gulls, he warned it was 'deadly serious'.
But he told MSPs that he could not intervene on NatureScot to change the licensing system because it would leave the Government open to judicial review.
He urged people to stop feeding the birds, which he said was the primary reason for the issue.
The birds have been an increasingly common site in urban areas as they leave their natural habitat in search of food.
He said: 'We have to work out what it is that is causing the issue in the first place.
'We are feeding them – it is quite simple. We are creating habitat, and we are creating feeding stations which are allowing gulls to inhabit our space, and that is now quite clearly coming into conflict.'
He added: 'We have got to try and limit food waste and public littering. We have got to take away these feeding opportunities.'
SNP MSP Christine Grahame warned against 'demonising' gulls, which she described as 'clever, adaptable' animals.
'Language such as 'mugging', 'menace' can be applied to us, our fellow counterparts,' she said, 'but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food.
'Anthropomorphising is tempting but not helpful.'
A NatureScot spokesperson said: 'We understand gulls can sometimes cause problems in our towns and cities.
'At the same time, gull populations are facing serious declines. NatureScot has a duty to balance health and safety concerns with gull conservation.
'Over the last five years we have supported many individuals, businesses and communities to better manage gulls without the need to kill the birds or destroy their nests.
'As a result, the number of licence applications to destroy nests and eggs and kill chicks has reduced, from 2,633 in 2023 to 1,601 in 2024.'
The spokesperson said in the longer term, Scots will 'need to find ways to live with gulls and other wildlife'.
They added: 'We will continue to work with local authorities to ensure that collaborative gull management plans are put in place for future years, with a focus on effective preventative measures, deterrents, changes to behaviour and guidance.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

QUENTIN LETTS: Welcome back, PM. You didn't miss much, just a mutiny of MPs and a plot by Ange to depose you!
QUENTIN LETTS: Welcome back, PM. You didn't miss much, just a mutiny of MPs and a plot by Ange to depose you!

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

QUENTIN LETTS: Welcome back, PM. You didn't miss much, just a mutiny of MPs and a plot by Ange to depose you!

Good Heavens, it was Sir Keir Starmer! The Prime Minister swaggered into the Commons at 11.30am. First time for over a fortnight. He was lucky a clerk didn't ask to check his security pass. The Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, signalled subtle displeasure at Sir Keir's neglect of the House. He said MPs would be given more leeway in their questions, to allow them to catch up with the absentee. I hear that on Monday night Sir Lindsay summoned the Cabinet Secretary to his study to tear him off a strip over Sir Keir's scurvy attitude to parliamentary scrutiny. Kemi Badenoch could have said 'Welcome back, stranger, you didn't miss much – just a mutiny among your MPs, a poll saying you're now as popular as the clap and a plot by Angela Rayner to depose you'. Instead the Conservative leader, who is not excessively endowed in the humour department, came over all jabbery. She shouted that Sir Keir had 'evaded Prime Minister's question time for two weeks' and was now 'irrelevant'. Aiee, that was ill-judged. You do not have to be Kemi-sceptic to see that even our nasal plodder of a PM is more relevant than she at present. Mrs Badenoch paid for her rant. Sir Keir was able to gloat, no fewer than seven times, that his opponent was 'unserious'. Did she truly mean he should not attend G7 and Nato summits? Furthermore, should she ever become PM (a possibility he later declared not to exist), the head of Nato would need to hang a sign over her empty seat at the summit table saying 'gone to PMQs'. How the sycophants tinkled with laughter at that. Starmer was at his most patronising. The chamber was surprisingly unbusy. The Lib Dems were down to seven. Reform MPs were a total no-show. The Tories were sparse and one of them – Mark Pritchard from The Wrekin, Shropshire – was so rude about Mrs Badenoch that he might soon defect. Sir Keir's parliamentary private secretary, a shrewd lad, leaned forward and muttered something to the Prime Minister when Mr Pritchard was trumpeting. Sir Keir proceeded to baste Pritchard in warm treacle. The old bloviator loved that. More interesting than anything on the Opposition benches was the paucity of Labour bodies. Despite doughnutting behind ministers to make TV viewers think it was a big turn-out, there must have been barely a tenth of Labour's contingent on parade. This was evidence of two things: the size of the Starmer arch-loyalist faction and the much greater number of Labour MPs who are indifferent towards him. Theirs was an ominous absence. Once Mrs Badenoch had blurted out her 'evading PMQs' line, these Starmer loyalists rose one after another to hail the nasal knight's 'leadership' and to complain that Kemi's remarks were a disgrace. Such was the consistency of these contributions, it was obvious Labour's Whips were orchestrating them. You just get a Whip to send a job-hungry MP a text message saying 'Here's what to say'. Most of them oblige. It's sickeningly low-grade but it works. Those applying their suction nozzles to Sir Keir's posterior included: Gemmell (C Ayrshire), Ahmed (Glasgow SW), Bailey (Leyton), Macdonald (Norwich N), McDonald (Stockton N) and Slinger (Rugby) but for sheer, marvel-eyed sycophancy none quite matched a woman from West Bromwich called Coombes. Whenever the first ministerial shuffle happens it will be a surprise if these virtuosi are not rewarded for their heroic efforts. Two other things. First, is Sir Keir's eyesight giving him gyp? He seemed to have new spectacles – they were glinting in a way I had not seen before – and, as happens occasionally, he asked for his speech to be raised on a special platform which was placed atop the despatch box. This did not prevent him from misreading some of the words. And earlier we had another corker from Lucy Powell, the dazzlingly intellectual Leader of the Commons. In an effort to praise the military she managed to refer to our 'armed sauces'.

Question Time sees woman share 10-year health battle in debate on 'failing' NHS
Question Time sees woman share 10-year health battle in debate on 'failing' NHS

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Question Time sees woman share 10-year health battle in debate on 'failing' NHS

Question Time on BBC One tonight featured a debate around the NHS in Scotland and how one in three people are turning to private healtcare due to long waiting lists A woman described how she felt she was "failed" by the NHS on two separate occasions in a poignant moment on tonight's Question Time. This week's debate took place in St Andrews in Fife, Scotland with host Fiona Bruce sitting on the panel alongside Shirley-Anne Somerville MSP, Anas Sarwar MSP, Andrew Bowie MP, Thomas Kerr and Lesley Riddoch. ‌ A large part of the BBC show tonight was centered around whether Scotland's NHS is "dying before our eyes". Anas Sarwar, leader Scottish labour highlighted how one in three people are forced to go private for healthcare and one audience member explained how she was part of that shocking statistic. ‌ The female audience member asked, "I'd just be interested to know how you measure the improvements that you're seeing in the NHS if you're saying that the waiting lists are going down? Is it not just because more people are going private? Just today I was getting a private surgery having been failed by the NHS twice." The woman, who did not disclose the nature of the surgery she needed, went on to explain how she was forced to turn to private healthcare after being "failed" by the NHS on two separate occasions. She added: "I first got this looked at nearly 10 years ago by an NHS specialist dermatologist who didn't think there was anything to be concerned about, I followed up again a year ago, I was told the same thing and I'm not blaming these doctors who are very pushed for time, I work in healthcare myself but then I went to see a private doctor because I am fortunate to have the means to be able to pay for private health insurance and as soon as they saw it they immediately rushed me to have it removed. But I firmly believe that healthcare should be accessible to everyone and it should be equal, but I've kind of been forced into this situation where I don't want to deny myself the healthcare that I can afford but it shouldn't be at the expense of others." In response Thomas Kerr, representing Reform UK, explained "too many people are going private," and said "the NHS isn't working in it's current system, it does have to be looked into and it does have to be reformed". He added: "Just throwing money at it doesn't work, we've seen that time and time again, we've had record funding in th NHS that is still not working for people on the ground." ‌ When asked by Fiona if he supported the idea of a mixed economy like the French system he added: "As long as healthcare is free at the point of need for anyone who needs it then I don't mind where someone gets their healthcare at all. If you can afford it and you want to pay it privately then that's entirely up to a person individually." He went on to address the problem in Scotland of the number of doctors leaving the NHS, he said: "We have a higher tax system in Scotland which is making people who are learning in our universities like here in St Andrews are then leaving to go down to England or to go travel abroad, I think we have to look at the tax system in Scotland to make sure it is fair to try and keep our home grown talent here to make sure the NHS works." Mr Kerr was then grilled about Brexit by broadcaster and commentator Lesley Riddoch. She said: "Right Thomas, what happened to the £380m quid a week we were going to get from Brexit?" She went on to say: "We've got a bit of a mess going on with healthcare here, we've got a static life expectancy which is shameful given the amount of wealth there is in this country and overall our health is not great." Question Time has now finished for the summer, it will be back on our screens in September.

Don't use 'value-laden language' against seagulls...it might 'demonise' them, claims veteran SNP MSP
Don't use 'value-laden language' against seagulls...it might 'demonise' them, claims veteran SNP MSP

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Don't use 'value-laden language' against seagulls...it might 'demonise' them, claims veteran SNP MSP

An MSP called for seagulls not to be 'demonised' after the Scottish government announced a summit to address serious concerns about the birds attacking people. Agriculture Minister Jim Fairlie confirmed the move in a debate on the issue of gulls swooping on the public raised by both former Conservative leader Douglas Ross and SNP grandee Fergus Ewing. But the SNP's Christine Grahame said: 'Language such as 'mugging' and 'menace' can be applied to us, our counterparts, but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food.' She claimed people should modify their own behaviour to tackle the problem and added: 'What we mustn't have is people versus gulls, or gulls versus people.' Mr Ross, a Highlands and Islands Tory MSP, told the chamber he has been 'inundated' with concerns about gulls from constituents, including a couple in the village of Hopeman who were 'worried about going out of their home'. Grahame, who has announced she will not stand in the 2026 Scottish parliament election, pointed members to a submission from the OneKind animal charity that urged them to avoid 'value-laden language' that described gulls as a 'menace or nuisance' and their behaviour as 'mugging' or 'dive-bombing'. Highlands and Islands MSP Mr Ross said: 'Well, I will say these gulls are a menace, they are dive-bombing and they are a problem.' Mr Ewing, who represents Inverness and Nairn, said a swooping gull could cause serious injury for an elderly person while their droppings can cause 'potentially lethal' illness in an infant. The minister said: 'There is absolutely no doubt - we've heard from members right across the chamber - that the people are being injured, they are being attacked and this is something that we have to deal with.' He said action needs to also be taken to find out if human behaviour is allowing gulls to 'thrive', including in urban areas as well as licences for dealing with the birds. Mr Fairlie said: 'I've already said that I will convene a summit in Inverness and we will look at the entire issue.' The power to hand out licenses to deal with birds is with NatureScot, a government-funded quango whose role includes conserving gull numbers as well as controlling them. Mr Fairlie said that licences can only be issued if there is a clear health and safety concern and not because the birds are regarded as a menace or nuisance. Mr Ewing asked if any analysis has been done by the Scottish Government or NatureScot about the health risks, and warned: 'I believe there has been no analysis whatsoever. If so, and there is a fatality, this Government will be held responsible for that fatality because they haven't looked into it.' Mr Ross said: 'In typical nationalist fashion Jim Fairlie believes that another talking shop will solve all these issues when he could take action right now.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store