
American values are threatened by the American president
My dad's journey through war and concentration camps teaches me that authoritarianism does not strengthen a nation and that, notwithstanding Elon Musk's warning that empathy is 'the fundamental weakness of Western civilisation,' it has been one of our national strengths – and that because of our president, it is now in peril.
My father's family was Armenian. During World War II, my family members were living throughout Eastern Europe and were secretly involved in a network that was spying on the Nazis and transmitting information to the West. The Gestapo uncovered the network, and my dad's heroic cousin Izabela was arrested in Poland in 1942 and sent to Auschwitz, along with her daughter, Teresa. Izabela died in Auschwitz, and Teresa was subjected to medical experiments by the Nazis.
My father and other immediate family members were arrested as well for being part of the spy network. But they were detained in Romania, where officials and the police – the 'deep state' – shielded them from the Gestapo, so they were imprisoned for a time but survived. (Bribery helped.)
Izabela's son-in-law, Boguslaw Horodynski, a Pole, oversaw the spy network and survived the war. But the Soviets, seeing a freedom fighter as a potential threat to the emerging Communist bloc, arrested him and dispatched him to a labour camp in the Siberian gulag.
Romania's prime minister personally asked Josef Stalin to show mercy. But Stalin wouldn't budge. Perhaps this is the prism through which Stalin saw Boguslaw: He's an immigrant in Romania, he's potentially a risk to national security, and due process is a silly concept that would slow us down, so we're sending him to a prison in another country. Sound familiar?
By this period, my dad had seen multiple relatives like Boguslaw disappeared or murdered by Nazis or Communists. He was determined to escape to the West. So in 1948 he swam across the Danube River to Yugoslavia as a first step to the West – and then was disappeared himself into a concentration camp, then an asbestos mine and finally a remote timber camp. But a young French diplomat, Robert Morisset, stationed in Belgrade, found out about my dad and wrote a letter to Yugoslav authorities on his behalf. That saved his life, for my dad was released: Thank God for Western diplomats willing to speak up about human rights.
Even in Communist labour camps, America shone as a beacon of liberty. So although my dad spoke no English, he dreamed of finding a path to get there. He made his way to France, and in 1952 the Cameron family in Portland, Oregon, working through Church World Service and the First Presbyterian Church in Portland, sponsored my dad to come to America. He arrived by ship in New York, and his first purchase was a Sunday New York Times to teach himself English.
My dad was dazzled by America. He made his way to Oregon, where his first job was at a logging camp – where the loggers ate steak!
He was thrilled to hear Americans speak freely, to learn about due process of law, to see how universities were cherished. He revelled in a land where people weren't randomly tarred as enemies of the people, where the government didn't disappear people off the streets.
To my dad, fleeing genocide and repression, America seemed extraordinarily accepting of diversity. Immigrants were accepted, and so were competing opinions. His landlady returned his rent. 'I'm not going to charge a refugee,' she said. 'You need the money more than I do.'
My dad recognised America's imperfections, of course, for those ideals are more lofty than our sometimes grubby reality. Yet I've seen how they inspired my relatives imprisoned in Eastern Europe and people just like them in places like Venezuela and El Salvador.
Yet now American values are threatened by an American president. The Trump administration deported – it said by mistake – Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Despite an apparently unanimous ruling from the Supreme Court ordering the facilitation of his return, White House officials have shrugged. Another immigrant, Ricardo Prada Vásquez, a Venezuelan, simply vanished into the system – until my Times colleague Miriam Jordan wrote about his case.
I watch all this, and I think about what is threatened today, including those values that, like a lighthouse in a raging storm, drew Ladis Kristof to these shores and made him a (heavily accented) American patriot until his death in 2010.
It can take many generations to build a great edifice admired around the world and just days to destroy it. And President Donald Trump is a wrecking ball.
So, Mr President, a plea: If you want to make America great again, let's start by respecting the rule of law and ending the practice of disappearing people into distant dungeons. — ©2025 The New York Times Company
Nicholas Kristof is an opinion columnist for NYT. This was first published in The New York Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Putin wins Ukraine concessions but doesn't get all he wants
IN a few short hours in Alaska, Vladimir Putin managed to convince Donald Trump that a Ukraine ceasefire was not the way to go, stave off US sanctions, and spectacularly shatter years of Western attempts to isolate the Russian president. Outside Russia, Putin was widely hailed as the victor of the Alaska summit while at home, Russian state media cast the United States president as a prudent statesman, even as critics in the West accused him of being out of his depth. Russian state media made much of the fact that Putin was afforded a military fly-over, that Trump waited for him on the red carpet, and then let the Russian president ride with him in the back of the "Big Beast", the US presidential limousine. But Putin's biggest summit wins related to the war in Ukraine, where he appears to have persuaded Trump, at least in part, to embrace Russia's vision of how a deal should be done. Trump had gone into the meeting saying he wanted a quick ceasefire and had threatened Putin and Russia's biggest buyer of its crude oil — China — with sanctions. Afterwards, Trump said he had agreed with Putin that negotiators should go straight to a peace settlement and not through a ceasefire as Ukraine and its European allies had been demanding — previously with US support. "The US president's position has changed after talks with Putin, and now the discussion will focus not on a truce, but on the end of the war. And a new world order. Just as Moscow wanted," Olga Skabeyeva, one of Russian state TV's most prominent talk show hosts, said on Telegram. The fact that the summit even took place was a win for Putin before it even started, given how it brought him in from the diplomatic cold with such pomp. Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's former president and a close Putin ally, said the summit had achieved a major breakthrough when it came to restoring US-Russia relations, which Putin had lamented were at their lowest level since the Cold War. "The mechanism for high-level meetings between Russia and the United States has been restored in its entirety," he said. But Putin did not get everything he wanted and it's unclear how durable his gains will be. For one, Trump did not hand him the economic reset he wanted — something that would boost the Russian president at a time when his economy is showing signs of strain after more than three years of war and increasingly tough Western sanctions. Yuri Ushakov, Putin's foreign policy aide, said before the summit the talks would touch on trade and economic issues. Putin had brought his finance minister and the head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund all the way to Alaska with a view to discussing potential deals on the Arctic, energy, space and the technology sector. In the end, though, they didn't get a look in. Trump told reporters on Air Force One before the summit started there would be no business done until the war in Ukraine was settled. It's also unclear how long the sanctions reprieve that Putin won will last. Trump said it would probably be two or three weeks before he would need to return to the question of thinking about imposing secondary sanctions on China, to hurt financing for Moscow's war machine. Nor did Trump — judging by information that has so far been made public — do what some Ukrainian and European politicians had feared the most and sell Kyiv out by doing a deal over the head of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelenskyy. Trump made clear that it was up to Zelenskyy as to whether he would agree — or not — with ideas of land swaps and other elements for a peace settlement that the US president had discussed with Putin in Alaska. While deliberations continue, Russian forces are slowly but steadily advancing on the battlefield. According to the New York Times, Trump told European leaders that Ukrainian recognition of Donbas as Russian would help get a deal done. And the US is ready to be part of security guarantees for Ukraine, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. "For Putin, economic problems are secondary to his goals, but he understands our vulnerability and the costs involved," said one source familiar with Kremlin thinking. "It will be Trump's job to pressure Ukraine to recognise the agreements."


The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Police summon father of activist linked to subversive ‘Hong Kong Parliament'
National security police have summoned the father of an activist wanted for his involvement in the 'Hong Kong Parliament', a group deemed subversive by authorities, to 'assist in an investigation', the Post has learned. A source said that the birth father of Alan Keung Ka-wai, a man surnamed Koo, had been asked to report to Tin Shui Wai Police Station on Wednesday morning to help with the investigation into his Canadian-based activist son. Keung is also believed to have a stepfather. '[We] expect the investigation to wrap up around noon,' the source said. Koo was seen leaving the police station around noon. Alan Keung is among 15 activists who were each slapped with a HK$200,000 (US$25,477) bounty last month for their involvement in an overseas election organised by 'Hong Kong Parliament' in May. Police earlier accused the group, founded by wanted self-exiled activists Elmer Yuan Gong-yi, Victor Ho Leung-mau, Fok Ka-chi and Choi Ming-da, of attempting to subvert state power by promoting 'self-determination' and formulating a so-called Hong Kong constitution. Keung was also the chairman of the Taiwan-based advocacy group, Hong Kong Democratic Independence Union. Four members of the union based in the city, aged 15 to 47, were arrested by national security police last month for conspiring to subvert state power. A man surnamed Keung published a declaration in a local Chinese-language newspaper last Thursday, saying that he, his wife and his son were severing familial ties with the activist in Canada. 'From now on, any disputes involving Keung Ka-wai with Chinese or Western forces will be unrelated to us, [with this severance] in effect immediately,' the statement said. The latest round of arrest warrants and bounties declared by police has sparked another row between China and several Western countries. Last week, Beijing slammed the G7 for 'blatantly slandering and defaming' Hong Kong police's law enforcement actions. The G7, which consists of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States, said Hong Kong's latest move was a form of transnational repression that undermined human rights and the safety of communities. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST


The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
China's early South American soybean buys squeeze US out of peak export window
China has moved early to lock in soybean supplies from Brazil for September and October, sidelining US exporters from what is traditionally their most lucrative selling period. The shift underscores Beijing's growing trade reliance on South America and comes amid renewed political and commercial tensions with Washington. According to market analysis from Brazil's Safras & Mercado, traders reported Chinese purchases of roughly 8 million tonnes of soybeans for September and 4 million tonnes for October, about half of the country's projected demand for the two months. All volumes are sourced from South America, with Brazil capturing the lion's share. The move effectively shortens the US 'window' for soybean shipments to China, which typically runs from September to January before the Brazilian harvest arrives. Last year, China imported 105 million tonnes of soybeans, 22.13 million of them from the US, illustrating how pivotal this early-season slot has been for American farmers. The decision to buy more soybeans from South America comes as Chicago Board of Trade soybean futures hover near five-year lows, with reduced Chinese buying expected to keep prices under pressure. When asked about the soybean purchases and their impact on US producers, Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington, did not directly address the trade volumes. Instead, he said Bejing hoped 'the US side will work with China to implement the important common understandings reached by our heads of state' and called for dialogue 'on the basis of equality, respect and mutual benefit' to promote sustainable bilateral relations. The Chinese embassy in Brasilia did not respond to requests for comment. On Monday, US President Donald Trump publicly urged Beijing to quadruple its soybean purchases from the United States, a dramatic call just days before a tariff truce between the two countries was set to expire. Posting on social media, Trump claimed China was concerned about soybean shortages and said he expected 'quick' orders from Beijing. The remarks briefly sent Chicago futures higher, but market watchers quickly questioned whether such a deal was realistic. Meeting the request would require China to source most of its soybean imports from the United States, an unprecedented shift that would displace established Brazilian volumes. It remains unclear whether increased Chinese agricultural purchases would be a condition for a lasting trade deal between Beijing and Washington. In the meantime, China has not booked any US soybeans for the fourth quarter, and some feed manufacturers are reportedly testing alternative suppliers, including Argentina, to secure cheaper South American protein meals. In Brazil, the news of both the early Chinese commitments and Trump's gambit was met with quiet confidence among exporters. In a statement, the Brazilian Soybean Producers Association said on Monday that it was monitoring the impact of a potential trade deal on crops, but that the combination of strong September and October sales could be an opportunity to further cement Brazil's role as China's primary supplier. As the US risks losing ground in the Chinese market, Brazil and China are also working on longer-term trade integration. On Sunday, the Brazilian newspaper Folha de S. Paulo reported that officials from both countries were said to be drafting a bilateral protocol to recognise environmental certifications and traceability systems for key agricultural exports, particularly beef and soybeans. The plan would align methodologies for measuring emissions, land use and animal welfare, allowing Chinese authorities to formally recognise Brazilian sustainability seals such as 'Carbon Neutral Meat' and 'Low Carbon Soy'. Measures include integrated digital tracking, QR codes linking to environmental data and shared databases. The protocol aims to smooth trade flows, add value to certified products and pre-empt future non-tariff barriers. A Chinese technical delegation is expected in Brazil later this year to inspect systems on the ground before finalising the deal. The talks come against a backdrop of US tariff hikes on Brazilian goods and growing political friction between Washington and Brasília, even as China expands its list of authorised Brazilian exporters in other sectors, from coffee to processed foods. -- SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST