Indians cancel trips to Turkey, Azerbaijan after countries back Pakistan: Report
Indians have cancelled travel plans for Turkey and Azerbaijan in massive numbers, according to online booking platform EaseMyTrip's co-founder Prashant Pitti.
'For Turkey, we have seen cancellations of about 22 per cent, and for Azerbaijan, it is above 30 per cent. Last year, 3.8 lakh people travelled to either Azerbaijan or Turkey from India,' Pitti told News18.
Also Read: Pune traders boycott Turkish apples, kickstart 'Ban Turkey' movement amid Indo-Pak tensions
The downturn in travel plans comes days after EaseMyTrip suspended all flight and hotel bookings for Turkey and Azerbaijan amid the country' support for Pakistan while India was engaged in conflict with the country.
In addition to EaseMyTrip, Ixigo CEO Aloke Bajpai had also announced that the platform would suspend all flight and hotel bookings for Turkey, China and Azerbaijan. 'Enough is Enough! Blood and Bookings won't flow together," he said.
Also Read: 'Starting to doubt...': Trump says Ukraine may not make deal with Putin in Turkey
Prashant Pitti stated that if one were to consider a modest 60,000-70,000 rupees per passenger spent, it equates to somewhere around 2,500 to 3,000 crores, spent by Indians in these countries.
'Now, this money will probably come back to us in the form of these countries choosing to give their arsenals, their weaponry to Pakistan and hitting back on them, which is why it is important for us Indians to know where to spend our money," he said.
Also Read: Ixigo CEO says 'enough is enough' as firm halts flight and hotel bookings to Turkey, Azerbaijan and China
Several traders have also boycotted goods coming from Turkey and Azerbaijan. Turkey and Azerbaijan had issued statements after Operation Sindoor in support of Pakistan. Further, Turkish drones were also reportedly used by Pakistan's army to target India's military bases and civilian areas.
Co-founder Nishant Pitti took to X on Saturday and said, 'Travel is a powerful tool. Let's not use it to empower those who don't stand with us. Last year: 287,000 Indians visited Turkey & 243,000 visited Azerbaijan Tourism drives their economies: Turkey: 12% of GDP | 10% of jobs Azerbaijan: 7.6% of GDP | 10% of jobs.'
"When these nations openly support Pakistan, should we fuel their tourism and their economies? Every rupee we spend abroad is a vote. Let's spend it where our values are respected. Jai Hind," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
J-10 Jet Maker AVIC Chengdu Slips 17% In A Month After 64% Surge Post Pahalgam Attack
Last Updated: In the two weeks between April 30 and May 12, the price of Avic Chengdu Aircraft stock shot up to 95.86 CNY from 58.75 CNY, registering a jump of 64 per cent in the duration. AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Stock: Shares of Avic Chengdu Aircraft Co Ltd, a Chinese defence manufacturing and the maker of J-10 fighter jets, have seen a weak momentum by falling over 17 per cent with the ease of tensions between India and Pakistan. J-10 jet fighters were used by the Pakistan army during the border tensions. Stocks of Avic Chengdu Aircraft experienced a sharp spike after the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. In the two weeks between April 30 and May 12, the price of Avic Chengdu Aircraft stock shot up to 95.86 CNY from 58.75 CNY, registering a jump of 64 per cent in the duration. Other Chinese defence stocks also saw surged in the expectations of a full-fledged war and the surging demand of weapons like fighter jets, missiles and other equipment. Since then, the stock has been in the consolidation phase with a slide to below 80 CNY. The Chinese defence stock has declined after Prime Minister Narendra Modi challenged Pakistan's claims that Chinese-made fighter jets were responsible for destroying the Indian Air Force's Adampur airbase. First Published:
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Australia confident U.S. will proceed with Biden-era submarine pact after review
Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday (June 12, 2025) he was confident the AUKUS submarine pact with the U.S. and Britain would proceed, and his government would work closely with the U.S. while the Trump administration conducted a formal review. In an Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio interview, Mr. Marles said AUKUS was in the strategic interests of all three countries and the new review of the deal signed in 2021 when Joe Biden was the U.S. President was not a surprise. "I am very confident this is going to happen," he said of AUKUS, which would give Australia nuclear-powered submarines. "This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken," Mr. Marles told the ABC. Australia in 2023 committed to spend A$368 billion ($239.3 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, Australia's biggest ever defence project with the United States and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet U.S. President Donald Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss tariffs and a request from the United States for Australia to increase defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product. Mr. Albanese had previously said defence spending would rise to 2.3% and has declined to commit to the U.S. target, saying Australia would focus on capability needs. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the U.S. to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia-class submarines to allow the sale of up to three U.S. submarines to Australia from 2032. The first $500 million payment was made when Mr. Marles met with his U.S. counterpart Pete Hegseth in February. U.S. NOT MEETING PRODUCTION TARGETS The Pentagon's top policy adviser Elbridge Colby, who has previously expressed concern the U.S. would lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Mr. Marles said. "It is important that those production and sustainment rates are improved," he added. AUKUS would grow the U.S. and Australian defence industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs, Mr. Marles said in a statement. John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was "primarily an audit of American capability" and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear powered submarines when it was not meeting its own production targets. "Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor," Mr. Lee said. Charles Edel, Australia chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said AUKUS was significant for "enhancing deterrence by putting more players in the field", and it would be important for Mr. Albanese to seek reassurance from Mr. Trump when they meet. "A necessary part of the conversation will be discussing how both Australia and the U.S. are working to boost their own defence capabilities, enhancing allied integration, and delivering deterrent effects with a sense of urgency," he said. Under the multi-stage AUKUS timeline, Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS-class submarine expected to come into service from 2040. Mr. Marles said Britain's recently completed review of AUKUS was positive. Britain announced plans this month to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Defence, railway stocks rally may not be sustainable, warns Ankit Mandholia of Motilal Oswal. Here's why
Expert View: As the Indian stock market witnessed a fresh leg-up from the RBI's policy booster, Ankit Mandholia, Head Equity and Derivatives and Wealth Management, Motilal Oswal Financial Services, decodes the broader impact of the central bank's action on the economy and markets. He also warns of remaining cautious and selective following a sharp rally in defence and railway stocks. Here are edited excerpts from his interaction with Mint. The RBI surprised markets with an aggressive monetary policy move. They slashed the repo rate by 50 basis points, bringing it down to 5.50%. They also announced a staggered 100 basis points reduction in Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) to 3%, which will inject about ₹ 2.5 lakh crore into the banking system. These moves will be beneficial for rate-sensitive sectors like Banks and NBFCs by lowering their cost of funds, and reduced financing cost would boost demand for Housing and Automotive sectors. Lower interest rates and easing liquidity conditions will spur infrastructure activity and revive consumer durable demand as well. Businesses requiring working capital or expansion funding will find borrowing more attractive. This could translate into increased investment, capacity expansion, and potentially higher employment generation. The RBI maintained its real GDP projection of 6.5% for FY26, while reducing its inflation projections to 3.7% from 4.0% earlier. This reflects RBI's confidence in India's macro trajectory, and this could drive the broader risk-on sentiment. Front-loading of rate cuts by the RBI addresses the need to spur growth and also shows the RBI's commitment to maintaining price stability while supporting growth. The Defence and Railway sectors saw significant gains over the past two months, following a dip in March 2025. The Defence sector's market cap hit an all-time high in May'25, recording a CAGR of 55% between FY19 and May'25. The Railway sector's market capitalisation rebounded from its lows, recording a CAGR of 46% over the same period. The India-Pak tensions (Operation Sindoor), along with strong order book growth and a recovery in broader market sentiments, have fuelled the rerating trends in these sectors. Further, the central government has front-loaded capex in the current financial year (FY26), spending ₹ 1.6t in Apr'25, up 61% from ₹ 992b in Apr'24. In FY26, the government is targeting capex of INR11.2t, a 6.5% YoY growth. If the positive trend in capex continues in the coming months, it will be positive for the sector, particularly from the railways and defence sides. Moreover, defence companies are eyeing large opportunities from exports of platforms such as Akash missile, MRSAM and defence control systems, where they have already established their product quality in the domestic markets. While these sectors have long-term structural tailwinds — capex visibility, policy push, and national security focus — the sharp P/E expansion raises a flag. A part of the move is sentiment-led and may not be sustainable. We suggest a selective approach, preferring companies with a well-balanced revenue mix, control over margins, and the ability to maintain or improve growth profile going forward. The overall earnings for small-cap stocks declined by 16% YOY in 4QFY25, falling short of the already muted expectations. Despite this, the Nifty Smallcap100 index has surged over 17% in FY26 — raising concerns that the current rally may be resting on fragile fundamentals. This sharp run-up has deprived investors of valuation comfort, with the one-year forward P/E for Nifty Smallcap100 at 25.8x (as on May 2025), representing a premium of 60% to its 10-year average of 16.1x. The disconnect between price and profits is unlikely to be sustained indefinitely. A broader economic slowdown or further earnings disappointment in small-caps could trigger a quick reversal, especially with retail money driving these names. We suggest adopting a selective approach, focused toward fundamentally strong small-caps and possibly increasing allocation to mid/large-caps, which have better earnings visibility. Indian stock markets are facing overhang from global headwinds, including unexpected shifts in US tariff policies (including the recent doubling of the tariff on Steel and aluminium imports from 25% to 50%) and the ongoing geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine and the Middle East countries. A strong U.S. dollar, high U.S. bond yields and a hawkish U.S. Federal Reserve policy could make emerging markets like India less attractive for foreign investors. On the domestic front, corporate earnings growth remains a concern. Nifty50 delivered a 3% YoY PAT, reporting a single-digit profit growth for the fourth successive quarter since the pandemic (Jun'20). Consequently, there has been a cut in the Nifty EPS estimate for FY26. Nifty Midcap-100 and Nifty Smallcap-100 indices are trading at 29.3x and 25.8x (as on May'25), representing premiums of ~30% and ~60% to their respective 10-year average, raising concerns about overvaluation amidst muted earnings growth visibility. Additionally, instability in macroeconomic data, both on the global and domestic front could pose volatility risks for the Indian markets. Therefore, Indian equities are subject to challenges from global headwinds and modest earnings growth, with stretched valuations in multiple market pockets. However, stable domestic macros and improved corporate performance would support long-term growth prospects. FII flows remained positive for the third consecutive month, at USD 1.7b in May'25, while DIIs invested USD7.9b— their 22nd consecutive month of inflows and the third-highest monthly tally ever. This led to a record 14-month high institutional flow. The AMFI data for May'25 indicated that Mutual Fund SIP inflows remained strong at Rs26,688cr — the highest ever monthly SIP contribution on record. The two-engine flow dynamic — steady DII inflows supported by retail SIPs, and returning FII interest, provides stability to the market. The FII index futures positions remain well below peak, implying that FIIs still have room to scale up exposure, and DIIs appear well-cushioned to support any corrections. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
