Bryant Park Grill's future in doubt after judge's ruling boots iconic eatery in favor of famed chef
The nonprofit Bryant Park Corporation (BPC), which manages the park, is booting longtime Grill operator Ark Restaurants in favor of world-famed chef Jean-Georges Vongerichten. But Ark owner Michael Weinstein says he won't vacate the glass-enclosed eatery and two small outdoor cafes despite their leases expiring this month, as he presses a court case seeking to overturn the decision.
Weinstein told The Post he has no intention of shutting down the Grill and its satellites as 'long as we're in litigation.'
3 Michael Weinstein, owner of the Bryant Park Grill, is suing several entities including Bryant Park Corporation, which is replacing the restaurant with an eatery from superstar chef Jean-Georges Vongerichten.
Gabi Porter
Weinstein ran the Grill for 30 years. He's suing the park corporation, Vongerichten's management company Seaport Entertainment Group, the Parks Department which has the final say over an operator, and the New York Public Library, whose main building abuts the Grill's space and has an advisory say.
His state Supreme Court filing says the corporation's 'flawed' selection process was designed to choose Vongerichten from the outset and that BPC president Daniel Biederman sought to run the park as his 'personal domain.'
But in rejecting Ark's separate request for an injunction to block its ouster last week, Judge Anar Rathod Patel basically called Ark and Weinstein sore losers, saying, 'Mere dissatisfaction with a competitive outcome does not constitute bad faith.'
Following Patel's ruling, 'The park intends to exercise its right to proceed to an eviction' of Ark from the site, Biederman said.
Bryant Park Grill, at the park's eastern end, has 4,900 square feet indoors and nearly as much space on the roof for alfresco dining. It's one of the nation's highest-volume restaurants with $25 million in annual revenue.
3 The corporation believes Michelin-starred Vongerichten would bring greater prestige and greater revenue to the park over time.
Tamara Beckwith
The BPC issued a request for proposals to take over the leases for the Grill and the small cafes last year, in advance of their expirations this spring.
Eleven would-be operators submitted proposals. The corporation chose Seaport Entertainment Group (SEG) because it believes Michelin-starred, internationally famous Vongerichten would bring greater prestige and greater revenue to the park over time, even though SEG would pay less in rent at the outset than Ark was paying.
SEG's proposal 'presents the best combination of operating record, financial strength, and creative talent in the food and design field,' Biederman told Community Board 5.
3 Bryant Park Grill, at the park's eastern end, has 4,900 square feet indoors and nearly as much space on the roof for alfresco dining in warm weather.
Steve Cuozzo
According to Ark's court filing, Vongerichten's team might need to close the Grill for 10 months or longer for a redesign — to which the BPC would contribute $2 million, which Ark called 'improper' as it was not offered to any of the other applicants.
But no shutdown is imminent. Biederman told The Post, 'Weinstein is pulling a wide variety of legal moves to over-stay his lease, so he'll probably stay there for spring and maybe summer months.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
10 hours ago
- Politico
Solar for None? What's next after federal program axed.
Soldier on. Hang it up. Fight. Those are some of the options that solar energy nonprofits and states are weighing after the Trump administration moved last week to terminate the Biden-era $7 billion Solar for All program. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin argued that July's passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act means the agency lacks both the authority and the money 'to keep this boondoggle alive.' So far, none of the 60 awardees has announced plans to challenge the actions nor to agree to the terminations. But three recipients, granted anonymity to speak about internal discussions, told our Jean Chemnick they're weighing both options — including whether to accept EPA's offer for access to money to help wind down their programs. EPA is 'basically trying to make it sound like you'll never get your funding unless you agree to their terms, and that's just not correct,' Jillian Blanchard, vice president of climate and environmental justice at Lawyers for Good Government, told Jean about EPA's termination notices. 'People are owed what they're owed.' President Joe Biden's climate law created Solar for All as part of the $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. It was designed to promote community solar energy in underserved areas, through grants to each state and territory, though some grants went to nonprofits in states whose leaders did not want it. The awards ranged from $43.5 million to nearly $250 million. The Trump administration has been trying for months to terminate the other $20 billion of grants in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, but Solar for All had been safe, until Trump's megabill became law. Representatives of the three recipients told Jean that some awardees don't have the money to continue their activities without the federal money. Some can't even access EPA's grant portal to cover past outlays. Duanne Andrade, executive director of the Solar and Energy Loan Fund, which received a $156 million grant to set up a solar revolving loan for Florida, called EPA's move 'disheartening.' 'In Florida, we're about to see the highest energy rate increase in history,' she told Jean. 'And all of this impacts low- and moderate-income people more than anyone. These are the people that are paying more already for capital, for energy, for housing, for everything.' Senate Democrats enter the frayMeanwhile, supporters of Solar for All are pushing back on the Trump administration's justification for terminating the grants. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) argued in a Friday letter that the Republican law repealed only unobligated funds. EPA had already obligated the Solar for All money, so it can't be clawed back, they said, citing statements from congressional Republicans and the Congressional Budget Office. 'Neither CBO nor Republicans understood the repeal and rescission of the GGRF to save anything more than EPA's unspent oversight dollars,' the Democrats write. 'Wishful statutory interpretation on the part of EPA does not enable EPA to cancel lawfully obligated grants.' It's Friday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Timothy Cama. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to tcama@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Jessie Blaeser breaks down the exaggerated cost-savings numbers from the Department of Government Efficiency. Power Centers Wind, solar crackdown deepensThe Treasury Department tightened the rules Friday for renewable energy projects to qualify for federal tax credits. The new Treasury Department guidance would undo years of existing practice defining when a solar or wind project has started construction, a key metric that spells out when developers can claim tax credits, Kelsey Tamborrino and James Bikales report. The guidance comes after Trump ordered Treasury in July to tighten the definition for the start of construction, in an attempt to limit 'market distorting subsidies for unreliable, foreign controlled energy sources.' The Treasury rules have been at the center of tug-of-war between Republican moderates and hardliners in recent months, Benjamin Storrow writes. Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and John Curtis of Utah, moderate Republicans, have argued that Treasury should continue to employ the traditional definition for the start of construction, while conservatives like Rep. Chip Roy of Texas have argued for a more stringent definition. The still-mysterious Empire Wind studyA federal records request by POLITICO's E&E News returned an almost completely redacted study by the Trump administration that had been used to justify canceling the Empire Wind project off the New York coast earlier this year, Ian M. Stevenson and Mike Soraghan write. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the Biden administration 'rushed approval' of the project based on 'flawed science.' Construction later restarted, but Interior has repeatedly refused to release the study cited by Burgum. In the copy of the report, 27 pages were fully blacked out. Interior cited a 'deliberative process' privilege that agencies sometimes use. Plastics treaty negotiations collapseUnited Nations talks on a treaty to end plastic pollution collapsed in the early hours of Friday morning, as countries failed to agree on the basic parameters of the text. The latest setback in discussions followed a 10-day summit in Geneva, Switzerland. After nearly three years of deliberations, it was meant to be the final round of negotiations after previous talks in Busan, South Korea, also failed to yield a deal, Leonie Cater reports. In Other News Trump-Putin summit: The Trump administration has discussed the use of Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker vessels to support gas development in Alaska as one possible deal to pursue in talks with President Vladimir Putin, according to Reuters. Manufacturing change: Heat pumps used in industrial settings could offer $1.7 trillion in public health benefits from 2030 to 2050, the American Lung Association finds. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Human pollutants influenced a marine climate cycle in the Pacific Ocean, contributing to drought in the Western U.S., a study finds. The Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is cutting 130 jobs because of budget uncertainty. U.S. utilities face soaring costs and worsening shortages in the supply of electric power transformers, threatening to slow the growth of data centers and artificial intelligence expansion. That's it for today, folks. Thanks for reading, and have a great weekend!
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
ETHA AUM Nears $16B
Top 10 Creations (All ETFs) Ticker Name Net Flows ($, mm) AUM ($, mm) AUM % Change ARKK ARK Innovation ETF 2,834.71 12,895.59 21.98% QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust Series I 1,567.10 373,143.66 0.42% FAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August 721.95 1,632.62 44.22% HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF 715.69 18,921.48 3.78% DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust 584.15 40,101.02 1.46% ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF 500.85 15,967.11 3.14% IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF 462.39 64,515.01 0.72% LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF 396.59 28,653.47 1.38% TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF 349.27 5,688.12 6.14% VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 307.39 731,596.52 0.04%Top 10 Redemptions (All ETFs) Ticker Name Net Flows ($, mm) AUM ($, mm) AUM % Change IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF -453.61 659,939.72 -0.07% IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF -443.55 10,776.74 -4.12% GLD SPDR Gold Shares -309.82 103,973.91 -0.30% SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3x Shares -307.69 12,984.60 -2.37% XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund -295.36 52,669.00 -0.56% SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF -271.17 27,671.78 -0.98% SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF -177.76 14,157.34 -1.26% HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF -167.29 160.22 -104.41% EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF -142.72 15,817.76 -0.90% VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF -126.72 86,720.79 -0.15%ETF Daily Flows By Asset Class Net Flows ($, mm) AUM ($, mm) % of AUM Alternatives 61.28 10,696.52 0.57% Asset Allocation 36.43 27,203.20 0.13% Commodities E T Fs -293.56 228,719.78 -0.13% Currency 888.35 195,877.65 0.45% International Equity 3,137.49 1,981,186.34 0.16% International Fixed Income 322.91 314,752.32 0.10% Inverse 118.50 14,213.95 0.83% Leveraged -277.04 151,619.19 -0.18% Us Equity 7,700.15 7,495,050.51 0.10% Us Fixed Income 3,224.52 1,753,267.89 0.18% Total: 14,919.02 12,172,587.35 0.12%Disclaimer: All data as of 6 a.m. Eastern time the date the article is published. Data is believed to be accurate; however, transient market data is often subject to subsequent revision and correction by the | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved
Condé Nast Traveler
17 hours ago
- Condé Nast Traveler
What It's Like to Fly 13 Hours in Cathay Pacific's New Business Class
In 1983, Cathay Pacific was among the first commercial airlines to introduce a business class cabin, coddling 35 passengers onboard Boeing 747s fitted with widened seats sporting up-to-the-minute leg rests, plus the now obligatory cascades of Champagne. Forty-two years later, the Hong Kong flagship carrier may have just perfected the concept with the introduction of its luxury hotel-level Aria Suites, which come with privacy doors, fully flat beds, cutting-edge tech, Michelin-star meals, and the ambience of a design hotel. It's a new look which has bagged the airline a slew of awards since its recent launch, including a win in the Passenger Comfort category at the Crystal Cabin Awards and a bump from fifth to third place in the 2025 SkyTrax World Airline Awards. To get the lowdown I took to the skies flying from my home in Hong Kong to London Heathrow. The new Aria Suites have chic design details akin to a boutique hotel. Courtesy Cathay Pacific Pre-boarding The ease of traveling with Cathay Pacific is apparent before you reach the airport. The app is a dream—clear, intuitive, and without glitches. Passengers can pick their seats weeks in advance and check in online 48 hours before departure, as opposed to the usual 24 hours. Thanks to an in-town, self-service, check-in desk travelers are able to drop their luggage at Hong Kong Station in the heart of Central anytime between 24 hours to 90 minutes before their scheduled time of take-off—a boon if you have to leave your hotel at midday. From here, it's a breezy 24 minutes on the spotlessly clean, Wi-Fi-enabled Airport Express train and a business class fast-track through HKG's e-channels and CT scanners, which negate the need to remove liquids and laptops. I'm greeted by staff, immaculately attired in red jackets with standing collars, at the lounge within an hour of leaving home. Airport lounge My flight coincided with the reopening of Cathay Pacific's flagship airport lounge, The Bridge. Positioned at the end of the main walkway, it unfolds across two enormous wings: one specializing in Chinese food, the other with a Western menu. British designer Ilse Crawford is behind the design, a soft blur of warm woods, muted browns, mossy velvets, cognac-colored sofas, and tweed swivel chairs. Transit passengers are made comfortable with showers and quiet zones, and the food and drink on offer is always worth checking in early for. I skip my usual wontons at The Noodle Bar to try some new dishes at The Nook: perfectly crisp scallion pancakes, volcanic-spicy lamb bao (buns), and sweet barbecue pork rice rolls. It's all as delicious as anything you would find at Hong Kong's top restaurants. Elsewhere, there are two bountiful hot and cold buffets (both with plenty of vegetarian options), help-yourself ice buckets of wine and Champagne, and a long bar for all your coffee and cocktail needs.
