logo
Iran's cyber forces have many ways to attack U.S., experts warn

Iran's cyber forces have many ways to attack U.S., experts warn

Washington Post24-06-2025
U.S. officials and private experts are warning that Iran may retaliate against the United States for bombing its nuclear facilities with any of a wide range of cyberattacks that could cause lasting damage or significant psychological impact.
There were no reports of suspected Iranian cyberattacks against U.S. assets Monday, and the FBI declined to say whether it had seen activity below the surface. Most experts expect Iran to pursue cyber actions calibrated to not elicit a forceful American response.
In the 15 years since the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran with the early cyberweapon known as Stuxnet, a computer worm that infiltrated computers in Iran's nuclear enrichment program and damaged critical centrifuges, Iran has devoted itself to building its own capabilities to a point well beyond those of other countries its size.
It has unleashed its most destructive software on such varied targets as the rival state-owned oil giant Saudi Aramco, where it knocked out 30,000 computers in 2012 and halved its oil production, and the Sands casino business two years later, when it was controlled by American Sheldon Adelson, a zealous advocate for Israel.
Iran-linked groups have more recently focused on disrupting Israeli targets. It has claimed responsibility for hacking the country's missile alert systems and for leaking a think tank's documents to the public since the current round of violence began two weeks ago. Since this weekend's U.S. raids, pro-Iran accounts on Telegram and X have threatened retaliation against American targets as well.
While destructive attacks could be launched against critical industries including energy and water utilities, federal officials and others tracking Iran said it was more likely that self-proclaimed activist groups would deface U.S. websites or temporarily knock them offline with denial-of-service attacks, which are easy to execute and merely interrupt business.
'Low-level cyberattacks against U.S. networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks,' the Department of Homeland Security warned Sunday.
The hacktivist approach may appeal because they are carried out by seemingly independent groups, providing Tehran with a degree of plausible deniability. The Iranian government has proven adept at exploiting such strikes by portraying them as more debilitating than they are, said John Hultquist, chief analyst at Google Threat Intelligence.
'They are really clever when it comes to this,' Hultquist said. 'If you get the right misleading evidence and get someone moving fast enough, you might get that reported as much more significant than it was. One powerful headline might be enough to take back to their domestic audience' as proof of a strong response.
As a matter of self-preservation, Iran would also look to cyber means in the same way that it fired missiles at the U.S. presence in Qatar Monday — more as a show of commitment than an escalation.
'Iran doesn't have the military force projection to deliver ordnance to the U.S.,' said Adam Meyers, senior vice president at security firm CrowdStrike. 'Cyber is kind of the one thing to conduct operations on the U.S. homeland and potentially not trigger a redline response.'
Iran was active in hacking 2024 presidential campaigns in an effort to influence the media and voters, and it increased spying after was broke out in Gaza two years ago.
Dire warnings of an Iranian response also were issued five years ago, after the U.S. killed a top Iranian general. In that case, little visible cyberattacks materialized.
But it later emerged that Iran had used its considerable espionage ability to track U.S. targets that were marked for assassination in plots that were thwarted. Those targeted included John Bolton, a main architect of President Donald Trump's 'maximum pressure' campaign against Iran during his first term in office.
If that is any blueprint, the U.S. might not know how Iranian hackers are responding to the bombing until such an assassination plot is either uncovered or carried out, perhaps by someone claiming to be a lone wolf.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What time is Trump meeting Zelensky at the White House?
What time is Trump meeting Zelensky at the White House?

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What time is Trump meeting Zelensky at the White House?

The US president and Ukrainian leader are set for crunch talks on Monday to discuss how to end Russia's war. Volodymyr Zelensky returns to the White House on Monday for crunch talks with Donald Trump about ending the war between Ukraine and Russia. Six months after his last bruising encounter at the Oval Office, in which the US president and vice-president JD Vance accused Ukraine's leader of not being thankful for their help in an unforgettable encounter, Zelensky is back in Washington DC - but this time bolstered by the back-up of a host of European leaders. Monday's crucial discussions follow Trump's summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, which failed to produce a significant breakthrough. What time are the talks? The timings for Monday's series of talks in Washington have been released by the White House. Trump will greet Zelensky the White House at 1pm local time (6pm BST) and the pair will then have a bilateral meeting beginning at 1.15pm (6.15pm). Following this, Trump will take part in a meeting with European leaders who have travelled to Washington to back Zelensky - this meeting is scheduled for 3pm local time (8pm BST). Recap: Watch the fiery clash between Trump and Zelensky in February 2025 Which European leaders will be there? Zelensky will be accompanied in Washington by a host of European leaders, who make up the "coalition of the willing", determined to avoid a repeat of the embarrassing standoff between the Ukrainian leader and Trump in February. Among them is British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer, who hosted Zelensky at Downing Street before Trump met Putin in Alaska. Other key European figures will also be at the meeting with the aim of protecting Ukraine from submitting to Russian land grabs as a price for peace. They include France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Alexander Stubb, president of Finland. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Nato chief Mark Rutte are also attending.

What would happen if America started faking its economic data? Here's what happened when other countries did it
What would happen if America started faking its economic data? Here's what happened when other countries did it

CNN

time11 minutes ago

  • CNN

What would happen if America started faking its economic data? Here's what happened when other countries did it

Donald Trump South America InvestingFacebookTweetLink Follow Lying to your lenders is a bad enough idea when you're an individual. It's even worse when you're a country. That's the specter critics of President Donald Trump have raised after he fired the head of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics this month after disappointing jobs data. While there's no indication the data has been rigged (assertions from the White House aside) – or will be rigged in the future – the White House's nomination of a partisan to lead the government's economic data agency was enough to worry global economic and financial circles. There's historical precedent for that fear. Countries like Greece and Argentina have been both been punished by investors for putting out manufactured numbers in the past. 'President Trump has just taken one very negative stop along a slippery slope,' Alan Blinder, a former vice chair of the Federal Reserve, told CNN. 'The next worry is going to be manipulation' of data. At stake is the health of an economy relied upon by nearly every person on earth, directly or indirectly. The US economy affects everyone from Americans in glitzy Manhattan skyscrapers to, quite literally, garbage pickers living in developing nation slums. But while Greece famously faked its way into the European Union and Argentina to this day remains embroiled in legal fights over its own sham numbers, there key differences here: The US economy is the world's biggest, buoyed by its global dominance and its years of strength. The Trump administration says firing Erika McEntarfer wasn't about politics but was instead about making BLS data more rigorous and accurate. 'Historically abnormal revisions in BLS data over the past few years since COVID have called into question the BLS's accuracy, reliability, and confidence. President Trump believes that businesses, households, and policymakers deserve accurate data to inform their decision-making, and he will restore America's trust in the BLS,' said White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers in a statement to CNN. Still, economists warn, the United States is at something of a crossroads now, waiting to see what happens to data series that economists have praised as the gold standard, even if many agree that model updating and modernization could make major improvements to the data's accuracy. 'There's no substitute for credible government data,' said Michael Heydt, the lead sovereign analyst at rating agency Morningstar DBRS. In 2004, Greece confessed it had faked numbers on its national deficit and debt to qualify for entry into the eurozone in 2001. But the number-fudging didn't end there. Appointed to Greece's statistical agency in 2010, economist Andreas Georgiou made a bold decision: He worked to publish deficit numbers that aligned with reality. After years of untrustworthy numbers that made the idea of official Greek data a global punchline, his efforts were downright startling. What followed were years of legal fights, and he was prosecuted for allegedly inflating the country's deficit figures. Even the EU itself condemned Greece for the false data. The fakery made the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008 and 2009 significantly worse in Greece. Lenders, skittish of what Greece's actual public finances might be, shied away, demanding increasingly higher rates to hold Greek bonds. Austerity measures demanded by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to bail out Greece angered everyday citizens. Pictures of Greeks rioting in the streets, burning cars and expressing their rage, underscored the dangers. In Argentina, accusations of untrustworthy inflation and economic growth data have dogged Latin America's third-largest economy for decades, scaring off investors despite a wealth of natural resources. Then-President Nestor Kirchner demoted the person in charge of preparing inflation data because she (correctly) reported surging prices in 2007. Everyone from ordinary citizens to global investors treated official inflation data as suspect for years after. That contributed to the country's credit ratings staying in junk territory for years – one of the factors investors typically cite to charge a country more to loan it money. (In Argentina's case, previous sovereign defaults were also a major factor. The unreliable inflation data, after all, did not happen in a vacuum.) That matters to ordinary people because short- and long-term debt, whether from a federal government down to tiny cities and towns, can help fund everything from new schools to roads to essential services. When lenders turn off the money spigot – or charge dearly for access – that means regular people ultimately pay the price. But the United States is far from replicating either scenario, said Robert Shapiro, the chairman of economic advisory firm Sonecon and a former Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs under President Bill Clinton. When the data was revealed to be fake in both Greece and Argentina, those economies were already in terrible shape, Shapiro pointed out. 'So the impact of the markets no longer being able to rely on the data was a little less because the markets were already backing away from investment and employment.' The US economy is growing, hitting a relatively robust annualized rate of 3% in the second quarter. And at over $30 trillion, the US economy has a heft that both Greece and Argentina lack. 'We're the largest economy in the world. We are by far the greatest financial center in the world,' Shapiro said. Trump fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, shortly after the August 1 jobs report showed sharply slower jobs growth than expected for July – and significant downward revisions to data from June and May. Trump accused McEntarfer, without evidence, of manipulating the reports for 'political purposes.' Analysts begged to differ. The US is 'a world leader in providing high-quality data,' Heydt said. 'The BLS in particular is kind of a world class institution… The US for a long time has been kind of the gold standard for data.' William Beach, a former Trump BLS commissioner, told CNN previously that 'there's no way' for McEntarfer or others to rig the data. 'By the time the commissioner sees the number, they're all prepared, they're locked into the computer system,' he said. 'There's no hands-on at all for the commissioner.' But large revisions in the bureau's data have raised eyebrows, not just this month, but in the past as well. A preliminary annual revision in August 2024, for example, showed the US economy had added 818,000 fewer jobs over the past year than previously reported. Those kinds of large revisions might suggest deeper issues, like how the BLS gets their data and constructs their economic models, said Kathryn Rooney Vera, the chief market strategist and chief economist at financial services company StoneX. 'Several economists and research teams I personally engage with have flagged these as structural issues with the data long before Trump's involvement or the firing of the BLS chief,' Rooney Vera told CNN. And Shapiro noted another wrinkle: budget cuts. Already the BLS has said it will cut back on collecting some data because it has fewer people. That, in turn, means it can take longer to get to final numbers for data releases. In the case of the jobs report, big companies usually respond with information first. Smaller companies tend to trail. 'And so you get a lot of responses that come in after the date when the initial estimate is put out,' he said, leading to revisions. Still, the US has other sources of data, both public and private, to round out a fuller picture of the economy. Shapiro pointed to the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. 'These institutions are made up virtually 100% by statisticians and economists,' Shapiro said. 'They're utterly nonpolitical in their jobs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store