Putin's Helicopter Came Under Ukrainian Drone Attack During His Trip to Disputed Kursk Region, Kremlin Admits
Ukrainian drones targeted Russian President Vladimir Putin's helicopter during his recent visit to the disputed Kursk region last week, the Kremlin has admitted. Yury Dashkin, commander of an air defense unit, said on Sunday that Putin's helicopter came under attack from Kyiv's drone strike while he was touring the reclaimed Russian territory on May 20, according to state news outlet TASS.
Dashkin said that the helicopter was "virtually at the epicenter of repelling a large-scale attack by the enemy's drones." "Therefore, we simultaneously conducted an air defense battle and ensured the safety of the presidential helicopter's flight in the air," he said explaining the near-fatal attack on the Russian premier.
Putin's Helicopter Under Attack
News of the attempted attack came shortly before Russia carried out its largest drone and missile strike on Ukraine to date — an action that drew criticism from President Trump. He warned that any attempt by Putin to take full control of Ukraine would result in Russia's "downfall."
He also took aim at Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a post shared Sunday night on Truth Social. "I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" Trump wrote on Truth Social.
"I've always said that he wants ALL of Ukraine, not just a piece of it, and maybe that's proving to be right, but if he does, it will lead to the downfall of Russia!"
Earlier on Sunday, the U.S. President expressed his surprise to reporters over Vladimir Putin's decision to escalate attacks on Ukrainian cities, especially after his own attempts to negotiate a ceasefire.
When asked whether he was now seriously thinking about imposing more sanctions on Russia, Trump responded, "Absolutely. He's killing a lot of people. What the hell happened to him?"
Later that night, in a post on Truth Social, Trump also took a jab at Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, saying he was "doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does." "Everything out of his mouth causes problems, I don't like it, and it better stop."
Zelensky Infuriates Trump
Earlier on Sunday, Zelenskyy condemned the "silence of America" following Russia's largest air strike in three years of conflict. The second consecutive night of heavy drone and ballistic missile attacks left at least 12 people dead, including three children, between Saturday night and Sunday.
"Every such terrorist Russian strike is reason enough for new sanctions against Russia," Ukraine's president said.
Suring his campaign for presidency, Trump has repeatedly claimed that he could bring the war in Ukraine to an end within 24 hours—even before officially taking office.
However, the scale and intensity of this weekend's Russian attacks stood in stark contrast to Trump's earlier claims that Putin was seeking peace.
As a result of the bombardment, Kyiv Day—traditionally observed on the final Sunday of May—began with weary residents taking cover in bunkers, subway stations, and underground shelters.
Ukraine and its European partners have been pushing for a 30-day ceasefire as an initial step toward broader peace talks. However, in a setback to those efforts, Trump refused this week to impose more sanctions on Moscow for rejecting an immediate halt to hostilities, as Ukraine had requested.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
20 minutes ago
- Straits Times
How EU takes bigger defence role is main Europe-US issue, Costa says
BRUSSELS - The main issue in relations between the European Union and the United States is the EU taking on more responsibility for its own defence, while the trade dispute is only a distraction, the chairman of EU leaders Antonio Costa said on Thursday. Speaking to reporters ahead of talks with U.S. President Donald Trump at the Group of Seven leaders meeting in Canada next week and a NATO summit in two weeks, Costa said the 27-nation European Union should focus on the main issue. "The main issue is the United States wanting to rebalance the burden sharing on European defence. This is the real main issue," Costa said. "The United States has legitimately decided that they have new strategic priorities and we need to agree with the United States how during the coming years we can rebalance the burden-sharing on European defence in the most fair and effective way with very important concerns: never, never, never undermine the deterrence effect of Article 5 of the NATO Treaty," Costa said. European leaders have been scrambling to boost their defences against a potential Russian attack after the Trump administration made clear since it took office that the U.S. was no longer willing to be the main guarantor of Europe's security. At the same time, the EU and the U.S. are in negotiations on rebalancing their trade relationship, with Washington pushing to reduce its trade deficit with Europe in trade in goods. Washington has already imposed 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium and 25% tariffs on cars and car parts, in addition to a 10% tariff on most other goods. The EU is preparing its own retaliation package. "We need to ...focus on the main issue: how to rebalance the burden sharing on European defence. If we start creating other kinds of problems between us, we are only creating irritants, losing the focus on the main issue," Costa said. NATO leaders -- which includes 23 European Union countries -- are to discuss on June 24-26 whether to boost defence spending to 5% of GDP from the current 2% following a call for such higher spending from Trump. Costa said that a few years ago boosting European defence capabilities was seen as undermining NATO, but the same action now was seen as the best way to preserve the transatlantic relationship. He also said the amounts spent on defence were secondary to how they were spent and the best option was for EU countries to coordinate their efforts and spending to create a collective defence capability. "Whether we need to increase spending to 3.5%, 5%, etc is not the question, because we are not looking at a magic number. We need to define ...what are the capabilities we need to build, what are the gaps we need to fill, and how we could invest in these capabilities in the coming years," Costa said. "Nobody is talking about a European army. What we need is to have one, very robust and effective, deterrence and collective defence system. And that's why what we need to do, is invest together ... based on the plans approved by NATO," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US announces pick for NATO's next Supreme Allied Commander
FILE PHOTO: This photo shows the logo of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and the US flag at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium on February 17, 2025. NICOLAS TUCAT/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo WASHINGTON/BRUSSELS - President Donald Trump's administration announced on Thursday its nomination for the next top U.S. general in Europe and said the U.S. military officer would also assume the traditional role of Supreme Allied Commander Europe. Trump's decision to nominate U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Alexus Grynkewich to both roles, which was first reported by Reuters, will relieve European NATO allies and even some of Trump's fellow Republicans amid concerns about a retrenchment in American military leadership of NATO. Grynkewich must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The position of SACEUR, which oversees all NATO operations in Europe, has been filled by a U.S. general since its creation after World War Two. U.S. Army General Dwight D. Eisenhower became the alliance's first SACEUR in 1951. Still, since taking office in January, Trump's administration has pressured NATO allies to ramp up their defense spending, saying Europe should be primarily responsible for defense on the European continent. Trump has also said he wants NATO allies to boost investment in defense to 5% of gross domestic product, up from the current target of 2%. Speaking at NATO headquarters earlier on Thursday, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he was confident that members of the NATO alliance would agree to a major boost in defense spending. No country is yet at 5%, not even the U.S., but Hegseth said there was progress on agreeing to the target. "I'm very encouraged by what we heard in there," Hegseth said after a morning meeting of NATO defense ministers on Thursday in Brussels. "Countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment to NATO." Grynkewich, who is now the director for operations at the U.S. military's Joint Staff, would succeed Army General Christopher Cavoli, who has been in the role since shortly after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, helping oversee billions of dollars in U.S. security assistance to Kyiv. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
43 minutes ago
- Business Times
Trump, Xi spoke by phone as trade and tech disputes strain ties
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on Thursday (Jun 5), according to China's Foreign Ministry, as trade tensions roil relations between the world's two largest economies. Relations between the two rivals have soured in recent weeks, with both sides accusing the other of violating a trade truce that brought down tariffs from massive highs. With the fresh conflict threatening the fragile détente, market analysts were hopeful the conversation would pave the way to a trade off-ramp. Stocks rose on news of the call, with the S&P 500 extending gains into a fourth straight day. The phone call between the leaders marks their first known formal contact since Trump took office. The last conversation between Trump and Xi took place in January before the US president's inauguration. The Chinese Foreign Ministry said the call was initiated at Trump's request. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Rare earths have emerged in recent days as a key flashpoint. The US has accused China of reneging on a promise to relax export controls on such metals needed for cutting-edge electronics. Beijing has been frustrated by fresh US restrictions on the sale of chip design software and plans to start revoking visas for Chinese students. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Trump has long said direct talks with Xi were the only way to resolve differences between the nations, but the Chinese leader had thus far been reluctant to get on the phone with his American counterpart – preferring that advisers negotiate key issues. Export controls and US actions on student visas and technology curbs will likely be central to future negotiations. US and Chinese trade chiefs only agreed in Geneva last month to lower tariffs for 90 days, as they worked towards a broader deal. History suggests that any final deal could be a long time coming. In 2018 during Trump's first term as president, the two sides agreed to put their dispute 'on hold' after a round of negotiations, but the US soon backed away from that deal, leading to more than 18 months of further tariffs and talks before the signing of the 'Phase One' deal in January 2020. One goal for China this time around will be seeking relief from US export controls on cutting-edge chips vital for AI and military advancement. That's likely to be a sticking point in Washington, with both Democrats and Republicans in rare agreement that Beijing poses a national security threat. Beyond strains in economic ties, geopolitical frictions are also growing. Foreign Ministry officials this month protested US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's assertion at a gathering of military chiefs in Singapore that China poses an imminent threat to Taiwan, a self-ruled island claimed by Beijing. BLOOMBERG
