Trump ‘caught off guard' by Israeli strikes on Syria last week
Israel launched strikes on the capital Damascus and the southern Druze-majority city of Sweida last week, saying it aimed to put pressure on the Syrian government to withdraw its troops from the region amid ongoing clashes there.
Trump 'was caught off guard by the bombing in Syria and also the bombing of a Catholic church in Gaza,' spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a press briefing on Monday.
'In both accounts, the president quickly called the prime minister to rectify those situations,' she continued.
An Israeli strike on Gaza's only Catholic church last week, killed three people and injured 10 others including the parish priest, who used to receive daily calls from the late Pope Francis.
The Israeli prime minister called Pope Leo to express regret over the strike on the Gaza church, blaming a 'stray missile.'
Netanyahu visited the White House earlier this month, his third trip since Trump returned to power in January, and Leavitt praised his relationship with the president, adding they were in 'frequent communication.'
Israel and Syria on Friday began a US-brokered ceasefire and on Monday, Syrian authorities evacuated Bedouin families from Sweida.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor said the ceasefire was largely holding despite isolated gunfire in areas north of Sweida city, with no new reports of casualties.
Last week's clashes in the southern province killed more than 1,260 people, according to the war monitor, and have shaken the rule of interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has pledged to protect minorities in a country devastated by 14 years of war.
In May, Trump met with Sharaa in Saudi Arabia and announced the lifting of many longstanding US sanctions against Damascus.
Trump later praised the leader, who led a major armed group that was once aligned with al-Qaida and toppled the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad in December.
The United States removed a bounty on Sharaa after he came to power.
With Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Smithsonian removed Trump from impeachment exhibit over 'appearance'
"The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a 25-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the post reads. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." The museum added that the impeachment placard will be "updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history." Confusion over the exhibit began on July 31 when The Washington Post first reported that references to both of President Donald Trump's impeachments were removed. Why were Donald Trump's impeachments removed from exhibit? The museum explained on Aug. 1 in a statement to USA TODAY that the references to Donald Trump's impeachments, which occurred in 2019 and again in 2021, were part of a "temporary label." In September 2021, a "temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump" was added, according to the Smithsonian's statement, with the museum adding that "it was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025." For now, the display currently appears how it did nearly 20 years ago, according to the Smithsonian statement and the Washington Post's report, which also noted that the exhibit now reads, "only three presidents have seriously faced removal," omitting Trump. "In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed," the museum's statement reads. "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the 'Impeachment' case back to its 2008 appearance." Where is the impeachment placard located at the Smithsonian? The "impeachment" placard is housed within an exhibition called "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden," which opened in 2000, according to the emailed statement from the Smithsonian. The placard is part of a display featuring information and artifacts about Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, the display's companion website says. Nixon resigned before he could be formally impeached. Other impeached presidents featured on Smithsonian website The display's companion website does not include a dedicated section for the Trump impeachments, but does note in an introductory sentence, "The House of Representatives impeached Andrew Johnson in 1868, William J. Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump in 2019 and again in 2021. In all four cases the Senate voted to acquit." Additionally, the website features sections about Johnson's impeachment, including tickets and newspaper clips from the time; Nixon's Senate hearing and resignation, including testimony papers and photos from the proceedings; and Clinton's trial, with tickets and Senate question cards.
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why it just got harder to become a doctor or lawyer
For people like her, navigating that maze just became far more challenging. Major changes are coming to higher education in the United States after President Donald Trump signed his major domestic policy bill into law. Among them is an end to Grad PLUS loans, a program that helps people pay for medical school and law school. Since Congress created the loans, direct from the federal government, in 2006, they have covered the full cost of attending graduate and professional school for nearly 2 million students. Beginning July 1, 2026, that won't be an option anymore. Trump's tax and spending law will eliminate the Grad PLUS program for new borrowers (students who take out loans before that date will be grandfathered in for up to three years). The measure imposes new borrowing caps - $50,000 annually and $200,000 overall - on the amount of federal direct loans students can take out for degrees in law and medicine. And it limits their repayment options after they graduate. Read more: Trump just made it harder to close the Education Department All those technicalities mean that some students like Tran may have fewer options for law school or medical school - or could be steered down a different career path altogether. "There's no way I can graduate early enough to avoid the Grad PLUS change," she said. The reforms represent the culmination of years of conservative efforts to rein in student lending. However, there has been bipartisan consensus about the causes of the underlying problem Republicans are trying to solve. Left-leaning groups and policymakers have also been highly critical in recent years of the crippling debt that some graduate programs impose on students. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, a doctor from Louisiana and chairman of the Senate education committee, said the new legislation will put a stop to a vicious cycle that has kept college costs too high. "The increasing availability of federal loans has resulted in skyrocketing tuition prices, trapping students in a cycle of overwhelming debt that they can't pay back," he said in a statement to USA TODAY. "By capping inflationary graduate loan programs, we prevent students from overborrowing and put downward pressure on rising college costs." Read more: Is grad school worth the investment? Our exclusive data shows some surprising answers. In 2024, the average annual law school tuition at a private university was nearly $60,000, according to American Bar Association data analyzed by the Law School Admission Council. For in-state residents attending public institutions, it was roughly $32,000. It's hard to know exactly how the loan limits will impact law schools, said Austen Parrish, dean of the University of California, Irvine School of Law. It's likely, in his view, that higher-ranked, more expensive schools will enroll a greater number of wealthy students who won't be as reliant on loans. Other, less privileged students may have to trade prestige for cost, he said. "You're going to see students having to make difficult decisions," he said. Medical schools brace for shift Watching from north-central Montana as Congress passed Trump's spending bill, Julianna Lindquist was happy she started medical school when she did. The 23-year-old, originally from Connecticut, is in her second year at Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine in Montana. (Of the two types of medical schools, osteopathic programs are the less-common version; their coursework is similar to that of other medical schools, but instead emphasizes a more holistic approach to patient care.) This semester, Lindquist is taking out the full amount of Grad PLUS loans she's eligible for - roughly $24,000. "I would not be anywhere without student loans," she said. "There's financial aid, but it's not enough." About half of all medical students rely on the Grad PLUS program, borrowing more than $1 billion annually, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. Graduates of osteopathic schools, the vast majority of which take on Grad PLUS loans, often go on to serve rural areas or become primary care providers. With federal support disappearing, it'll be up to the private lending market to make up the difference, said Jane Carreiro, dean of the College of Osteopathic Medicine at the University of New England in Portland, Maine. "How are students going to navigate that?" she said. "That's a question that we're all asking." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears
Huge crowds of pro-Palestine marchers, including Julian Assange, Bob Carr and Ed Husic, have marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge in the rain to protest against Israel's conduct in Gaza and to speak out about the children starving there. The world-famous landmark was closed to traffic at 11.30am on Sunday, with protesters gathering in Lang Park in the city centre in chilly weather before walking north to Bradfield Park across the bridge. About 3pm NSW police sent out a mass text message to phones throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Message from NSW Police: In consultation with the organisers, the march needs to stop due to public safety and await further instructions,' the message read. A police helicopter hovered overhead with instructions for the hordes of protesters to turn around and walk back towards the city. A second text message read: 'After consultation with the protest organisers, we are asking that everyone stops walking north. As soon as the march has stopped, we will look at turning everyone around back towards the city BUT it needs to be done in a controlled way in stages to keep everyone safe. Earlier the Indigenous actor Meyne Wyatt and the former Socceroo and Australian of the Year Craig Foster were among tens of thousands of people marching in the wet weather, while the Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi spoke passionately before the walk began. Faruqi, who has been an outspoken critic of the federal government's action in relation to Israel's conduct in Gaza, commended protesters for 'defying Chris Minns' after the New South Wales premier said: 'We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos.' 'Thank you for defying Chris Minns,' she said. 'This is a man who wants you to stay home and be silent in the face of a genocide. 'It was never about logistics. It was never about traffic. It was never about communications or anything else. It was always about stopping us and silencing us. It was always about protecting Israel and the Labor government from accountability.' Police had rejected an application from organisers for them to facilitate the march, arguing there was not enough time to prepare a traffic management plan and warned of a potential crowd crush and huge disruptions. But on Saturday the NSW supreme court ruled the march could go ahead. On Sunday protesters turned out carrying pots and pans – to highlight the starvation in Gaza – while many carried Palestinian flags and signage along with their wet weather gear and umbrellas. One protester that Guardian Australia spoke to, a British man called Dan, held a sign reading 'Gay Jews 4 Gaza'. 'I grew up in a north London Jewish community, and I think there's a widespread Zionism that exists within the Jewish community that is difficult to separate from religion,' he said, adding: 'I think it's important for people within the community to stand up and raise their voice against the state of Israel because they're not representative of the Jewish community as a whole.' Guardian Australia also spoke to Philomena McGoldrick, a registered nurse and midwife, who has spent stints working in Gaza and described her heartbreak at images circulating of starving children. 'Innocent babies have no colour, no religion, no language. In this day and age … it's heartbreaking … But it's nice to meet people standing on the right side. The tide has changed.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The WikiLeaks founder was also spotted in the crowd, one of few public appearances since Assange arrived home in Australia after a decade-long extradition battle. He was photographed alongside Carr, the former NSW premier and federal foreign affairs minister who last week told Guardian Australia the federal government should sanction the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and move quickly to recognise Palestinian statehood. Carr said it would send 'a message that we are turned inside out with disgust by what appears the deliberate starvation' of Gaza. Carr's call was echoed by Husic, a federal Labor MP and former cabinet minister, who joined the rally to march across the bridge alongside the five state Labor MPs who defied Minns. Labor's Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D'Adam, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine were among 15 NSW politicians who signed an open letter on Thursday evening calling on the government to facilitate 'a safe and orderly event' on Sunday. Meanwhile, pro-Palestinian protesters in Melbourne's city centre, who had planned to shut down King Street Bridge in solidarity with the Sydney protest, appeared to have been blocked from crossing the bridge. Video shared on social media by the protest organisers showed police in riot gear and shields blocking the bridge with trucks. Victoria police were approached to confirm the bridge had been shut down; a spokesperson said a statement would be released at the end of the day. In Sydney, Transport for NSW urged people to avoid non-essential travel around the central business district and northern parts of the city.
