Video shows stampede at Tel Aviv memorial event, not Israelis fleeing to bunkers
'Israeli Settlers fleeing to Bunkers as Iranian missiles being to arrive,' reads part of the caption of a video shared on Facebook on June 15, 2025.
The video shows people running in different directions in an open area, leaving behind white chairs.
The post was shared two days after Israel started firing missiles at Iran on June 13, hitting nuclear and military sites as well as residential areas, prompting counterattacks from Tehran (archived here and here).
The United States also used bunker-busting bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities, which was followed by an Iranian missile attack targeting a US military base in Qatar (archived here).
Israeli strikes on Iran have killed at least 610 civilians and wounded more than 4,700, according to the health ministry. Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 28 people, according to official figures and rescuers.
A fragile ceasefire came into effect on June 24, 2025, bringing an end to 12 days of fighting.
However, the video circulated on social media does not show Israelis fleeing to bunkers for shelter.
AFP Fact Check extracted keyframes from the video to conduct reverse image searches. This led to the original version, shared on X on April 30, 2025 – weeks before the warfare started (archived here).
According to its caption, the video showed a stampede that happened at a Yom Hazikaron event in Tel Aviv, which left 20 people injured.
Yom Hazikaron, or Memorial Day, pays tribute to soldiers killed in the line of duty and to victims of attacks in Israel.
️Chaos at Tel Aviv Hostage Memorial as Police Clash Sparks Stampede At a Memorial Day ceremony in Tel Aviv, two Palestinian Israeli ushers were assaulted and arrested by police, triggering panic and a stampede that left 20 people lightly injured.#Israel#Palestinepic.twitter.com/udqkurUe4H
— Xnews_with_Grok (@Xnews_with_grok) April 30, 2025
An internet search of the keywords 'Tel Aviv + memorial + stampede' led to a news report by a local newspaper Israel Hayom that includes the same video as the one in the claim (archived here).
The stampede, it reported, happened because event staff were misidentified as "suspicious individuals wearing vests" while trying to enter a memorial ceremony in Tel Aviv.
AFP Fact Check has previously debunked several other false claims related to the Israel-Iran war, such as here, here and here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pete Hegseth's news conference made one thing clear – but two questions still need answering
Pete Hegseth's angry news conference, where the US defence secretary roundly abused those media outlets and individuals who didn't agree with him, certainly told us one thing. That when reliable information eventually emerges from the battle damage assessment of the US attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant, it won't be accepted by everyone. The whole issue has suddenly become politically toxic in Washington and will doubtless be fed into the spin dryer of vitriolic commentary and assertion that has been the most stand-out feature of this second Trump administration. But what we did find out from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Dan Caine, was that the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs had been designed in some secrecy with exactly this sort of target in mind. Trump-Iran live: We also learned they all worked as per the test simulations, and that 12 were fired at six separate targets at Fordow and another two at a single target at the Natanz nuclear facility. But over how to characterise the damage done in these attacks is really just a semantic spat. The two key questions are rather different. Firstly, will the Iranians decide to give up their quest for a nuclear weapon as a result of this attack, as the Syrians did in 2007 when the Israelis destroyed their Al Kibar nuclear reactor? Or else will they go hell for leather for a nuclear weapon, as Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did after the Israelis destroyed his nuclear reactor in 1981? Read more: And secondly, if the Iranians decide to go again for a nuclear weapon, how long will it be before they are back at the nuclear threshold, where they were less than a month ago? Will it be within a year? Or five years? Or longer? When we have an answer to those two questions, then we can put some real perspective on whether the US bombing has really been a success.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
What damage could potential Iran retaliation do to your pocketbook
Was Iran's missile attack on the U.S. base in Qatar the only retaliatory measure it will take against the United States following the bombing of its three nuclear sites? And will the ceasefire hold between Israel and Iran? Answers to those questions could determine how much we pay in every U.S. store—not just at the pump, according to a set of new reports. One model even suggests the inflation rate could more than double by the end of the year with a big enough increase in oil prices. Crude oil traders appear cautiously optimistic, though. Futures prices at 12 p.m. ET Thursday for a barrel of oil were above $65.88—lower than they were when Israel first attacked Iran on June 12. They're about $8 lower than when tensions were at their highest. President Donald Trump and others in his administration say they've ended the Israel-Iran war by dropping the huge bunker-busting bombs, but two papers this week from Oxford Economics still call the situation in the Middle East "fluid" and warn about what could happen if Iran decides to disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei added to the uncertainty Thursday when he warned any future attacks against Iran would come at a great cost. Oil prices tumble from June 20 highs Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them. Oxford Economics says its unlikely Iran would completely shutdown the Strait of Hormuz because they might not have the capabilities, or U.S. military would likely intervene. Iran also wouldn't likely have an interest in disrupting all oil shipping, considering more than 80% of the crude in the strait is generally bound for Asia. Where is the Strait of Hormuz How Iran could slow shipping through the Strait of Hormuz Iran might decide to make shipping in the Strait of Hormuz riskier and more expensive—largely because of higher insurance costs—by using various methods to harass and slow ships moving through the strait, according to Oxford Economics: ◾ Deploy mines ◾ Attack ships with drones and missiles ◾ Jam GPS signals The effectiveness any of these disruptions would have varying impact on prices in world oil markets. Recent history shows that the larger the rise in oil prices at the start of a conflict, the longer it typically takes for them to return to previous levels. How oil prices changed following in previous incidents How gas prices followed oil prices after Russia invaded Ukraine Not unsurprisingly, higher oil prices drive up fuel prices. It's rarely a one-to-one change, though, because of the additional costs—refining, taxes and distribution among them—by the time gasoline reaches the pump. When Russia invaded Ukraine, already inflated oil prices drove up U.S. gas prices and helped drive higher inflation throughout the economy. How a short-term, oil-price spike might affect inflation in the U.S. Oxford Economics modeled what might happen if Iran were able to slow about 70% of shipping traffic in the Strait of Hormuz and raise world oil prices by 25%. Their model showed that the annual inflation rate—which was 2.4% in May as measured by the consumer price index—could rise as high as 5.5% by the end of the year. In the same scenario, Oxford Economics projected the unemployment rate to rise from 4.2% in May to 4.5%, which could spur the Federal Reserve to start cutting interest rates to slow job losses—despite the higher prices driven by higher oil prices.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Fordow centrifuges ‘no longer operational' after Trump strikes, UN nuclear watchdog concludes
Centrifuges at Iran's notorious underground Fordow Uranium Enrichment Plant are 'no longer operational,' the leader of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog declared Thursday — backing the Trump administration's assessment that last week's strikes crippled Tehran's ambitions for an atomic weapon. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi cautioned that language claiming Iran's facilities at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz were 'annihilated' was 'too much,' but explained that 'we already know that these centrifuges are no longer operational.' 'It has suffered enormous damage,' Grossi told Radio France Internationale when pressed about the impact of the US strikes. 'There is very, very, very considerable damage.' Advertisement The Argentine refrained from estimating how far Iran's nuclear program had been set back by Saturday's strikes, but confirmed that 'with these reduced capacities, it will be much more difficult for Iran to continue at the same pace as before.' 4 IAEA director general Rafael Grossi said Iran's centrifuges at Fordow are no longer operational. AFP via Getty Images 4 Satellite imagery showed the impact of the strikes, but officials have noted that there's no crater because the US dropped heavy duty bunker buster bombs. Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies/AFP via Getty Images Advertisement A precise assessment of the damage to each site will require ground-level assessments with access that the Iranian authorities have been unwilling to give. However, Grossi explained that centrifuges, which are needed to spin uranium material rapidly in order to enrich it to weapons-grade levels, are very sensitive to vibrations and require precision to work properly. 'There was no escaping significant physical damage,' he told RFI of the effect of America's bombs. 'So we can come to a fairly accurate technical conclusion.' President Trump has been adamant that Iran's facilities were 'obliterated,' but a leaked 'low confidence' preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reported by multiple outlets Tuesday suggested the attack only set the program back by several months. Advertisement CIA director John Ratcliffe later claimed that the strikes 'severely damaged' Iran's nuclear programs, citing a 'body of credible intelligence.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard made a similar assertion. 4 President Trump has insisted that the US 'obliterated' Iran's three nuclear facilities. AP Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine held a press briefing Thursday morning, intended to refute claims that the strikes may not have completely destroyed the nuclear work being done in those facilities. Trump also hit back at fears that Iran may have transferred its enriched uranium out of Fordow. Advertisement 'The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of [the] facility,' Trump wrote on Truth Social Thursday. 'Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!' Iranian propagandists and leadership have tried to project an image of business as usual. 4 Top military brass played a video showcasing the destructive power of the GBU-57 series Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOPs) bunker buster bombs. Getty Images 'The US hit nuclear sites but couldn't achieve much,' Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared in a televised speech Thursday. 'US President Trump needed to do showmanship.' Khamenei also claimed victory over Israel and the US despite the clear drubbing Iran weathered and its failure to breach American defenses of the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar during retaliatory strikes carried out Monday. IAEA inspectors had been monitoring Iran's nuclear program in keeping with the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty. However, on Wednesday, Iran's Parliament moved to end cooperation with the watchdog and boot its inspectors from the country.
