
What Is the Medicare Beneficiary Ombudsman?
The Medicare beneficiary ombudsman (MBO) is a representative who works on behalf of Medicare enrollees to resolve Medicare-related complaints, ensure access to information, and improve the program.
An ombudsman is a person who reviews how an organization operates, investigates complaints, and helps resolve those complaints. They typically work as a client advocate within an organization or business. The MBO serves this function within the Medicare program.
Learn more about the services the MBO provides and how to connect.
What is the role of a Medicare beneficiary ombudsman?
Congress formed the MBO role in 2003. The person in this role assists Medicare enrollees in various areas, including handling complaints, appeals, and requests for information.
The general duties of the MBO, as outlined in section 1808 of the Social Security Act, are to:
receive and help resolve complaints and inquiries that Medicare beneficiaries and other stakeholders make
work with representatives of health insurance counseling programs to provide information and resources to beneficiaries
report to Congress on ways to improve the administration of Medicare
In addition to addressing complaints, some of the specific issues enrollees may have to address with an MBO include:
Appeals: If you disagree with a Medicare payment or coverage determination, you can file an appeal. The MBO can assist you with this process.
Enrollment concerns: If you have issues when leaving a Medicare Advantage (Part C) plan or joining a new plan, the MBO can assist you.
Claims: If you need to file a Medicare claim, the MBO can help you through the process or troubleshoot issues that arise.
What are a beneficiary's rights under Medicare?
As a Medicare beneficiary, you have various clearly outlined rights and protections. The MBO exists to help preserve those rights and ensure fair treatment of all Medicare beneficiaries.
It can be helpful for Medicare enrollees to periodically review their rights to understand what types of treatment and services they can expect.
A Medicare beneficiary's rights include:
fair and courteous treatment
privacy of personal and health information
access to appropriate healthcare professionals for medically necessary services
clear, understandable information access regarding coverage, plan options, costs, and more
Medicare designs its protections to keep beneficiaries up to date on coverage status and prevent unexpected costs. They come into play when Medicare may not cover a service, or you reach the end of Medicare coverage.
A beneficiary's protections include:
receiving an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) of Noncoverage for any services that Medicare doesn't cover
getting a Notice of Medicare Noncoverage at least 2 days before covered home health services end
acquiring a Hospital-Issued Notice of Noncoverage (HINN) for inpatient services that Medicare Part A doesn't cover
If you've experienced violations of your rights or protections or have an issue with Medicare noncoverage, you can contact the MBO for assistance.
How to contact a Medicare beneficiary ombudsman
Not all Medicare-related questions should go directly to the MBO. Other contact points may be more suitable based on your coverage and the nature of your question or concern.
If you're a Medicare Advantage or Part D enrollee, contact your insurance carrier with any questions or complaints about your plan. You can generally find contact information for the plan on the back of your insurance card.
If you have questions about Original Medicare or need help with issues that a private insurance carrier can't address, you can contact Medicare by phone at 800-633-4227.
If you have general questions or would like free, unbiased Medicare counseling, you can contact your local State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP).
Finally, if you have questions that the channels above can't resolve, you can direct your query to the MBO. You can do so by contacting Medicare by phone at 800-633-4227 and requesting your case's submission to the MBO.
Summary
The MBO has a role within the Medicare program to provide customer service and advocacy.
The MBO can assist Medicare beneficiaries with resolving complaints and accessing important information. They also work to improve Medicare's administration by submitting an annual report to Congress on its operation.
If you have a concern requiring the MBO's attention, you can contact Medicare by phone and explain the situation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
16 minutes ago
- E&E News
Atmospheric CO2 buildup broke another record in May
Climate-warming carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere broke another record last month, breaching 430 parts per million for the first time in recorded history. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego, whose researchers track atmospheric CO2, publicly announced the findings Thursday morning. NOAA announced the findings in social media posts on X and Facebook, linking to the public data on its website. The agency also typically reveals the annual CO2 in a news release, like last year's announcement, but hadn't done so as of 12:30 p.m. ET on Thursday. Advertisement Kim Doster, NOAA's director of communications, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
UnitedHealthcare accused The Guardian of looking to ‘capitalize' on CEO's murder in lawsuit
UnitedHealthcare sued The Guardian and its parent on Wednesday for defamation, claiming the US version of the British daily newspaper ran information it knew to be incorrect in order to 'capitalize' on the assassination of the medical insurer's CEO. The article in question was produced and published by The Guardian's US investigations team as part of a series titled 'Too Big to Care' and was available worldwide at publication. In the article, George Joseph, an investigative reporter for The Guardian's US publication, wrote that UnitedHealth Group, UnitedHealthcare's parent, had engaged in cost-cutting tactics by paying off nurses to cut down on hospital transfers. Citing internal emails, documents and interviews with more than 20 current and former staffers, the report claimed that the payments were made 'as part of a UnitedHealth program.' Nursing home residents in need of 'immediate hospital care under the program failed to receive it' because of 'interventions from UnitedHealth staffers,' per the report. The lawsuit from UnitedHealth Group, United Healthcare Services and Optum, the group's health services segment, filed in Delaware's Superior Court, accused The Guardian of publishing 'knowingly false claims' in the story, alleging it used 'deceptively doctored documents' and 'patently untruthful anecdotes' to produce the article. 'The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway, brazenly trying to capitalize on the tragic and shocking assassination of UnitedHealthcare's then-CEO, Brian Thompson,' the lawsuit alleged. The Guardian is strongly pushing back against UnitedHealthcare's lawsuit, emphasizing in a statement that it will defend Joseph's reporting. 'The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees — as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks,' The Guardian said in a statement. 'It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts,' the publication said. The health care giant's accusations echo a statement published by UnitedHealth Group the same day The Guardian released its investigation. In the statement, the company accused the publication of building a 'narrative' using 'anecdotes rather than facts.' The company noted that the Justice Department had investigated the allegations, interviewed witnesses, and combed through thousands of documents, only to find 'the significant factual inaccuracies in the allegations.' A UnitedHealth Group spokesperson told CNN that The Guardian 'refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative.' 'The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care,' the company said in a statement. However, despite the claim, a spokesperson for The Guardian told CNN that it has 'received no requests for correction or retraction on any aspect of the story.' UnitedHealthcare is being represented by Clare Locke, a law firm known for taking on defamation cases against media organizations. The firm has also represented Project Veritas; and one of its partners, Jered Ede, who is working on the UnitedHealthcare lawsuit, was also Project Veritas's chief legal officer.


Fox News
17 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ex-Biden adviser calls Jean-Pierre ‘kinda dumb,' deletes tweet, says she's not a ‘genius-level Black woman'
As criticism mounts from within Biden's world against former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and her new book, one ex-aide lambasted the now-Independent ombudswoman as "kinda dumb" — a tweet he deleted but later stood by. Timothy Wu, now a Columbia Law professor, was former President Joe Biden's "architect" of antitrust policy whose faculty bio claims he also coined the progressive term "net neutrality" in 2002. In a now-deleted tweet, Wu wrote: "from a [White House] staff perspective, the real problem with Karine Jean-Pierre was that she was kinda dumb." "[She had n]o interest in understanding harder topics. Just gave random incoherent answers on policy," Wu added in the trashed tweet. The X account "I work with my word" replied to the original tweet, calling it "pretty racist," and the tweet was later deleted, but the reply remained. Below the reply, Wu added a new line of commentary, saying the Biden White House was "full of genius-level Black women. [Jean-Pierre] was not one of them." In response to another X user asking Wu whether Trump White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt understands executive policy, the professor said a good ombudsperson will "meet with policy staff and try and understand what the administration is doing and why." Fox News Digital reached out to Wu via his Columbia faculty office, where he has taught since 2006. The former Biden adviser was also a Democratic primary candidate for New York's lieutenant governorship in 2014, and also worked in the Obama administration and at the Federal Trade Commission. Jean-Pierre announced Wednesday that she left the Democratic Party and has become an Independent while revealing her upcoming book: "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines." She was mocked and criticized by several people in Biden's orbit besides Wu, including one who said, "I wouldn't ignore what Karine has to say, but it's not an account in which much weight will be invested — just like her briefings." "At noon on that day [that Biden left office], I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically," Jean-Pierre said of her new Independent streak.