
Why Britain needs Israel to win against Iran
It's understandable that the focus of coverage of Israel's strikes on Iran, and the Iranian regime's response, has been entirely on the potential regional consequences of Israel's mission to destroy Iran's nuclear capability. But although this may seem more like a version of Neville Chamberlain's infamous 'quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing' than an issue of immediate relevance to British national security, it is most definitely the latter. It is vital to our national security that Israel succeeds.
For one thing, Iran operates hit squads in the UK with the explicit aim of assassinating British citizens it deems to be enemies. It's said that the best way to ensure something remains secret is to mention it on the floor of the House of Commons. It sometimes seems that this is exactly what happened in 2023 when the then security minister Tom Tugendhat gave MPs details of how the police and security services had detected at least 15 'credible threats' to kill or kidnap UK citizens and residents in 2022. Iran, he said, had been gathering information about Jews as a 'preparation for lethal operations'.
The IRGC uses the same techniques as Isis and al-Qaeda to develop and radicalise UK-based regime supporters
In his statement, he named an IRGC member Mohammad Mehdi Mozayyani, who had 'worked to conduct a lethal operation against Iranian dissidents here in the United Kingdom'. Iran International, an Iranian opposition television station, was forced to close its London office because the threat to its staff was so serious. Last month, three alleged Iranian spies appeared in court charged with targeting UK-based journalists so that 'serious violence' could be inflicted on them.
The import of Mr Tugendhat's statement has been widely ignored, not least by the government in which he served and the current Labour government. Neither has proscribed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the terror arm of the regime.
In a subsequent interview with the Jewish Chronicle, one of the few outlets to cover the Iranian presence in the UK, Tugendhat said:
We have very clear intelligence about the activities of hostile regimes in the UK and we keep a very close eye on what their agents and those close to them are doing. We know that the Iranians are using non-traditional sources to carry out these operations, including organised criminal gangs. They are paying criminal gangs to conduct surveillance. Basically, the Iranians are using crooks based in Britain to spy for them… We have been seeing threats and Iranian operational activity directed against them [Israeli and Jewish targets in the UK]. I do not issue these warnings lightly.
The director general of MI5, Ken McCallum, has said that Iran's 'aggressive intelligence services' are actively planning terrorist attacks on British soil, calling it 'the state actor which most frequently crosses into terrorism'. Last October MI5 said it had foiled at least 20 regime-backed terror plots in the UK since 2022.
But it is not just Iranian terror operations that pose a threat to UK safety. The regime is also behind an extensive network of organisations, mosques and student bodies that are a more insidious concern. There is, for example, no bar on alleged links with the IRGC, so the Islamic Centre of England (ICE) has been able to operate as a charity with impunity. This is despite being described last year by the then chair of the Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, Alicia Kearns, as the IRGC's 'London office'.
It had an official warning by the charity commission after holding a vigil to honour the IRGC terror mastermind Qasem Soleimani after he was assassinated in 2020. It was also ordered to scrap a rule in its constitution requiring one trustee to be a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader – which the regulator said created a conflict of interest and demonstrated an 'apparent lack of independence'. The ICE says it is a:
Purely religious and cultural organisation, which provides various services to the local communities… It is an independent charity regulated by British law, which is totally funded by the local beneficiaries. The majority of the trustees, donors, and attendees are British citizens. Indeed, this charity is nothing to do with politics, while we strongly believe that the politically motivated lobbies are trying to drag the charity into their political disputes.
The Islamic Student Association of Britain has hosted online talks at the Kanoon Towhid Islamic centre in west London with senior IRGC commanders. One of these was Saeed Ghasemi, who said in his talk in 2021 that if Soleimani had not been killed, 'we could have taken over one after another the European countries you are studying in'. A former chair of the association has said that
Islamic Students Associations have never had any direct or indirect affiliation to the IRGC or any army, government or security group anywhere in the world and neither have I… Islamic Students Associations have never held any physical gathering/seminar/conference…with any of the falsely accused individuals.
Astonishingly (well, rather predictably given our repeated failure to take this form of the Iranian threat seriously) at least six charities with alleged links to Iran or the IRGC have been funded by the British taxpayer as part of the pandemic furlough scheme. One, the Islamic Centre of England, received £109,476 in 2020 and £129,556 in 2021.
The key point is that the IRGC uses much the same techniques as Isis and al-Qaeda, utilising a network of mosques, charities and centres to develop and radicalise UK-based regime supporters. One such organisation was exposed for hosting online IRGC commanders who called on British students to join the IRGC to 'bring an end to the lives of Zionists and Jews across the world'.
The security services do a valiant job in seeking to uncover and foil terror plots. But they have been let down – as have all of us – by a political class which has refused to proscribe the IRGC, which would make all of the above illegal. Even now, as Israel is doing the West's work for it, our PM and Foreign Secretary cannot bring themselves to offer a word of actual support. Even though, as we have seen, the threat Iran poses to UK security is real – and growing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Kneecap hire billboards across London before rapper's court case
The Irish rap trio Kneecap have taken out billboards across London that read 'more blacks, more dogs, more Irish, Mo Chara' before the rapper's appearance in court accused of a terrorism offence. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, 27, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, London, in November. He is due to appear at Westminster magistrates' court on Wednesday morning. In a post on Instagram on Tuesday, Kneecap said they had 'plastered London with a few messages ahead of this witch-hunt'. The billboards are white, green and orange, the colours of the Irish flag. The phrase on them is a reference to the 'no Irish, no blacks, no dogs' signs that were placed in the windows of some London pubs and boarding houses in the 1950s and 1960s. Kneecap posted: 'British courts have long charged people from the North of Ireland with 'terrorism' for crimes never committed. We will fight them. We will win.' The group has urged supporters to 'bring flags, bring instruments, bring banners, bring your mates' to the court in protest. A small crowd had gathered outside the court on Wednesday morning. Kneecap's lawyers include Gareth Peirce, who represented the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, in his US extradition case, Darragh Mackin, who helped Kneecap win their case against Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative Party leader, and Brenda Campbell KC, who represented the families of the Hillsborough disaster. The Metropolitan Police said they had charged Chara, who appears on the court list as Liam O'Hanna, after initially being made aware of a video that had been shared online. The force previously said the trio were under investigation after clips posted appeared to show them calling for the deaths of MPs and shouting 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'. Kneecap said they have 'never supported' Hamas or Hezbollah, both of which are banned in the UK. In a previous statement the group said: 'We are not the story. Genocide is.' Kneecap are set to play Glastonbury next week after being removed from the TRNSMT festival in Glasgow in July.


Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
Is Kemi Badenoch's grooming gangs outrage just politics or does she really care?
Here's a rule I tend to apply across the board in Westminster: If a politician is talking, politics is probably taking place. Add into that, if the topic of debate is especially grave or serious, be more prepared to apply the rule, not less. Which brings us to the grooming scandal. There is no doubt Tory leader Kemi Badenoch was politicising the issue when she ripped into the government in the Commons on Monday. In fact, she admitted as much. Asked about it during her news conference, she said: "When I'm in the Commons, I will do politics. If every time we are pointing things out and doing our job we are accused of politicising something, it makes it a lot harder." So the question here is less about whether politics is at play (it almost always is and that's not necessarily a bad thing), and more about whose interests the politics is working towards. In other words, does Ms Badenoch care about the grooming scandal because she cares about victims or because she cares about herself? 1:03 To answer that, it's useful to try and pinpoint exactly when the Tory leader started showing such a keen desire for a public inquiry. Was she always harbouring it? Or did it only arrive after Elon Musk and others pushed the scandal back up the news agenda? On this, she's not helped by the record of the governments she served in. Yes, the broader child abuse inquiry was announced under David Cameron, but there was no specific statutory grooming inquiry. As late as 2022, the then Tory safeguarding minister was batting away demands for a public inquiry on the basis that locally-led probes were preferable. That is - as it happens - the same explanation the current Labour safeguarding minister Jess Phillips offered to Oldham Council in the rejection letter that sparked outrage and set us on a path to this eventual outcome. 1:56 "If we'd got this right years ago then I doubt we'd be in this place now," wrote Baroness Casey in her audit. If Labour can be attacked for acting too slowly, the Tories - and by extension Ms Badenoch - can be too. In response, her aides insist she was bound by collective responsibility while she was a minister, and that the issue was outside her brief. Ms Badenoch also points to her work with patients of the now closed Tavistock Gender Identity Clinic as evidence of her track record campaigning for change in thorny policy areas. In this context, the presence in the grooming scandal of questions around the role of gender and ethnicity mark this as an issue that you'd expect the Tory leader to not only be interested in, but to genuinely care about too. But as previously discussed, just because a politician is somewhat sincere in what they are saying, doesn't mean there isn't a dollop of politics mixed in too. And having dug out a recording of a post-PMQs briefing with Ms Badenoch's media adviser from January, that certainly seems to be the case here. Asked what had changed to trigger the calls for an inquiry, the spokesperson said: "We can all go back and look at the reasons why this entered the popular discourse. This is something that is of high public salience." Or to put it another way, the politics changed.


NBC News
25 minutes ago
- NBC News
British lawmakers vote to decriminalize abortion amid concern about the prosecution of women
LONDON — British lawmakers voted Tuesday to decriminalize abortion in England and Wales after a lawmaker argued it was cruel to prosecute women for ending a pregnancy. The House of Commons approved an amendment to a broader crime bill that would prevent women from being criminally punished under an antiquated law. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said the change was needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help,' she said. 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.' The amendment passed 379-137. The House of Commons will now need to pass the crime bill, which is expected, before it goes to the House of Lords, where it can be delayed but not blocked. Under current law, doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalized in 2019. Changes in the law implemented during the Covid-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks. That has led to a handful of widely publicized cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more. Anti-abortion groups opposed the measures, arguing it would open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the U.K.'s biggest pro-life campaign group. The debate came after recent prosecutions have galvanized support to repeal parts of the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act. In one case, a mother of three was sentenced to more than two years in prison in 2023 for medically inducing an abortion about eight months into her pregnancy. Carla Foster, 45, was released about a month later by an appeals court that reduced her sentence. Judge Victoria Sharp said that case called for 'compassion, not punishment' and there was no useful purpose in jailing her. Last month, a jury acquitted Nicola Packer on a charge of unlawfully self-administering poison or a noxious thing with intent to procure a miscarriage. Packer, who took abortion medicine when she was about 26 weeks pregnant, testified that she did not know she had been pregnant more than 10 weeks. Supporters of the bill said it was a landmark reform that would keep women from going to prison for ending their pregnancy. 'At a time when we're seeing rollbacks on reproductive rights, most notably in the United States, this crucial milestone in the fight for reproductive rights sends a powerful message that our lawmakers are standing up for women,' said Louise McCudden of MSI Reproductive Choices. A second amendment that would have gone even further than Antoniazzi's proposal, barring the prosecution of medical professionals and others who help women abort their fetuses, did not get to a vote. A competing Conservative measure that would have required an in-person appointment for a pregnant woman to get abortion pills was defeated.