Former Mid and East Antrim chief faces prosecution over alleged deleted emails
A solicitor of Ms Donaghy added she will 'vehemently contest these three technical offences'.
Northern Ireland's Public Prosecution Service (PPS) on Friday confirmed that it has taken a decision to prosecute two people following a police probe into the alleged deletion of emails related to a freedom of information (FOI) request at the council in 2021.
It comes after a BBC Spotlight programme reported police searches of the council offices in October 2021 and April 2022 were connected to an alleged attempt to delete correspondence around a decision to withdraw council staff involved in post-Brexit trade agreement checks at Larne Port.
During a time of political tension over the introduction of an 'Irish Sea border', a number of staff were temporarily removed from the posts for their safety following alleged threats from loyalist paramilitaries.
Department of Agriculture staff were also withdrawn from the port on February 1 2021 amid security concerns.
However police later said they were not aware of any credible threats.
A PPS spokesperson said one individual is being prosecuted for three offences under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, and a second individual is being prosecuted for one offence under the same Act.
'The charges relate to offences allegedly committed in April 2021 and June 2021,' they said.
In total four individuals were reported on a police investigation file submitted to the PPS for consideration.
The PPS said a senior prosecutor carefully considered all the available evidence and applied the test for prosecution before taking decisions in relation to the four reported individuals.
'It has been determined that the available evidence in relation to the other two reported individuals is insufficient in order to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction and therefore the test for prosecution is not met in relation to them,' they said.
Solicitor Kevin Winters said Ms Donaghy has an outstanding High Court legal action against the council alleging discrimination.
'Today we received notification that she will be prosecuted on three counts of allegedly concealing records, aiding and abetting another person to erase or conceal a record and attempting to erase or conceal a record contrary to FOIA and other legislation,' he said.
'Our client denies any wrongdoing during her time in office and will vehemently contest these three technical offences.
'Central to her defence will be very strong allegations of investigative bias over the manner in which this inquiry has been conducted.
'Those same allegations have been the subject of a long-running complaint to PONI, the out workings of which will feature in any trial, if one is ever directed.'
He added: 'Anne Donaghy has an impeccable record and service working for the council.
'She wants to put on record her sincere thanks for the all the support she has received from former colleagues in council and beyond in the wider community.
'Our client takes a lot of strength from this and knows it will serve her well going forward when confronting what are essentially contrived politically motivated allegations.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Courier
3 hours ago
- The Courier
EXCLUSIVE: Fife Reform defector was 'passionate' anti-Brexit voter
A Fife councillor who defected to Nigel Farage's Reform UK campaigned fiercely against Brexit – and won backing from Labour's most pro-EU wing. Councillor Julie MacDougall quit Labour in 2024 after being blocked from standing as a General Election candidate. She is now in Reform, which evolved from the anti-EU Brexit Party. The Courier can reveal Ms MacDougall had publicly supported EU membership and been endorsed as an MP hopeful by Labour Movement for Europe, a pro-EU faction. 'You don't get an endorsement from them without pledging true allegiance to the EU,' a source explained. Ms MacDougall also superimposed the stars of the EU flag over her Facebook profile picture in 2020. One former party colleague described the councillor as a 'passionate' EU supporter who 'despised' Brexit. A Labour source added: 'Julie MacDougall's desperate search for relevance continues. 'Having been rejected as a Labour candidate multiple times, she is now abandoning what she previously said she believed in to try to get herself a seat with any party in any parliament that might have her. 'She has previously been strident in her pro-EU views, as a member of the Labour Movement for Europe, and even displaying an EU flag around her face in social media profile pictures. 'She needs to explain to people in her council ward why she has suddenly abandoned these views in favour of Reform, who were previously called the Brexit Party.' Ms MacDougall told The Courier she had backed Remain during the EU Referendum in 2016, and says she does not know how she would vote if the ballot was re-run. She said: 'I've always been pro-European. It's more about the fact the country has voted to leave. That's what the people of the country decided, and that's democracy. 'I accept that decision by the people that voted.' Asked how she would vote now, the councillor added: 'I haven't thought about a vote at the moment, because I don't think that's something on the table.' Ms MacDougall, whose late father John was a Labour MP in Fife, also denied accusations of careerism. 'Everyone can have their own opinion. Labour was where my heart was. Sadly, things have changed,' she added. 'Had I really wanted to progress my career, I would have joined another party years ago when other parties approached me. It's taken me till now to make my decision.' A Reform UK spokesman said: 'Unlike Labour, who continue relitigating Brexit and driving us ever closer to the EU, Councillor MacDougall is committed to a free, sovereign country that is governed by its citizens. 'We welcome anyone who shares our values of slashing immigration, cutting taxation, and building a better Britain.'
The Courier
3 hours ago
- The Courier
Perth asylum seekers and refugees: Council reveals spending and inspection details
The council has revealed more details about asylum seekers and refugees in Perth after a flurry of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. Perth and Kinross Council has also explained what it can and cannot say about the situation across its patch. The local authority has had many FOI queries about the topic, including where its funding comes from, the costs incurred, and how many people are housed in Perth and Kinross. On Wednesday, it took the unusual step of issuing a 1,400-word response to the questions posed. It comes after council chiefs shut down speculation that up to 250 extra people could be accommodated in the city. Local politicians also hit out at anti-immigration protesters after a demonstration was held in Perth. Below are some of the key questions put to the council, with The Courier providing answers to several the local authority was unable to answer. Knowing the difference between an asylum seeker and a refugee is key to understanding the council's responsibilities. An asylum seeker has fled their home country due to persecution or fear of persecution. Their application for refugee status in the UK has not yet been decided. A refugee has received formal recognition, either through the Refugee Convention or through other forms of protection, and has been granted the right to stay in the UK. Anyone who has been granted asylum can no longer stay in a hotel. As of August 14, there were 191 asylum seekers at two hotels. They are widely known to have been staying at Perth's Station Hotel and neighbouring Best Western Queens Hotel since autumn 2022. However, the council says it doesn't identify these hotels because it could lead to public disorder. Perth and Kinross Council recently shut down rumours that more asylum seekers are to be housed in Perth. The local authority says it meets weekly with the Home Office to discuss arrangements for asylum seekers. A statement read: 'Where a need for more accommodation is identified, the Home Office, and its partner Mears Group plc, must request the assistance of the local authority to find accommodation. 'A full assessment needs to be made prior to any further accommodation being recommended to the Home Office. 'No such assessment has been requested or undertaken in relation to any hotel or other property in the area. 'Consequently, any rumours which are being circulated at present are completely untrue.' Information about the nationalities of housing applicants or tenants is not held by Perth and Kinross Council. However, the number of people in each accredited UK refugee resettlement scheme has been disclosed. In the 2021/2022 year, 19 refugees were resettled through the Afghan Reallocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) and Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme (ACRS). The Homes for Ukraine Scheme saw 350 refugees arrive in Perth and Kinross in 2022. There were four through the Sudan United Kingdom Resettlement Scheme (UKRS) in 2023/24 and seven from the Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme (ACRS) in 2024/25. As they are refugees and not asylum seekers, none of these live in the two Perth hotels. A Courier interview with street pastor Suzanne Black revealed that, as of February 2023, asylum seekers in one of the hotels hailed from Egypt, Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, Kuwait, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, Eritrea, Kuwait and Nigeria. They were exclusively male, aged between 20 and 45, and had found their way to the UK via Belfast or across the English Channel. Perth and Kinross Council does not fund the accommodation or placement of asylum seekers, as the cost is covered by the UK Government. The Home Office has also provided funding for the costs of supporting asylum seekers in asylum accommodation. As of August 14, Perth and Kinross Council had received £231,000 for the 2025/26 financial year, plus £53,000 carried forward from 2024/2025. This was spent in the following areas: – Supporting health checks and GP registration – Trauma support initiatives – English Language and Education – Employability skills and welfare support projects – Digital inclusion project – Housing Move on Support – Communities and Social Connections Projects – Legal/cultural integration advice project This is unclear, but in the past five years the council has received around £5.6 million from the UK and Scottish governments to support the resettlement and community integration of refugees. Most of this funding is associated with supporting people displaced by the conflict in Ukraine. From the UK Government, the following has been received: in 2021/2022 in 2022/2023 in 2023/2024 in 2024/2025 An asylum seeker who has a successful claim is usually granted either 'humanitarian protection' or 'refugee' status. This means they can be eligible for homelessness services and social housing. Homelessness presentations from Perth asylum seekers have increased in recent years because the UK Government has been under pressure to process claims faster. As a result, some successful claimants have had to leave their hotels and find alternative accommodation before any has been found. Some of these may have sought housing in other areas: Environmental health officers have carried out four inspections on Perth asylum accommodation. In 2023, from two inspections, a kitchen drainage issue was identified. This year, a lift issue was discovered and resolved at one of two inspections.
South Wales Guardian
8 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Nicola Sturgeon's ‘political instinct' to back a united Ireland
However, the former Scottish first minister insisted the issue of Northern Ireland's future is for people there to decide. She stressed that was the case because she said she could 'get bit prickly if people from outside Scotland start to say what's best for Scotland'. However, speaking to the Nolan Show on BBC Radio Ulster, she stated: 'My political instinct would be in favour of a united Ireland. 'But that's not a matter for me.' Ms Sturgeon continued that as a supporter of Scottish independence, she believes that 'Westminster governance has not served Scotland well', adding that she is 'not sure it will have served Northern Ireland well'. The former SNP leader said: 'I think what Brexit did to Northern Ireland and has done to Scotland is probably an example of the downsides of Westminster governments.' However, she that 'detailed assessments' over whether the province's future should be in the UK or as part of a united Ireland were 'for people in Northern Ireland to make'.
