The White House really does want Fox News to fire its pollster
It was about a week ago when Fox News released the results of its latest national poll, which, like most recent surveys, included all kinds of discouraging news for Donald Trump and his agenda. The president, predictably, was not pleased.
But instead of simply whining about his unpopularity, Trump went further, suggesting that Fox News should 'get rid of' its pollster.
Earlier this week, the president published even more hysterical items to his social media platform, claiming that major news organizations 'CHEAT' with their public opinion research. The Republican proceeded to refer to pollsters as 'Negative Criminals' (I still don't know what that means), adding, 'These people should be investigated for ELECTION FRAUD, and add in the FoxNews Pollster while you're at it.'
The next day, the White House's Stephen Miller appeared on the network, and Fox News' John Roberts reminded his guest about some of the results from his employer's latest poll. The presidential adviser didn't hesitate.
'I don't want to make things awkward for you, John, but it is our opinion that Fox News needs to fire its pollster,' Miller said. He added that, as far as the White House is concerned, Fox News' pollster 'has always been wrong' about Trump.
Right off the bat, it's worth emphasizing the fact that Fox News polls — the network's partisan reputation notwithstanding — have been rather accurate of late.
But I'm also struck by the fact that Trump and his team have complained bitterly about all kinds of media outlets and their polls, but Fox News is the only one that's been targeted by the president's and the White House's public declarations that the pollster should be fired.
It's a push rooted in an unspoken insult.
In the run-up to Election Day 2024, Trump argued that Fox News 'shouldn't be allowed' to show remarks from his Democratic rival. Around the same time, the Republican also argued that Fox News 'shouldn't allow' Democratic attack ads.
Trump added soon after that Fox News should stop 'constantly putting on Liberal Democrats' who end up 'nullifying' Republican guests.
We heard related talk during his first term. Around this time six years ago, the president whined online that Fox News was going too far 'in covering the Dems,' referring to Democratic presidential candidates. Trump added that Fox News executives should instead prioritize 'the people who got them there.'
A Washington Post analysis added that it was a remarkable sentiment because it was 'an explicit expression of his expectation that Fox News will at least play down coverage of Democratic issues and candidates, if not shut them out entirely.'
As we discussed at the time, Trump was making clear that he saw Fox News not as a news organization, but as a Republican entity that exists to advance a partisan cause. Indeed, the same week, the then-president insisted that if the network was 'putting more Democrats on than you have Republicans,' then Fox News was necessarily straying from what Trump saw as its proper mission.
The Post's 2019 analysis added that Trump saw a 'symbiosis' between the network and his political operation and that the president also expected 'Fox News to box out anti-Trump voices in the name of staying true to a group he views as their shared base.'
The more the White House calls on Fox News to fire its pollster, the more we're reminded that Trump continues to see the network as a political instrument instead of a news organization.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Crowds & Police Clash In NYC, Chicago As Protests Spread - CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip - Podcast on CNN Audio
Crowds & Police Clash In NYC, Chicago As Protests Spread CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip 48 mins As Los Angeles enters its fifth day of unrest, a curfew has been declared from 8pm to 6am local time and will cover one square mile of the entire Los Angeles area. President Trump has mobilized 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the city to quell the demonstrations against his immigration raids.
New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
Armed National Guard Troops Aid Immigration Agents on Raids in Los Angeles
Armed National Guard troops mobilized by President Trump accompanied federal immigration enforcement officers on raids in Los Angeles on Tuesday, a move that the state of California has called unlawful and inflammatory. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, confirmed Tuesday evening that the National Guard was accompanying Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials on their operations. The Trump administration deployed nearly 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines to the Los Angeles area to stop protests. The deployment enraged officials in California, who filed lawsuits asking the court to intervene in what they called was illegal and provocative. Earlier in the evening, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted a photo of what appeared to be military personnel with rifles standing with ICE officers on social media. 'This We'll Defend,' he wrote. ICE also posted images on social media of officers detaining individuals while being surrounded by National Guard members who could be identified by the insignia on their uniforms. A federal judge in California set a hearing for Thursday afternoon on the state's request to restrict the federal government's use of military personnel in Los Angeles in law enforcement, limiting them only to protecting federal property. The state also demanded an emergency order by Tuesday afternoon declaring that the Marines and other troops could not accompany immigration agents on raids or perform other law enforcement activities, such as operating checkpoints. The judge, Charles S. Breyer, declined to meet the deadline.
Washington Post
28 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers
TPresident Donald Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food aid for lower-income people . The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future.
