High interest rates, volatile stock markets could prime private credit to outshine private equity again
[SINGAPORE] Funds that invest in private credit globally may be poised to beat those for private equity (PE) again this year. That is especially if interest rates remain high while exit opportunities in stock markets are stymied by volatility.
An Apr 29 report by index provider MSCI shows that private credit funds generated 6.9 per cent last year, exceeding the PE funds' return of 5.6 per cent. 2024 marked the third straight year of outperformance.
A relatively new asset class, private credit began as a source of liquidity when the global financial crisis of 2008 caused high-yield and syndicated loan markets to seize up. Demand for private credit has been growing, as tighter regulations make it more onerous for banks to lend to companies.
Interest rates on private debt are usually charged at a premium to the benchmark rates, so the asset tends to perform better when borrowing costs are rising, or not falling as quickly as anticipated.
On May 7, the Federal Reserve held interest rates steady for the third time this year. While noting that the US economy has 'continued to expand at a solid pace', the central bank highlighted that the risks of higher unemployment and inflation have risen.
This indicated the Fed has dropped 'its implicit easing bias', Ray Sharma-Ong, head of multi-asset investment solutions, Southeast Asia, at Aberdeen Investments, said in a May 8 report. The uncertainty surrounding US economic outlook due to the impact of tariffs and trade policy 'makes it harder for the Fed to cut rates pre-emptively to support economic growth'.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Private credit, predominantly consisting of floating rate instruments, has benefited from the higher interest-rate environment. The increased interest income has more than offset any write-downs and default events,' Keith Crouch, executive director at MSCI Research, told The Business Times. 'Given these factors, while private credit funds have shown resilience, the overall trend will depend on how these dynamics evolve.'
Keith Crouch of MSCI Research says that higher borrowing costs have benefited private credit, and the dynamics in the interest-rate climate will influence the asset's outlook. PHOTO: MSCI
Another reason for the more sanguine outlook for private credit compared to PE is the squeeze on exit opportunities amid continued volatility in public stock markets.
PE fund managers rely on deal flow to exit and generate returns for their investors, which typically include pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and insurers. The exits occur when the portfolio companies raise capital via avenues such as initial public offerings, or through mergers and acquisition activity. But these are drying up in the aftermath of the turmoil unleashed on global financial markets by US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, and the ongoing trade negotiations.
'The current market environment with the heightened volatility and long-term economic uncertainty simply creates greater exit challenges for PE,' said Michael Jones, managing director at PGIM Private Capital, which manages a US$109.7 billion portfolio of private placements, mezzanine and direct lending investments.
'It is fundamentally easier to exit private credit funds because private credit funds become self-liquidating over time, given the underlying investments have stated maturity dates and private credit can ultimately force an exit if needed (either via a refinancing or a sale) or negotiate an outcome as the borrower needs to address the debt at maturity,' he told BT.
Michael Jones of PGIM Private Capital says private credit funds are 'fundamentally easier' for investors to exit. PHOTO: PGIM PRIVATE CAPITAL
Fewer PE exit opportunities could aggravate the current low rate of distributions, the returns or profits that fund managers disburse to investors.
In the fourth quarter of 2024, the distribution rate of buyout and venture capital funds – two types of PE funds – remained well below their five-year averages before the Covid-19 pandemic, according to the MSCI report. This 'remains a concern' for investors in PE funds as capital they would otherwise redeploy to new investments remains stuck.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


International Business Times
a day ago
- International Business Times
Wall Street Shows Mixed Signals as S&P 500 Down 0.21%, Dow Gains 38 Points as Middle East Tensions Escalate
U.S. stock markets finished Friday with mixed results as traders continued to grapple with new geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East and further cycles in oil and currency markets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 38.47 points, or 0.1%, to end at 42,210.13. The S&P 500, on the other hand, slipped 0.21%, while the Nasdaq Composite sank more deeply by 0.49%. Investor sentiment took on a cautious tone as President Donald Trump postponed taking military action in the wake of recent flare-ups in the Israel-Iran conflict. Markets began the day on a positive note, but worries about what could unfold over the weekend contributed to choppy trades and late-session declines. Energy prices also signaled the market's unease. Brent crude dropped 2.3 percent to $77.01 a barrel, but it was still up 3.6 percent for the week. U.S. crude futures settled at $74.93, down 0.28%, but still up 2.7% for the week, despite a holiday-thinned session on Thursday. "People are holding back from major moves ahead of the weekend. There's still a lot of risk tied to how the situation unfolds," said Rick Meckler of Cherry Lane Investments. Diplomatic Moves and Geopolitical Risks: The United States forged ahead with targeted sanctions on enterprises tied to Iran's defense industry, a diplomatic strategy from the White House. But analysts warn that with Israel and Iran continuing to trade hostilities, any miscalculation would see the crisis ratchet higher and put vital oil infrastructure at risk. "There's always a chance of an unintended spark in these kinds of conflicts," said John Evans, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates. European officials called on Tehran to resume negotiations over its nuclear ambitions after a high-level meeting in Geneva ended without progress. European stock markets closed slightly higher, buoyed by optimism from earlier Asian trading sessions. The MSCI World Index was down slightly by 0.01%, while gains in Hong Kong and Seoul helped balance out losses in the other Asian markets. Fed Talk Spotlights Policy The Gap: Federal Reserve officials spoke publicly for the first time since comments by the Fed's chair, Jerome H. Powell, on Wednesday, indicating that the central bank is likely to cut interest rates this year. But he cautioned that inflation, particularly from Trump's trade tariffs, is a risk. A divide among policymakers is also now visible. Governor Christopher Waller insisted to open the door to a rate cut as soon as the next meeting, and Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin countered that there's no rush to move. Powell, for his part, warned against putting too much stock in forecasts in such a dynamic environment. Waller's dovish take sent bond markets into motion. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasuries fell 2 basis points to 4.375%. Strong safe-haven demand, which has been soaring in recent weeks because of global tensions, was another factor contributing to the fall. Currency and Commodity Price Movements The dollar was stronger, reaching a three-week high against the yen. A gauge of the dollar against major currencies inched 0.03% higher on the day and 0.6% for the week. The euro was 0.3% firmer at $1.1528. Gold prices were down 0.13% at $3,365.91, set for a weekly decline despite some strength earlier in the week as a safe haven asset.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Trump says he may change his mind about firing Fed chair Powell
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 20) again floated the idea of firing Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair he has long attacked over interest rates he wants lowered. 'I don't know why the Board doesn't override (Powell),' Trump wrote in a lengthy post on Truth Social criticising Fed policy. 'Maybe, just maybe, I will have to change my mind about firing him? But regardless, his Term ends shortly.' Trump added: 'I fully understand that my strong criticism of him makes it more difficult for him to do what he should be doing, lowering Rates, but I have tried it all different ways.' Fed chairs have long been seen as insulated from presidential dismissal for reasons other than malfeasance or misconduct, but Trump has threatened to test that legal premise with frequent threats to fire Powell. Trump nearly as frequently reverses course on those threats. 'I'm not going to fire him,' he said at the White House on Jun 12. The Fed held rates steady on Wednesday in the 4.25 to 4.5 per cent range and forecast slower growth as well as higher unemployment and inflation by year's end. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Fed governor Chris Waller, who has been floated as a possible Trump pick to be Powell's successor, said on Friday that with inflation coming down and the labour market showing signs of weakening, rate cuts should be considered as soon as July. But even Waller joined Wednesday's unanimous Fed decision to leave rates on hold, signalling no inclination by any of Powell's six fellow Board members, or of the five voting regional Fed bank presidents, to 'override' him. Fed decisions are typically reached through consensus, and more than a couple of dissents would be rare. Elected partly on voters' belief that he could contain high inflation, the Republican US president has imposed tariff hikes in office. Powell, echoing an academic consensus, has said some of those tariff hikes will be paid for in higher consumer prices. Powell's term ends in May 2026, and Trump is expected to nominate a successor in the coming months. A Supreme Court ruling in May eased concerns that Trump could fire Powell as the justices called the Fed 'a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity.' REUTERS
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
US Federal Reserve split on whether to hedge on inflation, or proceed with cuts
[WASHINGTON] The close split at the US Federal Reserve over whether to keep hedging against inflation risks or move forward faster with rate cuts came through on Friday (Jun 20) in the first public comments from policymakers following a decision this week to hold borrowing costs steady for now. Rising tariffs are expected to raise inflation over the rest of the year, with a new Federal Reserve monetary policy report on Friday concluding that higher import taxes had already raised inflation for goods, even if headline inflation, including services, remains weaker than expected in recent months. But Fed governor Christopher Waller on Friday said he felt the inflation risk from tariffs was small, and the Fed should cut rates as soon as its next meeting in July, because recent price increases have been moderate while he sees some worrying signs for the job market such as a high unemployment rate among recent college graduates. 'Any tariff inflation ... I don't think is going to be that big and we should just look through it in terms of setting policy,' Waller said on CNBC's Squawk Box. 'The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good ... We could do this as early as July.' 'I'm all in favour of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate,' Waller said. In a Reuters interview, Richmond Fed president Tom Barkin took a more tempered view, arguing that with inflation still above the Fed's 2 per cent target after a multi-year battle to contain it, key tariff debates still unresolved, and the unemployment rate at a low 4.2 per cent, there was no urgency to cut rates. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Nothing is burning on either side such that it suggests there's a rush to act,' Barkin said. 'I'm not in a mood to ignore a spike in inflation were it to come ... We will have to see if it comes. 'I'm comfortable with where we are ... Core inflation is still over target. Being modestly restrictive is a good way to address that.' San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly had what may be an in-between view, telling CNBC late on Friday a rate cut in the fall would be 'more appropriate' than a July move unless the labour market falters. While tariffs could give rise to meaningful inflation, she said, there is 'a lot to be said' for the view that businesses will find ways not to pass higher costs on to their customers, tempering any inflation impact. The Fed should not be preemptive and needs to watch where the data goes, she said: But with data in hand showing both inflation and the job market cooling, 'we cannot wait so long that we forget that the fundamentals of the economy are moving in a direction where an interest rate adjustment might be necessary'. The job market is still solid, she said: But 'we are at a point where additional softening could turn into weakening, which I don't want to see, and we can't allow for that to happen because we are waiting for inflation to pop up just around the corner.' The Fed this week held its policy rate steady in the 4.25 to 4.5 per cent range where it has been since December. The Trump administration says the tariffs will ultimately help the US economy, and the president has demanded the Fed slash rates immediately. New Fed economic projections this week, by contrast, anticipate slower growth and higher inflation. Those projections showed policymakers overall still anticipate rate cuts later in the year, a sign they do feel tariffs will raise prices but not in a persistent way. Opinion, however, was closely divided in what Barkin called a 'bimodal' split, with seven policymakers seeing zero cuts needed this year, and eight anchoring the median at two cuts, which aligns with investors' view of quarter-point reductions at the Fed's September and December meetings. Though none of the three identified their specific rate views, their comments sketched their ongoing debate over how seriously and persistently President Donald Trump's efforts to recast global trade will influence the path of prices, jobs and growth in coming months. In a Wednesday press conference, Fed chair Jerome Powell cautioned against putting too much weight on any particular outlook at this point, given how volatile the debate around trade has been and how many key decisions remain outstanding. Powell testifies in Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday of next week as part of regular semiannual hearings on monetary policy, which in this case follows a week of insults from Trump and demands to cut rates, and nervous chatter on Wall Street about the president's plans for the Fed when Powell departs next May. Powell on Wednesday seemed content to wait for more data before resuming rate cuts. 'For the time being, we are well-positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance,' Powell told reporters. REUTERS