logo
Is it time to scrap the Cash ISA? Experts' view on Rachel Reeves' controversial plan to get UK investing

Is it time to scrap the Cash ISA? Experts' view on Rachel Reeves' controversial plan to get UK investing

Independent28-02-2025

SPONSORED BY TRADING 212
The Independent Money channel is brought to you by Trading 212.
One of the biggest talking points this year has been the UK's Cash Isa and what alterations Rachel Reeves may make to it. Early suggestions included removing it entirely, but more recent news has suggested a cap on the amount which can be saved, which is currently set at £20,000 per person per tax year (across all Isa types).
For the uninitiated, saving money within an Isa makes it exempt from tax on interest earned. It is estimated that around £300bn in total sits in Cash Isas, which some have suggested could be put to better use were it invested, for example in a Stocks and Shares Isa. While it's true that over the long term this can generate better returns than cash, this approach doesn't factor in how or when people may need to access their cash. This has led to widespread debate among City executives, politicians and beyond about potential reform.
But what about the people who use them? To get a broad representation of how a range of people use, or could in future use, a cash Isa, The Independent has spoken to a professional trading platform, a wealth management company for high net worth individuals, a money coach, a female money platform and one of our own money writers.
The reasonings and insight each gave for different areas of society were varied, but the overarching message was clear: The cash ISA must remain and is an important part of UK society's wealth-building.
And, even if a reduction in allowance won't hurt everybody, there's absolutely no guarantee it would have the seeming desired effect of pushing individuals towards investing instead - at least, not without far more guidance, education and understanding. And, let's be clear: that's exactly what these newly launched Independent Money pages are intended to bring for people.
When it comes to building an investing culture throughout the population, the UK has a long way to go.
But in savings, while people know how and why to do it, there also remains a wide gap in the ability of some families to do so, with a Yahoo Finance report last year showing 12 per cent of low income families have under £100 in savings.
A crucial stepping stone
Even so, with cash Isas being shielded from tax and an ideal location for anybody to contribute to, there's still a big role for them to play whether for those starting out on savings journeys or for those who have a bigger pile built up - especially, as Wealth Coach Sara Jane Maxwell notes, if they are not yet ready to move into investing.
'A cash Isa is a great tool. It works really well for people who are nervous or unsure about time horizons or don't want to venture into investments yet,' she told The Independent. 'I feel like it will be reduced, possibly not withdrawn altogether, because the government wants us to be investing rather than holding cash.
'When people come to me they usually have a cash Isa already but might not be utilising it to the full potential. I don't work with lots of people with huge balances in them, so the annual limit being reduced wouldnt impact a tremendous amount - but sometimes they might feel that being in an Isa [rather than regular savings account] puts their money at risk - so the more awareness of them, the more we make people have more interest in them, is a positive.'
The Independent 's money writer Marc Shoffman agrees on cash Isa being a stepping stone towards future investing potential - and says branding is an important part of overall awareness on the subject which may be better served changing rather than some of the sweeping and, at times, complicated reforms which have been suggested elsewhere.
'People are naturally and understandably cautious about investing. Having personal finance education in school would help so that children build an understanding of how to generate wealth beyond how Hollywood or TV shows depict it.
'Getting people to save is hard enough so having a cash Isa provides a comfortable starting point and the products play a key role of putting money away for short term goals. Scrapping cash Isas isn't a good idea as there is no guarantee that the money would automatically go into backing British stocks, which appears to be the Treasury's aim.
'Better education and maybe a rebranding stocks and shares Isas to an 'investment Isa' would be a start in making this area more appealing.'
The saving-investing knowledge gap
That latter point on City execs and politicians seeming to think people will automatically divert more money towards investing is an important one, and a recurring theme.
If people aren't already investing, there are reasons behind that - fear, knowledge, misunderstanding, timeframes, personal preference and risk appetite are all just some of the factors at play. It simply won't follow that being allowed to save less in one tax-free environment means the remainder will straight away be sent into shares, British or otherwise.
Saving and investing platform Trading 212 's Head of Treasury, Gabriel May, explained that trying to time-lock using a cash Isa will simply see a change of location, not of mindset.
'People should be free to decide how they save. Forcing them to shift from cash savings to riskier products by undermining the Cash Isa is not only unrealistic but also questionable in intent. If this option is removed, people will simply move their money to less beneficial savings accounts, ultimately reducing their returns,' he said.
Laura Pomfret, of female money platform Financielle, adds further context around that knowledge gap.
Many people might have an idea of what they want to achieve in money terms, but be 'overwhelmed' about how to start, let alone get there.
'They come when they feel overwhelmed in their money journey,' Ms Pomfret says. 'It might be consumer debt, wanting to own a home, a large expense on the horizon. They usually have a financial goal in mind and not know how to get there.'
Jumping straight into investing, then, isn't an ideal approach for many, even if they have started saving already.
Entry point and wealth building
The idea of savings being the only part of a person's, or a family's, wealth is a risky one over the long-term perhaps. But it's absolutely the most important one initially, and only once that is in place can they reasonably be looking further ahead at other products, other ways of looking after their futures.
'We start clients at the beginning: work to a budget which they then manage,' Ms Promfret explains. 'Is there an excess at the end of the month? If not, it's debt, overspending, credit lines. After sorting that, the very first thing we recommend is building an emergency fund, then stronger savings.
'It builds after that.'
Cash Isas clearly have to remain available, but also accessible - even if people cannot fill out £20,000 or close to that a year, restricting what they can put in - without regard for family circumstance or size, or even stage of life, might simply prove restrictive for the long haul.
Trading 212 's Mr May said: "It's a highly appealing financial product. It encourages saving by offering an attractive combination of a high interest rate, tax benefits, and flexible withdrawals. Building a financial safety net is essential for everyone's financial well-being. Our clients' data demonstrates that the product serves as an entry point into the broader Isa family, promoting long-term wealth accumulation.'
Steve Jordan, director and co-founder at Five Wealth, said that while many clients grow more wealth through shares investments, he was 'strongly against' any removal of the cash Isa and pointed out the demographic who would be most at risk, were they somewhat backed into a corner where investments was their only tax-free approach available.
'A large proportion of the population only have cash savings and don't receive any financial planning advice,' he told The Independent. 'Low-risk savers and pensioners would potentially be disproportionately affected; the result for these people could be forcing them into paying more tax on their cash savings or forcing them into capital-at-risk investments that may not be suitable.
'Savers without much investment knowledge could make the move without the benefit of advice and could be unprepared for the volatility that may affect them.'
It also shouldn't be just about moving from cash to stocks and shares Isas either, Mr Jordan notes, with Junior and Lifetime Isas being alternatives too.
'What about the Jisa and Lisa? These investments can have a timescale which is much shorter than that needed for investment. Shares may not be appropriate at all for people saving for a house or money that may be needed at 18. I agree that longer term excess savings are probably better invested in markets than in cash on a return point of view, but that's not always the only consideration,' he said.
And yet, perhaps it won't be as dramatic as it all sounds.
Perhaps political inertia will again reign supreme, as Ms Pomfret suggests - and actually, discussion around limiting something that some people don't already use might just encourage them to find out about it and get started.
'It will at least get press and attention. I don't think Ms Reeves will reduce it so much in the end - it'll be the usual approach of say something and then the end result is not as bad.'
Whatever the eventual outcome for the cash Isa, it's clear that for long-term wealth building, saving remains the start of the journey and a critical step, even if longer-term, more people should certainly be looking to begin investing.
When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Treasury technicalities plus party politics bring more attention for the North East
Treasury technicalities plus party politics bring more attention for the North East

ITV News

time42 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Treasury technicalities plus party politics bring more attention for the North East

The Chancellor's big ticket items for the North East came early - which is somewhere between encouraging and disconcerting when we're talking about public transport projects. Around £2.8 billion from the Spending Review was announced last Wednesday for infrastructure in our region, including extending the Tyne and Wear Metro to Washington. By comparison, Rachel Reeves' big speech today was a bit of an anticlimax. In the small print afterwards, we found that areas of Newcastle, Middlesbrough and Stockton that 'have been too easily left behind' are to receive up to £20m over the next decade for things like improving parks and tackling graffiti. The government are calling them 'trailblazer neighbourhoods', which sounds a bit like a spoof initiative from The Thick Of It, and a lot like the Conservative governments' various funding pots for local regeneration schemes. The Tories talked a lot about what they called 'levelling up', with mixed results. Labour have talked less about tackling regional inequalities, but have made a technical tweak that might make a big difference. They've revised the Treasury's 'Green Book', used to judge value-for-money for investment. London and the South East normally deliver bigger bang for your buck, so have often been prioritised for new infrastructure. The government says: no more, wider impacts will be considered, so regions like ours will be able to compete. Despite some government departments having their budgets squeezed when it comes to day-to-day spending, there is money around for investment due to another tweak to government rules, around borrowing. Rachel Reeves made a passing promise today to set out the government's plans for 'Northern Powerhouse Rail' in the coming weeks. Campaigners say it should mean a high speed rail line from Liverpool to Hull, and up to the North East. It's hard not to be sceptical, given it's been talked about in many forms over many years. The Chancellor spoke quite a bit today about the government being focused on ensuring there's economic growth, and people have opportunity, in every part of the country. She also dedicated a fair amount of time to attacking Reform UK, reflecting the threat they pose to Labour, after their local election successes in places like County Durham. The Chancellor has been accused of doom and gloom in her first 11 months in office, focusing on what she claims has been a horrible inheritance from the Conservatives. With this Spending Review she tried to change gear and set out a more positive plan for the years ahead. The North East will hope to play a big part.

Fact check: 2025 spending review claims
Fact check: 2025 spending review claims

Belfast Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Fact check: 2025 spending review claims

On Wednesday Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves delivered the Labour Government's first spending review, outlining its spending plans for the next few years. We've taken a look at some of the key claims. How much is spending increasing by? At the start of her speech Ms Reeves announced that 'total departmental budgets will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms'. That headline figure doesn't tell the full story, however. Firstly, 2.3% is the average annual real-terms growth in total departmental budgets between 2023/24 and 2028/29. That means it includes spending changes that have already been implemented, for both the current (2025/26) and previous (2024/25) financial years. The average annual increase between this year and 2028/29 is 1.5%. Therefore, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said, 'most departments will have larger real-terms budgets at the end of the Parliament than the beginning, but in many cases much of that extra cash will have arrived by April'. Secondly, it's worth noting that the 2.3% figure includes both day-to-day (Resource DEL) and investment (Capital DEL) spending. Capital spending (which funds things like infrastructure projects) is increasing by 3.6% a year on average in real terms between 2023/24 and 2029/30, and by 1.8% between 2025/26 and 2029/30. Day-to-day departmental budgets meanwhile are seeing a smaller average annual real-terms increase – of 1.7% between 2023/24 and 2028/29 and 1.2% between 2025/26 and 2028/29. Which departments are the winners and losers? Ms Reeves touted substantial spending increases in some areas (for example, the 3% rise in day-to-day NHS spending in England), but unsurprisingly her statement did not focus on areas where spending will decrease. Changes to Government spending are not uniform across all departments, and alongside increases in spending on things like the NHS, defence and the justice system, a number of Government departments will see their budgets decrease in real terms. Departments facing real-terms reductions in overall and day-to-day spending include the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (this factors in reductions in aid spending announced earlier this year to offset increased defence spending), the Home Office (although the Government says the Home Office's budget grows in real terms if a planned reduction in asylum spending is excluded) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Did the Conservatives leave a '£22 billion black hole'? Ms Reeves made a claim we've heard a number of times since it first surfaced in July 2024 – that the previous Conservative government left a '£22 billion black hole in the public finances'. That figure comes from a Treasury audit that forecast a £22 billion overspend in departmental day-to-day spending in 2024/25, but the extent to which it was unexpected or inherited is disputed. The IFS said last year that some of the pressures the Government claimed contributed to this so-called 'black hole' could have been anticipated, but others did 'indeed seem to be greater than could be discerned from the outside'. An Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) review of its March 2024 forecast found an estimated £9.5 billion of additional spending pressures were known to the Treasury at that point in time, but were not known to the OBR as it prepared its forecast. It's true that this review didn't confirm the £22 billion figure, but it also did not necessarily prove that it was incorrect, because Labour's figure included pressures which were identified after the OBR prepared its forecast and so were beyond the scope of the OBR's review. We've written more about how the Government reached the figure of £22 billion in our explainer on this topic. How big is the increase in NHS appointments? Ms Reeves took the opportunity to congratulate Health Secretary Wes Streeting for delivering 'three-and-a-half million extra' hospital appointments in England. The Government has previously celebrated this as a 'massive increase', particularly in light of its manifesto pledge to deliver an extra two million appointments a year. Ms Reeves' claim was broadly accurate – data published last month shows there were 3.6 million additional appointments between July 2024 and February 2025 compared to the previous year. But importantly that increase is actually smaller than the 4.2 million rise that happened in the equivalent period the year before, under the Conservative government – as data obtained by Full Fact under the Freedom of Information Act and published last month revealed. What do announcements on asylum hotels, policing, nurseries and more mean for the Government's pledges? Ms Reeves made a number of announcements that appear to directly impact the delivery of several pre-existing Labour pledges, many of which we're already monitoring in our Government Tracker. (We'll be updating the tracker to reflect these announcements in due course, and reviewing how we rate progress on pledges as necessary). The Chancellor announced an average increase in 'police spending power' of 2.3% a year in real terms over the course of the review period, which she said was the equivalent of an additional £2 billion. However, as police budgets comprise a mix of central Government funding and local council tax receipts, some of this extra spending is expected to be funded by increases in council tax precepts. Ms Reeves said this funding would help the Government achieve its commitment of 'putting 13,000 additional police officers, PCSOs and special constables into neighbourhood policing roles in England and Wales', a pledge we're monitoring here. The spending review also includes funding of 'almost £370 million across the next four years to support the Government's commitment to deliver school-based nurseries across England', which Ms Reeves said would help the Government deliver its pledge to have 'a record number of children being school-ready'. The Chancellor also committed to ending the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament, with an additional £200 million announced to 'accelerate the transformation of the asylum system'. When we looked last month at progress on the Government's pledge to 'end asylum hotels' we said it appeared off track, as figures showed the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels was higher at the end of March 2025 than it was when Labour came into Government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store