At least three killed, scores injured as Russia targets Ukraine with new attacks
Russian forces have pummelled Ukraine with drones and other weapons, killing three people and injuring scores of others despite international pressure to accept a ceasefire, officials said Thursday.
According to the Ukrainian air force, Russia launched a barrage of 63 drones and decoys at Ukraine overnight. It said that air defences destroyed 28 drones while another 21 were jammed.
Ukraine's police said two people were killed and six were injured over the past 24 hours in the eastern Donetsk region, the focus of the Russian offensive. One person was killed and 14 others were also injured in the southern Kherson region, which is partly occupied by Russian forces, police said.
The head of the Kharkiv region, Oleh Syniehubov, said that 15 people, including four children, were injured by Russian drone attacks overnight.
Opinion: Ukraine showed that drones are the new bullets. Why doesn't Canada get this?
Kharkiv city mayor Ihor Terekhov said Russian drones targeted residential districts, educational facilities, kindergartens and other civilian infrastructure.
'Kharkiv is holding on. People are alive. And that is the most important thing,' Terekhov said.
The Russian military has launched waves of drones and missiles in recent days, with a record bombardment of almost 500 drones on Monday and a wave of 315 drones and seven missiles overnight on Tuesday. The recent escalation in aerial attacks has come alongside a renewed Russian battlefield push along eastern and northeastern parts of the more than 1,000-kilometre front line.
While Russian missile and drone barrage have struck regions all across Ukraine, regions along the front line have faced daily Russian attacks with short-range exploding drones and glide bombs.
Ukraine hit back with drone raids. Russia's Defence Ministry said that air defences downed 52 Ukrainian drones early Thursday, including 41 over the Belgorod region that borders Ukraine. Regional Gov. Vyacheslav Gladkov said three people were injured by Ukrainian attacks Thursday.
The attacks have continued despite discussions of a potential ceasefire in the war. During their June 2 talks in Istanbul, Russian and Ukrainian negotiators traded memorandums containing sharply divergent conditions that both sides see as non-starters, making any quick deal unlikely.
Speaking at a meeting of leaders of southeast European countries in Odesa, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky urged the European Union to toughen its latest package of sanctions against Russia. He argued that lowering the cap on the price of Russian oil from $60 to $45 as the bloc has proposed isn't enough.
Opinion: In Ukraine, the bold drone attacks against Russia are a rare chance for celebration
'Real peace comes with a $30 cap – that's the level that will truly change thinking in Moscow,' Zelensky said.
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius arrived in Kyiv Thursday on an unannounced visit, noting that the stepped-up Russian attacks on Ukraine send a message from Moscow that it has 'no interest in a peaceful solution at present,' according to German news agency dpa.
Pistorius said his visit underlines that the new German government continues to stand by Ukraine.
'Of course this will also be about how the support of Germany and other Europeans will look in future – what we can do, for example, in the area of industrial co-operation, but also other support,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
10 hours ago
- CTV News
Alberta drilling company fined $126K following serious workplace injury
Oil pumping jacks, also known as "nodding donkeys", operate in an oilfield near Almetyevsk, Tatarstan, Russia, on Wednesday, March 11, 2020.(Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg) An Edmonton-based drilling company has been sentenced after a worker was seriously injured on the job. TAQA Drilling Solutions Inc. is being fined $126,000 as a result of an incident that happened three years ago. On March 23, 2022, a worker was taking apart oilfield drilling equipment in Edmonton when they were struck by a projectile, according to a Friday government news release. The worker was seriously injured. TAQA pleaded guilty to one charge under the Occupational Health and Safety Code (OHS) for failing to provide safeguards if a worker could come into contact with objects thrown by machinery or equipment. The Crown withdrew eight other charges. Under a 'creative sentence,' the company has been ordered to pay $126,000 to the Glenrose Hospital Foundation for neuromodulation research at the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital. The OHS Act provides a creative sentence option in which fines can be paid directly to an organization or project to improve or promote workplace health and safety.
CTV News
13 hours ago
- CTV News
Sweden and the Netherlands say before NATO summit they will spend 5% of GDP on defense
BRUSSELS — Less than two weeks before a NATO summit, Sweden and the Netherlands said Friday that they intend to increase defense spending to five per cent of their gross domestic product, in line with U.S. President Donald Trump's demands. Trump and his NATO counterparts meet for a summit in the Netherlands on June 24-25, where they're due to agree a new defense spending target. He insists that Europe must look after its own security, while Washington focuses on China and its own borders. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said that 'Sweden will reach a new NATO spending target to five per cent of GDP, where at least 3.5 per cent of GDP will be allocated towards core defense requirements to fulfill NATO's new capability targets.' 'We are in a specific geographical situation where we need to meet the future threats from Russia,' Kristersson told reporters in Stockholm, standing alongside NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. After Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, NATO's 32 allies agreed to spend at least two per cent of GDP on their military budgets. But NATO's new plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investment of at least three per cent. The aim now is to raise the bar to 3.5 per cent for core defense spending on tanks, warplanes, air defense, missiles and hiring extra troops. A further 1.5 per cent would be spent on things like roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can deploy more quickly, as well as preparing societies for possible attack. According to the most recent NATO figures, Sweden was estimated to have spent 2.25 per cent of its GDP on defense last year. The Netherlands spent 2.06 per cent, among 22 of the 32 allies who reached NATO's old benchmark. The Dutch caretaker government announced on Friday that it would increase spending on defense to 3.5 per cent of GDP in an effort to meet the five per cent goal. It's not clear where the approximately 18 billion euros (US$20 billion) will come from. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans called the decision 'historic' and told reporters after a Cabinet meeting that he hoped other NATO countries would also increase their spending. 'My expectation is that this will happen,' he said. Poland and the Baltic countries — Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — have already publicly committed to five per cent, and Rutte said last week that most allies were ready to endorse the goal. A big question still to be answered is what time frame countries will get to reach the new spending goals. A target date of 2032 was initially floated, but Rutte has said that Russia could be ready to launch an attack on NATO territory by 2030. The United States insists that a near-term deadline must be set. But Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said on Thursday that his country would get to five per cent,. but would require a decade to do so. Molly Quell reported from The Hague, Netherlands. Lorne Cook And Molly Quell, The Associated Press
Globe and Mail
16 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
In this brave new world, the economy is highly political
Christopher Collins is a visiting fellow at the Cascade Institute at Royal Roads University. Jens Hillebrand Pohl is the director of the Helsinki Geoeconomics School. Thirty-five years ago, an American author named Edward Luttwak wrote a landmark essay popularizing the term 'geoeconomics.' Mr. Luttwak, an influential political scientist who has been called 'the Machiavelli of Maryland,' argued that as the Cold War ended, traditional military power would be joined by economics as a way for countries to exert power. We were entering an age where, as Mr. Luttwak wrote, the world order would be shaped by 'the logic of war in the grammar of commerce.' This fusion of economics and geopolitics remained an obscure area of study for years following Mr. Luttwak's essay. Indeed, in the 1990s, the world went in the opposite direction; free trade, open markets and global investment soared in an era of hyperglobalization. Economics appeared increasingly disconnected from geopolitics, and economic activity was focused on maximizing value, rather than on projecting power. Some went so far as to argue the world had reached 'the end of history,' following the 'unabashed victory of economic and political liberalism.' However, recent developments, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine and escalating U.S.-China tensions, show that the world may be, as the late U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger said, 'in the foothills of a new Cold War.' As the IMF warns, increasing trade restrictions, technological decoupling, disrupted capital flows and migration restrictions are fragmenting the global economy, splitting the world into competing 'blocs.' However much we may have wanted to be done with geopolitics, it is not done with us. In this era, economic policies are increasingly driven by political and power dynamics, and geopolitical questions are informed by economic concerns. All the components of the global economy – currencies, supply chains, technology, trade and capital flows, and information networks – have become tools of power and influence. More and more, these instruments serve as expressions of national sovereignty, whether through export licensing, cross-border data regimes, or control over investment standards. And across the world, economic policy is no longer reactive or technocratic: It is being politicized and weaponized. As a resource-rich, trade-dependent middle power, Canada must navigate this increasingly fragmenting world while protecting its core economic interests. To do so, Canada will first need to develop a sophisticated capability to engage in what experts call 'economic statecraft.' This will include developing economic tools to manage both bilateral and multilateral relations with the U.S., China and Europe. Fortunately, as history has shown, this is something at which Canadians are skilled. As Robert Bothwell, one of the leading historians of Canadian foreign policy, once said, when it comes to trade talks, Canadians 'are notoriously tough.' Canada's private sector will also need to adapt to this new reality. Geoeconomic shifts have reshaped how companies do business around the world, leading to what some have called 'a new geography of manufacturing.' In this environment, firms are not just adapting to geopolitics, they are becoming its agents. Global businesses and investors must now align their operational models with geostrategic risks, navigate extraterritorial legal exposure, and anticipate shifts in access to data, talent and capital. Managing all of this will require new ways of thinking, something the CEO of one large global Canadian financial services firm likened to 'swapping out your cross-country skis for downhill skis midslope.' Canadian investors will also be affected. As economist David Skilling has said, 'trade wars are a precursor to capital wars.' In a sign of the times, Larry Fink – the CEO of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager – has argued that global capital markets are becoming more attuned to national goals in what he calls 'the second draft of globalization.' Canadians invested approximately $2.5-trillion abroad in 2024, and Canadian investors may increasingly find themselves caught between competing political pressures in a fragmenting global investment landscape. Arguably, the most immediate challenge for Canada lies in managing its relationship with the U.S. while preserving economic diversification. Unlike some other middle powers, which can hedge between competing blocs, Canada's geographic position and economic integration with the U.S. make strategic ambiguity nearly impossible. For Canadian investors, a provision in Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act to increase tax rates on some foreign investors is particularly concerning. It signals a broader shift: the weaponization of access to U.S. capital markets as an instrument of statecraft. As Mr. Luttwak predicted, economics is increasingly becoming a venue for geopolitical competition, especially among the great powers. Meeting this challenge will be tough. But, as we have seen before, Canadians are tough, too.
