14 South Africans held in Zimbabwean jails
They are among over 70 foreign nationals behind bars in the country, the majority for crossing the border illegally.
The Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission says these people should be deported and not held.
During a visit to the Harare Remand and Chikurubi Maximum Security prisons recently, the commission exposed inhumane conditions.
It's calling for an urgent intervention.
The commission inspected the Harare Remand and Chikurubi Maximum Security prisons.
It found inhumane conditions, lack of access to education, healthcare and delays in legal proceedings.
But, the commission also found dozens of undocumented migrants.
The ZHRC says these people should be deported and not held in these jails.
Human rights lawyers are calling for the swift implementation of all the commission's findings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Suspicious? Doubts over R124m Powerball won through banking app - again!
South Africans have cast doubt on the legitimacy of an unidentified woman who has come forward to claim the R124 million Powerball lotto jackpot that was won last week. According to Ithuba, the winning ticket was bought via the Absa banking app. According to Ithuba, a Johannesburg woman has come forward this week to claim the R124 million Powerball jackpot. The anonymous winner purchased her ticket via her Absa banking app with a R37.50 wager. The numbers were selected manually. According to the woman, she unknowingly ignored a call from her bank, which notified her of her winnings. 'I kept seeing calls from an unfamiliar number but thought it was telesales, so I ignored them at first…I finally answered, and it was my bank advising me to report to the nearest Ithuba office as I had won some money. 'They didn't tell me the exact amount. It was only when I arrived at Ithuba that I was told I had won the jackpot. I am still in shock.' The Powerball winner revealed how she would be spending her fortune. 'My husband has been unemployed for a few years, so we've been living on one income; it's been a tough, hand-to-mouth situation. Now everything will change. I wish my parents were still here; there's so much I would have wanted to do for them.' On the X app, many South Africans expressed doubt in the version of events told by the reported Powerball winner. Some found the woman's story hard to believe, given her claims that she did not check her winning numbers and ignored persistent calls following a massive lotto windfall. Others, like X user @victordascencao, have raised suspicions about how and why Lotto and Powerball jackpots have only been won by FNB and Absa app users in the last five years. 'There are no public records of Division 1 winners from Capitec, Nedbank, TymeBank, retail tills, or the National Lottery website in this period', the X user posted. Some X users have also pointed to a scandal involving the National Lottery Commission (NLC) fraudulently misappropriation of funds intended for charitable purposes. Some South Africans called for Ithuba to bring back live Lotto and Powerball draws to beat the allegations of them running a 'scam'. Ithuba has clarified that 'all draws are conducted in the presence of independent auditors and under surveillance.' According to Ithuba, Lotto and Powerball winners are protected by the Data Protection Act. As a result, the lottery operator cannot reveal the winner's personal information without their consent. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Double standards? Renaldo Gouws on Gayton's K-word 'pass'
Axed DA MP Renaldo Gouws has reacted to news that Gayton McKenzie will not be probed over his old social media posts, which included the K-word, as they did not fall within the timeframe of him being in public office. Last year, the outspoken YouTuber courted controversy over using the racial slur. However, Gouws was shown the door by an internal party committee. Gayton McKenzie's K-word bombshell tweets have led to many political parties calling for his resignation as minister. However, Parliament spokesperson Moloto Mothapo stated that an ethics committee could not probe the posts – dated between 2013 – 2017 – as the Patriotic Alliance leader was not yet an MP at the time. Unlike Renaldo Gouws, Gayton McKenzie's K-word tweet hasn't had any repercussions – for now. Images via X He said: 'In terms of Item 4(2)(a) of the code, read with Item 4(3)(f), conduct committed before a person becomes an MP does not fall within the scope of the code. 'Accordingly, no complaint has been opened by the registrar, and both parties were informed of this in writing earlier today. There is, therefore, no competent complaint before the ethics committee.' Meanwhile, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is set to make a statement on the On social media, many South Africans have questioned how Renaldo Gouws was held accountable for using the K-word, while Gayton McKenzie was not. Setting the record straight, Gouws claimed that the DA took action against him, and not parliament. He posted on X: 'It was the DA that terminated my membership with the party after 13 years due to social media and political pressure. Touching on the YouTube clips in which he said the K-word, he continued: 'The video in question was uploaded in 2010, three years before I joined the DA. The DA was also aware of the video, as I declared it to them. It was considered dealt with as early as 2013. He added: 'Unfortunately, the Federal Executive disagreed with the Federal Legal Commission's (FLC) findings, which stated I should remain as a Member of Parliament. The Fedex decided to overturn the FLC decision. A disgruntled Renaldo Gouws added, 'Almost a year later, and the DA still refuses to share the minutes of that meeting with me so that I can know why they decided to overrule the findings by the FLC. So much for a 'transparent' political party'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘We are truly sorry': Open Chats Podcast issues apology to coloured community after backlash
This is the second apology the Open Chats Podcast issued, after the first failed to calm the storm. The Open Chats Podcast team has released an apology to the coloured community and all South Africans after intense backlash over racist remarks made during episode 128. The controversy sparked national outrage, legal action and calls for cancellation. Now, the hosts are taking public steps toward accountability and education. Backlash over episode Episode 128 of the Open Chat Podcast ignited a firestorm. Remarks made about the coloured community were widely condemned as racist, sexist and deeply offensive. The clip quickly went viral, drawing outrage across social media. This prompted the Patriotic Alliance (PA) to file charges against the hosts. The controversy escalated when old tweets from PA leader and sports minister Gayton McKenzie were shared, showing him using the K-word. This sparked renewed debate and even calls for his resignation. The fallout spread far beyond the original podcast audience. It turned into a national talking point. ALSO READ: Zuma's former fiancée LaConco makes acting debut in Mzansi Magic's 'Genesis' Previous apology rejected The podcast's initial apology failed to calm the storm. Many South Africans viewed it as insincere, with TikTok users posting videos criticising the tone and delivery. The backlash only deepened calls for cancellation and heightened demands for genuine accountability. This week, in episode 131, the hosts released a new apology. They say it is 'serious, unreserved, and from the heart'. 'We take full accountability' 'We wish to unconditionally and unreservedly apologise for the hurt and harm we caused to the coloured community and South Africa at large. Our statements in episode 128 were racist, sexist, unfortunate, irresponsible, reckless, and unAfrican. We take full accountability for our utterances,' the Open Chats team said. The team acknowledged that their words had caused 'outrage and offence' across racial lines. They recognised that their right to freedom of expression could not be exercised in ways that stripped others of their dignity. Content removed and call for calm Episode 128 has since been removed from all official platforms. However, the hosts expressed regret that clips continue to circulate independently. They urged the public to stop sharing the content to prevent further harm. They have also committed to undergoing formal education on race relations at a reputable higher-learning institution, to ensure such incidents are not repeated. Working with the Human Rights Commission While the team had initially intended to approach the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) on their own, several political parties had already taken that step. The podcast's legal team is now liaising with the SAHRC to reach a resolution. They said they will comply fully with any directives issued. In a direct appeal to political parties critical of the podcast, the hosts invited open dialogue. They suggested a recorded discussion could take place in the future. Plea for forgiveness Closing their statement, the Open Chats Podcast hosts expressed remorse. 'We are disappointed with ourselves and the blatant disregard we showed when talking about a vulnerable group of people. We remain remorseful and request the forgiveness of the coloured community of South Africa. We are truly sorry for the damage we've caused.'
