logo
‘Dear neighbor': A red carpet for Putin, no ceasefire for Trump

‘Dear neighbor': A red carpet for Putin, no ceasefire for Trump

Japan Times17 hours ago
What Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump shared in the back of the U.S. presidential limousine on the short ride to their longest on-the-record meeting will likely remain a mystery.
There was a lot the two presidents left unsaid at the end of an inconclusive Alaska summit — most notably, they made no mention of a ceasefire in Russia's war in Ukraine, Trump's stated goal in going into the talks. Their get-together was capped by one of the shortest news conferences Trump has ever held.
The much-anticipated event was surprising for the lack of fireworks and the unusual restraint of a free-wheeling president who'd been upstaged by Putin in Helsinki seven years ago. This time, they took no questions from the packed room of journalists in Anchorage, leaving them to wonder about the details of the tantalizing agreement the pair had mentioned but kept under wraps.
The fear going in had been that Ukraine would get sold out. The implication going out was that Trump planned to relay a message that Kyiv and European allies didn't want to hear as he made his way back to Washington on Air Force One.
"I'm going to start making a few phone calls and tell them what happened, but we had an extremely productive meeting,' Trump said. "Many points were agreed to. There are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there but we have a very good chance of getting there.'
In the moment, Ukraine's worst fears weren't realized — Trump didn't give anything away, at least publicly. But that sentiment could change quickly over the weekend as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy starts piecing together what Trump and Putin hashed out in that nearly three-hour meeting.
What exactly were the outstanding points of issue?
Russian leader Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands during a joint news conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. |
BLOOMBERG
There were plenty of intimations of Russian contentment. Putin seized the initiative by speaking first at the podium alongside Trump, typically the privilege of the host.
The Russian leader spoke of an "understanding' that he and Trump had reached that he said may even open the door to ending the war that he'd started.
Then Putin issued a warning. "We expect that Kyiv and the European capitals will take all this in a constructive manner and will not put up any obstacles, will not attempt to disrupt the planned progress through provocations or backstage intrigues,' he said.
There was little solace for Ukraine in an interview Trump then gave to Fox News' Sean Hannity, in which he explicitly put the ball in Zelenskyy's court to "get it done.' He said he might be at a meeting between the Ukrainian leader and Putin, but didn't entirely commit, and still he offered no details of what had been discussed.
"There's one or two pretty significant items but I think they can be reached,' Trump said. "It's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done. And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit.'
John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, said Trump may well tell his allies "to keep their mouth shut' once he briefs them on the secret details of the meeting with Putin. That will be hard for them to do, especially if the U.K., France and Germany conclude that Ukraine is about to be told to accept a bad deal.
"We're in the early stage of a poker game,' said Benjamin Jensen, a senior fellow for the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
By inviting the Russian president onto American soil and giving him an audience, Trump had already delivered a diplomatic win for the strongman leader who became an international pariah for ordering the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Putin, by all accounts, has ceded nothing in return.
The shadows of U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin are cast during a news conference following their meeting to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. |
REUTERS
Trump had talked a big game in the lead-up to the summit, saying that he'd know in an instant whether Putin was serious and that he wouldn't hesitate to walk out if he wasn't convinced. In the end he walked down the red carpet — not always in a straight line — and clapped as a jaunty Putin walked over to grab his hand.
Perhaps taking stock of the lessons of previous encounters, when the two were left unsupervised without note takers or aides, the White House announced that top aides would join Putin and Trump for their sit-down this time.
And yet minutes after the two leaders got off the tarmac, Putin was spotted beaming from inside the "Beast," as the armored limousine is known, seated alone with Trump.
The U.S. president appeared solicitous of his guest, urging Putin to walk ahead as they stepped off a podium in front of reporters. The Russian leader had made a point of showing he couldn't hear questions lobbed at him.
"President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?' one reporter shouted. Putin put his hand up to his ear but didn't answer.
Those private 10 minutes were all the time Putin needed to feel the flight across the Bering Strait had been worth it.
He was in Alaska, the U.S. state the Russian czar had sold to the Americans more than 150 years ago, for about as long as the flight over: four hours. His pool reporters were treated to "Chicken Kiev" (pointedly spelled the Russian way) along the way.
Putin's veteran foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, played his part by arriving in Anchorage in jeans and a white sweater emblazoned with USSR in black Cyrillic letters. Earlier in the day, Trump had made of point of saying he'd consulted with Belarus's autocratic leader, Alexander Lukashenko.
U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin speak after a joint news conference following a U.S.-Russia summit on Ukraine at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. |
Sputnik / POOL / VIA AFP-JIJI
That was an alarming signal for many traditional U.S. allies. Dubbed "the last dictator in Europe' by the Republican administration of President George W. Bush, Lukashenko is Putin's closest ally and under international sanctions, including by the U.S. None of that seemed to bother Trump, who said they'd had a "wonderful' chat.
Putin laid the flattery on thick in Anchorage, putting the focus firmly on the relationship with the U.S. as Russia's neighbor separated by a only a few kilometers of water across the Bering Strait.
"When we met, we got off the planes, I said 'good afternoon, dear neighbor, it's very nice to see you in good health and alive.' And it sounds very neighborly, in my opinion, kind,' he told the assembled reporters. "We are close neighbors, that is a fact.'
He made little reference to the Ukrainian neighbor that Russia invaded.
In a day punctuated by memorable images though ultimately wrapped in enigma, there was a telling moment of clarity. Putin, in power for more than a quarter of a century, has studied English but rarely resorts to speaking it in public.
Even before he landed in Alaska, it was clear that Putin was already angling for another meeting with Trump, this time on Russian soil. Just as he opened the briefing to reporters, he also found a way to close it.
"Next time in Moscow,' Putin suggested in English.
"Oh, that's an interesting one,' Trump replied. "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Afghan Taliban seek to end international isolation
Afghan Taliban seek to end international isolation

NHK

time18 minutes ago

  • NHK

Afghan Taliban seek to end international isolation

The Taliban interim government in Afghanistan has signaled that the country wants to ends its international isolation following Russia's recent recognition of the Islamist group's rule. The Taliban regained power in August 2021. The interim government's economy minister Din Mohammad Hanif spoke with NHK in Kabul on Saturday. The interview came after Russia became the first state to recognize the Taliban government last month. Hanif said the recognition has good benefits politically and economically. He expressed hope that Russia will extend economic cooperation with investment and the development of the country's mineral resources. Hanif said they will request other countries to recognize their government as well. The minister denied that women's human rights are being violated in Afghanistan, and said the country's religious customs should be respected. Japan, the United States and European countries have been critical of the Taliban's strict restrictions on women's rights to education and employment.

Trump stresses 'peace through strength' in WWII anniversary message
Trump stresses 'peace through strength' in WWII anniversary message

NHK

timean hour ago

  • NHK

Trump stresses 'peace through strength' in WWII anniversary message

US President Donald Trump says his administration remains committed to upholding a foreign policy of "peace through strength". The White House released his message on its website to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two. Trump said, "More than 100,000 Americans perished in the Pacific Theater alone." He praised the fallen soldiers, saying that "the Japanese Empire was defeated, ensuring that the world would be spared from the oppressive clutches of destruction and tyranny." He added, "Today, Japan has become our strongest ally in the Pacific, hosting more than 50,000 American troops who stand guard against new totalitarian regimes and their expansive ambitions." The president noted that "peace is never promised, but is earned through sacrifice, defended with strength."

Banking's ailing climate coalition loses ground in Europe
Banking's ailing climate coalition loses ground in Europe

Japan Times

time11 hours ago

  • Japan Times

Banking's ailing climate coalition loses ground in Europe

Inside the world's largest climate coalition for banks, there's speculation that an exodus led by Wall Street could be about to spread to the European Union. The Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), an organization dedicated to decarbonizing global finance, may be facing defections by some large EU banks with sizeable U.S. exposures, according to a person close to the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. The risk of being accused in the U.S. of having an anti-oil bias appears to be a key concern among the banks, the person said. EU exits from NZBA would mark a painful milestone for the group. In the U.S., where President Donald Trump's re-election has brought with it intensified political attacks on net-zero policies, banks have had to navigate a landscape in which NZBA commitments have come with the risk of lawsuits and Republican blacklists. In the EU, meanwhile, net zero has been enshrined in law and the bloc's banks stand out as some of the world's most climate conscious. A spokesperson for NZBA said the alliance is committed to supporting its remaining members, without commenting on possible EU defections. This moment calls for "long-term work that requires courage, consistency and true leadership to stay on track, even when faced with barriers to action,' the person said. BNP Paribas, the EU's biggest bank by assets, was questioning the value of continued NZBA membership as recently as June, according to another person familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private conversations. The bank is reluctant to create headlines by leaving, however, and back in June discussed postponing a formal decision until around the end of the year, the person said. A spokesperson for BNP declined to comment. Deutsche Bank, Germany's largest lender, is "monitoring current developments and will assess them,' according to a spokesperson, who added that the bank's own sustainability and net-zero targets remain unchanged. A spokesperson for Spain's Banco Santander said it's still committed to net zero but declined to say whether that includes remaining an NZBA member. A UniCredit spokesperson reiterated comments it made last month in connection with its earnings release, when the bank noted that it's an NZBA member with a net-zero transition plan to support clients in their low-carbon transition. Commerzbank closely monitors "market trends, regulatory developments and jurisdictions to ensure we can act appropriately if necessary,' Beate Schlosser, a spokeswoman for the bank said by email. Commerzbank's 2050 net-zero goal still holds, she said. Among reasons EU bank executives have given in the past for staying in NZBA was the access it gave them to other banks. But as defections continue, that access is no longer a selling point. Barclays, which left earlier this month not long after U.K. peer HSBC Holdings, said the string of walkouts means NZBA "no longer has the membership to support our transition.' Barclays' exit was promptly followed by UBS Group of Switzerland. Those departures, though all by banks in non-EU countries, have added to speculation that EU banks will be next, the person familiar with discussion inside NZBA said. The value of climate alliances such as NZBA remains a topic of debate. Lisa Sachs, head of Columbia University's Center on Sustainable Investment, said that a key weakness of frameworks like NZBA is the assumption that the finance industry can have a material impact on the low-carbon transition simply through setting targets to reduce emissions and committing to nudging portfolio companies to decarbonize. "Financial institutions are not the right institutions to fix market flaws or deliver societal transitions because their mandates are to maximize returns within existing market conditions,' she said. "And their assessments of risk are based on those parameters rather than on long-term societal risks.' NZBA still has 125 members across the globe representing a combined $41 trillion in assets, according to its website. Banks in Northern Europe are among the most outspoken in their support, with ING Groep and ABN Amro Bank in the Netherlands, Swedbank and SEB in Sweden and Danske Bank in Denmark all underscoring their backing via spokespeople. The alliance was created to encourage banks to throw their weight behind the net-zero transition. It initially required members to align their financing operations with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. But after being virtually wiped off the North American map earlier this year, NZBA dropped that requirement and recast itself in more of a support role. It's a dramatic loss of stature for the alliance, which was created back in 2021 and feted by global bank executives at the COP26 climate summit in Scotland. Back then, when interest rates were at crisis lows and a global pandemic had created room for a green energy boom, net-zero finance looked like a reliable path to commercial success. That narrative was reinforced when U.S. President Joe Biden a year later signed the Inflation Reduction Act — the biggest piece of green legislation in U.S. history. Ironically, NZBA is hemorrhaging members just as fossil-fuel finance appears to be in decline on Wall Street. Policies designed to push up supply and drive down prices have pummeled the oil sector, and analysts at JPMorgan Chase have said this moment may mark the first decline in global upstream oil and gas development spending since 2020. In all, financing provided to oil, gas and coal projects by Wall Street's top six banks fell 25% to $73 billion this year through Aug. 1 from the same period in 2024, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. "A fundamental truth is that financial institutions follow markets — they don't create them,' Sachs of Columbia University said. Banks that have left NZBA in the U.K. have faced some pushback from clients and investors. HSBC lost a string of green customers, and the Church of England Pensions Board says it's now "engaging' with Barclays and HSBC on their NZBA exits. "As a shareholder we want to see banks to be genuinely committed to acting to address very real quantifiable financial risks like climate change,' says Laura Hillis, director of responsible investment at the pensions board. "It is very clear that some banks simply are not prepared to stay the course on their own commitments long term, which points to governance issues.' At the same time, banks leaving NZBA have said they'll continue to help clients decarbonize their businesses. UBS said on Aug. 7 its "commitment to sustainability remains unchanged and we recognize the importance of an orderly transition to a low-carbon economy.' Departing banks are also sticking with their sustainable finance goals. HSBC, for example, says it did $54.1 billion in deals it categorized as sustainable finance in the first half of 2025, which is up 19% from the same period a year ago. The bottom line remains that the decisions made by financial institutions "are driven by whether a specific investment is financeable today, given current market conditions, policies, and risk-return profiles,'' Columbia's Sachs said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store