Govt aims to boost seafood exports amid EU ban
KARACHI:
Sindh Minister for Livestock and Fisheries Muhammad Ali Malkani has said that the provincial government is taking all necessary steps to increase seafood exports and is in contact with the federal government in this regard.
Speaking during the Question Hour in the Sindh Assembly on Tuesday, Malkani replied to various written and supplementary questions from members. He informed the assembly that there are several hatcheries in Sindh for fish breeding, where seeds are sown. "We release fish seeds into rivers at the government level." He said that efforts are being made to meet the standards set by the European Union to lift the ban on seafood exports, particularly for shrimp and fish.
Malkani said that those who set up factories for export of fisheries are provided with assistance, but no subsidies are given.
Senior Minister Sharjeel Inam Memon requested Deputy Speaker Naveed Anthony to address the issue of some members asking irrelevant questions. Memon noted that there are existing rules for asking questions in a member's absence.
MQM's Dr Fauzia Hameed referred to the deplorable condition of fishermen's colonies, urging the government to take notice. Aijaz Haq also pointed out that poor fishermen's boats are sinking, and the government is not providing any facilities to help them. Abdul Waseem from MQM asked about the legal action taken against those using banned nets for fishing.
In response, Muhammad Ali Malkani said that while action is taken, the department lacks sufficient resources. He also acknowledged the absence of cold storage facilities but assured that the department will help the fishermen in this regard. ucted in collaboration with community-based organisations.
Meanwhile, parliamentary journalists made their voices heard in the assembly, protesting against the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) amendment and demanded its withdrawal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Macron, on Greenland visit, berates Trump for threats against the territory
NUUK: French President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday criticised US President Donald Trump's threats to annex Greenland, as he made a visit to the Danish autonomous territory. 'That's not what allies do,' Macron said as he arrived in Nuuk, Greenland's capital. Macron is the first foreign head of state to visit the vast territory – located at the crossroads of the Atlantic and the Arctic – since Trump's annexation threats. Trump, since returning to the White House in January, has repeatedly said America needs the strategically located, resource-rich island for security reasons, and has refused to rule out the use of force to secure it. Denmark has also repeatedly stressed that Greenland 'is not for sale.' Macron said his visit was aimed at conveying 'France's and the European Union's solidarity' for 'the sovereignty and territorial integrity' of Greenland. Macron warns against 'peace that is a capitulation' in Ukraine Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen, and dozens of Greenlanders waving their territory's red-and-white flags, were on hand to greet the French president. Macron kicked off his six-hour visit with talks on board a Danish frigate with Frederiksen and Nielsen. He was to later visit a glacier to see firsthand the effects of global warming. A visit to a hydroelectric plant was initially scheduled but was cancelled at the last minute. Macron's trip to Greenland was 'a signal in itself, made at the request of Danish and Greenlandic authorities', his office said ahead of the trip. 'Not for sale' The Danish invitation to Macron contrasts sharply with the reception granted to US Vice President JD Vance, whose one-day trip to Greenland in March was seen as a provocation by both Nuuk and Copenhagen. During his visit to the US Pituffik military base, Vance castigated Denmark for not having 'done a good job by the people of Greenland', alleging they had neglected security. The Pituffik base is an essential part of Washington's missile defence infrastructure, its location putting it on the shortest route for missiles fired from Russia at the United States. Polls indicate that the vast majority of Greenland's 57,000 inhabitants want to become independent from Denmark – but do not wish to become part of the United States. Unlike Denmark, Greenland is not part of the European Union but is on the list of Overseas Territories associated with the bloc. The Arctic has gained geostrategic importance as the race for rare earths heats up and as melting ice caused by global warming opens up new shipping routes. Copenhagen in January announced a $2 billion plan to boost its military presence in the Arctic region. NATO also plans to set up a Combined Air Operations Centre (CAOC) in Norway above the Arctic Circle, as Russia aims to bolster its military presence in the region. During his visit, Macron plans to discuss Arctic security and how to include the territory in 'European action' to contribute to its development, while 'respecting its sovereignty', his office said. Mount Nunatarsuaq Macron scheduled glacier visit was to Mount Nunatarsuaq, about 30 kilometres (19 miles) from Nuuk, to see firsthand the effects of global warming on the frontlines in the Arctic. The Arctic is warming four times faster than the rest of the planet, according to a 2022 study in scientific journal Nature, and Greenland's ice sheet melted 17 times faster than the historical average during a May 15-21 heatwave, a recent report showed. France intends to 'massively reinvest in the knowledge of these ecosystems,' following in the footsteps of famed French explorer Paul-Emile Victor who carried out multiple expeditions to Greenland, Macron's office said. Greenlandic authorities recently designated Victor's hut, built in 1950 in Quervain Bay in the north, as a historic structure.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Worst foreign policy decision of 21st century
Listen to article There are clear indications that the world is no longer traveling on an upward track. The current journey of the world is on a downward track, and the need for an immediate course correction is the responsibility of the four great powers — the United States, China, Russia and the European Union. Liberal internationalism has failed as an order, and so has the momentum of globalisation, which has been unsuccessful in bringing the world closer together. Democracies all over the world are degenerating, lapsing, regressing and retreating. All anti-communist dictators that the United States supported in the past and installed during the Cold War to create favorable regimes in Latin America, Africa Middle East and Asia are dead, but others wearing democratic suits have taken their place. Nationalism, protectionism and revisionism are eating what is left of cosmopolitanism, and anti-immigration laws and racism are back as the picture posters of a world in a downward spiral. The brutality of the two World Wars forced the world to understand the importance of adherence to international norms. These norms are being set aside now with impunity, and states like Israel now demonstrate that state behaviour is no more constrained by international norms. During the bipolar moment of the world, the world order rested on both the balance of power and legitimacy — a world conforming to laws and rules. Legitimacy today is on a downslide. That can be seen in how Israel is carrying out genocide in Gaza with absolute freedom from the consequences of its actions. Loss of legitimacy is being demonstrated in how the war in Ukraine is being fought, or how India initiated a thoughtless and unnecessary military action against Pakistan. As if this were not enough, the US-Iran nuclear talks have failed, and one can be certain that no international rules or laws may be followed once again to punish another sovereign nation — Iran. Notable historians and scholars of international relations with pro-Western sentiments are referring to President Xi Jinping's no limits partnership with Moscow as arguably the biggest foreign policy blunder by him since his time in power. Yet, the Chinese President's decision is a copycat of what the United States has practiced earlier. Under the Henry Kissinger doctrine of reducing tensions with the weaker rival to concentrate on the stronger, President Nixon warmed ties with China as the United States focused on and targeted the Soviet Union. China now plans to cook the American soup with the same recipe. However, if Israel attacks Iran with or without the consent of the Americans, it will constitute the biggest foreign policy blunder of the 21st century. Calling an unlimited partnership between two great powers a foreign policy blunder is looking at the event from a liberal lens that views revisionism as an international offence. Seen from a realist perspective, the unchallenged power that the United States enjoyed during the unipolar moment changed the dynamics of the global balance of power. The current Sino-Russo partnership is a consequence of the shift in the global balance of power that emerged when the all-powerful American might pushed the interests of the other great powers aside to make the entire world a de facto American sphere. The United States, as a global hegemon during the unipolar moment, had three clear choices to make: create an international system of absolute American dominance of power; allow creation of an international system of shared responsibility for global peace and security; or revert to an international system of power rivalry and sphere of influence. Until the first decade of the 21st century, Americans dragged the international system of absolute American control and dominance of power. By 2012, both President Putin and President Xi rose to power as Russia's President and General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, respectively. Two years later, President Putin annexed Crimea. The moment to create an international system of shared responsibility for global peace and security was lost, and an international system of power rivalry and sphere of influence replaced the system of absolute American dominance and power. This was acknowledged by the Trump administration in 2017 when the American National Security Strategy presented in that year welcomed the return of 'great power competition'. Today, the war in Ukraine is a classic example of a return to the clash of spheres of influence in global politics. China showcases this contest in the Eastern Pacific, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea. Before the greatest blunder of foreign policy of the 21st century is committed, the United States and its ally, Israel, must give due consideration to the international system in vogue. Sphere of influence is the space where one's great power exercises dominance and control, and if an outside power wishes to challenge that, it will only be at a cost that may be too high or unbearable. In a broader geopolitical sense, a military strike at Iran will hurt the political, economic and commercial interests of the other two great powers, and it is for this reason that such a military misadventure will be disapproved and contested by the rival powers. Russia and China will not compete or cooperate but confront any challenge posed to the sovereignty of Iran. This assumption is based on the current dynamics of regional geopolitics, regional political, economic and commercial concerns, and wider regional insecurity, which is not acceptable and tolerable to both Russia and China. Not just the two great powers but many other countries in the region may cooperate and have their foreign policy driven by this very sensitive and main agenda. President Trump, on his part, represents himself as a liberal internationalist and a peacemaker who rejects the use of military force as a preferred instrument of policy to resolve conflicts. He favours diplomacy, and if the world needs to get back on the right track, he must not become part of committing the biggest foreign policy blunder of the 21st century. Israel's military action in Gaza has already eroded the moral authority of the United States; any military action against Iran will erode the chances of the world traveling back on an upward track. Post Script: As the article is being submitted for publication, Israel has carried out air strikes on Iran. The worst foreign policy decision of the 21st century has been taken.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Sindh budget focuses on social, urban uplift
Listen to article The PPP's Sindh government on Friday unveiled a Rs3,451.87 billion budget for the fiscal year 2025-2026 — representing a 12.9% increase compared to the previous year's budget of Rs3,056.3 billion and a deficit of Rs38.458 billion. Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah, who also holds the portfolio of provincial finance minister, presented the proposed budget in the Sindh Assembly, where the PPP holds a two-thirds majority. Shah announced a salary increase of 12% for government employees from grades-1 to grade-16 and a 10% raise for officers of grade-17 through grade-22. He also announced an 8% increase in pensions. "We are introducing a finance bill to abolish and decrease some taxes/levies/cess instead of increasing them," the CM stated amid a round of applause. "The budget emphasizes increased allocations for education, health, infrastructure, and social welfare, along with strategic initiatives to modernize governance and stimulate economic growth," he said. The province's receipts for FY 2025-26 are projected at Rs3,411.5 billion, marking an 11.6% rise compared to the current year. Federal divisible pool transfers, which constitute 75% of total revenue, are estimated at Rs1,927.3 billion, a 10.2% increase, despite a 5.5% shortfall in the current year's revised estimates. Additional federal transfers, including straight transfers and grants to offset losses from the abolition of the Octroi and Zila Tax (OZT), are also set to increase, bringing total federal transfers to Rs2,095.6 billion. The Current Revenue Expenditure (CRE) is set at Rs2,149.4 billion, reflecting a 12.4% increase from Rs1,912.36 billion in FY 2024-25. This rise is due to inflationary pressures, increased grants to non-financial institutions such as hospitals and universities, salary relief allowances for government employees, and higher pension payments. Total expenditure is expected to increase by 12.9% to Rs3,450 billion. Current revenue expenditure will grow by 12.4% to Rs2,150 billion, driven by salary and pension hikes (6%), grants to local bodies (3%), and substantial increases in key sectors. The police department has been allocated Rs189.75 billion, reflecting an increase of 15.7%. The health sector has been allocated Rs336.46 billion, with an 11.3% increase, while Rs518.05 billion has been allocated for the education sector, showing an 18% increase. Additionally, Rs20 billion has been allocated for Pro-Poor Social Protection and Economic Sustainability Initiatives, highlighting the government's focus on inclusive growth. To improve transparency and efficiency, education-related funds will be directly disbursed to schools. Grants-in-aid totaling Rs702 billion have been allocated for various government and non-financial institutions, based on directives from the Chief Minister's Secretariat and the Finance Department.
