AI Impact Awards 2025: Newsweek Celebrates AI Innovation
Newsweek has announced the winners of its inaugural AI Impact Awards, recognizing 38 companies across 13 different categories.
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly more popular among everyday Americans, AI has laid its claim as the most transformative technology of the century. From health care to finance, from retail to education, AI is in the process of revolutionizing nearly every industry and sector. To celebrate strides in various areas, Newsweek is recognizing businesses that are using new capabilities to solve practical challenges.
"AI is reshaping our world, and the organizations receiving this award are at the forefront of that transformation," Jennifer H. Cunningham, the editor-in-chief of Newsweek, said in a press release. "We are proud to spotlight the companies whose technologies and practices are pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve—responsibly and effectively."
About one in six American workers say that at least some of their work is currently done with AI and an additional one in four say that while they're not using AI much now, at least some of their work can be done with AI, according to an October poll conducted by Pew Research Center.
This year, the AI Impact Awards were divided by specific sectors. Newsweek awarded five practitioners in the health care category and four in education. Three practitioners were recognized in each of the following categories: arts and media; brand and retail; science and engineering; finance; marketing; and workplace. The customer service and sustainability categories each had two companies recognized, and the mobility and sports categories each had one honoree.
Under brand and retail, Perfect Corp. was recognized for its Skin Analysis tool, which earned them the 2025 award for Best Outcomes, Customer Experience.
Wayne Liu, the chief growth officer at Perfect Corp., told Newsweek that winning this award was a particularly notable milestone for the company.
"Not all awards are equal. This one is very different, and it also gives us all this sense of excitement," Liu said, adding, "Our technology, our effort has been seen."
AI Impact Awards
AI Impact Awards
Newsweek Illustration
To adjudicate this year's entries, Newsweek selected a cross-industry panel of 56 expert judges who work with AI technology in their respective fields. In addition to category winners, these judges also selected Every Cure as the overall Best in Class. Every Cure, a nonprofit aimed at identifying new uses for FDA-approved medications, received an additional award, in the Best Outcomes, Materials Science and Chemistry category.
There were also five recipients in the Best of—Most Innovative AI Technology Service category. Among those honorees is Ex-Human, a digital platform that allows users to create customizable AI humans to interact with. This year, Ex-Human was awarded the Extraordinary Impact in AI Human Interactivity or Collaboration award.
Artem Rodichev, the founder and CEO of Ex-Human, told Newsweek that the win "validates our vision that emotional depth matters."
"Building AI is not about functional stuff, but how technology can make people feel better," Rodichev said. "Winning this award helps us to build trust, to attract new partners, and in general, to acknowledge that the emotional side of innovation is important."
The winners of the 2025 AI Impact Awards were invited to attend Newsweek's upcoming AI Impact Summit.
The three-day summit, which is being held in Sonoma, California, from June 23 through 25, brings together a diverse group of leaders. Tech innovators, C-suite executives, policymakers and ethicists will all join Newsweek in a series of thought-provoking conversations about how organizations can most effectively adopt AI.
To see the full list of winners and awards, visit the official page for Newsweek's AI Impact Awards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
4 Things Schools Need To Consider When Designing AI Policies
Artificial intelligence has moved from Silicon Valley boardrooms into homes and classrooms across America. A recent Pew Research Center study reveals that 26% of American teenagers now utilize AI tools for schoolwork—twice the number from two years prior. Many schools are rushing to establish AI policies. The result? Some are creating more confusion than clarity by focusing solely on preventing cheating while ignoring broader educational opportunities AI presents. The challenge shouldn't be about whether to allow AI in schools—it should be about how to design policies that strike a balance between academic integrity and practical preparation for an AI-driven future. Here are four essential considerations for effective school AI policies. 1. Address Teacher AI Use, Not Just Student Restrictions The most significant oversight in current AI policies? They focus almost exclusively on what students can't do while completely ignoring teacher usage. This creates confusion and sends mixed messages to students and families. Most policies spend paragraphs outlining student restrictions, but fail to answer basic questions about educator usage: Can teachers use AI to create lesson plans? Are educators allowed to use AI for generating quiz questions or providing initial feedback on essays? What disclosure requirements exist when teachers use AI-generated content? When schools prohibit students from using AI while allowing teachers unrestricted access, the message becomes hypocritical. Students notice when their teacher presents an AI-generated quiz while simultaneously forbidding them from using AI for research. Parents wonder why their children face strict restrictions while educators operate without clear guidelines. If students are required to disclose AI usage in assignments, teachers should identify when they've used AI for lesson materials. This consistency builds trust and models responsible AI integration. 2. Include Students in AI Policy Development Most AI policies are written by administrators who haven't used ChatGPT for homework or witnessed peer collaboration with AI tools. This top-down approach creates rules that students either ignore or circumvent entirely. When we built AI guidelines for WITY, our AI teen entrepreneurship platform at WIT - Whatever It Takes, we worked directly with students. The result? Policies that teens understand and respect because they helped create them. Students bring critical information about real-world AI use that administrators often miss. They are aware of which platforms their classmates use, how AI supports various subjects, and where current rules create confusion. When students participate in policy creation compliance increases significantly because the rules feel collaborative rather than punitive. 3. Balance AI Guardrails With Innovation Opportunities Many AI policies resemble legal warnings more than educational frameworks. Fear-based language teaches students to view AI as a threat rather than a powerful tool requiring responsible use. Effective policies reframe restrictions as learning opportunities. Instead of "AI cannot write your essays," try "AI can help you brainstorm and organize ideas, but your analysis and voice should drive the final work." Schools that blanket-ban AI usage miss opportunities to prepare students for careers where AI literacy will be essential. AI access can vary dramatically among students. While some students have premium ChatGPT subscriptions and access to the latest tools, others may rely solely on free versions or school-provided resources. Without addressing this gap, AI policies can inadvertently increase educational inequality. 4. Build AI Literacy Into Curriculum and Family Communication In an AI-driven economy, rules alone don't prepare students for a future where AI literacy is necessary. Schools must teach students to think critically about AI outputs, understand the bias in AI systems, and recognize the appropriate applications of AI across different contexts. Parents often feel excluded from AI conversations at school, creating confusion about expectations. This is why schools should explain their AI policies in plain language, provide examples of responsible use, and offer resources for parents who want to support responsible AI use at home. When families understand the educational rationale behind AI integration—including teacher usage and transparency requirements—they become partners in developing responsible use habits rather than obstacles to overcome. AI technology changes rapidly, making static policies obsolete within months. Schools should schedule annual policy reviews that include feedback from students, teachers, and parents about both student and teacher AI usage. AI Policy Assessment Checklist School leaders should evaluate their current policies against these seven criteria: Teacher Guidelines: Do policies clearly state when and how teachers can use AI? Are disclosure requirements consistent between students and educators? Student Input: Have students participated in creating these policies? Do rules reflect actual AI usage patterns among teens? Equity Access: Can all students access the same AI tools, or do policies create advantages for families with premium subscriptions? Family Communication: Can parents easily understand the policies? Are expectations clear for home use? Are there opportunities for workshops for parents? Innovation Balance: Do policies encourage responsible experimentation or only focus on restrictions? Is the school policy focusing on preparing students for the AI-driven workforce? Regular Updates: Is there a scheduled review process as AI technology evolves? Does the school welcome feedback from students, teachers and parents? Skills Development: Do policies include plans for teaching AI literacy alongside restrictions? Who is teaching this class or workshop? Moving Forward: AI Leadership The most effective approach treats students as partners, not adversaries. When teens help create the rules they'll follow, when teachers model responsible usage, and when families understand the educational reasoning behind policies, AI becomes a learning tool rather than a source of conflict. Schools that embrace this collaborative approach will produce graduates who understand how to use AI ethically and effectively—exactly the capabilities tomorrow's economy demands.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FDA Announces Major Recall of Popular Coffee
Another day, and another recall. While it can be daunting to keep up with recalls, it's important, because following guidance sent out regarding recalls can make sure that your family and loved ones stay safe. Some recalls are even life-threatening, so if a product in your home is recalled, don't mess around and make sure to follow the recall protocols. So, what's the definition of a recall? According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a recall is a "method of removing or correcting products that are in violation of laws administered by the FDA." The FDA adds that a "recall is a voluntary action that takes place because manufacturers and distributors carry out their responsibility to protect the public health and well-being from products that present a risk of injury or gross deception or are otherwise defective." Now, an instant coffee is being recalled due to potential glass fragments. A Voluntary Recall of Coffee Over Glass Fragments Dollar General has issued a voluntary recall in 46 U.S. states due to concerns of glass exposure in jars of its Clover Valley Instant Coffee. on Aug. 11, Dollar General released a voluntary recall notice on its website and said that a customer's report of possible glass in the product is what sparked recall. The statement adds, "Dollar General is actively investigating the source of the glass contamination and apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this product issue." The FDA also released information about the recall. "Ingesting glass fragments may cause injury to the consumer, and these injuries may include damage to teeth, laceration of the mouth and throat, or perforation of the intestine," they stated. The good news is that no illnesses or injuries have been reported so far. According to the FDA notice, customers who purchased the coffee are encouraged to throw it out and contact Dollar General either via email at customercare@ or by phone at 1-888-309-9030 from 6 a.m. to 1 a.m. CST seven days a week to request a full refund of the purchase price, including any tax. The recalled Clover Valley Instant Coffee was sold and distributed in Dollar General retail stores between July 9 and 21, 2025. More information with specific lot numbers can be found via the Dollar General Announces Major Recall of Popular Coffee first appeared on Men's Journal on Aug 13, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iress Limited (ASX:IRE) Looks Interesting, And It's About To Pay A Dividend
Explore Iress's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Readers hoping to buy Iress Limited (ASX:IRE) for its dividend will need to make their move shortly, as the stock is about to trade ex-dividend. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. The ex-dividend date is of consequence because whenever a stock is bought or sold, the trade can take two business days or more to settle. This means that investors who purchase Iress' shares on or after the 22nd of August will not receive the dividend, which will be paid on the 22nd of September. The company's upcoming dividend is AU$0.11 a share, following on from the last 12 months, when the company distributed a total of AU$0.22 per share to shareholders. Based on the last year's worth of payments, Iress has a trailing yield of 2.4% on the current stock price of AU$9.03. If you buy this business for its dividend, you should have an idea of whether Iress's dividend is reliable and sustainable. So we need to investigate whether Iress can afford its dividend, and if the dividend could grow. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If a company pays out more in dividends than it earned, then the dividend might become unsustainable - hardly an ideal situation. That's why it's good to see Iress paying out a modest 44% of its earnings. Yet cash flows are even more important than profits for assessing a dividend, so we need to see if the company generated enough cash to pay its distribution. Thankfully its dividend payments took up just 36% of the free cash flow it generated, which is a comfortable payout ratio. It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously. View our latest analysis for Iress Click here to see the company's payout ratio, plus analyst estimates of its future dividends. Have Earnings And Dividends Been Growing? Companies with consistently growing earnings per share generally make the best dividend stocks, as they usually find it easier to grow dividends per share. Investors love dividends, so if earnings fall and the dividend is reduced, expect a stock to be sold off heavily at the same time. With that in mind, we're encouraged by the steady growth at Iress, with earnings per share up 4.8% on average over the last five years. Recent growth has not been impressive. However, companies that see their growth slow can often choose to pay out a greater percentage of earnings to shareholders, which could see the dividend continue to rise. The main way most investors will assess a company's dividend prospects is by checking the historical rate of dividend growth. Iress's dividend payments per share have declined at 6.1% per year on average over the past 10 years, which is uninspiring. It's unusual to see earnings per share increasing at the same time as dividends per share have been in decline. We'd hope it's because the company is reinvesting heavily in its business, but it could also suggest business is lumpy. The Bottom Line Should investors buy Iress for the upcoming dividend? Earnings per share have been growing moderately, and Iress is paying out less than half its earnings and cash flow as dividends, which is an attractive combination as it suggests the company is investing in growth. It might be nice to see earnings growing faster, but Iress is being conservative with its dividend payouts and could still perform reasonably over the long run. Overall we think this is an attractive combination and worthy of further research. While it's tempting to invest in Iress for the dividends alone, you should always be mindful of the risks involved. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Iress you should know about. A common investing mistake is buying the first interesting stock you see. Here you can find a full list of high-yield dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
