logo
Delhi rising: A rare opportunity to shape capital's future

Delhi rising: A rare opportunity to shape capital's future

Time of India4 hours ago

Delhi, India's historic and political heart, stands at a pivotal moment. For decades, it has been a city of immense potential, rich in culture, talent, and connectivity. However, despite its stature, Delhi today finds itself falling behind neighbouring cities like Gurugram and Noida in terms of infrastructure, housing, and investment.
The slow stagnation has been painful to witness for those of us who have called Delhi home for generations. While Gurugram and Noida have become magnets for businesses, startups, and new housing, Delhi's middle class is increasingly priced out of the city. Home ownership for a regular working family has become a distant dream. Many of my peers, friends, former government officials, professionals, and civil servants have had to leave Delhi to find homes in satellite cities, even as their social life and loyalties remain rooted in the capital. I, too, was forced to move to Gurugram—not out of choice, but necessity.
The real issue isn't a lack of land; it's a lack of coordinated development. Delhi spans 1,483 square km, yet only 703 of these are developed. This leaves nearly 783 square km of untapped potential—urban land that could be harnessed for planned growth, housing, infrastructure, and economic activity. The key to unlocking this lies in two powerful policy tools: the Master Plan for Delhi 2041 (MPD 2041) and the Land Pooling Policy (LPP).
Together, these tools provide a visionary but practical roadmap for the capital. If executed well, the LPP could release 20,000 to 25,000 acres of land—enough to create over 2 million homes for 8 million people. This transformative opportunity presents itself for Delhi, which desperately needs affordable and inclusive housing.
For the first time in recent memory, there's alignment across the four major institutions that govern Delhi: the elected Delhi government, the Lieutenant Governor's office, the Union government, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). This rare political and administrative consensus offers us a unique opportunity to act decisively and collaboratively.
What could this future look like?
First, it means homes for all. The LPP can significantly increase the supply of residential units, ease price pressures, and make homeownership more accessible to working families, young professionals, and even retirees. Instead of being forced to relocate to Noida or Gurugram, Delhiites could once again live affordably within their own city.
Second, this policy would boost economic activity. Large-scale development will require the construction of roads, schools, public transport, health facilities, and commercial hubs, each generating jobs and opportunities across construction, logistics, real estate, education, and services. In essence, this is not just a housing policy; it's an economic stimulus with long-term implications.
Third, it ensures dignity for Delhi's village communities. Many of these villages are situated on valuable land but have been neglected due to unplanned development and a lack of infrastructure. This has led to the rise of unauthorised colonies and increased inequality. Under the LPP, landowners become stakeholders in the city's progress, benefiting from structured development and a share in the value created.
It's important to note that we are not starting from scratch. Delhi has already laid the groundwork through policy design, consultations, and pilot efforts. The blueprint is in place. What's needed now is rapid, transparent, and accountable implementation.
We have examples to draw from. Over the past decade, Gurugram has added over 50 million square feet of office space, transforming itself into a corporate and commercial hub. Noida is quickly becoming a model for integrated townships, logistics parks, and digital innovation. Delhi, with its legacy infrastructure and central location, has every advantage—what it needs now is momentum.
This is not just a city planning exercise; it's a question of Delhi's future. Will it continue to push its workforce, families, and heritage communities to the margins? Or will it rise to become the inclusive, thriving capital its residents deserve?
As citizens, administrators, and policymakers, we must treat this as a now-or-never moment. The convergence of vision, land, and governance is extremely rare in Indian urban planning. Delaying action would not only cost us time but also trust. It would push more families out of Delhi, deepen inequality, and lock up billions in idle land value.
But the alternative is inspiring. We can build a Delhi that's affordable and aspirational—a city that offers stability to the middle class, opportunity to the youth, and dignity to its village communities. A city where planning is proactive, not reactive; where growth is inclusive, not exclusionary. With MPD 2041 and the LPP, we have the means to create such a future—not decades from now, but in the coming years.
Delhi is waiting—for action, for leadership, and for belief. This is our moment to act. Let's do it in a timeframe, because 'Yeh hai Dilli meri Jaan!'
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian roads will match US standards in 2 years, says Nitin Gadkari
Indian roads will match US standards in 2 years, says Nitin Gadkari

Business Standard

time43 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Indian roads will match US standards in 2 years, says Nitin Gadkari

Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways, Nitin Gadkari, said on Monday that India's road infrastructure will match that of the United States within two years. He backed the claim by pointing to the government's decade-long focus on investment in the sector. "The question is not about the facelift, it has already changed. You have just watched the newsreel, the main picture is yet to start. The projects in the pipeline are progressing rapidly. In another two years, you will be able to see that Indian road infrastructure will be similar to that of America," Gadkari told ANI in an interview, when asked when Indian roads would undergo a complete transformation. He added, 'Some people from America met me and said our infrastructure is better than America.' Improved roads lower logistics costs Gadkari explained that improved highways and expressways have reduced logistics costs, thereby enhancing India's export competitiveness. "If we raise our exports, it will improve our agricultural sector, manufacturing, and services, among all other sectors," he said. He noted that India has historically faced high logistics costs—around 16 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP)—compared to 8 per cent in China and 12 per cent in the US and Europe. "Our roads were not good, our ports were not good. Traffic congestion raised costs," he said. Major projects underway Gadkari outlined several key infrastructure projects in progress, including 25 greenfield expressways, a 3,000-km highway to boost port connectivity, and ₹1 trillion worth of roads linking key religious tourism circuits. He added that the government is connecting Buddhist circuits and the Char Dham pilgrimage routes with all-weather highways. "We are developing 36 tunnels between Jammu and Srinagar; 23 have been completed, and works for another 4–5 are underway," Gadkari said. "We are developing 15 ropeways under Parvatmala Yojana, besides 35 multi-modal logistics parks." Infrastructure: The backbone of growth Public infrastructure is central to economic growth, improving connectivity, trade, and quality of life. Over the last decade, India has made significant advances in this area. The PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan (NMP), launched in 2021, seeks to bring together various ministries—such as Railways and Roadways—for integrated planning and streamlined execution of major infrastructure projects. India currently has the second-largest road network in the world. Its National Highways (NH) span approximately 146,000 km, forming the backbone of national transport. According to a ministry statement released in February 2025, the network has grown substantially—from 65,569 km in 2004, to 91,287 km in 2014, and to 146,145 km by 2024.

Collegium system imperfect but preserves ‘judiciary's autonomy', says Supreme Court judge
Collegium system imperfect but preserves ‘judiciary's autonomy', says Supreme Court judge

Scroll.in

timean hour ago

  • Scroll.in

Collegium system imperfect but preserves ‘judiciary's autonomy', says Supreme Court judge

The Supreme Court's Justice Surya Kant has said that the collegium system of appointing judges, despite its imperfections, serves as a 'crucial institutional safeguard' and preserves the judiciary's autonomy, The Indian Express reported on Sunday. Kant, who is slated to become the next chief justice of India, said that the collegium system 'significantly limits interference by the Executive and Legislature, thereby preserving the Judiciary's autonomy and insulating judges from extraneous pressures that could otherwise compromise their impartiality,' the newspaper reported. Under the collegium system, the five most senior judges of the Supreme Court, including the chief justice, decide on the appointments and transfers of judges to the top court and the High Courts. Speaking at Seattle University in the United States on June 4, Kant acknowledged that the system has faced criticism, especially on the lack of publicly articulated criteria for selecting judges. However, he said that 'recent efforts by the Supreme Court signal a growing commitment to enhancing transparency and public confidence in it'. In 2022, the Supreme Court Collegium had published detailed documentation of its deliberations on selecting five judges. Since October 2017, the Collegium has also been publishing its resolution on the court's official website. Kant also said that the 'the judiciary's evolving relationship with its own independence, lies at the very heart of how India's vast, pluralistic democracy continues to function with remarkable cohesion'. He also said that some phases of institutional strain 'particularly during the Emergency' eventually 'gave way to renewed judicial consciousness'. In recent years, the Bharatiya Janata Party government at the Centre has been selectively appointing judges recommended for elevation to the bench by the Supreme Court collegium, which has allowed the Union government to exercise a veto over judicial appointments. The executive and the judiciary have been in a tug-of-war regarding appointments to higher judiciary in recent years. Former Law Minister Kiren Rijiju and Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar have repeatedly criticised the collegium system of appointing judges, contending that it is opaque. In 2014, the BJP-led government had introduced the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act with the objective of making appointments to the Supreme Court and High Courts 'more broad-based, transparent, accountable and bringing objectivity in the system'. The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act had proposed to make judicial appointments through a body consisting of the chief justice, two senior Supreme Court judges, the Union law minister and two other eminent persons nominated by the chief justice, the prime minister and the Leader of the Opposition. In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down the Act, ruling that it was unconstitutional.

The State will neither forgive nor forget ‘anti-Tamil Nadu policies' of BJP, says TNCC president Selvaperunthagai
The State will neither forgive nor forget ‘anti-Tamil Nadu policies' of BJP, says TNCC president Selvaperunthagai

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

The State will neither forgive nor forget ‘anti-Tamil Nadu policies' of BJP, says TNCC president Selvaperunthagai

Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC) president K. Selvaperunthagai on Monday responded to Union Home Minister Amit Shah's statement that a BJP-AIADMK government would be formed in the State in 2026, saying the State would neither forget nor forgive the 'anti-Tamil Nadu policies' of the BJP-led government at the Centre. He said a BJP government in Tamil Nadu would always remain a 'mirage'. In a statement, he termed as hypocritical Mr. Shah's remarks that he regretted he couldn't speak Tamil. '...what better proof is needed of the government's betrayal than the fact that it had allocated only ₹24 crore over three years for Classical Tamil, while granting ₹664 crore for Sanskrit, a language spoken by only 24,000 people? How will Mr. Shah answer for depriving Tamil Nadu of ₹2,152 crore under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan as a punishment for opposing Hindi imposition through the National Education Policy? Since 1968, Tamil Nadu has followed the two-language policy of Tamil and English,' he said. As for Mr. Shah's claims about the grant of more funds to Tamil Nadu, Mr. Selvaperunthagai said, 'According to official data, in the past seven years, the BJP-led government at the Centre has collected ₹7.38 lakh crore in direct taxes, the GST, and cesses from Tamil Nadu, but returned only ₹2.56 lakh crore to the State. After exploiting Tamil Nadu financially, what evidence does Mr. Shah have to prove his claim that more funds have been given to the State?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store