Social Security eyes massive reform in US: New policy could hit 3.4 million Americans this month
Social Security
Administrative (SSA) policy, senior citizens soon won't be able to simply call SSA to change their address or check the status of their benefit claim. They will have to first verify their identity online or go to a field office if they are unable to do so, reported CNN.
Under the new SSA policy change, around 3.4 million people would have to travel to field offices to update their addresses, among other requests. The crucial development comes at a time when the agency's staff has been trimmed and offices experience extended wait times for appointments.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Data Science
Degree
MCA
Management
Leadership
others
Public Policy
Project Management
Technology
Finance
CXO
Artificial Intelligence
Data Analytics
healthcare
Others
Operations Management
Data Science
PGDM
Healthcare
Product Management
MBA
Cybersecurity
Digital Marketing
Design Thinking
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK DABS India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Prof Cert in DS & BA with GenAI India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
30 Weeks
IIM Kozhikode
SEPO - IIMK-AI for Senior Executives India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Postgraduate Cert in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
IIT Madras
CERT-IITM Advanced Cert Prog in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
ALSO READ:
Dr Vinay Prasad's FDA exit in less than 3 months linked to Sarepta gene therapy controversy? Check details
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Live like royalty for the cost of a coffee?
Dream Home Art Union
Buy Now
Undo
Big changes in Social Security
In its latest bid to curb fraud, SSA is expanding its online authentication requirement for address changes, claim status requests, benefit verification letters and tax statements, according to a regulatory filing Social Security recently submitted to the Office of Management and Budget. The agency intends to implement the change by August 18, assuming OMB approves it.
The SSA is also looking to expand the use of multi-step verification to generate a personal identification number (PIN) so that beneficiaries can change their addresses, among other requests.
Live Events
"Beneficiaries will be forced to take millions of unnecessary trips to field offices, where they will face longer waits for appointments and slower processing times," wrote Kathleen Romig, the director of Social Security and disability policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) in a blog post. She added that this will create a "significant new burden", especially for those who reside in rural areas or have transportation or mobility difficulties.
ALSO READ:
Justin Trudeau may have a new romance brewing: Ex-Canadian PM's love life in spotlight after Sophie Gregoire separation
The SSA stated prevention of fraud as the cause for this change. Nancy LeaMond, the American Association of Retired Persons' executive vice president and chief advocacy officer, said, 'AARP supports efforts to strengthen fraud prevention and identity verification. However, we are concerned that SSA's new Security Authentication PIN (SAP) process, particularly its expansion to additional telephone services, could create new barriers for older adults who rely on telephone access to manage their Social Security benefits."
The SSA announced that beneficiaries could make the changes online, but that would still pose new difficulties, AARP said. 'Our experience shows that the option to verify identity online will be a challenge for the one in four older adults who report never going online. Creating an online 'My Social Security' account can be a complicated process for people who are uncomfortable with online systems or do not have reliable internet access,' LeaMond explained.
ALSO READ:
Katy Perry-Justin Trudeau spotted together a month after her breakup with Orlando Bloom. Why did they split?
What are critics saying about SSA changes?
Some advocacy groups have raised concerns that many senior citizens and people with disabilities won't be able to complete the verification process, which includes the generation of a one-time PIN, through their mySocialSecurity accounts. 'For many older Americans, the phone is how they access Social Security services without having to rely on complicated technology or long, difficult, or costly trips to field offices,' Nancy LeaMond wrote in a letter Tuesday to Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano.
'We are concerned that under this new policy, older Americans, especially those in rural areas, will have to call, wait on hold for possibly hours, and then wait weeks for an appointment — and in some cases even take time off work — to complete simple transactions they have long been able to do over the phone,' she wrote, urging the commissioner to reconsider the measure.
ALSO READ:
Julian Brown missing: Was Atlanta inventor working on "the most dangerous thing" he's ever done? Check details
Meanwhile, a Social security spokesperson said the report was inaccurate. The new identification process will not lead to increased field office visits and is 'completely optional,' the spokesperson said in an email to CNN.
However, in the agency's regulatory filing, there is no indication that the new policy is optional. The agency states in the filing that it expects there will be 3.4 million 'Respondents who decline to use SAP (Security Authentication PIN) and visit a field office for in-person identity proofing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's tariff treasure: US ‘taking in so much money' – but where is it going?
US President Donald Trump frequently boasts about the billions of dollars flowing into the US government's coffers from sweeping tariffs, calling it historic, unmatched, and a windfall for the nation. But while he celebrates the surge in revenue, many are asking: Where is all that money going -and who is really paying the price? 'We have a lot of money coming in, much more money than the country's ever seen,' Trump said over the weekend, referring to revenue from tariffs. According to the US treasury department, the government collected nearly $30 billion in tariff revenue last month, a staggering 242% increase compared to July last year. Since April, when Trump introduced a 10% tariff on nearly all imported goods, followed by steeper levies, the government has collected a total of $100 billion. That's three times the amount collected during the same four-month period last year. Promises vs reality Trump has floated two main ideas for the tariff revenue: paying down the national debt or returning money to citizens via 'tariff rebate checks.' 'The purpose of what I'm doing is primarily to pay down debt, which will happen in very large quantity,' Trump said Tuesday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like See Results for Car Selling Websites Search Now Undo 'But I think there's also a possibility that we're taking in so much money that we may very well make a dividend to the people of America.' So far, neither has happened. So, where is the money going? All revenue collected by the federal government, whether from tariffs or taxes, goes into a general fund managed by the Treasury Department. This fund, sometimes referred to as 'America's checkbook,' is used to pay the government's ongoing expenses, including Social Security and interest on debt. With the US national debt now exceeding $36 trillion, and a budget deficit of $1.4 trillion this fiscal year, the government continues to borrow to make up the difference. The added tariff revenue has helped narrow the deficit slightly, reducing the amount of new borrowing needed. 'It's not like there's a better use for the money,' said Brett Ryan, senior US economist at Deutsche Bank, in a comment to CNN. What about rebate checks? A bill introduced recently by Republican Senator Josh Hawley proposes distributing 'tariff rebate checks' to Americans. However, economists warn that this move could backfire. 'They're the wrong policy to pursue right now,' said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale and a former economist in the Biden White House, noting that such payouts could fuel inflation. Hidden costs of tariffs While the government sees a financial boost, the economic pain isn't invisible. Many businesses have absorbed the higher costs, but not all. Prices for items like appliances, toys, and electronics, which are sensitive to import costs, have been rising, according to recent government inflation data. Major retailers such as Walmart and Procter & Gamble have already issued warnings about upcoming price increases. The uncertainty around trade policy has also had broader implications. Economic surveys indicate that businesses are more cautious about hiring, leading to fewer job openings. 'Tariffs are going to have a negative economic effect on the American economy,' Tedeschi said. The Yale Budget Lab estimates the tariffs could reduce US GDP by 0.5 percentage points this year and next. While tariff revenue may offer short-term gains, a slower-growing economy could offset these by reducing income and payroll tax revenue in the long run. The white house view Despite the concerns, Trump and his advisers remain optimistic. They argue that the combination of tax cuts, tariff income, and government spending will ultimately strengthen the US economy. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays .
Mint
10 hours ago
- Mint
McDonald's sees sales boost from toys, budget meals
(Bloomberg) -- McDonald's Corp. sales picked up in the latest quarter, suggesting that pop culture-focused collaborations and budget meals are helping to offset diners' economic anxiety. Global sales at restaurants open at least 13 months rose 3.8% in the second quarter, the company said Wednesday. That's higher than the average estimate of analysts polled by Bloomberg. International markets led the company's growth, while the US was slightly ahead of expectations as Americans spent more per trip. The results ended four quarters of declining or tepid growth as the burger chain dealt with an E. coli outbreak, backlash against American brands in the Middle East and consumer unease about the economy in response to President Trump's trade disputes. Total guest counts around the world rose, Chief Executive Officer Chris Kempczinski said on call with analysts. McDonald's stock rose 2.6% at 9:30 a.m. in New York. The shares had gained 3.1% this year through Tuesday's close, trailing the 7.1% increase in the S&P 500. The chain's second-quarter efforts to bring in customers included a meal timed to the launch of the Minecraft movie and a Squishmallows themed limited-time offer. In the US, the company launched chicken strips while trying to win over budget-sensitive diners with the offerings on its lower-priced 'McValue' menu, such as its meal bundle starting at $5. The company's turnaround in the US is stark, with sales rising 2.5% in the second quarter after slumping in the three months ended in late March. It also contrasts with a mixed picture across the restaurant industry. Rivals such as Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. and Pizza Hut are grappling with pullbacks as they struggle to convey to customers that their meals are a good deal, while Taco Bell US is still bringing more diners in buzzy new launches and cheap eats — a similar playbook to McDonald's. Second-quarter earnings, excluding some items, were $3.19 a share — higher than analysts' average estimate. Revenue, which consists of sales by company-operated restaurants and fees from franchised locations, also outpaced expectations. The overall second-quarter results show that McDonald's strategy is working and could lead to 'sustained' same-store sales outperformance compared to the rest of the industry, Citi analyst Jon Tower said in a note to clients. Ahead of the earnings release, analysts were expecting growth for McDonald's global same-store sales to accelerate in the second half of the year. Initiatives such as the relaunch of the Snack Wrap — which customers requested for years — were fueling the outlook. The US business should be 'stronger' in the fourth quarter than in the third, Chief Financial Officer Ian Borden said on the analyst call, in part because in the three-month period through Sept. 30 the company will go up against last year's successful rollout of the $5 bundle. McDonald's is looking to bring back low-income diners in the US, Kempczinski said, since they eat at its restaurants more often than middle- and high-income diners. 'This bifurcated consumer base is why we remain cautious about the overall near-term health of the US consumer,' Kempczinski said on the analyst call. The company will continue to market the Snack Wrap for $2.99 through year end, the CEO said. It's also looking at making its core menu look more affordable. When diners see combo meals advertised for $10 or more, that's 'shaping value perceptions in a negative way,' Kempczinski said. McDonald's also plans to test new beverages, including cold coffees and crafted sodas, at more than 500 US locations starting in September. 'A balance between value and quality is being struck with the $5 dollar promotion and premium beverage service targeting Gen Z directly,' Brian Mulberry, a portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management, said in an email. (Updates shares and adds details from earnings call starting in fourth paragraph.) More stories like this are available on
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
'Digital India without any digital rights': Viral Reddit post questions terms on Income tax portal
A Reddit post by an Indian taxpayer has gone viral for calling out the official e-Pay Tax portal of the Government of India, not for a technical glitch, but for what the user described as 'absolutely insane' Terms & Conditions. Posted by FearlessTransition41 on the r/india subreddit, the post has resonated with thousands of users who say they've faced similar issues when trying to do something as routine and necessary as paying their taxes online. The user wrote, 'Just tried paying income tax… and the T&Cs are absolutely insane' The user, who was simply trying to pay their income tax online, decided to scroll through the platform's terms and conditions, and was left shocked by what they read. 'I was paying my direct income tax through the Indian government's official e-Pay Tax portal, and out of curiosity, I actually read the Terms & Conditions. What I found is straight-up dystopian:' They went on to highlight six clauses that sparked widespread concern: No guarantee of refund if payment fails 'If money is deducted but the payment fails, tough luck. No guarantee of refund, no immediate resolution. You just have to 'wait and check back later.' If that doesn't work, contact your bank. The portal takes zero responsibility," the user wrote. No refunds, no chargebacks 'Even if their system screws up or you're charged twice, they won't reverse it. You just have to claim it in your ITR and hope it works out," the user claimed in their post. No data protection guarantee 'Not liable if your personal or financial data gets hacked. They literally state they don't guarantee your information won't be intercepted by third parties. Imagine that, a government tax portal saying that,' it read. Platform not responsible if it doesn't work 'They don't promise the system will even work. If it's buggy or fails during payment, that's your problem,' the user claimed. They can change terms anytime, silently 'They can change these terms ANYTIME without telling you. So even if they add more draconian rules, you're automatically bound by them the moment you use the service," the post read. Legal jurisdiction limited to Delhi courts 'All legal disputes must go through Delhi courts. So if you're in Mumbai, Chennai, Bangalore, or anywhere else, prepare to lawyer up in Delhi,' the user wrote. The Reddit user went on to say, 'Taxpayers are expected to be perfect… but the system isn't' The Reddit post ends with a larger question many are now echoing across social media: 'This feels like Digital India without any digital rights. Taxpayers are expected to be perfect and compliant, but the system itself doesn't offer even basic consumer protection. Why are citizens treated like this for doing their civic duty?' 'Isn't it fair to expect transparency, accountability, and at least some level of protection when using official services?' The post has sparked an outpouring of reactions online, with users slamming the lack of consumer rights, data protection, and transparency. 'I really wonder what was going in the mind of the person behind these T&Cs,' a user commented. 'Yes, them stating data breaches liability is with the taxpayer is straight up infringement of Fundamental right to privacy and Data protection laws,' another user wrote. 'They're probably making these draconian rules so that when they rain down hell on someone,the person has to 'settle' with them,' the third user remarked. 'This is a lawsuit waiting to happen,' the fourth wrote. 'It's just like rocket science,' the fifth user wrote.
